Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron
Archdiocese of Dublin
.
Belgrove Infant Girls' School in Clontarf, Dublin 3
, will lose a teacher in September following a drop in enrolments last year.
It means pupils going into first class will be amalgamated from three classes into two for part of the school day, resulting in enlarged class sizes of 34 pupils.
Average primary class sizes nationally are 22.5 pupils, and the Government has pledged to reduce the average to 19 pupils.
READ MORE
Eamonn Broderick, the parent of a six-year-old child who is due to progress to first class in September, said most parents were willing to fund the appointment of a teacher which they estimated would cost about €60,000 or €600 per family.
'We were confident we would have the money together quickly,' he said. 'This is a relatively affluent area. Earlier this the school was able to raise €40,000 to do up the yard in a week. The school indicated they would need about €60,000 for a 10-month contract, as well as PRSI, insurance, etc.'
However, the school's patron body, the Archdiocese of Dublin, told the principal in recent weeks that the move was not possible on the basis that a 'school cannot appoint a mainstream teacher and pay via private funds', records show.
The school, meanwhile, has told parents that several appeals against the reduction in teacher numbers were unsuccessful and that every effort had been made to make the transition to amalgamated classes as 'smooth as possible'.
It said the arrangement was for one year only, as the school's enrolment figures have since rebounded, and it will regain a teacher in September 2026.
A letter to
Minister for Education Helen McEntee
, signed by 237 parents, says the planned class sizes for first class pupils are 'too large' and increase the potential for 'negative impacts on learning quality and the teaching environment for students'.
The letter states that enlarged classes will also 'further reduce the available special education teaching resources to an unacceptably low level'.
A spokesman for the Department of Education said pupil enrolments on the previous September 30th are the key factor for determining staff resources at schools.
While an appeal by the school had been considered by an independent primary staffing appeals board, it was unsuccessful. The board's decision is final.
'The configuration of classes and the deployment of classroom teachers are done at local school level,' the spokesperson added. 'The department's guidance to schools is that the number of pupils in any class is kept as low as possible, taking all relevant contextual factors into account [eg, classroom accommodation, fluctuating enrolment, etc].'
Parents' representatives met the school principal and chair of the board on June 19th last to express their concerns over the move.
Minutes of the meeting show parents asked the school to provide further communication so all information could be 'properly conveyed' to the wider school community.
However, the school declined and said that they had been advised by Catholic school managers 'not to have a public meeting', according to minutes of a meeting on June 19th last.
Mr Broderick, meanwhile, said many parents were worried that the new arrangement would disrupt and dilute children's education, but felt their concerns were not being listened to by those in authority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Senator shows Seanad picture of her seven-week scan as ‘only evidence' pregnancy existed
Holding up a picture of her seven-week scan in Seanad Éireann, Sinn Féin Senator Nicole Ryan said it was the 'only evidence' that her ' pregnancy ever existed'. The scan was taken after she began bleeding and she was relieved there was a heartbeat at the time, she said. However, two days before her 12-week scan she 'knew something was wrong' when she found her sheets covered in blood. She learned later in hospital that she had had a miscarriage. Ms Ryan was among a number of senators who spoke in the Seanad on Wednesday about their experience of miscarriage. They shared their experiences as part of a debate on Sinn Féin's proposal to introduce paid leave for pregnancy loss. READ MORE The Bill would entitle women to at least five days of paid leave and their partner to 2½ days. The proposed legislation would also lead to the establishment of a confidential opt-in register of pregnancy loss. [ Woman who suffered six miscarriages says employers' response ranged from empathy to pressure to return to work Opens in new window ] There was Opposition criticism of the Government's move to defer the Bill by a year while it develops similar legislative proposals of its own. Ms Ryan argued that to 'delay this Bill is to traumatise even more women'. She said the proposed pregnancy loss register is 'incredibly important' as the State does not recognise losses of pregnancies under 23 weeks' gestation. She said 'pregnancy loss is one of the most common forms of bereavement and yet one of the least recognised in both society and law'. Fine Gael Senator Linda Nelson Murray praised Ms Ryan for bringing the proposals, saying: 'As someone who has suffered miscarriages myself, including my eldest daughter's twin, I know what that ache is like for thousands of women across Ireland.' She said pregnancy loss is often treated as 'something that is silently endured'. However, she supported the Government's argument that Sinn Féin's plan to amend a working time law was not the best way to bring in the new leave entitlements. Amending family leave provisions or introducing standalone legislation 'would form a more suitable legal basis', she said. Labour Senator Nessa Cosgrove also commended Ms Ryan on the Bill, saying she too has suffered a miscarriage. Sinn Féin Senator Joanne Collins said she suffered a miscarriage when she was in a job that did not give her the option to leave her post. 'I miscarried while I worked, because there was no other option,' she said, adding that there was 'no system, no cover'. Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke said his officials believe there are 'significant policy challenges' to the operation of the Bill as drafted. The Seanad passed his motion that gives the Government 12 months to develop legislative proposals in line with the principles of the Sinn Féin Bill. 'I fully recognise the need to introduce leave for those who experience pregnancy loss,' he said.
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Taoiseach accuses Pearse Doherty of ‘asserting falsehoods' over claim Japan flight rebooked for hurling semi-final
Micheál Martin accused Pearse Doherty TD of "asserting falsehoods" and "poor politics" when he made the suggestion, based on media reports. He also said there was no additional cost from a late decision to fly east, via Toronto, rather than west, via Dubai. But the Taoiseach then said the final costs "haven't been reconciled," but would be published in due course on his Department's website. The story was "unequivocally and categorically" wrong, he said, because the Cork v Dublin All-Ireland hurling semi-final was due to begin at 5pm. One flight would have landed him back in the capital at 8am and the other at noon, so he was going to see the match in either case, he said. He indeed attended Croke Park to see his native county's famous win. The Finance committee was discussing revised estimates when Mr Doherty said: "Your travel made the media recently. You returned from a trip to Japan, and you rebooked that trip home through Toronto. "It is suggested that that was on the basis of security advice. Can you explain, if that is the case, why you didn't share the security advice with any of the media corps who were travelling, in relation to their security?" Mr Martin replied: "It's a nonsense story. It is important that the context is made very clear. The story is suggesting there was a rescheduling to do with the match. There wasn't. "The alternative would have had me in at 12 o'clock. The way I went, I came in at eight. I had nothing to do with it. I don't book the travel. "And in terms of the security at the time, these were booked a week in advance. And in the Middle East there are issues, as we all know. It was a precautionary approach." Mr Doherty asked him to explain why, if it was security advice that avoided the risk of flying through Dubai, he had not shared that information "with other Irish citizens who were accompanying you on the trip." Mr Martin said: "Two things. First of all, there wasn't additional cost as a result of that, to my knowledge. I don't get into the minutiae of the routes. "Anybody who's a journalist sent out by their media organisation, they take their own advices. They organise their own travel and so forth. "The people who were organising on my behalf took a view that the Middle East was problematic in terms of cancelations and in terms of activity. "That's what I've been told." Mr Doherty said it was "a bit bizarre", saying the Taoiseach had suggested it was "more about [onward flight] cancellation, as opposed to anything personally happening yourself." Instead of "an abundance of caution," he said the Taoiseach "flew through Toronto because there was a risk of cancelation, and therefore you would miss the match." Mr Martin said the assertion was wrong. "I just want to unequivocally say to you, and categorically -- like the truth does matter on these matters - this had nothing to do with the match. "The match was on at five o'clock that day. So either route would have got me in at eight or 12. "This has nothing to do with budget spending, it's just political. That's what you're at, and it's regrettable." Mr Martin said that the switch was "to mitigate any risk of flight cancelations," Mr Doherty said. "You would have missed the match. That is simple fact, because the security situation already had resulted in extensive Middle East airspace being closed in the days prior to this being booked." Mr Martin snapped: "You're not asking a question. You're asserting falsehoods. And you don't want to allow a reasonable, rational explanation to be given."
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the inquiry into the handling of child abuse in schools: a mammoth task
On paper, the task facing Mr Justice Michael MacGrath, as chair of the Commission of Investigation into the Handling of Child Sexual Abuse in Schools, seems impossible. That he is expected to complete its report within five years appears even more so. A comparable inquiry would be the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse, which investigated abuses in residential institutions for children. It published its 2,600-page report in 2009, nine years after being set up. The Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation was established in 2015 to investigate the treatment of women and children in such institutions. It was five years later, in 2020, when its 3,000-page report was presented to government. Both those commissions operated on a similar sampling basis as is to be employed by the new commission. The judge's work will be assisted by the new commission being allowed to take into account 'the extent of concerns of child sexual abuse established by previous investigations' including the scoping inquiry into historical sexual abuse in schools run by religious orders, which called for the establishment of the commission. As this inquiry also recommended, the commission will extend its work to allegations relating to all types of schools. READ MORE The new commission will also have the discretion to reduce the time period under investigation as considered appropriate, taking into account in particular the barriers to investigating older allegations. This should help to limit the task it faces. It is welcome that the terms of reference for the new commission 'shall strive to be as survivor-centred as possible.' Its survivor engagement programme will provide 'a non-adversarial setting' for survivors, or relatives of deceased survivors, to tell their story with identities protected. This is similar to the role of confidential committees at the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse and the Mother and Baby Home Commission of Investigation. And, as with those, the new commission 'may' have regard to the work of the survivor engagement programme. Or it may not, as claimed by critics of previous commissions, who said that this survivor testimony was not allowed adequate weight in findings made. The commission's terms of reference include a wise direction that on or before July 2027 it will write to the Minister for Education and Youth to confirm whether it will be in a position to report by July 2030, as currently required, or propose changes to its terms of reference which will make that possible. Commitments to secure funding for redress schemes from those responsible for sexual abuse in schools are also welcome. Previous experience would suggest, however, that securing this will be no easy task.
