Brazil's top court threatens Bolsonaro with arrest, demands explanation for order breach
The order summoning Bolsonaro's lawyers was issued by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case in which Bolsonaro is accused of plotting a coup.
Bolsonaro's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside normal business hours.
Moraes had on Friday ordered Bolsonaro to wear an ankle bracelet and banned him from using social media, among other measures -- which were later upheld by a court panel -- over allegations he courted the interference of US President Donald Trump, who tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro.
In an interview with Reuters on Friday, Bolsonaro described Moraes' decision to prohibit his social media use as "cowardice," and said he intended to continue engaging with the press to ensure his voice was heard.
On Monday, Moraes said Bolsonaro breached the Supreme Court order when speaking with journalists earlier in the day, following a meeting with allies in the Brazilian Congress.
The moment, which marked the first time Bolsonaro publicly showed his ankle bracelet, came hours after Moraes issued a clarification of Friday's ruling, which stated that Bolsonaro's use of social media included use through third parties.
Moraes in his decision attached screenshots of several posts on social media, including on news outlets, that showed Bolsonaro "displaying the electronic monitoring device, delivering a speech to be displayed on digital platforms." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week called Moraes' court orders a "political witch hunt," responding on Friday with immediate visa revocations for "Moraes and his allies on the court, as well as their immediate family members." The court's crackdown on Bolsonaro adds to evidence that Trump's tactics are backfiring in Brazil, compounding trouble for his ideological ally and rallying public support behind a defiant leftist government.
Hours before summoning Bolsonaro's lawyers, Moraes had issued a ruling that raised questions about whether the right-wing leader was allowed to talk to journalists.
"Obviously, the broadcasting, re-broadcasting, or dissemination of audio, video, or transcripts of interviews on any third-party social media platform is prohibited," the judge said, in a clarification of Friday's ruling.
The measure sparked debate in Brazil regarding the ruling's range.
Bolsonaro on Monday canceled an interview with a news outlet that would have been broadcast live on social media.
"The prohibition is that he communicates on social media; it is not a prohibition against third parties speaking about him, whether to praise or criticize," said Ivar Hartmann, a law professor at Sao Paulo business school Insper.
He added that, in his view, interviews are permissible, provided they are not intended to circumvent the legal limitations, such as giving an interview to a supporter.
But Vera Chemim, a Sao Paulo-based constitutional lawyer, said she believed the former leader is on shaky ground, noting that interviews, while not explicitly mentioned in the court order, could still be used to justify Bolsonaro's arrest.
"Bolsonaro is now completely silenced," she said. "Any misstep could lead to a preventive arrest." The Supreme Court declined to comment or elaborate on the specifics of that decision.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Trump hits Brazil with 50% tariffs, excludes key sectors
SAO PAULO/BRASILIA (Reuters) -- US President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped a 50 percent tariff on most Brazilian goods to fight what he has called a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies. Trump announced the tariffs, some of the steepest levied on any economy in the US trade war, as his administration also unveiled sanctions on the Brazilian supreme court justice who has been overseeing Bolsonaro's trial on charges of plotting a coup. "Alexandre de Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt against US and Brazilian citizens and companies," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. Moraes, he said, "is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions — including against former President Jair Bolsonaro." Trump's final tariff order and the sanctions followed weeks of sparring with Brazilian leader Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who has likened the US president, a close ideological ally of Bolsonaro's, to an unwanted "emperor." Despite Trump's effort to use the tariffs to alter the trajectory of a pivotal criminal trial, the range of exemptions came as a relief for many in Brasilia, who since Trump announced the tariff earlier this month had been urging protections for major exporters caught in the crossfire. "We're not facing the worst-case scenario," Brazilian Treasury Secretary Rogerio Ceron told reporters. "It's a more benign outcome than it could have been." The new tariffs will go into effect on Aug. 6, not on Friday as Trump announced originally. In a fact sheet about Trump's executive order Wednesday, the White House tied the tariffs to Brazil's prosecution of Bolsonaro, who is standing trial on charges of plotting to overturn his 2022 electoral loss. Trump's executive order formalizing a 50 percent tariff excluded dozens of key Brazilian exports to the United States, including civil aircraft, pig iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy and fertilizers. Embraer said an initial review indicated that a 10 percent tariff imposed by Trump in April remains in place, with the exclusion applying to the additional 40 percent. The exceptions are likely a response to concerns from US companies, rather than a step back from Trump's efforts to influence Brazilian politics, said Rafael Favetti, a partner at political consultancy Fatto Inteligencia Politica in Brasilia. "This also shows that Brazilian diplomacy did its work correctly by working to raise awareness among US companies," he said. Brazilian Minister of Foreign Affairs Mauro Vieira said he met with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio Wednesday to reaffirm the country's willingness to negotiate the tariffs, in a sign that negotiations that had stalled in June could restart. Vieira stressed that Bolsonaro's legal woes cannot be included in negotiations, he said. Despite the exemptions, it was too soon to celebrate, said former Brazilian trade secretary Welber Barral, estimating that Brazil exports some 3,000 different products to the United States. "There will be an impact," Barral said. An analysis by the American Chamber of Commerce for Brazil showed that almost 700 products were exempted from the higher tariffs, covering 43.4 percent of Brazil's total exports to the United States by value. Among the top concerns in the government of Lula, Bolsonaro's leftist rival, was Embraer, which exports 45 percent of its commercial aircraft and 70 percent of its executive jets to the United States. Analysts had also warned of a serious potential impact on Suzano, one the world's largest wood pulp producers. Embraer shares rose 11 percent in Sao Paulo, and Suzano gained over 1 percent in afternoon trading. Oil lobby group IBP said oil shipments to the US, which had been suspended, would resume after oil products were listed as exempt from the new tariffs. Mining lobby Ibram, meanwhile, said the exemptions covered 75 percent of mining exports. But other crucial sectors could not dodge Trump's fusillade. Wednesday's executive order did not include exemptions for beef or coffee, two key exports to the United States. Roberto Perosa, the head of Brazilian meatpacking lobby Abiec, which represents beef producers including JBS and Marfrig, told reporters Wednesday that the group estimates losses of $1 billion in the second half of this year because of the new tariffs. Brazilian coffee exporters group Cecafe said in a statement that it will continue working for coffee to be included among the exemptions. And the battle over the tariffs is set to continue, with the political motivation behind them providing ammunition to plaintiffs who have launched a court challenge. Alex Jacquez, who served at the White House National Economic Council under then-President Joe Biden, said in a statement that the new tariffs were a clear violation "of both the law and Trump's own stated trade policy." "We run a trade surplus with Brazil — these punitive tariffs will not serve to rebalance any unfair trade, it will only serve to make a cup of coffee more expensive," he said.
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
UN holds emergency talks over summit cost
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -- The UN's climate bureau held an urgent meeting on Tuesday over concerns that sky-high accommodation prices for this year's COP30 climate summit in Brazil could price poorer countries out of the negotiations, according to diplomats and a document seen by Reuters. Brazil is preparing to host this year's UN climate summit in November in the rainforest city of Belem, where nearly every government in the world will gather to negotiate their joint efforts to curb climate change. Concerns about logistics have dogged preparations for COP30. Developing countries have warned that they cannot afford Belem's accommodation prices, which have soared amid a shortage of rooms. In an emergency meeting of the UN climate body's "COP bureau" on Tuesday, Brazil agreed to address countries' concerns about accommodation and report back at another meeting on Aug. 11, said Richard Muyungi, chair of the African Group of Negotiators, who called the meeting. "We were assured that we will revisit that on the 11th, to get assurances on whether the accommodation will be adequate for all delegates," Muyungi told Reuters after the meeting. He said African countries wanted to avoid trimming their participation because of the cost. "We are not ready to cut down the numbers. Brazil has got a lot of options in terms of having a better COP, a good COP. So that is why we are pushing that Brazil has to provide better answers, rather than telling us to limit our delegation," Muyungi said. Another diplomat familiar with the meeting said complaints about affordability came from both poor and wealthy nations. An agenda for Tuesday's meeting, seen by Reuters, confirmed it was convened to address "operational and logistical preparations for the Climate Change Conference in Belem" and the African Group of Negotiators' concerns on the matter. Brazil's Foreign Ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Brazilian officials organising the summit have made repeated assurances that poorer countries will have access to accommodation they can afford. A spokesperson for the UN's climate body, UNFCCC, declined to comment on the meeting. Brazil is racing to expand the 18,000 hotel beds usually available in Belem, a coastal city of 1.3 million, to host the roughly 45,000 people projected to attend COP30. The government this month said it had secured two cruise ships to provide 6,000 extra beds for delegates. It also opened bookings to developing countries for more affordable accommodation at daily rates of up to $220. That is still above the "daily subsistence allowance" the UN offers some poorer nations to support their participation at COPs. For Belem, the figure is $149. Two UN diplomats showed Reuters quotes they had received from hotels and property managers in Belem for rates of around $700 per person per night during COP30. Officials from six governments, including wealthier European nations, told Reuters they had not yet secured accommodation because of high prices, and some said they were preparing to reduce their participation. A spokesperson for the Dutch government said it may need to halve its delegation compared with recent COPs, when the Netherlands sent around 90 people during the two-week event, including envoys, negotiators and youth representatives. Poland's deputy climate minister Krzysztof Bolesta told Reuters earlier this month, "We don't have accommodation. We'll probably have to cut down the delegation to the bone." "In an extreme event, maybe we will have to not show up," he said.
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
Trump says Epstein 'stole' young women from Mar-a-Lago
WASHINGTON (AP) — US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' young women who worked for the spa at Mar-a-Lago, the latest evolution in his description of how their highly scrutinized relationship ended years ago. One of the women, he acknowledged, was Virginia Giuffre, who was among Epstein's most well-known sex trafficking accusers. Trump's comments expanded on remarks he had made a day earlier, when he said he had banned Epstein from his private club in Florida two decades ago because his one-time friend 'stole people that worked for me.' At the time, he did not make clear who those workers were. The Republican president has faced an outcry over his administration's refusal to release more records about Epstein after promises of transparency, a rare example of strain within Trump's tightly controlled political coalition. Trump has attempted to tamp down questions about the case, expressing annoyance that people are still talking about it six years after Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial, even though some of his own allies have promoted conspiracy theories about it. Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's imprisoned former girlfriend, was recently interviewed inside a Florida courthouse by the Justice Department's No. 2 official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, though officials have not publicly disclosed what she said. Her lawyers said Tuesday that she's willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions. Aboard Air Force One while returning from Scotland, Trump said he was upset that Epstein was 'taking people who worked for me.' The women, he said, were 'taken out of the spa, hired by him — in other words, gone.' 'I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people,' Trump said. When it happened again, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Asked if Giuffre was one of the employees poached by Epstein, he demurred but then said 'he stole her.' The White House originally said Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because he was acting like a 'creep.' Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year. She claimed that Maxwell spotted her working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, when she was a teenager, and hired her as Epstein's masseuse, which led to sexual abuse. Although Giuffre's allegations did not become part of criminal prosecutions against Epstein, she is central to conspiracy theories about the case. She accused Epstein of pressuring her into having sex with powerful men. Maxwell, who has denied Giuffre's allegations, is serving a 20-year-prison sentence in a Florida federal prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse underage girls. A spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee, which requested the interview with Maxwell, said the panel would not consider granting the immunity she requested. The potential interview is part of a frenzied, renewed interest in the Epstein saga following the Justice Department's statement earlier this month that it would not be releasing any additional records from the investigation, an abrupt announcement that stunned online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's political base who had been hoping to find proof of a government coverup.
