China Launches Global Campaign To Discredit French Rafale Fighter Jets Following India-Pakistan Conflict
French intelligence officials, speaking anonymously to the Associated Press, disclosed that Beijing instructed its diplomatic missions to question the Rafale's battlefield performance and discourage potential buyers from purchasing the aircraft. This coordinated effort aimed to undermine France's lucrative defense export business and weaken Paris's strategic partnerships, particularly in Asia where China seeks regional dominance.
The disinformation campaign gained momentum after Pakistan's controversial claims regarding the four-day military engagement in May. Islamabad alleged it had successfully shot down five Indian Air Force aircraft, including three Rafale jets, during the conflict. India acknowledged suffering losses but has not disclosed specific details about the number or types of aircraft lost during Operation Sindoor.
French Air Force Chief General Jerome Bellanger presented evidence suggesting only three Indian aircraft were lost: one Rafale, one Russian-manufactured Sukhoi, and one Mirage 2000 from an earlier French generation. If confirmed, this would mark the first combat loss of a Rafale fighter jet since its operational deployment.
The Pakistani claims created significant challenges for France's defense industry, as existing and prospective Rafale customers began questioning the aircraft's combat capabilities. French intelligence identified this vulnerability and discovered that Chinese officials were actively exploiting these doubts to influence potential buyers away from the Rafale program.
The Rafale fighter jet represents a cornerstone of French military exports and serves as a diplomatic tool for strengthening international relationships. Sales of these advanced aircraft generate substantial revenue for France's defense sector while enhancing the country's geopolitical influence, making them a strategic target for Chinese interference.
Despite extensive intelligence gathering, French authorities have been unable to establish direct links between the disinformation campaign and Beijing's government. China has categorically rejected these accusations, with the Ministry of National Defense dismissing them as "groundless rumors and slander." Chinese officials maintain their commitment to responsible military export practices and claim to support regional stability.
The revelation highlights the intersection of military technology, international arms sales, and information warfare in contemporary geopolitics. As nations increasingly compete for defense market share, the use of diplomatic channels to undermine competitors' products represents a new dimension of economic and strategic rivalry.
France's allegations come amid broader concerns about Chinese influence operations and disinformation campaigns targeting Western military technologies and defense partnerships. The incident underscores the vulnerability of defense contractors to reputation-based attacks, particularly when their products face real or perceived battlefield setbacks.
The situation continues to evolve as France works to counter the alleged disinformation while maintaining its position in the competitive global fighter jet market. The outcome may influence future defense procurement decisions and shape how nations approach military technology marketing in an era of increased information warfare.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
ICC appoints Sanjog Gupta as its new CEO
Indian media mogul Sanjog Gupta was on Monday named the new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Jay Shah-led International Cricket Council (ICC), replacing Australian Geoff Allardice, who stepped down before the Champions Trophy earlier this year citing personal reasons. ICC appoints Sanjog Gupta as its new CEO.(Disney Star) Gupta, who was serving as the CEO (Sports & Live Experiences) at JioStar, will be taking charge of his new role with immediate effect. He will be the seventh CEO of the ICC, which said it received more than 2,500 applications from 25 countries from which 12 candidates were shortlisted. "Candidates ranged from leaders associated with sport's governing bodies to senior corporate executives from across sectors," the ICC said. The names were forwarded to the Nominations Committee comprising ICC deputy chairman Imran Khwaja, ECB chairman Richard Thompson, SLC president Shammi Silva and BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia. They recommended Gupta for the role which was approved by ICC chairman Jay Shah. "Sanjog Gupta has been a driving force behind the transformation of sports broadcasting in India and globally," the ICC said. The governing body also noted Gupta's role in establishing and expanding other leagues such as the Pro Kabaddi League and the Indian Super League (football) while promoting global events like Premier League and Wimbledon. "Sanjog has played a pivotal role in shaping the continued growth of marquee Cricket properties such as ICC events & IPL, establishing domestic sports leagues like PKL and ISL, furthering the popularity of global sporting events such as Premier League and Wimbledon and scaling the business across consumer and commercial objectives," it said. Shah said Gupta's experience in sports strategy and commercialisation will be vital for the ICC. "Sanjog brings extensive experience in sports strategy and commercialisation, which will be invaluable for the ICC," he said. "His deep understanding of the global sports as well as M&E landscape combined with his continued curiosity about the cricket fan's perspective and passion for technology will prove essential in our ambition to grow the game in the coming years." Gupta succeeds Allardice who had quit in January this year after a four-year tenure. It was widely speculated that the 57-year-old Allardice's decision to leave was triggered, in major part, by the ICC Board's unhappiness with his failure to present a "clear picture" of Pakistan's lack of preparedness to host the Champions Trophy. Gupta said he is looking forward to contributing to the next phase of cricket. He began his career as journalist and joined Star India (now JioStar) in 2010. Over the years, he held multiple leadership roles in content, programming and strategy before becoming Head of Sports at Disney and Star India in 2020. Gupta was appointed CEO of JioStar Sports in November 2024 following the merger of Viacom18 and Disney Star. The post of ICC's CEO has been previously held by David Richards, Malcolm Speed and Allardice from Australia, David Richardson and Haroon Lorgat from South Africa and Indian-born Manu Sawhney.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Tibet & Dalai Lama make China nervous?
Even as the Dalai Lama has called for a 'middle way' approach, the Communist Party of China (CPC) cannot come to terms with the idea of co-existing with Tibetans as its totalitarian ethno-nationalist state has no room for a non-Han group or leader — and certainly not for someone like the Dalai Lama whom his followers revere like a god. read more Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama speaks in a video broadcast at the start of the 15th Tibetan Religious Conference, a meeting of religious leaders in McLeod Ganj, near Dharamsala on July 2, 2025. (Photo: Sanjay Baid/AFP) Even as the Dalai Lama has given up the demand of Tibet's independence and has called for a 'middle way' approach, China has rejected it and has continued to call the 90-year-old leader as a 'separatist'. China has made it clear that there will not be any compromise. Under the middle way approach, the Dalai Lama has sought genuine autonomy for Tibet within the Chinese state wherein Tibetans would have rights for the management of religious, cultural, educational, linguistic, health, and environmental affairs and China would be in charge of foreign relations and defence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China has rejected the approach and said it calls for 'splitting China' and has accused the Dalai Lama of seeking a 'semi-independent political regime' or a 'state within a state' within China under the guise of autonomy. The real reason, however, is that an autonomous Tibet, is incompatible with Communist China's ethos. The subjugation of Tibet has been a must for the Communist Party (CPC) and any cordial co-existence has been off the table since the very beginning, according to Prof. Tej Pratap Singh, a scholar of China at the Department of Political Science at Banaras Hindu University (BHU). Indeed, one of the first things that the CPC leader Mao Zedong did after establishing the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 was to order the invasion of Tibet. The fact that Chinese began the invasion of Tibet even as Tibetan negotiators were holding talks with the Chinese envoy, General Yuan Zhongxian, in Delhi shows that talks were a ruse and the invasion was decided from the beginning. 'The People's Republic of China is an ethno-nationalist state of the Han people and the Communist Party has no tolerance for any other ethnic group having a province of their own and that too an autonomous province like Tibet. Moreover, China wanted to control Tibet to lay claims to Indian territories. So, the subjugation of Tibet and the erasure of Tibetan identity have been enshrined in the foundations of Communist China,' says Singh. Indeed, China's claims on India's Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh are rooted in its claim on Tibet. China has said that Ladakh and Arunachal are parts of Tibet, and as it claims to be a part of China, it also claims these Indian regions to be a part of China. Totalitarian China has no room for non-Han people Even though China claims to be a multi-ethnic, atheist state, it is a totalitarian ethno-nationalist state of the Han people. It's not just that the vast majority of Chinese people —91 per cent— are Han, all Chinese leaders from Mao to Xi Jinping have been Han. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By definition, an ethno-nationalist state is one in which national identity is defined by shared ethnicity. Formally, China considers 56 ethnic groups as part of China, but that is a farce as China's policies lay bare that it is a Han ethno-nationalist state and everyone has to comply to the Han way of life. For example, China has made it clear that all religious groups and institutions in the country, whether Buddhists in Tibet or Muslims in Xinjiang, have to incorporate 'Chinese characteristics' in the practice of their religious. For Muslims, China has even gone to the length of demolishing traditional mosques and getting them rebuilt as per the architecture of the Han people. Similarly, China has set up internment camps and put hundreds of thousands of Muslims in those camps to be taught the Han way of life — China calls them 'reeducation camps'. For Tibetan Buddhists, China has denied them the right to recognise their leader, the Dalai Lama, and has said it will appoint the next Dalai Lama. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 'Chinese' national identity is essentially Han identity and every ethnic group, whether Tibetan Buddhists or Uyghur Muslims, have to mould themselves as per the Han way of life, says Singh, the China scholar at BHU. Scholars have described the imposition of Han way of life on other groups inside China in the name of Sinicization as 'internal colonialism' where regions of non-Han people like Tibet and Xinjiang have been converted into Han colonies. No room for Tibet & Dalai Lama in China As China is an ethno-nationalist state of Han people, a Chinese leader can never tolerate someone like the Dalai Lama — even if he offers concessions like ceding the demand for independence for autonomy within the People's Republic. 'The Dalai Lama is a symbol of Tibetan Buddhists and a reminder that Tibet had remained out of China's active control for centuries. China can never allow the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet and can never allow an autonomous Tibet to coexist with China as that would give prominence to a non-Han people and their leader. That's why China is committed to not just subjugating Tibet but keeping the Dalai Lama out of Tibet and erasing the Tibetan identity with the destruction of monasteries, replacement of Tibetan language with Mandarin, and the break-up of the Tibet province,' says Singh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Historically, Tibet comprised three provinces of U-Tsang in central Tibet that included Lhasa and was the spiritual centre, eastern province of Kham, and northeastern region of Amdo that had many monasteries. China broke large parts of Kham and merged them into Sichuan and Yunnan provinces and parts of Amdo were incorporated into Qinghai and Gansu. Currently, the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) is less than half of the size of the pre-1950 Tibet. Singh says that China wants to name the next Dalai Lama as the one it would support would toe its line and lead its Sinicisation efforts. 'On the other hand, a successor recognised by Tibetans in exile, as the Dalai Lama announced last week, is bound to be anti-China and is bound to deny legitimacy to the Chinese rule in Tibet and any territorial claims on Indian land that arise from Chinese rule. That would be unacceptable to China,' says Singh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
Is Xi Jinping's dream of being China's 'president for life' unravelling?
After over a decade of unchallenged authority, Xi Jinping is showing signs of stepping back. From skipping key summits like Brics in Brazil to quietly redistributing the Chinese Communist Party control, China's most dominant leader since Mao may be preparing for a shift. Is the era of Xi as 'president for life' beginning to fade as the 2027 Party Congress approaches? read more Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives at the Kremlin to attend a festive concert, held on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two, in Moscow, Russia, May 8, 2025. File Image/RIA Novosti via Reuters Chinese President Xi Jinping is beginning to relinquish some of his long-held control over the operations of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). For the first time in his leadership, key responsibilities are being passed down to Party institutions and senior colleagues, a move that experts see as significant given Xi's history of centralising power. In late June, the Politburo — China's core political decision-making body — examined a new framework regulating Party-affiliated organs. These bodies, known as central commissions and leading groups, have played a growing role in Chinese governance throughout Xi's tenure. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Xinhua, these groups are expected to focus on 'planning, discussing and checking on major matters.' This redefinition of duties aims to strengthen coordination across Party institutions, which have increasingly taken on functions that were once the domain of state agencies. Most of these organisations were either created or given expanded authority under Xi, especially in sensitive sectors such as finance, science and technology, cybersecurity and national security. Some of these entities have already begun operating under the leadership of figures other than Xi, including Premier Li Qiang, Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang, and Cai Qi, Xi's chief of staff. CCP devolves under Xi Jinping Over the last decade, the CCP has overhauled several state functions by transferring authority to Party-led mechanisms. During Xi's rule, the creation or elevation of 'leading small groups' into 'central commissions' has become a recurring strategy to assert direct Party oversight. This transformation has affected multiple policy areas, including economic reform, religious affairs, and overseas Chinese relations. A notable example is the transformation of the group overseeing Hong Kong and Macau. Initially a modest entity, it was upgraded to a Party commission in 2020 and took control from the previously dominant State Council-based office. Similar structural changes were implemented in 2023, where commissions on finance and science were placed under Li Qiang and Ding Xuexiang, respectively. The cyberspace commission, a critical agency for China's internet governance and data regulation, is now chaired by Cai Qi. Xi's muted visibility Xi Jinping's recent absences from major international events have also drawn attention. For the first time since assuming the presidency, he did not attend the Brics summit, held this year in Rio de Janeiro. Chinese Premier Li Qiang led the Chinese delegation. This followed a similar pattern in 2023, when Xi skipped the G20 summit in India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Between May 21 and June 5, Xi did not appear in public for 14 consecutive days. This unusually long silence, uncharacteristic for the Chinese president, added to questions about shifts in his leadership style. Additionally, a new Revolutionary Memorial Hall opened in Shaanxi Province was not named after Xi's father, Xi Zhongxun, despite expectations to the contrary. Xi Zhongxun was a senior figure in the Party, and the absence of his name from the hall stood out amid Xi Jinping's otherwise consistent emphasis on his revolutionary lineage. Xi Jinping, China's 'president for life' Xi Jinping's current authority stems from a series of institutional reforms and leadership consolidations that began when he assumed power in 2012. He rapidly ascended through the ranks, simultaneously holding the top three positions in China's political structure: General Secretary of the Communist Party, President of the country, and Chairman of the Central Military Commission. Soon after taking office, Xi launched a sweeping anti-corruption campaign that penalised over a million Party members and removed several high-ranking military officers. This effort bolstered his standing as an uncompromising reformer and helped dismantle potential opposition. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During his second term, Xi's political clout was further cemented when he was formally designated as the 'core leader' of the CCP — a title previously reserved for Mao Zedong. In 2018, the National People's Congress approved a constitutional amendment eliminating the two-term limit for the presidency. This cleared the way for Xi to pursue a third term, which he secured in 2022 as General Secretary, followed by re-election as president in 2023. With this shift, Xi diverged from all his predecessors, who voluntarily stepped down after two five-year terms. His continuation in office without term limits earned him the unofficial title of 'President for Life.' Headwinds challenging Xi's power Despite his ironclad hold on power, Xi's tenure has not been without controversy or crisis. His handling of the Covid-19 pandemic faced widespread criticism, both domestically and internationally. When the virus emerged in late 2019, doctors who first raised alarms were detained, and Xi remained silent publicly until January 20, 2020, despite being briefed on the outbreak on January 7. This delay is widely viewed as a lost opportunity to contain the virus early. The subsequent enforcement of the 'zero-Covid' policy involved mass lockdowns, forced quarantines and extensive travel restrictions. Though initially hailed as a success, the policy eventually crippled China's economy and triggered rare public demonstrations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Its sudden reversal in December 2022 left millions un-vaccinated, particularly the elderly and raised questions about planning and transparency. By July 2022, only 51 per cent of citizens over the age of 80 had received a single vaccine dose, compared to 93 per cent in Japan. Economic challenges have also heated up. When Xi first came to power, China's GDP grew at 7.8 per cent in 2013, already slower than previous years. Since then, growth has steadily declined. Promises to double the size of the economy by 2035 remain far off-track amid a slowing property sector, declining exports and regulatory crackdowns on private enterprises. In foreign policy, Xi's assertive posture has alienated several regional neighbours. China's expansive claims in the South China Sea, under the so-called 'nine-dash line,' have escalated tensions with countries like the Philippines, Vietnam and Indonesia, pushing them closer to the United States — an outcome contrary to Beijing's strategic objectives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dissent within the top ranks Xi's leadership has also seen repeated purges of top-level officials, indicating an undercurrent of instability within the CCP's upper echelons. In 2023 alone, Defence Ministers Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu were removed from office. That same year, Foreign Minister Qin Gang — formerly ambassador to the US and a fluent English speaker — disappeared from public view just months into his role. While Wei and Li were reportedly ousted over corruption charges, no explanation has been offered for Qin's removal. The expulsion of Admiral Miao Hua from the Central Military Commission — the apex command structure of China's armed forces — further suggests discord within the military leadership. These developments, though rarely acknowledged in state media, hint at fractures inside the tightly guarded corridors of Chinese power. Although Xi continues to dominate headlines — appearing on the front page of People's Daily 157 times between April and June 2025 — there are clear signs that the monolithic image of his rule is being tested. What next ahead of CCP's National Congress in 2027? Xi Jinping turned 72 in June this year. The next significant milestone in China's political calendar is the 21st National Congress of the Communist Party, scheduled for 2027. That event will mark the end of Xi's third term as General Secretary and could provide clarity on whether he plans to remain at the helm or initiate a phased handover of responsibilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Although some analysts have suggested that recent developments could indicate preparations for succession, others note that no apparent successor has been identified. Unlike previous leaders, Xi did not promote a designated heir at the end of his first term in 2017 and has refrained from doing so since. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
