Indiana's cigarette tax will triple on July 1. Businesses say Hoosiers will spend money elsewhere
When Indiana lawmakers earlier this year approved an increase in the state's tobacco taxes to help plug a $2 billion budget shortfall, they did so at the objection of hundreds of businesses across the state.
The 200% tax bump, which goes into effect on July 1, worried convenience store owners who warned state lawmakers in April that increases could hurt the state and local economies.
'Raising the cigarette tax will not reduce smoking but will drive consumers across state lines to purchase cigarettes at lower prices, which negatively impacts sales of responsible small Indiana business owners,' store owners wrote in a letter provided to IndyStar.
Advocacy groups, such as the American Cancer Society and the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, have long supported an increase in the tobacco tax to encourage Hoosiers to avoid or quit smoking and bring in additional state revenue. The measure been proposed by the Indiana House in the past, but efforts have fallen short in the Senate.
Not in 2025. Indiana lawmakers and Gov. Mike Braun signed off on raising the cigarette tax by $2 a pack, which takes the state's cigarette taxes from around $1 to $3 a pack. Taxes on other tobacco products, such as cigars and e-cigarettes, will also rise. Legislative leaders, when unveiling the tax increase in the final days of the session, said they expect it to raise roughly $800 million over the two-year budget cycle, helping fund the state's Medicaid costs.
"Along with revenue comes a really pretty good public policy that was going to help persuade people to either not start smoking or stop smoking at the same time," Indiana Sen. Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, said in April.
But some convenience store owners say the tax increases could lead to illegal distribution of tobacco products and drive customers out of state, which would hurt state revenues and local businesses. A 200% tax increase is also not reflective of the current economy, Scott Hackleman, the chief operating officer of Herdrich Petroleum, wrote in a late-April letter to Indiana lawmakers. Herdrich operates 20 QuickPix convenience stores, including four in Richmond at Indiana's border with Ohio.
'While the intent behind this increase may be well-meaning,' Hackleman wrote. 'It places a disproportionate financial burden on a small group of adult consumers, many of whom are already facing significant cost-of-living increases across the board.'
When Indiana's tax on cigarettes rises from just under $1 a pack to nearly $3 a pack on July 1, the Hoosier State will have the 12th highest state cigarette tax in the country and a higher rate than any of the states that touch its borders.
The taxes per pack of cigarettes for Indiana and its neighboring states starting July 1 are as follows, according to advocacy groups like the American Lung Association and the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids:
Joe Lackey, the president of the Indiana Grocery and Convenience Store Association, said he believes the tax jump puts Indiana in a place to actually lose revenue as Hoosiers look to neighboring states to buy tobacco products. Residents from states like Illinois, who saw significantly higher cigarette taxes before Indiana's increase, may no longer see an incentive to drive to Indiana to purchase cigarettes.
What's in Indiana's state budget?: Here are the biggest winners and losers
'We were the cheapest state and the surrounding states were much higher,' Lackey said. 'We were selling a lot of tobacco out of Indiana, and that meant that we were collecting a lot of taxes for the state of Indiana that was not coming from Hoosiers.'
Lackey said the state may see a revenue bump in June as Hoosiers make their last purchases at the current tax rate. But he worries that businesses may close or cut jobs in the months once the tax bump takes effect.
'We anticipate this is going to be a very devastating tax,' he said.
Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at brittany.carloni@indystar.com. Follow her on Twitter/X @CarloniBrittany.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
DOJ memo outlines plans for ‘prioritizing denaturalization' — aka yanking US citizenship — of individuals charged with certain crimes
The Justice Department will prioritize revoking the US citizenship of individuals charged with certain crimes, according to a memo issued by the agency earlier this month. 'The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence,' read a June 11 'enforcement priorities' memo sent by Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate to all employees within the DOJ's Civil Division. Shumate noted that the civil division has established several 'categories of priorities for denaturalization cases' in order to 'promote the pursuit of all viable denaturalization cases … and maintain the integrity of the naturalization system while simultaneously ensuring an appropriate allocation of resources.' 'Denaturalization' was among five priorities for the DOJ's civil division listed in a June 11 memo. Getty Images The 10 categories of crimes that could lead to citizenship being stripped range from 'war crimes' to COVID loan fraud, according to the memo. Individuals 'who pose a potential danger to national security, including those with a nexus to terrorism, espionage, or the unlawful export from the United States of sensitive goods, technology, or information raising national security concerns' will be among those prioritized for denaturalization. As will individuals who 'further or furthered the unlawful enterprise of criminal gangs, transnational criminal organizations, and drug cartels.' Various forms of fraud are also listed in the memo, including 'Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan fraud and Medicaid/Medicare fraud' and 'fraud against private individuals, funds, or corporations.' The DOJ will also target 'individuals who committed human trafficking, sex offenses, or violent crimes.' Naturalized citizens who didn't disclose previous felonies during the process or acquired their citizenship through 'government corruption' or 'misrepresentation' could also be subject to prioritized denaturalization proceedings. The DOJ, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, has already stripped the US citizenship of at least one person convicted of possession of child pornography. AP 'Any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue' will also meet the priority threshold, according to the memo. 'These categories are intended to guide the Civil Division in prioritizing which cases to pursue; however, these categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case, nor are they listed in a particular order of importance,' Shumate noted. 'Further, the Civil Division retains the discretion to pursue cases outside of these categories as it determines appropriate.' Denaturalization is among the DOJ's top five enforcement priorities for the civil division, which also lists 'Combatting Discriminatory Practices and Policies,' 'Ending Antisemitism,' 'Protecting Women and Children' and 'Ending Sanctuary Jurisdictions' as top concerns. At least one person has been denaturalized since the memo was issued. Elliott Duke, a British national convicted of receipt and possession of child pornography in 2014, was stripped of his US citizenship on June 13, according to the DOJ. Duke was granted US citizenship in 2013 after enlisting in the US Army the year prior. He claimed on his 2013 citizenship application that he had never committed a crime for which he was not arrested, but the DOJ determined that in 2012, while serving in Germany, Duke began receiving and distributing child sexual abuse material. Duke's denaturalization case was investigated under 'Operation Prison Lookout,' which the DOJ describes as 'an ongoing national initiative involving the Justice Department and ICE to identify and prosecute sex offenders who have fraudulently obtained United States citizenship.' 'The laws intended to facilitate citizenship for brave men and women who join our nation's armed forces will not shield individuals who have fraudulently obtained US citizenship by concealing their crimes,' Shumate said in a statement. 'If you commit serious crimes before you become a US citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you.'

Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Treasury Secretary Bessent Says Budget Bill Will be Ready to Sign by July 4
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says he's confident that President Donald Trump's tax and spending deal will be through Congress and ready to sign by July 4. Bessent also pushes back against the idea that this bill cuts access to medicaid. He speaks to Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." Sign in to access your portfolio


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Senate's long day turns to night as GOP works to shore up support on Trump's big bill
'I have prevailed upon my Senate colleagues to please, please, please keep it as close to the House product as possible,' said Johnson, the Louisiana Republican, as he left the Capitol around dinnertime. House Republicans had already passed their version last month. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It's a pivotal moment for the Republicans, who have control of Congress and are racing to wrap up work with just days to go before Trump's holiday deadline Friday. The 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' as it's formally titled, has consumed Congress as its shared priority with the president. Advertisement The GOP leaders have no room to spare, with narrow majorities in both chambers. Thune can lose no more than three Republican senators, and already two — Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who warns people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who opposes raising the debt limit — have indicated opposition. Tillis abruptly announced over the weekend he would not seek reelection after Trump threatened to campaign against him. Advertisement Attention quickly turned to key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, who have also raised concerns about health care cuts, but also a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions. And on social media, billionaire Elon Musk was again lashing out at Republicans as 'the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' for including a provision that would raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion, which is needed to allow continued borrowing to pay the bills. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said his side was working to show 'how awful this is.' 'Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular,' Schumer said as he walked the halls. The Democrats have proposed dozens of amendments in what's called a vote-a-rama, though most were expected to fail. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. The White House said it was counting on Republican lawmakers to 'get the job done.' 'Republicans need to stay tough and unified during the home stretch,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Senators to watch Few Republicans appear fully satisfied as the final package emerges, in either the House or Senate. Tillis said it is a betrayal of the president's promises not to kick people off health care, especially if rural hospitals close. Advertisement Collins has proposed bolstering the $25 billion proposed rural hospital fund to $50 billion, and Murkowski was trying to secure provisions to spare people in her state from some health care and food stamp cuts while also working to beef up federal reimbursements to Alaska's hospitals. They have not said how they would vote for the final package. At the same time, conservative Senate Republicans — Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming — have proposed steeper health care cuts and filed into Thune's office for a near-midnight meeting. As the first few Senate amendments came up Monday — to strike parts of the bill that would limit Medicaid funds to rural hospitals or shift the costs of food stamp benefits to the states — some were winning support from a few Republicans, though none passed. Sen. Mike Crapo, the GOP chairman of the Finance Committee, dismissed the dire predictions of health care cuts as Democrats trafficking in what he called the 'politics of fear.' What's in the big bill All told, the Senate bill includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Advertisement Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Democrats fighting all day and night Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress are using the tools at their disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took 16 hours, and they have a stream of amendments. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern at the start of debate late Sunday about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. Associated Press writers Ali Swenson, Fatima Hussein, Michelle L. Price, Kevin Freking, Matt Brown, Seung Min Kim and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.