Disgraced abuser MP to face parliamentary ouster
NSW Premier Chris Minns said it would be "ridiculous" for independent MP Gareth Ward to be allowed to continue serving the state after he was found guilty of the crimes.
He called on the representative for the south coast seat of Kiama to immediately resign but added he had received legal advice that the former Liberal could be expelled from parliament if required.
"It is completely ridiculous to be in a situation where someone has been not accused, not charged, but convicted of incredibly serious sexual assault convictions and stay as a member of parliament," Mr Minns told reporters on Monday.
"This is just an untenable situation."
The "integrity" of the oldest parliament in Australia needed to be protected, the premier added, and action should be taken "as soon as possible" when parliament returned in early August.
"Many voters will say, are you really suggesting that someone who's been convicted of these incredibly serious charges continues on as a member of parliament, even if they're in jail," Mr Minns said.
Under the NSW constitution, state MPs will have their seat vacated if convicted of offences punishable with a term of more than five years' imprisonment.
The most serious charge for which Ward was found guilty carries a maximum 14-year jail term, but he still has the ability to appeal his convictions.
He was accused of inviting a drunk 18-year-old man - whom he met a year prior - to his South Coast home in February 2013.
The man told a jury that Ward, then a first-term Liberal MP, plied him with drinks before indecently assaulting him three times in one night despite his attempts to resist.
Two years later, Ward sexually assaulted an intoxicated political staffer after a mid-week event at NSW Parliament House.
The man, who was 24 at the time, said Ward climbed into bed with him, groped his backside and sexually assaulted him despite him repeatedly saying "no".
The coalition also condemned the conduct of the former minister for families, communities and community services, suggesting they would back any move to drive him out of parliament.
"There is no way he can effectively represent his constituents," Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said.
"If the power is there to expel Mr Ward he should be expelled."
Ward has held the Kiama electorate since 2011, winning three elections under the Liberal banner before securing the seat at the 2023 poll as an independent.
He remains on bail under strict conditions ahead of a detention application due to be heard in court on Wednesday. He is yet to be sentenced.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
13 minutes ago
- West Australian
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. "Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves," University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. "Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening." Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. "Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS)," Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese has maintained his government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. "If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that," Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.
Perth Now
13 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. "Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves," University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. "Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening." Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. "Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS)," Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese has maintained his government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. "If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that," Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.
The Australian
4 hours ago
- The Australian
Tasmania must get rid of Hare-Clark electoral system
It's time the Apple Isle grasps the nettle with electoral overhaul With Saturday's election of yet another lame-duck minority government in Tasmania, the time is ripe for the state to abandon the obsolete Hare-Clark electoral system, which has long deprived it of confident, enterprising governments. Hare-Clark worked tolerably well in Tasmania after the rise of the two-party system. Since 1972, when the Bethune government was pointlessly brought down by a disaffected coalition partner, Tasmania has had a succession of Labor and Liberal administrations that have governed with razor-thin majorities or with pistols held to their heads by crossbench partners. Hare-Clark has become a gateway to disaster, ultimately placing the power of the state in the hands of perhaps 10 per cent or even less of the electorate. Across the past 50 years we have witnessed chronic neglect of the great responsibilities of government, a marked deterioration in the standards of parliament. It would greatly serve the interests of both major parties if they were to collaborate on major and historic electoral reform in Tasmania. Single-member electorates and preferential voting would provide governments of either stripe with the security of numbers to confidently get on with the job. John Francis, Lauderdale, Tas What's in a name? The productivity reform roundtable has now become the economic reform roundtable, which means the easiest way to progress productivity reform, through changes to industrial relations laws and regulations, will be stifled by the union representation on the committee assembled. This leaves us with taxation reform being the main agenda item, and even then it appears that any discussion on the GST, a consumption tax and not a tax on savings, will be out of favour with the Prime Minister, who has stated he only approves of a progressive taxation system. While the proposed committee reviewing the need for productivity improvements appears to be a good starting point, it is likely there will be too many conflicts of interest to achieve any notable ways forward. Without meaningful productivity gains, small businesses will continue to fail and the increase in unemployment will become locked in. David Gray, Peppermint Grove, WA Xi's charm offensive It would seem that Anthony Albanese has fallen for the Chinese charm offensive. Our Prime Minister seems be in no hurry to meet President Donald Trump, nor Trump with Albanese. Meanwhile AUKUS, a compact uniting our traditional like-minded friends, is withering on the vine of ambivalence while awaiting needed nurture and reappraisal. Amid this ambiguity, lack of leadership is leaving us in a parlous position. Australia continues to change dramatically with thousands of new arrivals seeking pastures greener than the troubled homelands they have come from, but so often coming with the unresolved baggage from that past with its consequences. Stephanie Summers, Turramurra, NSW Blind bureaucracy The latest revelations of child abuse in the childcare sector highlight again the need for national co-ordination of offenders. It also points again to the disadvantages of having states and territories with different laws and regulations. The absurdity of unnecessary differences between jurisdictions was highlighted to me in an experience of obtaining a Working With Children Check. As a resident of NSW, I held such a check for the state for coaching junior cricket teams. When I needed a check to work at a youth organisation event in Victoria, I attempted to apply for it online and found the Victorian government website would not accept my identity documents because of a system glitch. To complete the application process I had to drive five hours from the southern highlands of NSW to a Victorian Post Office at Wodonga to lodge the application. One wonders how working with children in Victoria differs from working with children in NSW, and why there are not national regulations or at least uniform legislation across the jurisdictions. Mike Walker, Bowral, NSW Call this progressive? Tina Kordrostami's resignation from the Greens is telling. That someone who fled the Iranian regime now feels silenced by a so-called progressive party should concern all of us. Her experience points to a deeper problem. The Greens speak the language of justice and inclusion, but too often their positions seem driven more by extreme ideology than by a commitment to universal human rights. Their refusal to condemn terrorist groups – while relentlessly targeting Israel – suggests something far more opportunistic than principled. Kordrostami's call for a third path, one that rejects extremism on all sides, deserves to be taken seriously. John Kempler, Rose Bay, NSW
