‘Appalling act': Qantas to pay for sackings
The High Court unanimously rejected a Qantas appeal after the Federal Court found that the airline had illegally sacked staff.
A five-day hearing began in the Federal Court in Sydney on Monday to decide the penalty Qantas must pay for the 2020 decision during the Covid pandemic.
The Transport Workers Union (TWU) is calling for the maximum payment of more than $121m to be paid out.
'Not only was it an appalling act to get rid of a loyal workforce, it was the biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history,' TWU secretary Michael Kaine said in a statement on Monday. Transport Workers Union secretary Michael Kaine called the Qantas decision 'appalling'. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
'The penalty to Qantas must reflect this and send a message to every other company in Australia that you cannot sack your workers to prevent them from using their industrial rights.'
Mr Kaine said ground handling work for Qantas was now being undertaken by companies such as Swissport, which he alleged had 'severe understaffing' and a 'revolving door of fed-up workers'.
'This cannot be a business case for outsourcing and Qantas should not only pay the maximum legal penalty for its actions but commit to funding fair standards throughout its supply chain,' he said. Qantas is expected to pay millions in compensation. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia
'We need to see Qantas held accountable to the fullest extent here.'
The maximum penalty Qantas can be ordered to pay is $121m, on top of the $120m compensation fund that is now in the process of being administered to workers.
The hearing before Justice Michael Lee continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. "Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves," University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. "Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening." Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. "Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS)," Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese has maintained his government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. "If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that," Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. "Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves," University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. "Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening." Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. "Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS)," Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese has maintained his government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. "If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that," Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.
AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Trump flags new baseline tariff of 15 or 20pc
Washington | Australian exporters may face tariffs of 15 to 20 per cent at the United States border, with the Albanese government yet to strike a deal and US President Donald Trump flagging a new, higher baseline. Trump revealed the range for the new minimum tariff on Monday (Tuesday AEST) in a press conference in Turnberry, Scotland, where he met British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
