This deadly beast can surpass 5th-generation jets, more powerful than Rafale and F-35, has 12000 km range; it costs Rs..., it is...
India and Russia have had an enduring relationship for several decades, and the Russian Federation has consistently supported India throughout its challenging periods. In this context, it is critically necessary for India to strengthen and modernize its defense capabilities. On July 4, 2025, the Deputy Chief of the Army addressed critical perspectives on many issues, while talking about Operation Sindoor, and subsequently highlighted that the whole system must be enhanced with more technology.
Although the Indian Air Force's role in Operation Sindoor was pivotal, it still suffers from a fighter jet shortage. India is looking to solve this through a two-pronged approach: importing fighter jets from partner nations and increasing indigenous production of combat aircraft, in sufficient quantities to stay competitive in the region.
India is on the verge of acquiring Fifth-generation Fighters and has announced the AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) project to produce an indigenous fifth-generation stealth aircraft. The Defence Ministry has issued a contract for developing the prototype design of this fighter, which is supported by an initial fund of ₹15,000 crore. In terms of shifting global attention, once again, the spotlight has turned to strategic bomber jets because of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, which was used to destroy nuclear facilities in Iran by the U.S. This has also highlighted the evolution of capability with modern warfare and determination of effective offensive strike capability.
A few days ago, there were reports that India is developing a bunker-busting weapon system of its own – a missile based solution. Unlike the United States and Russia, India does not have modern strategic bombers capable of delivering real deep-strike ordnance. Therefore, India has turned to missile technology, and as such, India is working on adapting the Agni-5 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) for bunkering-busting purposes. At the same time, India is possibly intending to get one of the best global bombers in the world, Russia's Tupolev Tu-160M. This is a supersonic, variable-sweep wing heavy bomber, capable of speed, range, and nuclear missiles; the Tu-160M would elevate India's strategic strike role even further, if this deal goes ahead.
The Tu-160M, also known as the 'White Swan' in Russia and 'Blackjack' by NATO forces, is one of the world's most advanced strategic bombing jet aircraft, but the war in Ukraine has slowed production, as Russia is producing this state-of-the-art supersonic aircraft from its Kazan plant. Recently, a Ukrainian attack caused damage to some bombers at a Russian airbase, and this damage greatly diminished Russian capabilities for defense production. This damage also may have impeded India's work to acquire the Tu-160M, which could have been a significant strategic leap for the Indian Air Force. Some defense observers believe that if India can acquire the Tu-160M, the strategic balance in the region would move toward India. Currently, India has multirole fighter jets including Rafale and Su-30MKI. In parallel to adding bombers, India is also seeking to add fifth generation fighters, and, focusing on its AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) project, which is intended to boost India's future capacities in air combat.
Specifically, it is the Russian Tu-160M bomber that sets itself apart. The bomber has a combat range of 1,200 kilometers, meaning it can do this range without the need for refueling. If India manages to buy the jet, it could significantly reduce China's growing presence in the Asia-Pacific.
China has its own bomber – the H-6 – but comparing China's bomber to the Tu-160M, China's H-6 is sitting down on specs and technology. The Tu-160M being in the Indian Air Force's fleet will provide India an unquestionable strategic advantage over Beijing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Can Donald Trump force a ceasefire in Gaza?
TWO WEEKS after Israel's dramatic war against Iran, Binyamin Netanyahu is arriving in Washington to bask in glory alongside Donald Trump. But to receive a victor's reception at the White House, Israel's prime minister may have to yield to America's president on another matter. As the two leaders meet on July 7th, Mr Trump is hoping to be able to announce an end to the war in Gaza. Thousands of kilometres from Washington, in Doha, negotiators for Israel and Hamas, the Islamist movement that began the war with its surprise attack and massacre 21 months ago, will be in feverish talks to seal a deal in time for Mr Netanyahu's visit to America. The parties have agreed in principle on the framework of an agreement. During an initial 60-day truce, half of the estimated 50 Israeli hostages still held in Gaza, 20 of whom are believed to be alive, will be released in exchange for more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners. During the same period there will be further talks aimed at a permanent ceasefire. But a number of important details are still in dispute. Hamas wants Israel to withdraw from most of the areas it currently holds in Gaza and to allow international organisations to distribute aid in the strip, rather than rely on the distribution hubs Israel has set up (hundreds of Palestinians have been killed trying to reach these hubs since they began operating in early June). The group also wants clear guarantees that the 60-day truce will indeed bring an end to the war. A similar ceasefire earlier this year collapsed when Israel resumed military operations and closed Gaza to aid deliveries after the first phase had ended. Mr Netanyahu has said the group's demands are 'unacceptable'. Before taking off for Washington he told reporters that he is determined that 'Hamas will not be [in Gaza]' once the war is over. Yet there are reasons to be optimistic that this round of talks will indeed end in a deal. Mr Trump, flush from the ceasefire he imposed on Israel and Iran after America's strikes on Iran's nuclear programme, likes the idea of himself as an unparalleled peacemaker. He has made it clear that he expects both sides to accept the deal, claiming he will be 'very firm' with Mr Netanyahu. Mr Netanyahu, for his part, wants Mr Trump's backing for more strikes if Iran tries to revive its nuclear and missile programmes, as Israeli intelligence fears it is trying to do. Mr Trump may not want to be dragged into another round of fighting with Iran, so Mr Netanyahu has more of an incentive to accept a deal in Gaza this time. At the same, the threat from his far-right coalition partners to leave the government should he decide to end the war is becoming less compelling. Israel will have to hold an election by October 2026 at the latest. For Mr Netanyahu, whose public image has been boosted by the strikes against Iran, an earlier one may not seem like a bad bet. Hamas, too, is under increasing pressure to compromise. With Iran drastically weakened, it has lost one of its main backers in the region. It still has the support of Qatar and Turkey, but both are anxious to remain in Mr Trump's good books and have made it clear to the Hamas leaders they expect them to play along. Within Gaza, Hamas has lost ground, both to Israel and to local gangs. A ceasefire now could be its best chance to retain some of its power. Yet even if a deal is reached this week, the reprieve is likely to be temporary. For the 60-day truce to lead to an end of the war, Mr Trump will have to keep up pressure on both sides. And the would-be peacemaker-in-chief is not known for his attention span.
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Setback for Turkish firm Celebi as Delhi HC junks plea against revocation of security clearance
The Delhi high court on Monday dismissed Turkey-based firm Celebi Aviation's plea against the revoking of its security clearance in India. Celebi provided ground handling services at nine key airports in India. Celebi entered India's aviation industry through the Mumbai airport in 2008. (REUTERS/File) Celebi Aviation's security clearance was revoked by the Centre over national security concerns. The firm's licence was cancelled by the security wing of the ministry of civil aviation – the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS). In its filing, the firm called the decision 'unsustainable', while saying that no proper reason had been given for the revocation, and that it was done without prior notice, News 18 reported. The firm had entered India's aviation industry through the Mumbai airport in 2008, eventually expanding its services to Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai, Cochin, Kannur, Goa (GOX), and Ahmedabad. It assisted in flight operations, passenger services, cargo handling, bridge operation and warehouse management. The company was founded in 1958 and is currently present in 70 locations across the globe. Why did Celebi come under the BCAS scanner? The Centre revoked the firm's security clearance in May earlier this year. The aviation security regulator had said in a statement that the decision was taken due to 'national interests'. While BCAS did not provide any official reason for the revocation, the decision came in the backdrop of India's heightened tensions with Turkey after it backed Pakistan. Turkey also condemned India's counter-terrorism military strikes against Pakistan under Operation Sindoor. Minister of State for Civil Aviation and Cooperation, Murlidhar Mohol, also said that the decision had been taken in view of 'the call to protect national interests'. Following the BCAS order, Celebi Aviation India said they had no 'political affilitations' or 'links to any foreign government or individuals'. 'We are not a Turkish organisation by any standard and adhere fully to globally accepted practices of corporate governance, transparency, and neutrality, with no political affiliations or links to any foreign government or individuals," the firm said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
Pakistan's dirty Kargil skeletons tumble out, Asim Munir pays tribute to soldier disowned in 1999
Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir paid a tribute to a soldier, whose body the country once refused to accept during the Kargil War. Here's a story of Captain Karnal Sher Khan. read more Pakistan's newly appointed Field Marshal and Army Chief Asim Munir on Saturday paid a 'heartfelt tribute' to Captain Karnal Sher Khan on the occasion of his 26th 'martyrdom' anniversary. However, it is learnt that Khan was the same soldier whose body Pakistan refused to accept when it was found on Tiger Hill in the Dras sub-sector during the Kargil War. Munir, along with other senior Pakistani officers, paid tribute to the fallen soldier for what Islamabad described as his unwavering courage and patriotism during the 1999 Kargil War. According to the press release issued by the Indian Embassy in Washington, DC, back on July 15, 1999, Karnal Sher was one of the two soldiers whose bodies Pakistan adamantly refused to accept. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At that time, this was seen as Pakistan's way to evade acknowledging the involvement of the Pakistan army regulars in the misadventure in Kargil. The country vehemently denied Khan's identification by India through correspondence found on him, stirring major controversy amid the war. It is pertinent to note that this was not the first time Captain Karnal Sher was honoured in Pakistan. Interestingly, he is still the sole recipient of the Nishan-i-Haider award from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. In 2020, while Pakistan celebrated the 55th Defence Day, a massive procession was taken out to honour the Pakistani captain. Since then, he has often been referred to as a 'Kargil Hero'. What was India's take on the matter? According to the press release by the Indian consulate in Washington, in July 1999, the Indian authorities found the bodies of two Pakistani soldiers on the Indian side of the Line of Control in Kargil. As per the statement, the body belonged to Capt. Imtiaz Malik of the 165th Mortar Regiment and Capt. Karnal Sher of 12 Northern Light Infantry. The Indian Army took possession of the bodies, and on July 12, they conveyed the development to the government of Pakistan. 'We informed the Pakistani authorities that we would like to hand over the bodies to them. We did not receive any response,' the statement reads. After the notification was sent to the Pakistani government, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) approached the Government of India on July 13. In its letter, ICRC maintained that Pakistan had requested them to contact India for the handing over of the bodies of the two officers. However, in that letter, the names of the two officers were not mentioned. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India then provided ICRC with this information, along with the photographs of the bodies and copies of correspondence found on the two soldiers. The Pakistani government later conveyed through 'ICRC that the material we had furnished was 'insufficient' to establish the identities of the officers, and that they would like the bodies to be handed over and taken to Islamabad for verification.' 'It is clear that this was again an attempt to obscure and evade the fact that these were bodies of officers of the Pakistan Army involved in the Kargil operation,' the embassy said in the statement. In response to this, India offered that it would be willing to receive a Pakistani representative and even the family members of the soldiers to visit the country and identify the bodies. India pointed out that it would have been unprecedented and unheard of for bodies to be sent abroad before their nationality and military identity are determined. 'If Pakistan doubts them, it is for their representatives to come and see the bodies. We have not yet received a response from Pakistan through the ICRC,' the embassy said at that time. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD So, how were the bodies handed over to them? Tired of Pakistan's refusal, India eventually set a deadline of July 15 for Pakistan to claim the bodies of the soldiers. 'The Government of India had conveyed to the ICRC that, because of the weather conditions, the condition of bodies is deteriorating and the ICRC should come back with the response from Pakistan by 1100 hrs. IST on July 15,' the statement from the Indian side read. Eventually, the Pakistani authorities conceded and accepted the bodies of the army personnel. On July 17, the two bodies, draped in the green Pakistani flag, were handed over to an official of the International Committee of the Red Cross at the army base hospital in New Delhi. The Red Cross official named Dennis Allistone checked the bodies and documents of the two soldiers before taking them to the Palam airport. Both soldiers were eventually flown to Karachi. The two soldiers received full military honours from the Rajputana Rifles. How an officer in India helped Captain Karnal Sher in receiving Nishan-e-Haider While Pakistan initially abandoned Captain Karnal Sher, it was Indian Army officer, Brigadier M.P.S. Bajwa (now retired), who honoured the soldier in his way. Bajwa, who was commanding the 192 Mountain Brigade at that time, was so impressed by the Pakistani soldier's valour that he wrote a citation for him and placed it in his pocket while handing over the body, which eventually led to his recognition. Before Captain Karnal's body was dispatched to Delhi, Bajwa informed his General Officer Commanding of Khan's bravery and expressed the desire to write a small citation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A piece of paper with a handwritten citation was placed in his pocket. Initially, Pakistan refused to take his body, saying that their soldiers had never fought, but later the body was accepted,' Bajwa told The Print in 2019. 'It was heartening news that he was awarded the Nishan-e-Haider. I received a letter of thanks to the Indian Army from his father," he added.
