8 Utah bills going into effect on May 7 you should know about
The bills range from school safety and homelessness to flags and fluoride, but here are a select few you may want to know about.
S.B. 142 – App Store Accountability Act
As part of Utah's continued push to hold digital services, such as social media platforms, accountable for their content, Utah lawmakers passed S.B. 142.
The App Store Accountability Act forces app stores on both Android and Apple devices to require age verification in order to download apps. Specifically, the bill prohibits enforcing 'contracts,' such as a Terms of Service Agreement, for accounts belonging to minors without parental consent.
Under this bill, parents or guardians would be required to give consent for apps, and app developers would have to verify that consent through the app store. The bill also opens avenues for parents or guardians of minors harmed by a lack of enforcement to sue app stores.
H.B. 77 – Flag Display Amendments
One of the more controversial and followed bills in the 2025 General Session, H.B. 77, otherwise known as the Flag Display Amendments bill, bans the display of certain flags on government property.
The ban notably impacts public classrooms and restricts political flags from being shown, including pride flags, political movement flags, or any flag that is not listed as an exception, such as state flags, country flags, or municipality flags.
SLC council unanimously pass Pride, Juneteenth themed city flags ahead of state flag ban
H.B. 81 – Fluoride Amendments
A bill that garnered national attention, H.B. 81 goes into effect on May 7, officially making Utah the first state in the nation to ban fluoride in public water systems. The bill was passed as a 'matter of individual choice' on whether or not to have fluoride in the water.
And while Utah's water will no longer undergo fluoridization, the bill does allow for pharmacists to prescribe fluoride tablets as an alternative way of getting the benefits, should they want to.
H.B. 249 – Nuclear Power Amendments
In the 2025 General Session, Utah moved one step closer to bringing nuclear energy to the Beehive State. With the passing of H.B. 249, Utah will create the Nuclear Energy Consortium, the Utah Energy Council, and an Energy Development Investment Fund, starting May 7.
The bill is part of Utah's plan to 'combat the looming energy crisis' the state faces with a rising population. While the Consortium will be tasked with providing knowledge and expertise, the Council will oversee energy projects, such as storage and development of power plants.
H.B. 300 – Amendments to Election Law
Another controversial bill that made its way through the legislative session was H.B. 300, and it goes into effect starting today. The bill makes a few significant changes to how Utahns will vote by mail, including phasing out signature verifications on mail-in ballots and sending out mail-in ballots by default.
By 2029, Utahns will be required to opt in to receive a mail-in ballot and will be required to place the last four digits of their driver's license, state ID, or social security number on their ballot return envelopes.
H.B. 322 – Child Actor Regulations
A bill that sets up protections for child actors, including those who appear in content made for social media, such as YouTube, is set to go into effect on May 7.
H.B. 322 requires parents or guardians to set up a trust fund for the child actor, where a portion of earnings from the content can be placed. Among other protections, it also gives minors the right to delete any content made while they were underage once they turn 18.
How to protect your teeth after the fluoridation ban: DHHS offers tips
H.B. 403 – SNAP Funds Amendments
H.B. 403 starts the process to prevent soft drinks from being eligible to be purchased through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill, which went into effect on May 7, directs the Department of Workforce Services to file a waiver to the U.S. Department of Agriculture by July 1.
The waiver would request authorization to stop the use of SNAP benefits to buy soft drinks, which, if approved, would begin enforcement within six months. DWS would then be required to track the public health outcomes of the restriction and renew the waiver every year.
H.B. 505 – Homeless Services Revisions
Among a list of revisions made to address homelessness in the state, H.B. 505 makes it a Class C misdemeanor to camp out on state property without explicit permission. This includes the use of tents, motor vehicles, cots, beds, sleeping bags, or cooking with a campfire, propane stove, or other cooking equipment, according to the bill.
Latest headlines:
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to ABC4 Utah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
16-07-2025
- Axios
"Good Trouble" anti-Trump protests planned July 17 in Utah
Protesters plan to gather in at least 10 cities across Utah to protest the Trump administration on Thursday, the fifth anniversary of the death of civil rights leader and former congressman John Lewis. What we're watching: Whether turnout at SLC's anti-Trump protests recovers after a fatal shooting at the June 14 "No Kings" march downtown, by guards who police said were part of the event's "peacekeeping" team. Organizers struggled to draw a crowd in SLC for a nationwide July 4 protest after the national 50501 group cut ties with the SLC branch, citing "disregard" for its "strict no-weapons policy." Catch up quick: Before the shooting, anti-Trump rallies in Salt Lake attracted 10,000 or more protesters and were among the largest in recent Utah memory.
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Yahoo
Florida attorney general asks Supreme Court to pave way for new immigration law
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) asked the Supreme Court on Monday to allow the state to enforce its new immigration law as an appeal plays out in a lower court. The new law, S.B. 4-C, makes it a state crime for people to enter Florida after arriving in the U.S. illegally and evading immigration authorities. 'Illegal immigration continues to wreak havoc in the State while that law cannot be enforced,' Uthmeier's office wrote in the application. 'And without this Court's intervention, Florida and its citizens will remain disabled from combatting the serious harms of illegal immigration for years as this litigation proceeds through the lower courts,' it continued. Two anonymous people living in Florida illegally, the Florida Immigrant Coalition, and the Farmworker Association of Florida, sued over the law. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, an appointee of former President Obama, blocked police from enforcing it indefinitely, agreeing the statute is likely preempted by federal immigration law and unconstitutional. Florida's efforts at the Supreme Court come after a three-judge panel on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to lift the block as the state's appeal moves forward. The state argued its law is tailored to avoid any conflict with federal immigration authorities. 'Nothing in SB 4-C poses a conflict with federal law. Just the opposite, Florida's law scrupulously tracks federal law. SB 4-C similarly does not violate the Dormant Commerce Clause, since it is un-related to economic protectionism,' Uthmeier's office wrote in court filings. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the plaintiffs, declined to comment. Last year, the Supreme Court allowed a Texas law to take effect that makes it a state crime to illegally cross the Mexican border into the state, refusing the Biden administration's request for an emergency order blocking it on preemption grounds. Florida's request adds to what is already a jam-packed emergency docket at the Supreme Court. The justices are mulling six pending emergency applications from the Trump administration. Three ask to partially enforce the president's birthright citizenship executive order, while the others deal with his deportation policies and efforts to reshape various federal departments. Two death row inmates set to be executed in Florida and Mississippi this week have also asked the court for emergency interventions. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
02-07-2025
- The Hill
Lawsuit challenges Texas law requiring 10 Commandments in classrooms
Two lawsuits have been filed against a Texas law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. On Wednesday, 16 Texas families filed a lawsuit challenging a new state law that requires the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms, alleging a violation of the separation of church and state. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, also argued the law violated the First Amendment and right to free religious exercise. The law requires posters to be hung in a 'conspicuous place' in the classroom and that the commandments are 'in a size and typeface that is legible to a person with average vision from anywhere in the room.' It also requires the commandments followed by Protestant Christians to be displayed. 'As a rabbi and public-school parent, I am deeply concerned that S.B. 10 will impose another faith's scripture on students for nearly every hour of the school day,' said plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan. 'While our Jewish faith treats the Ten Commandments as sacred, the version mandated under this law does not match the text followed by our family, and the school displays will conflict with the religious beliefs and values we seek to instill in our child.' The lawsuit is made up of Christian, Jewish, Hindu and nonreligious families represented by the Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Freedom From Religion Foundation and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. The Hill has reached out to the governor's office for comment. This is the second lawsuit filed against the law, following another in June filed by a group of faith leaders that also alleged First Amendment violations. The legal battles will likely follow a similar issue in Arkansas, after a law was passed requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. A federal appeals court recently upheld a lower court ruling to block the Arkansas law, setting up a potential battle at the Supreme Court.
