
Florida seeks drug prescription data with names of patients and doctors
But the demand is sparking concerns about government overreach and patient privacy.
'You don't need such granular patient information for purposes of oversight,' said Sharona Hoffman, a health law and privacy expert at Case Western Reserve University. She added: 'You have to worry: Is the government actually trying to get information about reproductive care or transgender care or mental health care?'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Florida's six-week abortion ban, enacted by Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, and the state's Republican-dominated Legislature, requires that doctors who prescribe abortion pills dispense them in person, not through the mail. Another Florida law banned transgender transition care for minors and made it harder for adults to seek such care. Last year, a judge struck down key parts of that law, though it is still being enforced while the legal fight makes its way through the courts.
The data requested by the state could, in theory, be used to determine whether physicians are complying with those laws.
It was also unclear whether any of the benefit managers had complied and turned over the information to the state.
Some benefit managers and the employers that hire them to handle prescription drug benefits for their workers have also criticized the state's demand.
A group of large employers, the American Benefits Council, is asking the Florida regulator to withdraw its order to turn over the information. In a letter to the state, the council's lawyers wrote that the 'demand impermissibly violates the health privacy and security of millions of Floridians,' and that the state had not clearly outlined its authority or reasons for the action.
Advertisement
'We have a duty to employees and their data,' Katy Johnson, the president of the council, said in an interview.
Shiloh Elliott, a spokesperson for Florida's insurance regulator, said that objections to the state's data request 'are clearly from those who do not want to be regulated or have any oversight in their industry.' She said the office 'will continue to request data in the best interest to protect consumers.'
Rosa Novo, the administrative benefits director for Miami-Dade County Public Schools, which provides health coverage to about 45,000 people, said in an interview that while she appreciated the state's efforts to address drug prices, it was unclear why it would need this level of detailed information about patients and their medications.
'My doctor is the only one who should know that,' Novo said.
Federal privacy law allows benefit managers to hand over limited data about individual patients in certain circumstances, such as when regulators are conducting an audit. But, according to experts, Florida's data request could violate the law because it is so broad and may go beyond what the regulator needs to conduct its review.
Experts said that another concern with Florida's request is that when sensitive patient data is in multiple hands, it raises the risk of a breach in which the information may be stolen.
Elliott said those concerns 'should be addressed to the actual health care insurance companies that have had countless data breaches exposing millions of Americans' sensitive information.'
Florida's data order was first reported by Bloomberg.
Advertisement
Like other states, Florida already has access to some of the data it is seeking, such as detailed information about prescriptions that are paid through Medicaid. But that data is generally strictly walled off, accessible only to staff members whose jobs require it.
Benefit managers often field requests from government regulators asking for slices of data to conduct audits or investigations. Such requests typically ask benefit managers to strip out patient names, and other identifying details, or ask for a small sample of patient claims.
By comparison, Florida's data request was 'pretty expansive and unprecedented,' said Joseph Shields, the president of a group of smaller benefit managers, Transparency-Rx.
Florida sought data not only on Florida residents, but also on patients who may have filled a prescription while visiting the state. Its request included patients covered through the federal Medicare program and commercial plans through employers that are regulated under federal law rather than state law, according to the regulator's letter to one benefit manager reviewed by the Times.
The Prescription Drug Reform Act, the Florida law the regulator used to justify the data request, imposed new reporting requirements on the benefit managers but said nothing about a mandate requiring them to turn over such detailed patient information. Benefit managers have fiercely fought efforts to scrutinize their business practices.
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep. Mike Lawler will run for reelection, not for New York governor
NEW YORK — Republican Rep. Mike Lawler Wednesday announced he'll skip the New York governor's race and will instead run for reelection in his Westchester County-based swing congressional district. 'After months of deliberating over this and really working through it, I've decided the right thing to do for me and my family and my district is to run for reelection,' Lawler said. The two-term moderate Republican said he wants to help the GOP by running to hold onto the suburban swing district, which is considered one of the most competitive battlegrounds in the entire nation. 'I'm proud to run for reelection on my record and win next November and keep the House Republican majority,' Lawler added. Democrats mocked Lawler for chickening out of the governor's race, with Hochul tweeting that he 'doesn't have the spine to face me.' A crowded field of Democrats has already lined up for the chance to take on Lawler, whose NY-17 district is one of just three in the nation that elected a Republican to the House but backed Kamala Harris over Donald Trump. The challengers include Rockland County legislator Beth Davidson and Army veteran Cait Conley. Lawler was a key vote to pass Trump's unpopular Big Beautiful Bill, which included draconian cuts to health spending to fund outsized tax cuts for the rich. He claimed a side win in the bill by convincing Republicans to raise the cap on deducting SALT, or state and local taxes, to $40,000 from $10,000. Democrats say he welched on promises to eliminate it altogether. Lawler burst onto the political scene by toppling ex-Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney in the 2022 midterms in a race that featured a round of internal Democratic bickering following a redistricting battle that changed the district somewhat. In 2024, he easily turned aside a comeback effort from Democratic ex-Rep. Mondaire Jones, who held the seat previously. Lawler's decision is a boost to the no-holds-barred effort by President Trump and his Republican allies to hold onto their narrow House majority in the forthcoming midterm elections. The GOP holds a 219-212 edge, with four vacancies, three of which are in strongly Democratic districts. The party in power typically loses House seats in the first midterm elections after a president takes office, which would suggest a grim prognosis for the GOP, especially with Trump's approval ratings dipping into the low 40% range. But Trump is pushing Republicans to unilaterally redraw congressional district lines in states they control, most notably Texas and Ohio, which could yield close to 10 additional Republican seats. Democrats might counter by doing the same in blue states, potentially even New York, although the process looks legally trickier for them. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-New York, could now be a frontrunner for the GOP gubernatorial primary race. Republicans will also be keen to defend her far upstate district, but it should be an easier lift as it voted for Trump by a margin of about 20 points in 2024.


The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump reacts to Tulsi Gabbard reveal: ‘Irrefutable proof of Obama coup'
President Donald Trump is furious with former President Barack Obama, whom he is accusing of participating in a 'coup' against him in 2016. Trump is referring of course to recent disclosures from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who has released documents showing it was Obama who encouraged intelligence officials to reach stronger conclusions about Russia's alleged meddling in the 2016 election. According to Gabbard, the intelligence community was well aware that Russia did not hack voting machines, nor did the country have much impact on the outcome, but Trump's enemies in the Democratic Party wanted to paint him as a Russian collaborator, and so they overreached. The media, of course, followed suit, publishing headline after headline suggesting that Trump was a Russian stooge. Here is President Trump reacting to the latest news: 'We found absolute — this isn't like evidence, this is like proof, irrefutable proof, that Obama was seditious. That Obama was trying to lead a coup. And it was with Hillary Clinton and with all these other people, but Obama headed it up. And, you know, I get a kick when I hear everyone talks about people I never even heard of. […] It was Obama, he headed it up. And it says so right in the papers.' These allegations are extremely serious. Now, it's far too premature to throw around the word treason; in fact, I don't like when anybody, Democrat or Republican, starts accusing their opponents of treason. This reads less like treason to me and more like political weaponization of national intelligence for partisan purposes, which has become a recurring theme. Make no mistake: There was an effort to de-legitimize Trump's election to the presidency, and the argument was made by mainstream media mouthpieces leveraging the expertise of deep-state spymasters. Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter both said that Trump was an illegitimate president, in response to media reporting on Russia's meddling. This was the original 'stolen election' theory, and it's only been overshadowed because Trump's false contention that the 2016 election was stolen has subsequently received much more media coverage and much more vigorous pushback. Let me be perfectly clear: Trump should have never claimed that the 2020 election was stolen from him. But he's in good company: Look at the Democrats who said the same thing about 2016! And their main theory backing that up was Russian malfeasance — something intelligence officials privately discounted, until they went to the White House and had a chat with outgoing President Barack Obama.


Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
Huizenga skips Michigan Senate race
Rep. Bill Huizenga won't run in the Michigan Senate race, he said in a statement on Wednesday. Why it matters: Huizenga's decision to pass on the Senate opens up a clearer path for former Rep. Mike Rogers, the National Republican Senatorial Committee's preferred candidate. Huizenga hasn't given a clear indication that he has decided to run for reelection to the House. "I look forward to announcing my future plans later this year," he said in a statement. Huizenga raised $747,000 in the second quarter, leaving him with $1.4 million in cash on hand. Zoom in: The White House has been putting pressure on House Republicans in swing districts to forgo senate or gubernatorial campaigns to help President Trump retain the House majority. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) became the latest House Republican to officially take a pass on a statewide bid when he announced his plans to run House on Wednesday morning. "I've decided the right thing to do for me, my family and my district is to run for re-election," Lawler said said on "Fox & Friends" after telling the New York Times that he wouldn't be running for governor. Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) decided to run for House reelection and forgo a governor's bid after pressure from the White House.