Ofcom boss: Tech firms not given much power over how to protect children online
Ofcom's chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes told BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'We've set out about five or six things that we think can work, like facial checks and using things where you've already been checked for your age, like credit cards or open banking.
Dame Melanie Dawes defended upcoming online safety measures (Jeff Overs/BBC)
'We said (to tech companies) you decide what works for your platform but we will be checking whether it's effective and those that don't put in those checks will hear from us with enforcement action.'
Responding to the suggestion that Ofcom is giving companies a lot of power over how they implement measures, Dame Melanie said: 'No, we're not giving them that much power actually. What I'm saying is that when they're putting in age checks they need to work out what's going to work on their service.
'But, let me be really clear, what we are demanding to protect children and what does come in force at the end of this month they're going to need to tame those algorithms so that not just porn and suicide and self-harm material must not be shown but also violent content, dangerous challenges, misogyny, all of that must not be fed actively to kids on their feeds.'
Pressed on why those types of content are not being blocked altogether, the chief executive said: 'What Parliament decided was that there should be an absolute block on suicide and self-harm material and pornography for under-18s and, then, what we've done is also add to that other types of content that we think is really harmful for children.'
Ian Russell said Ofcom needs to communicate weaknesses in the legislation to the Government (Yui Mok/PA)
She added: 'I'm not a politician and I think it's incredibly important that Ofcom respects the role that we have which is to implement the laws that we've been given.
'If Parliament decides to widen those towards mis- and disinformation, or wider issues around addiction for the kids, for example, then of course, Ofcom stands ready to implement that.'
Mr Russell said on the programme that it 'sounds promising' but the proof will be in what happens in practice.
He said: '(Ofcom) need to act within the bounds of the Act in the strongest possible way.
'They're sitting in the middle pushed on one side by families who've lost people like me and pushed on the other side by the power of the big tech platforms.
'I also think it's really important that Melanie starts to talk back to Government because Ofcom is clear about where the act is weak and she needs to push back and communicate those weaknesses to the Government so that we can make change where necessary.'
He said the charity he set up in his daughter's name, the Molly Rose Foundation, will be monitoring how harmful content online is reduced.
Any company that fails to comply with the checks by July 25 could be fined or could be made unavailable in the UK through a court order.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said those changes in the law are 'really important', adding it was now up to technology companies to put in 'robust safeguards' for children using their platforms.
But she suggested it was not the end of ministers' plans, telling the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'We are very clear as a Government that this is the foundation for a safer online experience for children, but it is not the end of the conversation.
'Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, has been clear that he wants to look at things such as addictive habits and how we create healthier habits for children online in the same way as we talk about healthier physical habits for children.'
Ministers 'will keep under review what is required', Ms Alexander added.
Ofcom research found that 8% of eight to 14-year-olds in the UK had visited an online porn site or app on smartphones, tablets or computers in a month.
Last month, the regulator said it had launched a string of investigations into 4chan, a porn site operator and several file-sharing platforms over suspected failures to protect children, after it received complaints about illegal activity and potential sharing of child abuse images.
A report looking into the use and effectiveness of age assurance methods will be published by Ofcom next year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Asylum costs set to take up fifth of UK's shrunken aid budget, watchdog warns
Some £1.8 billion of the projected £8.9 billion budget for overseas assistance could be spent on supporting refugees and asylum seekers in Britain in 2027-28, a report by the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) says. Despite the June spending review suggesting a reduction in such costs over the next three years, they are still on course to absorb a 'significant portion' of total aid funding, according to the watchdog. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced plans to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament after the National Audit Office said accommodation costs could hit £15.3 billion over a 10-year period. But progress in bringing down aid spending on so-called in-donor refugee costs remains 'slow', the ICAI said. International OECD rules allow governments to use their aid budgets to cover some of the costs of helping people claiming asylum in the first year of entering a country, such as housing and food. According to ICAI calculations, asylum costs are expected to take up £2.2 billion of total UK official development assistance (ODA) funding for 2026-27, £1.8 billion the following year and £1.5 billion by 2028-29. The Government slashed Britain's aid budget earlier this year from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in order to pay for increased defence spending. Total ODA spending is now expected to fall from £10 billion in 2026-27 to £8.9 billion the following year before increasing slightly to £9.4 billion in 2028-29. This means a fifth of the total aid spend in 2027-28 is expected to go towards asylum costs, before dipping to around a sixth in 2028-29. ICAI commissioner Harold Freeman, who led the new report, acknowledged the Government had already taken some steps to address 'flaws in the system' but said further changes would be likely to be needed. He said: 'The UK's development programme is at a turning point, with budget reductions coming against a backdrop of increasing global conflicts, climate threats and rising humanitarian needs. 'At the same time, UK asylum costs are likely to continue to absorb a significant proportion of our aid funding. 'The Government has already taken steps to address some of the flaws in the system for managing aid identified by past ICAI work. 'But further changes will likely be needed to maximise the impact and value for money of the remaining development budget.' The Government has been contacted for comment. Last year, the watchdog raised 'value for money' concerns after some 28% – or £4.3 billion – of all UK aid in 2023 was spent on hosting refugees and asylum seekers in Britain under the previous Conservative government. The amount of ODA spending on in-house refugee costs has risen dramatically since 2020, in part due to visa schemes for Afghan and Ukrainian people but largely linked to lengthy stays in so-called asylum hotels, the ICAI said. In response to its latest report, the Tories said the 'eye-watering cost' of housing asylum seekers was 'utterly indefensible, particularly when so many people are struggling to get by'. Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said: 'This broken system rewards delay and indecision, while the British taxpayer foots the bill. 'Those who have no right to stay here should not be languishing in hotels; they should be detained and deported within days – not years. 'We need a migration system that is firm, fair, and fast. 'Over the past 12 months, Keir Starmer has systematically dismantled every deterrent, while his joke of a migrant deal agreed with France last week will do nothing to stem the flow of migrants risking their lives to cross the Channel.' The One campaign, which aims to reduce poverty in Africa, said the report confirmed that UK aid had been 'stretched to breaking point'. Executive director Adrian Lovett said: 'While it's right that refugees are housed in safe accommodation, paying for this from the diminished international aid budget means there will be even less support for the world's most vulnerable people at a time of growing global need.' Mr Lovett added: 'The UK is at its best when it delivers a strong and growing aid budget, but also uses its political and diplomatic muscle to help create the conditions for sustainable solutions. 'We look to ministers to be creative and ambitious on both fronts in the months and years ahead.'
Scottish Sun
27 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Rachel Reeves pledges to ‘rip up red tape' in bid to help the City kick-start economic growth
It comes after months of doom and gloom with the £25billion national insurance tax raid 'BETTER OFF' Rachel Reeves pledges to 'rip up red tape' in bid to help the City kick-start economic growth Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RACHEL Reeves will attempt to claw back credibility with business tonight by talking up Britain as a place of 'hope and opportunity'. The Chancellor will announce red tape will be ripped up to help the City kick-start economic growth and investment. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up It comes after months of doom and gloom with the £25billion National Insurance tax raid and low confidence among business chiefs. In her Mansion House speech, she will say: 'This is the foundation of an economy, and a country, that is more active and more confident. 'Where people and businesses look to the future and talk about hope, about opportunity, assured of their own capability, and the ability of our country to boldly face challenges ahead. "And certain of the prize if they succeed. Read More on Politics TAXING TIMES Wetherspoons boss blasts Rachel Reeves' tax raid, warning more pubs will shut 'Of higher wages and higher living standards. The renewal of Britain in every home and high street. To put it simply: a Britain that is better off.' Ms Reeves will tell the City that she will put financial services 'at the heart' of the Government's growth mission. She said it would have 'a ripple effect that will drive investment in all sectors of our economy and put pounds in the pockets of working people.' Ms Reeves will meet finance executives today to announce the biggest set of reforms, the Leeds Reforms, for the sector in a decade. Meanwhile, first-time buyers will find mortgages available from banks and building societies at more than 4.5 times their income — which will create up to 36,000 additional home loans in the first year. Treasury Minister Darren Jones yesterday said Labour's 'working people' tax pledge refers to 'anyone that gets a payslip' — as the party's muddle over who will be protected at the budget continued. Rachel Reeves FINALLY addresses Commons tears after she and Keir Starmer put on awkward show of unity
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Court reforms vital to tackle ‘scandalous disgrace' of backlog, says Ken Clarke
Given the mounting trial logjam, the Government has 'no choice' but to swiftly accept proposed reforms, which would see less cases heard by juries, according to the Conservative peer. Last week, plans to reduce the number of jury trials and create a new type of crown court where cases are heard by judges were unveiled by Sir Brian Leveson. The review commissioned by the Government seeks to 'reduce the risk of total system collapse' amid a record-high backlog where some cases are listed for 2029. It comes after the crown court backlog in England and Wales passed 75,000 cases for the first time, rising to 76,957 at the end of March. Sir Brian's recommendations are expected to save approximately 9,000 sitting days in the crown court each year from some of the main changes, such as by diverting cases to magistrates' courts or to the proposed Crown Court Bench Division for trials to be heard by judges. Juries would be reserved to hear the most serious cases. Ministers are now considering the recommendations and will respond in the early autumn with a view to legislation. The Government has already accepted a raft of reforms proposed in a separate independent sentencing review by former justice secretary David Gauke to tackle jail overcrowding. Speaking in Parliament, Lord Clarke of Nottingham, who also previously served as justice secretary, said: 'Does the minister accept that it is a scandalous disgrace that in this country some victims and people charged with offences have to wait months and sometimes years before a trial can take place? 'Does he therefore agree that, in those circumstances, the Government have no choice but to accept as quickly as possible the excellent recommendations made by Sir Brian Leveson, because I hear of no alternatives? 'Will he undertake that they will not take too long reviewing and considering these matters? 'This should proceed as rapidly as possible with the full support of everybody who has the interests of the rule of law and justice in this country at heart.' Welcoming his support, justice minister Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede, who is also a sitting magistrate, said: 'Data published last month showed the backlog stood at nearly 77,000 cases. That is an increase of 2,300 cases over the previous quarter. 'If we were not to take any action, it is projected that the outstanding caseload would be 100,000 in 2028. Clearly, that is unacceptable, and I absolutely take the point he made.' Leading lawyer and independent crossbencher Lord Pannick said: 'Does the minister agree that, in addressing the very serious problems faced by the criminal justice system, it is important not to romanticise the jury, given that 90% of all criminal trials in this country are heard without a jury and relatively speedily – not as speedily as perhaps they could be, but relatively so – and they are heard effectively and with justice.' Lord Ponsonby said: 'Of course I would agree because, as a magistrate, I was among those who hear 90% of all criminal cases. 'There is no right to a jury trial. However, there is a right to a fair trial. 'For a fair trial, it must be heard in a timely manner. That is where we are failing. 'We need these systemic changes to address that fundamental problem, so that people – both victims and defendants – can get a fair trial in a timely way.'
