logo
‘Purest form of fighting': Mundine launches bare knuckle boxing in Australia

‘Purest form of fighting': Mundine launches bare knuckle boxing in Australia

'We've got their blessing. We've handed over all our paperwork, our constitution, our safety protocols,' said Joseski, a former boxing promoter. 'We've gone to the police, we've spoken to them. They've basically said, 'It's out of our jurisdiction' '
No stranger to controversy during a dual-sport career that lasted nearly 30 years, Mundine anticipates there will be resistance to the introduction of the raw and intense discipline, which has attracted large audiences in the US and UK.
There was backlash to the Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship, co-owned by UFC superstar Conor McGregor, coming to Australia. The Australian Medical Association's WA state president Michael Page called it the 'human equivalent of dog fighting' and warned against the proliferation of more sports that could cause head injuries.
The state's sport minister said she saw no difference between bare knuckle boxing and UFC cage fighting, which has been held in arenas around Australia, but the WA Combat Sports Commission ultimately ruled that the McGregor-backed proposal did not meet its criteria.
Mundine hopes a successful outing in Brisbane, where World Bare Knuckle Fighting is looking to draw a crowd of up to 4000, will help convince decision makers in other jurisdictions to give his bare knuckle organisation a chance.
It will have a full medical team in place and has been endorsed by veteran ringside doctor Lou Lewis.
He has told the Combat Sports Authority of NSW that, while there was a higher risk of hand injuries, cuts and more acute damage per punch in bare knuckle boxing, it posed less risk of brain trauma than fighting with gloves due to shorter blows and fewer repeated blows to the head.
'In my opinion, bare knuckle boxing stands as a legitimate combat sport practised globally, with established rules and regulations that prioritise the safety of its participants,' Lewis wrote in the Mundine team's application.
Loading
Mundine said:, 'Obviously, it's going to be bloodier because it's bare knuckle and the skin can split quite easily. It's going to look more scary, but it actually isn't. We're doing it at a professional level where the fighters train for this type of fight.'
He added that wider weight divisions would also mean that fighters would not be left drained by having to lose body mass and would be better placed to absorb a blow to the head.
There are plans for 10 bouts on the inaugural bare knuckle Australian card in Logan, in Brisbane's southern suburbs. Fighters are expected to include Ben Horn, the brother of former world boxing champion and Mundine opponent Jeff Horn, and NRL player turned boxer Curtis Scott.
Never one not to talk a big game in his decades in the limelight, Mundine has ambitions well beyond that.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What does lifting trade restrictions on US beef mean for Australia?
What does lifting trade restrictions on US beef mean for Australia?

ABC News

time27 minutes ago

  • ABC News

What does lifting trade restrictions on US beef mean for Australia?

It might not be on our plates or menus just yet, but US beef has been a hot topic of conversation across the nation after this week's decision to lift import restrictions that had been in place for more than two decades. Australia banned beef imports from the US in 2003 after the fatal neurological disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), also known as mad cow disease, was discovered in American cattle. The blanket ban was lifted in 2019, however restrictions remained on beef that was sourced from Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the US, amid concerns it could carry the disease. "The Americans were unwilling to … do the traceability work to make sure that beef that was coming to Australia wasn't actually rebranded from somewhere else," veterinarian and former NSW Farmers Association president, James Jackson, said. "We don't want foot and mouth disease in this country, we don't want our consumers to eat beef and get Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which is the disease you get from eating cattle with mad cow disease." While some in the industry were optimistic that lifting the restrictions would open up trade opportunities for Australian producers, others raised concerns that Australia's biosecurity could be compromised. The federal government said the move was the result of a decade-long biosecurity review that found more robust movement controls had been introduced in the US. "The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks," Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said. "The Albanese Labor government will never compromise on biosecurity." Nationals leader David Littleproud questioned the timing of the decision, saying it looked as though it was a trade to appease US President Donald Trump. The biosecurity restrictions on beef imports from the United States were one of the key grievances that led the Trump administration to impose tariffs on Australia. Red Meat Advisory Council chair John McKillop said while the decision may have been pushed through "slightly quicker" than expected, he was confident it was the result of a long-running assessment. Global AgriTrends analyst Simon Quilty said the risk of US beef imports introducing diseases to Australia was now much lower. "They have improved their traceability methods within America and I think, in all honesty, that the degree of risk is significantly low," he said. Mr McKillop said any risk would also be mitigated by the limited amount of beef Australia was likely to import from the US. "They have the lowest beef herd in 70 years in the US at the moment [due to drought]," he said. "The most [beef] that was ever brought in, and this was pre-BSE … was 210 tonnes … in contrast to the 395,000 tonnes we exported to the US last year." Mr McKillop said the US was also experiencing near-record beef and cattle prices, and it was unlikely Australians would want to pay high prices for their product. While the amount of beef coming into Australia from the US may be limited, Mr Jackson said there could be a market for it. "There may be some lines [of product] come into Australia, people who want to sell American beef on a restaurant menu or something like that," he said. Mr Jackson said Australia must be open to accepting American beef if it wanted to maintain a trade relationship with the US. "Part of a trade deal is that you're willing to take product from other countries," he said. "Are we happy with Australian consumers eating American beef? Well, probably we're not that happy, but the reality is that if you trade, you've got to be happy to take other people's product as well." The trade restriction on US beef has been a key grievance for the Trump administration, which placed a 10 per cent tariff on all Australian imports earlier this year. Professor Ben Lyons, from the University of Southern Queensland's Rural Economies Centre of Excellence, said it was difficult to know how the move would impact that tariff. "Nothing would surprise us at the moment because that's the new paradigm under the Trump administration — full of surprises," he said. Dr Lyons said he was confident the Australian beef industry would maintain a strong export market, regardless of US-imposed tariffs. "If past performance is the best indicator of the future, we always seem to find a way with our export markets," he said. "Even the announcement of this tariff on Australian beef at the beginning of the year hasn't really had any economic impact as yet on our exports. "I think we should just carry on calmly and do what we do best. I don't really see this as being a long-term issue for Australian agriculture."

New device to help treat serious birth risk for women
New device to help treat serious birth risk for women

The Advertiser

time30 minutes ago

  • The Advertiser

New device to help treat serious birth risk for women

Women who experience postpartum haemorrhages could soon have access to more treatment options as a new device is added to Australia's therapeutic goods register. Between five and 15 per cent of women who give birth can experience a postpartum haemorrhage. It is a serious and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency which can lead to maternal death or morbidity. A haemorrhage is defined as a blood loss post-birth of 500 millilitres or more while a severe haemorrhage occurs when a litre or more is lost. The impacts on mothers of this complication can be physical and psychological, including extreme fatigue from blood loss, delayed milk production and trauma from the experience. But despite increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhages, many women are unaware of the risk. Care providers need to delicately balance factual information without frightening mums-to-be, maternal fetal medicine sub-specialist obstetrician Stefan Kane said. "Women are having babies at an older age and more are being induced, two things which can increase risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage," he told AAP. "Information is power and being aware of the chance of having a birth injury or haemorrhage is really important." Maternity care providers should also explain what will happen in the event of a haemorrhage, including the possibility of surgery, Associate Professor Kane said. Extensive blood loss after birth is most commonly caused by the uterus being too relaxed and not contracting down, which can be treated by medicine. In cases where the medicine did not work, Assoc Prof Kane said it was important for care teams to have other options as the condition is potentially life-threatening. The JADA system has recently been added to the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. It is a medical device that applies a low-level vacuum to the uterus and induces muscle contraction to control and treat postpartum haemorrhage. The device has been used overseas for a number of years and would be a helpful addition to Australian hospitals, Assoc Prof Kane said. "The first step is having it available on the register and now we can start studying it further and see the role it could play in our approach to preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage," he said. Women who experience postpartum haemorrhages could soon have access to more treatment options as a new device is added to Australia's therapeutic goods register. Between five and 15 per cent of women who give birth can experience a postpartum haemorrhage. It is a serious and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency which can lead to maternal death or morbidity. A haemorrhage is defined as a blood loss post-birth of 500 millilitres or more while a severe haemorrhage occurs when a litre or more is lost. The impacts on mothers of this complication can be physical and psychological, including extreme fatigue from blood loss, delayed milk production and trauma from the experience. But despite increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhages, many women are unaware of the risk. Care providers need to delicately balance factual information without frightening mums-to-be, maternal fetal medicine sub-specialist obstetrician Stefan Kane said. "Women are having babies at an older age and more are being induced, two things which can increase risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage," he told AAP. "Information is power and being aware of the chance of having a birth injury or haemorrhage is really important." Maternity care providers should also explain what will happen in the event of a haemorrhage, including the possibility of surgery, Associate Professor Kane said. Extensive blood loss after birth is most commonly caused by the uterus being too relaxed and not contracting down, which can be treated by medicine. In cases where the medicine did not work, Assoc Prof Kane said it was important for care teams to have other options as the condition is potentially life-threatening. The JADA system has recently been added to the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. It is a medical device that applies a low-level vacuum to the uterus and induces muscle contraction to control and treat postpartum haemorrhage. The device has been used overseas for a number of years and would be a helpful addition to Australian hospitals, Assoc Prof Kane said. "The first step is having it available on the register and now we can start studying it further and see the role it could play in our approach to preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage," he said. Women who experience postpartum haemorrhages could soon have access to more treatment options as a new device is added to Australia's therapeutic goods register. Between five and 15 per cent of women who give birth can experience a postpartum haemorrhage. It is a serious and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency which can lead to maternal death or morbidity. A haemorrhage is defined as a blood loss post-birth of 500 millilitres or more while a severe haemorrhage occurs when a litre or more is lost. The impacts on mothers of this complication can be physical and psychological, including extreme fatigue from blood loss, delayed milk production and trauma from the experience. But despite increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhages, many women are unaware of the risk. Care providers need to delicately balance factual information without frightening mums-to-be, maternal fetal medicine sub-specialist obstetrician Stefan Kane said. "Women are having babies at an older age and more are being induced, two things which can increase risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage," he told AAP. "Information is power and being aware of the chance of having a birth injury or haemorrhage is really important." Maternity care providers should also explain what will happen in the event of a haemorrhage, including the possibility of surgery, Associate Professor Kane said. Extensive blood loss after birth is most commonly caused by the uterus being too relaxed and not contracting down, which can be treated by medicine. In cases where the medicine did not work, Assoc Prof Kane said it was important for care teams to have other options as the condition is potentially life-threatening. The JADA system has recently been added to the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. It is a medical device that applies a low-level vacuum to the uterus and induces muscle contraction to control and treat postpartum haemorrhage. The device has been used overseas for a number of years and would be a helpful addition to Australian hospitals, Assoc Prof Kane said. "The first step is having it available on the register and now we can start studying it further and see the role it could play in our approach to preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage," he said. Women who experience postpartum haemorrhages could soon have access to more treatment options as a new device is added to Australia's therapeutic goods register. Between five and 15 per cent of women who give birth can experience a postpartum haemorrhage. It is a serious and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency which can lead to maternal death or morbidity. A haemorrhage is defined as a blood loss post-birth of 500 millilitres or more while a severe haemorrhage occurs when a litre or more is lost. The impacts on mothers of this complication can be physical and psychological, including extreme fatigue from blood loss, delayed milk production and trauma from the experience. But despite increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhages, many women are unaware of the risk. Care providers need to delicately balance factual information without frightening mums-to-be, maternal fetal medicine sub-specialist obstetrician Stefan Kane said. "Women are having babies at an older age and more are being induced, two things which can increase risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage," he told AAP. "Information is power and being aware of the chance of having a birth injury or haemorrhage is really important." Maternity care providers should also explain what will happen in the event of a haemorrhage, including the possibility of surgery, Associate Professor Kane said. Extensive blood loss after birth is most commonly caused by the uterus being too relaxed and not contracting down, which can be treated by medicine. In cases where the medicine did not work, Assoc Prof Kane said it was important for care teams to have other options as the condition is potentially life-threatening. The JADA system has recently been added to the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. It is a medical device that applies a low-level vacuum to the uterus and induces muscle contraction to control and treat postpartum haemorrhage. The device has been used overseas for a number of years and would be a helpful addition to Australian hospitals, Assoc Prof Kane said. "The first step is having it available on the register and now we can start studying it further and see the role it could play in our approach to preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage," he said.

Australian cycling star Ben O'Connor wins second ever stage of Tour de France after years of crashes
Australian cycling star Ben O'Connor wins second ever stage of Tour de France after years of crashes

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Australian cycling star Ben O'Connor wins second ever stage of Tour de France after years of crashes

Australian cycling star Ben O'Connor was adamant winning a stage of the Tour de France mattered more than a top-10 finish in the race after enjoying the satisfaction of raising his arms after taking out stage 18. Having found himself 'on the deck' too often for his own liking through the race over the years, the 29-year-old finally buried memories of other crashes to cross the line at the Col de la Loze after a brutal climb. Making the win more enjoyable was doing it as an 'Aussie rider on an Aussie team' after saluting for Jayco AlUla having only joined this season. 'It's a pretty cruel race,' O'Connor said. 'I've just found myself on the deck in the first two days a few times, but not really for my own fault. Stage 1, it wasn't my fault – I was just taken out.' 'In Copenhagen (in 2022), same thing, sprint finish, crash in front of me, nowhere to go. And then you had the crash in 2021 (when a fan holding a cardboard sign caused a massive pile up), so the first couple days really haven't treated me well at all in this race before.' It was O'Connor's second stage win, four years after his previous victory in 2021 when he finished fourth overall, the winning plan hatched with his team's sports director Matthew Hayman. 'He told me you've got nothing to lose,' O'Connor said. 'If you're going to win, you have to go from the bottom of the valley … and that's what happened. On the Col de la Loze, it was pretty straightforward – you either had it or you didn't.' O'Connor said the high of crossing the line first at any stage during the race made for a much better feeling than finishing near the top of the pack when the race concludes in Paris. 'Yes, definitely. Getting your hands up in the air is the most enjoyable thing,' he said. 'It's only when you complete a GC and you've done a perfect race yourself and you're proud of every single day that you've tapped it out and you've ticked the boxes, then that gives you a different kind of satisfaction.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store