Hegseth falsely cited weapon shortages in halting shipments to Ukraine, Democrats say
A batch of air defense missiles and other precision munitions were due to be sent to Ukraine to aid it in its ongoing war with Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022. The aid was promised by the US during Joe Biden's administration last year.
But the Pentagon halted the shipment, with NBC reporting that a decision to do so was made solely by Hegseth, Donald Trump's top defense official and a former Fox News weekend host who has previously come under pressure for sharing plans of a military strike in two group chats on the messaging app Signal, one of which accidentally included a journalist .
Hegseth has now halted US military supplies to Ukraine on three occasions, NBC said, with the latest intervention purportedly coming due to concerns that the US's own weapons stockpile is running too low.
When the president was asked about the pause in shipments to Ukraine by a reporter on Thursday, he claimed that it was necessary because 'Biden emptied out our whole country, giving them weapons, and we have to make sure we have enough for ourselves'.
A White House spokesperson said last week that the decision 'was made to put America's interests first following a [defense department] review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe. The strength of the United States armed forces remains unquestioned – just ask Iran.'
'This capability review,' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters on Wednesday, 'is being conducted to ensure US military aid aligns with our defense priorities.'
'We see this as a common-sense, pragmatic step towards having a framework to evaluate what munitions are sent and where,' Parnell added. He also seemed to confirm that there is no current shortage of arms for US forces. 'Let it be known that our military has everything that it needs to conduct any mission, anywhere, anytime, all around the world,' he said.
The decision surprised members of Congress, as well as Ukraine and the US's European allies. Democrats said there is no evidence that American weapon stocks are in decline.
'We are not at any lower point, stockpile-wise, than we've been in the three and a half years of the Ukraine conflict,' Adam Smith, a Democrat and ranking member of the House armed services committee, told NBC. Smith said that his staff had 'seen the numbers' on weapon supplies and that there is no justification to suspend aid to Ukraine.
The weapons being delayed include dozens of Patriot interceptor missiles that can defend against Russian missile attacks, as well as howitzers and other missile systems.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Russia has recently stepped up its bombardment of Ukrainian cities, using missiles and drones to wreak havoc and terror among Ukrainian civilians. The delay in getting help to fend off these attacks is 'painful', a senior Ukrainian lawmaker said last week.
'This decision is certainly very unpleasant for us,' said Fedir Venislavskyi, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's defense committee, according to Reuters.
'It's painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine.'
The Department of Defense did not reply to a request for comment on the aid pause.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Russia has committed flagrant human rights abuses in Ukraine since 2014, rules ECHR
Russia has committed flagrant and unprecedented abuses of human rights since it invaded Ukraine in 2014, including extrajudicial killings, sexual violence and forced labour, the European court of human rights has found. The court's grand chamber unanimously held that between 11 May 2014 and 16 September 2022, when Russia ceased to be a party to the European convention on human rights it had committed 'manifestly unlawful conduct … on a massive scale'. Pro-Russia armed groups entered the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine in 2014 and Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. In its judgment, published on Wednesday, the court said there was evidence of widespread and systemic use of sexual violence, accompanied by acts of torture, such as beatings, strangling or electric shocks. Civilians and prisoners of war were subjected to mock executions, the severing of body parts and electric shocks, including to intimate areas of their bodies, the court said. Finding repeated violations of the convention, many of which had taken place over a period of more than eight years, the court said: 'These actions seek to undermine the very fabric of the democracy on which the Council of Europe and its member states are founded by their destruction of individual freedoms, their suppression of political liberties and their blatant disregard for the rule of law. 'In none of the conflicts previously before the court has there been such near universal condemnation of the 'flagrant' disregard by the respondent state for the foundations of the international legal order established after the second world war.' Ukraine hailed the judgment as 'historic and unprecedented', saying it was an 'undeniable victory'. Russia did not participate in the proceedings and said it would ignore the judgment. Violations identified by the court included: Indiscriminate military attacks. Summary executions of civilians and Ukrainian military personnel. Torture, including the use of rape as a weapon of war. Unlawful and arbitrary detention of civilians. Unjustified displacement and transfer of civilians. Intimidation, harassment and persecution of all religious groups other than adherents of the historically Moscow-aligned Ukrainian Orthodox church. Intimidation and violence against journalists and new laws prohibiting and penalising the dissemination of information in support of Ukraine. Forcible dispersal by the Russian military of peaceful protests in occupied towns and cities. Destruction, looting and expropriation of property. Suppression of the Ukrainian language in schools and indoctrination of Ukrainian schoolchildren. Transfer to Russia, and in many cases, the adoption there of Ukrainian children. The court said: 'The prevalence of sexual violence and rape by Russian soldiers in occupied territory is especially abhorrent. The evidence shows the extreme violence of the circumstances in which women were raped or sexually assaulted and the intent to terrorise, humiliate and debase them … In addition to the impact on the direct victims, the raping of women and girls in the context of an armed conflict has also been described as a means for the aggressor to symbolically and physically humiliate the defeated men. 'Rape or the threat of rape is also used to drive communities off lands or to heighten terror during attacks. The evidence also attests to the horrific sexual violence frequently perpetrated upon male detainees. The sexual abuse, torture and mutilation of male detainees is often carried out to attack and destroy their sense of masculinity or manhood.' Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion The judges said that sexual violence and rape were deployed in Ukraine after the February 2022 invasion 'as part of a military strategy to dehumanise, humiliate and break the morale of the Ukrainian population, as individuals and as a community, and to assert dominance over Ukrainian sovereign territory'. The court will decide on whether to order compensation at a later date. However, Russia has previously told the court of its intention not to enforce judgments or pay damages. A total of 26 signatory states to the convention intervened as third parties in the case and expressed their support for making Russia accountable for violations of human rights arising from its invasion of Ukraine. The court also found that the shooting down of flight MH17 using a missile supplied and transported to eastern Ukraine by the Russian Federation, resulting in the deaths of all 298 civilians onboard, was in breach of the convention.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump keeps claiming places are selling gas for $1.99. There is no proof to back that up
President Donald Trump has been gassing up low gasoline prices, repeatedly asserting that they're as low as $1.99, but there's little proof to support his claims. 'There's two states, three states that were selling gasoline at $1.99. You haven't seen that for a long time,' the president said at a press conference on Wednesday. It's not immediately clear which states he was referring to as nowhere seemed to have such low prices. The Independent has reached out to the White House for comment. Mississippi currently boasts the lowest gas prices in the country with an average of $2.69 per gallon. In the city of Gulfport, gas goes for $2.35, according to GasBuddy, a firm that tracks gas prices across the country. Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Alabama also have an average under $2.80, as of Wednesday, GasBuddy found. Gas is going for $2.31 a gallon at one station in Fort McLellan, Alabama, GasBuddy found. The national average was $3.16 a gallon as of Wednesday afternoon, according to AAA. While those prices are low, it's still a far cry from the $1.99 that Trump has been touting. Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, told CNN that the last time he's seen states with average prices below $2 per gallon was in January 2021, following the Covid-19 pandemic, when people were driving less. Trump made similar remarks last week, when he declared: 'We have no inflation.' He then claimed multiple states boasted gas prices under $2: 'The gasoline just hit $1.99 today in 5 states.' In May, the president once again claimed gas prices were under $2 in some places. 'Gasoline just broke $1.98 a Gallon, lowest in years,' he wrote on Truth Social. One day before his social media post, RBOB Gasoline futures hit $1.98 per gallon, CNBC reported, perhaps explaining why Trump has been relying on that figure. Gas prices have fallen in recent weeks. The nation's average price of gasoline has declined for the second week in a row, according to GasBuddy data compiled from more than 12 million individual price reports covering more than 150,000 gas stations across the country. 'Nearly every state saw average gas prices decline for the second straight week, even as the nation celebrated July 4 with the lowest national average for Independence Day since 2020,' De Haan said in a statement.
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The poisonous face of UN Israel-hatred has finally got her comeuppance
If you haven't heard of Francesca Albanese, here's a word of advice: stop reading this column, because you're in danger of finding out who she is. Oh, for a world in which I'd never encountered the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, who in her three years in office has established herself as the sneering face of international Israelophobia! Still, at least there's a silver lining: only those who are familiar with the Italian can savour the news that Marco Rubio has sanctioned her for 'illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt International Criminal Court action against US and Israeli officials, companies, and executives'. In a muscular post on X, the US Secretary of State added: 'Albanese's campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated. We will always stand by our partners in their right to self-defence.' Six months into Donald Trump's second term, it is easy to forget just how unconventional and wonderful his administration can be. Can you imagine any other president taking such an obvious, justified and long-overdue step as sanctioning a poisonous UN official who appears to hate Israel, America and the West? Can you imagine Sir Keir Starmer doing so in the UK? He who recently imposed virtue-signalling sanctions upon two Israeli ministers who, for all their unpleasantness, pale in comparison to the hordes of evildoers across the region? You cannot. Why? The answer to that question reveals the deep ideological rot that has long ravaged our centrist leaders, their legions of officials, and the entire culture of the Western elites. In short, it is the reason we're in this mess. Rubio's sanctions could not have been imposed on a more deserving candidate. Born near Naples, Albanese came of age in the bubble of Leftist academia with a master's degree from that hotbed of radicalism, the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. She has since developed a reputation for her prowess as an anti-Israel provocateur. She regularly accuses the Jewish state of overseeing a regime of 'apartheid', for example, seemingly turning a blind eye to Israel's Arab politicians, Arab judges, Arab soldiers, Arab leaders of industry and Arab footballers on the national team. She has also compared Israeli actions with the Nazi Holocaust. In 2014, she remarked that the United States had been 'subjugated by the Jewish lobby'. Amid a storm of outrage, she apologised, but it set the tone for much of her perspective since. Which brings us to October 7. On that dark day, she posted that 'today's violence must be put in context' — Israel's naïve attempt to placate Hamas by allowing cash to flow into the Strip in the years beforehand was likely not what she had in mind — but she never extended the same dignity to Israel's military response, which she later wrongly and acontextually labelled a 'genocide'. That was not her only eye-catching comment after the pogroms. Bizarrely, Albanese also argued that 'the victims of 7/10 were not killed because of their Judaism, but in response to Israel's oppression', making an argument in defence of Hamas that even Hamas itself does not make. It all goes to show just how depraved the elites have become. In a sane universe, the UN would be an objective, reliable and virtuous organisation that tamed evil, stood up for democracy and promoted global harmony. After decades of Soviet propaganda, self-indulgent centrist fundamentalism in the West and manipulation by our authoritarian enemies, however, the world we inhabit is far from sane. To wit: it is one in which the UN has become the foremost enabler of jihadism. Trump may be something of a crude instrument, I suppose, but at least he (often) uses his power against the right targets. Albanese among them.
