Singapore, Japan, South Korea lead 2025 passport rankings; US hits lowest rank in 20 years, visa access now down to 182 nations
A steady decline for the US passport
In 2006 and again in 2014, the United States held the number one position on the Henley Passport Index. But over the past two decades, it has consistently dropped in rankings. Between 2019 and 2024, the US passport hovered between the 6th and 7th spots. In 2025, it has dropped to 10th place — its lowest ever in the history of the index.
According to the index's data methodology, which counts multiple countries with the same score as occupying a single rank, there are now 33 countries that effectively outrank the United States. This slide coincides with domestic policy changes, including the Trump administration's earlier travel bans and current immigration crackdowns.
Global mobility led by Asian and European nations
Singapore holds the top rank for 2025, granting its citizens visa-free access to 193 destinations. Japan and South Korea follow at number two with access to 190 countries. European countries continue to dominate the top tiers: Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and Finland are in third place, offering visa-free travel to 189 destinations.
Countries like Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, and Sweden take the fourth position with access to 188 countries. Greece, Switzerland, and New Zealand are tied at fifth with 187 destinations.
Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has slipped to sixth place with visa-free access to 186 destinations. Australia, Czechia, Hungary, Malta, and Poland rank seventh, and Canada, Estonia, and the UAE occupy the eighth position. The UAE in particular has made significant progress, jumping 34 ranks in the past decade — from 42nd to 8th.
What's behind the US drop?
The US passport now offers visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 182 out of 227 destinations worldwide. This drop is not just symbolic — it reflects a decline in international mobility for US citizens. In addition to policy-related shifts, the US recently introduced a new "visa integrity fee" for incoming international visitors. The fee, which will be at least $250 and is applicable to all visitors requiring non-immigrant visas, has drawn criticism from groups like the US Travel Association. They argue that such policies could discourage inbound travel and further isolate the country.
Christian H. Kaelin, chair of Henley & Partners, said the consolidation seen at the top of the rankings highlights the importance of sustained diplomatic efforts. 'Nations that proactively negotiate visa waivers and nurture reciprocal agreements continue to rise, while the opposite applies to those that are less engaged in such efforts,' he said.
Where does your passport rank? The 2025 Henley Passport Index ranks the world's passports according to the number of destinations they can access visa-free. The rankings are based on exclusive data from Timatic.Access the @HenleyPartners rankings 👉 https://t.co/msM7IKe7MJ pic.twitter.com/GFgG1vMOOA
The mobility gap is widening
While some countries move up, others are left far behind. At the bottom of the Henley Index are Afghanistan (25 destinations), Syria (27), and Iraq (30). This creates a gap of 168 destinations between the most and least powerful passports in the world — underlining the growing global inequality in freedom of movement.
Passport power: Full top 10 rankings
1. Singapore – 193 destinations2. Japan, South Korea – 190 destinations3. Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain – 189 destinations4. Austria, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Sweden – 188 destinations5. Greece, New Zealand, Switzerland – 187 destinations6. United Kingdom – 186 destinations7. Australia, Czechia, Hungary, Malta, Poland – 185 destinations8. Canada, Estonia, United Arab Emirates – 184 destinations9. Croatia, Latvia, Slovakia, Slovenia – 183 destinations10. Iceland, Lithuania, United States – 182 destinations
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Xi to Meet EU Chiefs at Downsized Summit Hit by Trade, Ukraine
Top representatives from the European Union will meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping and other key leaders Thursday, their first in-person summit since 2023 that's exposing a divide between the bloc and Beijing just months after earlier signs of a possible detente. Tensions spanning trade to the war in Ukraine are casting a pall over an event that coincides with the 50th anniversary of the establishment of China-EU diplomatic ties. The meeting has been cut short from two days to one at Beijing's request, Bloomberg News has reported, with the venue changed from Brussels to the Chinese capital after Xi refused to travel to Europe for the talks. The Chinese leader as well as Premier Li Qiang will meet throughout the day with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the head of the European Council, Antonio Costa, according to an EU official. The meeting follows the EU's summit with Japan held in Tokyo Wednesday. While there are no plans to issue a joint communique, the EU intends to release a statement listing the main messages it delivered, according to people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The tensions on display this week contrast with hope at the height of the trade war unleashed by Donald Trump for China to repair ties with the EU. Back then, Beijing appeared to be positioning itself as a more reliable partner as Trump alienated the bloc. Now, deep disagreements are once again marring the relationship. Tensions flared in April with Beijing's decision to impose export controls on rare earth magnets, which shook European car companies and other sectors. Brussels also takes issue with what it considers as Beijing's support for Moscow. The EU on Friday sanctioned two Chinese banks and five China-based companies as part of its latest measures against Russia. Trade ties are another source of frustration. The Asian nation's goods trade surplus reached almost $143 billion in the first half of this year, a record for any six-month period, according to data released last week. The EU inflamed trade tensions when it imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles last year in a bid to ward off a flood of cheap imports. In response, China launched anti-dumping probes into European brandy, dairy and pork. With assistance from Iain Rogers and Jorge Valero. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
White House taps mining expert to head national security office, sources say
* White House taps mining expert to head national security office, sources say White House taps mining executive for top NSC role, sources say * Copley expected to focus on supply chains, critical minerals * Trump administration sees rare earths access as key to national security By Jarrett Renshaw and Gram Slattery WASHINGTON, - The White House has tapped a former mining executive to head an office at the National Security Council focused on strengthening supply chains, three sources said, as a pared-down NSC zeroes in on a few of President Donald Trump's most oft-stated priorities. David Copley, who was chosen earlier in the year to serve as the top mining official at the U.S. National Energy Dominance Council, or NEDC, an interagency body chaired by the interior secretary, is now a senior director at the NSC, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss non-public personnel moves. The shift in roles reflects the White House ramping up its efforts to gain ground against China in a critical minerals arms race that touches a broad swath of global industries. China recently demonstrated its leverage by withholding exports of rare earth magnets, upending global markets and forcing U.S. officials back to the negotiating table, before reversing course. At the NSC, Copley will focus on strengthening U.S. supply chains and boosting U.S. access to the critical minerals that are often vital components of advanced military technology, two of the sources said. A White House official said Copley, who did not respond to a request for comment, will be overseeing the NSC's "international economics" component. Copley's precise title was not immediately clear, nor was it clear if he has formally left the NEDC. The decision to tap a mining expert for a top NSC position offers a window into how national security priorities have shifted under U.S. President Donald Trump. The NSC has been sharply downsized in recent months. Offices overseeing Africa and international organizations have been among those shuttered or downgraded, in line with the administration's skepticism of multilateral institutions. A special forces veteran was recently tapped to head the Latin America office, a move that comes as Trump has openly considered unilateral action against Mexican drug cartels. But Trump's focus on obtaining critical minerals like cobalt and nickel has never waned, and China's near-total control of the critical minerals industry has long rankled the president. In May, Reuters reported that Copley was among a clutch of officials who had been working on plans to pull Greenland deeper into America's sphere of influence, in part to ensure access to the island's vast deposits of rare earths. One of the sources said Copley's remit is, broadly speaking, "geostrategic affairs." Geostrategy is a field of international relations that focuses in part on the interplay of resource wealth and security, a matter of particular relevance for an administration that has made securing access to foreign resources a central element of its foreign policy. In April, the U.S. and Ukraine signed a sprawling deal to give the United States preferential access to Ukrainian minerals. An economist by training, Copley is an intelligence officer with the U.S. Navy Reserve, and he worked on Iraq-related issues for the State Department during Trump's first term. He previously held roles at minerals producer U.S. Silica. Copley consulted for Boston Consulting Group earlier in his career and served as an intelligence officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency, a component of the U.S. Department of Defense. Copley until recently had worked in a strategic development role for Denver-based Newmont, the world's largest gold miner by production with a market value of $54 billion. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"My Family Created Israel": The Rothschilds And Birth Of A Nation
New Delhi: Lord Victor Rothschild spoke in the British parliament only twice. Once, to champion milk pasteurisation, a public health issue. The other, to throw his weight behind the creation of a Jewish homeland. Few families in modern history have wielded as much influence as the Rothschilds. In Israel, their fingerprints are embedded in the land itself. "My family created Israel," his son, Lord Jacob Rothschild, once said. And he wasn't exaggerating. The truth will come out about the Rothschilds. Listen to Jacob Rothschild say it with his own mouth: 'My family created Israel.' — Red Pill USA (@Red_Pill_US) July 22, 2025 For over a century, the Rothschilds, a Jewish banking dynasty that began in 18th-century Frankfurt, quietly helped lay the economic, political, and physical foundations of the state of Israel. Land purchases in Ottoman Palestine to the construction of Israel's Supreme Court, the Rothschilds shaped a nation before it had a name. The story begins with Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), a coin dealer and banker who laid the foundations of Europe's most powerful financial family. His five sons fanned out across London, Paris, Vienna, Naples, and Frankfurt, forming a pan-European banking empire that would fund monarchies, infrastructure, and wars. Lord Rothschild spoke in Parliament only twice: once to discuss the establishment of the state of Israel and once to advocate for milk pasteurization. Let that sink in. "Control the food, control the people." — Red Pill USA (@Red_Pill_US) July 21, 2025 But it was in Palestine that the family carried out their most enduring social experiment. Long before David Ben-Gurion proclaimed the establishment of the state of Israel, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild (1845-1934) became its unsung architect. Between the 1880s and 1920s, Edmond channelled funds into what was then Ottoman-controlled land. He financed agricultural colonies, bought land from the Ottoman Empire, funded Hebrew schools, and built wineries that still bottle wine today. Most of you aren't ready for this rabbit hole. — illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) July 21, 2025 Agricultural colonies like Rishon LeZion, Zikhron Ya'akov, and Rosh Pina sprang to life under his patronage. He funded the draining of malarial swamps, the cultivation of vineyards, and the construction of schools that taught Hebrew to a new generation. To early settlers, he was HaNadiv HaYadu'a, "The Known Benefactor." When he died, he was given a state funeral in Israel, decades before it officially existed. If Edmond was the builder, Lionel Walter Rothschild (1868-1937) was the broker. A British aristocrat, scientist, and president of the English Zionist Federation, he became the formal recipient of the 1917 Balfour Declaration, the British letter pledging support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. He served as President of the English Zionist Federation. The legacy passed next to James Armand de Rothschild and his wife Dorothy. He donated 1.25 million pounds for the construction of the Knesset, Israel's Parliament building. After his death, Dorothy financed the Supreme Court. The most recent and arguably most vocal Rothschild to steward this legacy was Lord Jacob Rothschild (1936-2024), the 4th Baron and Victor's son. A financier, philanthropist, and cultural patron, Jacob chaired the Yad Hanadiv Foundation, which continues to support major projects in Israel. Under his leadership, the Foundation helped fund Israel's New National Library in Jerusalem. Not every Rothschild was a committed Zionist. Archival records suggest that Victor Rothschild, despite his parliamentary support, opposed certain humanitarian appeals on behalf of Jewish refugees before World War II.
