Hindi row: Maha govt forms committee to submit report on trilingual policy formula
At the press conference, he also announced that the state Cabinet has decided to scrap two government resolutions released on April 16 and June 17, saying the state government has made the Marathi language compulsory while Hindi is an optional language.
The committee has sought a three-month time limit for preparing the report. The April 16 government resolution had proposed Hindi to be a compulsory third language in Marathi and English schools for classes 1 to 5, but the government put it on hold after protests from various quarters.
The government issued a revised government resolution on June 17, whereby Marathi has been made mandatory in all schools while Hindi is optional. The students were given an option to use one of the Indian languages.
The government resolution further stated that students were allowed to choose from other Indian languages in the place of Hindi if 20 students per grade in a school express the desire to study any Indian language other than Hindi.
The Cabinet decision to cancel two government resolutions means the government has decided not to implement the trilingual policy before the Narendra Jadhav committee's report. Hindi won't be a third language for now in classes 1 to 5 in Marathi and English schools.
The Chief Minister also targeted the Uddhav Thackeray-led government over the Hindi language policy, saying that the Maha Vikas Aghadi government had accepted the report submitted by a high-level committee headed by noted scientist Raghunath Mashelkar, which had recommended making English and Hindi compulsory.
This was recommended to benefit the Marathi students in the Academic Bank of Credit and get entrance to pursue their education.
'The MahaYuti government has instead made Marathi compulsory, Hindi optional. The interests of Marathi students are important for the government. We will ask Uddhav Thackeray how Marathi schools in Mumbai are closing down. We will also ask him who was responsible for the Marathi people going out of Mumbai. However, the MahaYuti government has brought back Marathi people to Mumbai. Uddhav Thackeray is opposed to Hindi but rolling out a red carpet for English.'
Fadnavis alleged that Uddhav Thackeray wants to do politics over the Marathi language. However, Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray alleged that it was an attempt to implement a three-language formula by making Hindi compulsory and announced their strong opposition. It was also supported by other opposition parties.
The Marathi language experts, educationists and various other organisations also protested the government's revised resolution.
Fadnavis' announcement is an attempt to checkmate Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray to further cash in on the Marathi language issue while opposing Hindi ahead of the upcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation elections.
It is also an attempt to avoid poll losses to MahaYuti and thereby consolidate its position to lure Marathi people.
Meanwhile, Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, who had suggested the introduction of Hindi from class 4, appealed to the organisers not to take out a morcha on July 5 in Mumbai following Sunday's Cabinet decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Russia jails senior defence official for 13 years in corruption trial
Russian former deputy defence minister Timur Ivanov was found guilty of corruption and condemned to 13 years in a penal colony on Tuesday, the harshest sentence yet in a series of graft cases against defence officials. Ivanov was arrested in April 2024 on suspicion of taking bribes, and investigators added new embezzlement charges in October. More than a dozen people, including two other former deputy ministers, have been arrested in investigations into separate cases. The trial was closed on grounds of state secrecy. Anton Filatov, a former logistics company boss on trial with Ivanov, received a 12-1/2 year sentence. State media reported that the total sum embezzled was 4.1 billion roubles ($48.8 million), mostly in the form of bank transfers to two foreign accounts. Ivanov, who pleaded not guilty, was stripped of all state awards and the court confiscated 2.5 billion roubles worth of property, cars and cash from him. Russian media said he and his wife owned a luxury apartment in central Moscow, a three-storey English-style mansion on the outskirts of the capital and an extensive collection of classic cars including a Bentley and an Aston Martin. Russia's 'Z-bloggers', an influential group of war correspondents, have voiced outrage at the scale of corruption reported in the defence establishment while young Russians are dying fighting in Ukraine. One blogger, Alexander Kots, said 13 years was a long sentence but corrupt defence officials should be put on trial in wartime as 'traitors to the Motherland'. Ivanov had since 2016 been responsible at the defence ministry for big logistics contracts including those related to property management, housing and medical care. He was a deputy to Sergei Shoigu, who was replaced as defence minister last year but retains an important role as secretary of President Vladimir Putin's Security Council. Two of Shoigu's other former deputies have been arrested in separate investigations. In April, the former deputy head of the army's general staff, Lieutenant-General Vadim Shamarin, was sentenced to seven years in a penal colony for taking hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes. The prosecutions signal a drive by Putin to clamp down on graft, inefficiency and waste in Russia's huge military budget as it wages war in Ukraine. Defence spending accounts for 32% of the federal budget this year. Ukraine has also moved to clamp down on military corruption. A deputy defence minister in charge of weapons purchases was sacked in January, while in April authorities accused five suspects of involvement in a procurement scandal.
India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
US bill proposes 500% tariff on India, China over Russia business ties
A proposed US Senate bill, backed by President Donald Trump, could impose 500% tariffs on countries, including India and China, that continue trading with Russia, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said in an interview with ABC to ABC News, Graham stated, "If you're buying products from Russia, and you're not helping Ukraine, then there's a 500% tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70% of Putin's oil. They keep his war machine going."advertisementThe bill is reportedly expected to be introduced in August, marking a significant escalation in US efforts to isolate Russia economically. If enacted, the bill could severely impact India and China, the largest buyers of discounted Russian crude. For India, the move also risks tariffs on exports like pharmaceuticals, textiles, and IT is a major buyer of Russian oil, and imported EUR 49 billion worth of crude oil in the third year of the Ukraine invasion. Traditionally, India sourced its oil from the Middle East, but began importing a large volume of oil from Russia soon after the invasion of Ukraine in February development also comes on the heels of the much-expected India-US bilateral trade agreement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Tuesday that the trade deal is "very close", even as an Indian delegation continued discussions with US officials in Washington after trade talks hit a deadlock over key agricultural demands, sources told India proposed bill, co-sponsored by Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, reportedly has 84 co-sponsors and aims to pressure nations into halting Russian oil purchases, weakening "Moscow's war economy" and pushing it toward peace negotiations in told ABC News that Trump gave the green light during a golf game. "For the first time yesterday, the President told me I was playing golf with him. He says, 'It's time to move your bill.'"Originally proposed in March, the legislation faced delays after the White House signalled Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration had 'quietly pressured' the Senate to soften the bill by changing mandatory language ("shall") to discretionary ("may").Graham later reportedly proposed a carve-out for countries supporting Ukraine, likely to ease concerns among the US's European allies. "We are going to give President Trump a tool in the toolbox," Graham this bill becomes law, it may alter US's trade relationships with both China and India. Given that the US is India's primary export market, the policy could also trigger substantial economic repercussions and diplomatic tensions.- EndsTune InMust Watch
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
Officers, not Tom, Dick and Harry: Karnataka High Court to X on Railway's notice
The Karnataka High Court backed the Union government after it told the court that its officers are 'not Tom, Dick and Harry.' This came as X Corp India, the Indian arm of Elon Musk-owned X (formerly Twitter), challenged a Ministry of Railways notice asking the platform to take down a video of a woman driving a car on railway tracks in Advocate KG Raghavan, appearing for X, questioned the legality of the notice. 'What if every Tom, Dick and Harry officer sends notice to me? See how this is being misused,' he argued. He also asked whether posting such videos amounts to unlawful content, adding, 'Dog biting man is not news, but man biting dog is,' as reported by Live General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union of India, objected to the remarks. 'They are officers, not Tom, Dick and Harry. International bodies should not have this arrogance,' he said. He added that no social media company can expect unregulated functioning in India.'They are bound by regulations in all other countries but in India they want this luxury,' he M Nagaprasanna backed the objection and said, 'These are officers of the Union of India. I take objection to this.'advertisementX Corp has sought a declaration that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act does not empower authorities to block content directly, and that such orders must follow the procedure under Section 69A and its Advocate Aditya Sondhi, appearing for a digital media association, said content creators are affected by takedown orders. But the bench questioned how the association is aggrieved when the dispute is between X and the government. Mehta objected to the intervention, saying, 'Twitter is competent. It does not require external support.'The court posted the matter for final hearing on July 8. It allowed X Corp to amend its petition and include various ministries as parties. The Union government was directed to file its objections.- EndsTune InTrending Reel IN THIS STORY#Karnataka
