Philippine flooding centre stage at Marcos state of nation speech
Addressing a joint session of Congress after days of rain that left at least 31 dead, Marcos repeated his recent warning that the nation faced a climate change-driven "new normal", while pledging to investigate publicly funded projects that had failed.
"Let's not pretend, the people know that these projects can breed corruption. Kickbacks ... for the boys," he said, citing houses that were "swept away" by the floods.
"Someone has to pay for the grave damage and corruption," he said, adding he would demand a full list of failed flood control projects and make it public.
After months dominated by a feud with his vice president that left many voters disillusioned, Marcos's speech leaned heavily into bread-and-butter concerns.
"The people feel a sense of defeat and dismay at the government, especially when it concerns basic services," he said, referencing disappointing mid-term election results in May.
"The lesson for us is very simple. We need to do better. We need to work faster."
Marcos spent much of his 70-minute speech unveiling promises for the second half of his six-year term – from 40,000 more classrooms to new power plants and free dialysis treatments – though he offered little by way of detail.
Notably absent was any explicit mention of the rising tensions with China over disputed areas of the South China Sea that figured heavily into last year's address.
After 12 months marked by violent clashes at sea and an increasingly close military relationship with the United States, Marcos said only that the country faced "new threats" to its sovereignty while adding "more allies who can help us in our time of need".
NO SHOWS
Numerous high-profile allies of Vice President Sara Duterte, whose would-be impeachment trial was scrapped by the Supreme Court on Friday, skipped Monday's address, including the president's senator sister Imee Marcos.
The feud between the Marcos and Duterte political dynasties loomed large over the May mid-terms that saw the vice president's camp outperform expectations.
The duo swept to power in 2022 in an alliance that began crumbling almost immediately.
Their feud exploded into open warfare this year with her impeachment and the subsequent arrest and transfer of her father, ex-president Rodrigo Duterte, to face charges at the International Criminal Court in The Hague over his deadly drug war.
The timelines of those two events coincided with a sharp dip in the president's polling numbers.
Marcos had publicly stated that he was against the impeachment while consistently maintaining he was powerless to intervene.
"NEW NORMAL"
Last week, the Philippine president for the first time blamed climate change for storms which are hitting the country harder and more frequently, saying Filipinos would need to learn how to adapt.
"This is not an extraordinary situation anymore ... This will be our lives no matter what we do," he told a cabinet briefing, adding the country should plan for the long-term in addressing natural disasters.
"This is the way it's going to be as far as we know for... many decades to come, so let's just prepare," he said.
Michael Henry Yusingco, a senior research fellow at the Ateneo de Manila University School of Government, on Monday praised Marcos's pledge to tackle corruption around flood control projects but warned that follow-through would be everything.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
North Korea says Trump must accept new nuclear reality
SEOUL: North Korea said on Tuesday (Jul 29) the United States must accept that reality has changed since the countries' summit meetings in the past, and no future dialogue would end its nuclear programme, state media KCNA reported. Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un who is believed to speak for his brother, said she conceded that the personal relationship between Kim and US President Donald Trump "is not bad". But if Washington intended to use a personal relationship as a way to end the North's nuclear weapons programme, the effort would only be the subject of "mockery", Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by KCNA. "If the US fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-US meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the US side," she said. DPRK is short for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. North Korea's capabilities as a nuclear weapons state and the geopolitical environment have radically changed since Kim and Trump held talks three times during the US president's first term, she said. "Any attempt to deny the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state ... will be thoroughly rejected," she said. Asked about the North Korean statement, a White House official said Trump was still committed to the goal he had for the three summit meetings he held with Kim in his first term. "The resident retains those objectives and remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearised North Korea," the White House official told Reuters. At their first meeting in Singapore in 2018, Trump and Kim signed an agreement in principle to make the Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons. The subsequent summit in Hanoi next year broke down due to a disagreement over removing international sanctions that had been imposed against Pyongyang.
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
US Democrats, Republicans plan bills to pressure China as Trump pushes trade
[WASHINGTON] US senators from both major parties plan to introduce bills this week targeting China over its treatment of minority groups, dissidents and Taiwan, emphasising security and human rights as President Donald Trump focuses on trade with Beijing. The three bills, seen by Reuters ahead of their introduction, have Democratic and Republican sponsors, a departure from the fierce partisanship dividing Washington. Trump's push to reach economic agreements between the world's two biggest economies has strong support in the US Congress, especially from his fellow Republicans, but has prompted some China hawks to worry that the US government is de-emphasising security issues. 'It does appear that President Trump is keen to negotiate some kind of deal with China, and gaps are opening between his approach to China and the approaches of some members of his team, as well as with Congress, which overall has been quite hawkish on China,' said Bonnie Glaser, an Asia expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The desire for a hard line on China is one of the few truly bipartisan sentiments in the perennially divided Congress, even as many lawmakers support Trump's efforts to rebalance the bilateral trade relationship. 'The United States cannot afford to be weak in the face of the People's Republic of China and its aggression around the world,' said Democrat Jeff Merkley of Oregon, a lead sponsor of all three bills. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'No matter who is in the White House, America's values of freedom and human rights must remain at the heart of a clear and principled vision that guides our leadership on the global stage,' Merkley said in a statement. Trump administration officials have said that Trump remains fully committed to Asia-Pacific security issues as he pursues his trade agenda and a good personal relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Asked for comment on Monday, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said administration officials do not get ahead of the president on pending legislation. 'President Trump has publicly discussed his desire for a constructive relationship with China. He is focused on advancing American interests, such as leveling the playing field for American industries and getting China to stop the flow of fentanyl into our country,' she said via email. The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters query about the bills. Trade vs security One bill, co-sponsored by Republican John Cornyn of Texas, would deny entry into the United States of current or former Chinese government officials who were deemed to have engaged in the forced repatriation of members of China's Uyghur minority. Human rights groups accuse China of widespread abuses of Uyghurs, a mainly Muslim ethnic minority numbering about 10 million in its northwestern region of Xinjiang. Beijing denies any abuses. Another bill, co-sponsored by Republican John Curtis of Utah, aims to help Taiwan as the island faces increasing pressure from China. It would support countries in Latin America and the Caribbean that maintain official diplomatic relations with Taiwan and would take other steps to deepen coordination with Taipei. China claims the democratically governed island as its own and has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control. Beijing has stepped up military and political pressure against the island in recent years. A third bill, co-sponsored by Republican Dan Sullivan of Alaska, seeks to combat 'transnational repression' - efforts by any foreign government to reach beyond its own borders to intimidate, harass or harm dissidents, journalists or activists. Facing Trump's Aug 12 deadline, top US and Chinese economic officials will meet in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle their longstanding disputes, hoping to extend a truce by three months and keep sharply higher tariffs at bay. Trump 'cares about opening foreign markets to American trade, and that's what he's always cared about. And that is going to run counter to a lot of national security imperatives,' said Michael Sobolik, who specialises in US-China relations at the Hudson Institute. Democrats and some of Trump's fellow Republicans raised concerns about the announcement this month that Nvidia will resume sales of its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China, days after its CEO met with Trump. This reversed an AI restriction imposed in April that was designed to keep the most advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands. REUTERS
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Prabowo wants a global role for Indonesia
SURABAYA, Indonesia: Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto arrived at the BRICS Summit in Brazil this month, eager to showcase Indonesia's growing presence on the global stage. Instead, his BRICS debut was quickly overshadowed by his United States counterpart, Donald Trump, announcing that his administration would proceed with a 32 per cent general tariff on Indonesian goods entering the US, first announced in April. A day later, Mr Trump announced an additional 10 per cent would be slapped on all BRICS members, including Indonesia, its newest member. Although Mr Prabowo - who took on the top job just nine months ago - later managed to negotiate the tariff down to 19 per cent, describing it as the result of a ' tough negotiation ' during a phone call with Mr Trump, the episode cast a pall over his broader efforts to elevate Indonesia's foreign policy as a hallmark of his presidency. Indonesia's accession to BRICS in January marked a turn towards a more assertive foreign policy, a clear departure from Mr Prabowo's predecessor, Joko Widodo, who had prioritised domestic issues. Ahead of the BRICS summit, the Indonesian foreign ministry had described Mr Prabowo's intent as positioning Indonesia as a "bridge-builder" amid growing global uncertainties. BIG FISH IN A BIG POND Rather than anchoring Indonesia's foreign policy to ASEAN centrality as his predecessors did, Mr Prabowo, through BRICS and other efforts, is clearly seeking bigger ponds where Indonesia may become a significantly bigger fish. Just as Mr Widodo sought to be remembered for transforming Indonesia's physical infrastructure, Mr Prabowo appears keen on being remembered as a geopolitical heavyweight. His participation in the St Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) in June, alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin, was telling. At that forum, Mr Prabowo claimed Indonesia's BRICS accession process had been one of the fastest of all countries. He also explained his decision to attend the SPIEF instead of the G7 Summit in Canada to which he had been invited as a guest. "It is not because I didn't respect the G7, but because I gave my commitment to attend this forum before they invited us.' He added that Indonesia, by tradition, has always been non-aligned and that it "respect all countries'. A REALIST Mr Prabowo's interest in geopolitics is not new. As defence minister (from 2019 to 2024), he drew fire after pitching a controversial peace plan for the war between Russia and Ukraine at the Shangri-La Dialogue in 2023. His proposal included the creation of a demilitarised zone and an eventual United Nations-sponsored referendum in the 'disputed territories'. Ukraine's then foreign ministry spokesperson, Oleg Nikolenko, rejected it outright, saying there were no disputed territories and that Russia's withdrawal from all the occupied territories was non-negotiable. That episode revealed Mr Prabowo's realist outlook and the priority he gives to hard power in international relations over international laws and conventions. That posture has continued into his presidency. During a press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron in Jakarta in May, he declared: "We must acknowledge and guarantee Israel's rights as a sovereign country," adding a caveat that "Indonesia has stated that once Israel recognises Palestine, Indonesia is ready to recognise Israel". No previous Indonesian president has dared to offer an explicit promise to recognise the state of Israel, let alone throwing in some form of security guarantee. Yet, apart from his blunt language, Mr Prabowo had in fact barely shifted Indonesia's traditional stance vis-a-vis Israel. It has been a key element of its foreign policy to withhold diplomatic recognition and avoid ties with Tel Aviv as long as there is no independent Palestinian state. Now he has appeared to make, by the tone of his language at least, Palestine's independence a foreign policy priority. He has, moreover, signalled his willingness to work with Israel to achieve this objective, even if he has never elaborated how. In April, Mr Prabowo underlined his resolve to nudge along a resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict by offering to temporarily shelter 1,000 Palestinians impacted by the war in Gaza. If carried out, this will represent Indonesia's most concrete commitment to the Palestinian cause to date. Central to Mr Prabowo's approach is his ambition to usher in an age in which Indonesia 'will rise as a great country'. In this, he echoes Indonesia's first president, Sukarno, who had sought to bypass the two-bloc nature of the post-war world by drawing the non-aligned countries together as a third force. Mr Prabowo's real challenge remains how to balance Indonesia's role as a middle-ranking power amid global power rivalries. But what is becoming increasingly clear is that he will use all the influence at his disposal to raise Indonesia's prominence and stature and, by extension, the potential to make his own personal legacy more memorable than those of his predecessors.
