
Sydney Sweeney jeans ad backlash intensifies with viral takedown
Now, Doja Cat has joined in on the backlash surrounding the ads, posting a now-viral video on TikTok that sees the 'Say So' and 'Paint The Town Red' singer mimicking what Sweeney says in one of the ads. In an extremely exaggerated backwoods accent.
'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color… my jeans are blue,' Doja says in the clip, mocking Sweeney's words.
Check out the viral clip below:
my jeans are blee
Many have criticised the Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle ads' take on traditional white beauty standards, as well as the use of the 'jeans' / 'genes' homophone, highlighting how it has white supremacist and Nazi undertones.
This was only bolstered by another advert in which Sweeney stands in front of a billboard of herself with the words 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes' on it. As she walks past the poster, the word 'genes' gets crossed out and swapped with the word 'jeans.'
Read our full explainer on the controversy here.
Amid the intense scrutiny, some have praised the ad for putting an end to 'woke' marketing.
This isn't the first time that Sweeney has been surrounded by controversy.
The Euphoria and White Lotus actress faced criticism earlier this year for the sale of a Dr. Squatch bar of soap that contains her actual bathwater. Many labelled this as being antifeminist.
Additionally, in 2022, she was slammed by fans after photos showed guests wearing MAGA-like hats at a 60th birthday party for her mother.
Sweeney addressed this in a statement, saying: 'An innocent celebration for my moms milestone 60th birthday has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention. Please stop making assumptions.'
Still, the internet was far from convinced...
As of writing, neither Sweeney nor American Eagle have spoken out on the uproar surrounding the polarising jeans campaign.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
2 minutes ago
- Euronews
Sydney Sweeney polemic fuelled by her Republican voter registration
The controversy keeps on growing regarding American Eagle's now-viral ad campaign – which declares 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans'. The play on words 'jeans' and 'genes' throughout the ads have led many to criticise the homonym implication, with some going so far as to label the advertisements as 'Nazi' and glorifying white supremacy. One of the campaign's most polarising clips features the 27-year-old actress saying: 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality and even eye colour. My jeans are blue.' Check out our explainer on the Sydney Sweeney controversy. Some reactions to the controversy have gone viral, while US conservatives have seized on the indignation to blast 'woke' advertising. The White House even got involved, with communications director Steven Cheung writing online: 'Cancel culture run amok. This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024. They're tired of this bullshit.' Now, the US fashion retailer has finally responded to the backlash surrounding its campaign featuring the Euphoria and White Lotus actress. 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story,' they posted on Instagram. 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone.' This message marked the first time the retailer responded to days of backlash, and it remains unclear if the company was purposefully courting controversy with the ads. Une publication partagée par American Eagle (@americaneagle) On the same day that American Eagle issued its statement, vice president JD Vance defended the campaign, saying: 'My political advice to the Democrats is continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi. That appears to be their actual strategy.' He continued: 'I mean, it actually reveals something pretty interesting about the Dems though, which is that you have a normal all-American beautiful girl doing like a normal jeans ad. They're trying to sell jeans to kids in America and they have managed to so unhinge themselves over this thing. And it's like, did you learn nothing from the November 2024 election?' 'I actually thought that one of the lessons they might take is 'we're going to be less crazy.'," added Vance. "And the lesson they have apparently taken is we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful. Great strategy, guys! That's how you're going to win the midterms! Especially [with] young American men. So much of the Democrats is oriented around hostility to basic American life. So you have a pretty girl doing a jeans ad and they can't help but freak out. It reveals a lot more about them than it does us.' Still, the backlash continues... Even those who dismiss the take that the ads promote eugenics are still feeling uncomfortable with the campaign being used to raise awareness for domestic violence. The term 'tone deaf' has been doing the rounds. Sydney Sweeney has yet to address the controversy – something which some of her fans find troubling. Not helping things is the fact that Sweeney's Republican voter registration has been revealed. A viral post on X claimed that the actress was a registered member of the party, something subsequently confirmed by several news outlets, including the Guardian. Indeed, the actress is registered as a Republican voter in Florida. She registered to vote on 14 June 2024 - weeks after Donald Trump was convicted in New York City of criminal falsification of business records and a few months before he won a second US presidency. This has galvanised those who were already slamming Sweeney in 2022 for posting a series of photos from her mother's surprise birthday party, in which guests wore MAGA hats. Faced with growing criticism, Sweeney issued a statement on social media at the time, pleading with the public to 'stop making assumptions'. 'An innocent celebration… has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention,' added Sweeney. Regardless (or most likely because of) the Sweeney campaign controversy, the market value of AEO has increased by $400 million since the 23 July launch.


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Saatchi Gallery celebrates hip hop with joyful new photography show
From Eminem getting tattooed during his Slim Shady era to a blinged-out Mike Tyson living it up on a lavish Vegas trip, a new photography exhibition opening at London's Saatchi Gallery pays tribute to hip hop in all its vibrant forms. Having already made waves in Cologne, the Hip Hop: Living A Dream show brings together the work of three celebrated American photographers - Jamel Shabazz, Joseph Rodriguez, and Gregory Bojorquez - to offer a visual journey across the East Coast, West Coast, and beyond. The music, the fashion, the attitude, the lifestyle - it's all on display across two large spaces in the prestigious London gallery. Here we can see the culture's early roots - what began as a niche movement in 1970s New York, and has since exploded into the world's dominant genre, reshaping global music and pop culture. At the show's opening Bojorquez shared with Euronews Culture: 'I started out at underground hip hop shows - small places where I didn't need a press pass. There weren't a lot of people photographing back then, so I started getting calls from record labels, magazines, and artists themselves. I just tried to do the best job I could, every time." Reflecting on his remarkable career he added: 'These artists, now global icons, were still part of a subculture. I could hear the raw talent even then - it just took the world some time to catch up.' Bene Taschen, the gallery owner, emphasises the global impact of hip hop: 'Hip hop started over 50 years ago, and its influence is truly worldwide. It's not just music - it's fashion, lifestyle, and art. It has inspired millions, probably billions, across generations.' Walking through the exhibition, you'll see wonderfully intimate portraits of some of the most iconic figures in hip hop history - Snoop Dogg, Eminem, Jay-Z, Missy Elliott, Outkast, DMX and 50 Cent - alongside everyday fans whose passion helped make the beloved genre what it is today. And best of all, admission to the exhibition is completely free. It runs until 10 September 2025 and is well worth a visit. Check out the video above to see inside the exhibition and hear some of the incredible stories behind Gregory Bojorquez's most iconic photographs.


Fashion Network
3 days ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Creative professionals push back Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.