Trump trade deal may present geopolitical challenges for Indonesia
Indonesia's ambition to be less reliant on volatile superpowers could be challenged by its new obligation to purchase more American goods, observers have added, who also warned that the decision to significantly lower trade barriers for Washington may ruffle feathers among other key partners if not managed properly.
Countries around the world are wrapping up their trade negotiations with Trump ahead of his Aug 1 deadline for enforcing his so-called 'reciprocal tariff' policy. Some have finalised the trade agreement in the past weeks, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan and Vietnam.
On July 15, US President Donald Trump announced a 19-percent tariff for Indonesia, significantly below the 32 per cent level he threatened earlier.
As part of the deal, Trump added that Indonesia agreed to purchase US$15 billion in oil and gas, $4.5 billion in agricultural products and 50 Boeing jets
Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) economist Dandy Rafitrandi suggested that the geopolitical repercussions have already appeared.
'I think, [...] we can already tell that the [deal] carries quite a heavy weight because of its non-optional nature and other consequences,' he told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday.
Indonesia was granted a lower levy at 19 per cent following what Indonesian negotiators described as an 'extraordinary struggle' to reach a fairer deal with Trump.
The 19-per cent rate, which is the lowest Washington has extended to any country in Sout-East Asia so far, may come at a cost, as Indonesia is required to commit to major US purchases and be willing to remove all nontariff barriers for US imports to grant further ease of access for American companies.
Included in the list of nontariff barriers to be removed are import restrictions, licensing requirements on US remanufactured goods or parts and local content requirements.
The government has so far welcomed the deal with a positive tone, with president Prabowo Subianto affirming his commitment to usher in a 'new era of mutual benefit between two great nations'.
The Office of the Coordinating Economic Minister also hailed the deal as a 'huge win for Indonesia's labour-intensive industries', calling it a 'strategic achievement', as quoted in a statement issued earlier this month.
But questions started to emerge over how Indonesia plans to fulfill its pledge to purchase more US goods given its limited fiscal space and longstanding partnerships with several countries over certain commodities.
Concerns were also raised over Jakarta's nonaligned stance and growing ambition to deepen ties with alternative partners.
Indonesia's obligation to, for example, purchase 50 Boeing planes from the US may consolidate the latter's position as its key aircraft supplier and reduce future orders from alternative companies such as French aircraft manufacturer Airbus.
Provisions in the deal may make Indonesia more dependent on the US, making the agreement an obvious victory for Washington, according to international relations expert Ahmad Rizky M. Umar of Aberystwyth University.
'Indonesia has no choice but to buy these goods, which may cost more,' Ahmad said.
'This is also counterproductive to Jakarta's recent efforts to diversify its trading partners, including by finalizing the comprehensive economic partnership agreement with the EU [IEU-CEPA] earlier this month,' he went on to say, referring to the long-awaited deal with the EU to open wider market access. Read also: Ministry to rework local content rules in line with US trade deal
During its months-long negotiations with Washington, Indonesia, which has chosen to cooperate with the US, has at the same time intensified its efforts to strengthen its ties with alternative trading partners, seeking to buffer itself from the uncertainty of the US' increasingly unilateral trade moves.
President Prabowo has travelled to at least 14 countries across the Middle East, South-East Asia and Europe since Trump's tariff announcement in April, which observers say were efforts to intensify Jakarta's economic partnerships amid tariff uncertainties.
Yet, as Indonesia becomes increasingly reliant on the US for trade, its alternative partnerships could face challenges because of shifting constellations in economic ties.
CSIS economist Dandy compared the deal with Trump with the IEU-CEPA: 'It took the EU a decade to score a zero-tariff deal with Indonesia, while Trump took weeks.'
'We have also now relaxed local content requirements for US imports. Our other trade partners will also want the same perk, and it will be a challenge for Indonesia to keep everyone happy.' - The Jakarta Post/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia
The US Navy's USS Minnesota (SSN-783), a Virginia-class fast attack submarine, sails in waters off the coast of Western Australia on March 16, 2025. – AFP file photo WASHINGTON (Aug 2): US President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines Friday in an extraordinary escalation of what had been an online war of words with a Russian official over Ukraine and tariffs. Trump and Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's security council, have been sparring on social media for days. Trump's post on his Truth Social platform abruptly took that spat into the very real — and rarely publicized — sphere of nuclear forces. 'Based on the highly provocative statements,' Trump said he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' the 79-year-old Republican posted. Trump did not say in his post whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US military. But in an interview with Newsmax that aired Friday night, Trump said the submarines were 'closer to Russia.' 'We always want to be ready. And so I have sent to the region two nuclear submarines,' he said. 'I just want to make sure that his words are only words and nothing more than that.' Trump's remarks came hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow had started mass producing its hypersonic nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile, and could deploy them to Belarus, a close Russian ally neighbouring Ukraine, by year-end. The nuclear sabre-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump for the end of next week for Russia to take steps to ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions. Despite the pressure from Washington, Russia's onslaught against its pro-Western neighbor continues to unfold at full bore. An AFP analysis Friday showed that Russian forces had launched a record number of drones at Ukraine in July. Russian attacks have killed hundreds of Ukrainian civilians since June. A combined missile and drone attack on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv early Thursday killed 31 people, rescuers said. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half year invasion were 'unchanged'. Those demands include that Ukraine abandon territory and end ambitions to join NATO. Putin, speaking alongside Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, said Belarusian and Russian specialists 'have chosen a place for future positions' of the Oreshnik missiles. 'Work is now underway to prepare these positions. So, most likely, we will close this issue by the end of the year,' he added. – Insults, nuclear rhetoric – The United States and Russia control the vast majority of the world's nuclear weaponry, and Washington keeps nuclear-armed submarines on permanent patrol as part of its so-called nuclear triad of land, sea and air-launched weapons. Trump told Newsmax that Medvedev's 'nuclear' reference prompted him to reposition US nuclear submarines. 'When you mention the word 'nuclear'… my eyes light up. And I say, we better be careful, because it's the ultimate threat,' Trump said in the interview. Medvedev had criticised Trump on his Telegram account Thursday and alluded to the 'fabled 'Dead Hand'' — a reference to a highly secret automated system put in place during the Cold War to control the country's nuclear weapons. This came after Trump had lashed out at what he called the 'dead economies' of Russia and India. Medvedev had also harshly criticized Trump's threat of new sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine. Accusing Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game,' he posted Monday on X that Trump 'should remember' that Russia is a formidable force. Trump responded by calling Medvedev 'the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President.' Medvedev should 'watch his words,' Trump posted at midnight in Washington on Wednesday. 'He's entering very dangerous territory!' Medvedev is a vocal proponent of Russia's war — and generally antagonistic to relations with the West. He served as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. The one-time reformer has rebranded over the years as an avid online troller, touting often extreme versions of official Kremlin nationalist messaging. But his influence within the Russian political system remains limited. In Kyiv on Friday, residents held a day of mourning for the 31 people, including five children, killed the day before, most of whom were in a nine-storey apartment block torn open by a missile. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said only Putin could end the war and renewed his call for a meeting between the two leaders. 'The United States has proposed this. Ukraine has supported it. What is needed is Russia's readiness,' he wrote on X. – AFP donald trump nuclear submarine Russia Vladimir Putin
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
India aghast at Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs
NEW DELHI: Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25% tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the "most strenuous and obnoxious,' in a Truth Social post July 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them "dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25% tariffs kicked in as of Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath - and not the subject to the very highest rates - but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. "Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai based financial services firm. The levies "feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message.' Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal - or the lack of it - was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. As the US released rates across the world on Aug. 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. "The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V. Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the south Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. "We were expecting something in the 15 to 20% range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbours on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being "very disturbed.' A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40% of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. "The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for "months and months,' he said he'll have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated US$129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25%, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20% tariff, Vietnam got a 20% levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19% duties. "We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewelry Export Promotion Council. "We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi "my friend' in a Feb 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries "special.' India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported citing people familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. "It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Jewelry businesses "are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favourable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. "The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing "seems like a knee-jerk reaction,' according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. "This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said. - Bloomberg
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
A defining week for Anwar Ibrahim's leadership
KUALA LUMPUR: It has certainly been a defining week for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as he notched double wins at the diplomatic and economic fronts, which even his opponents would find difficult to fault. He has certainly been in top form as he brokered a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, orchestrating a diplomatic breakthrough, and then went on to make a call to United States President Donald Trump at 6.50 am. Anwar received plenty of messages from world leaders congratulating him on the handling of the potentially dangerous conflict between two neighbouring countries. It was a huge test for him as the Chair of Asean, but he pulled off magnificently as he brought the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia to Kuala Lumpur for a dialogue. He also made sure that officials from the US and China, the two important players in the region, were present to observe the talks. It is also evident that Malaysia's neutral posture of not taking sides has shown positive results, as that brought the two countries, locked in conflict, to the negotiating table. Trump himself reportedly intervened in the ceasefire negotiations by threatening both parties with heavy tariffs, but Malaysia's central role in mediating the agreement gave it diplomatic capital. At the same time, Malaysia scored a much-needed economic reprieve after the US agreed to scale back steep tariffs that had been threatening Malaysia's export-driven economy. At one point, Washington had threatened Malaysia with reciprocal tariffs of up to 25% in retaliation for what it claimed were unfair trade practices and currency. This week, the White House agreed to lower the rate to 19 per cent, offering breathing room to Malaysia's key sectors, especially electronics and palm oil. The sound of relief could be heard across the nation. Without doubt, Anwar was properly prepared by officials for his telephone conversation with Trump. But as many world leaders would know, an element of uncertainty can also be expected when dealing with Trump, as some US allies have ended up with high tariffs. Both cases, which Anwar handled well, demonstrated strategic diplomacy which was carried out with precision and the personal charm offensive, which Anwar is good at. By now, world leaders would have watched how Anwar has the ability to lift up the phone to call his counterparts. The world will certainly now see that there is value in Malaysia as a stabilising force and an economic partner. The week has not just been a personal success for Anwar and his government, but as one analyst put it, they are a reminder that middle powers like Malaysia can shape outcomes when they choose engagement over posturing. Thai veteran journalist Kavi Chongkittavorn wrote that Anwar has now positioned himself as a peacemaker. "Asean is doing a somersault. It just needs decisive leadership,' he said, pointing out that Anwar got the US and China to be present, which was another coup, as "both superpowers rarely collaborate on anything these days. Yet both sent envoys to support the Asean Chair's initiative.' These successes are not just wins for Anwar's government; they are reminders that middle powers like Malaysia can shape outcomes when they choose engagement over posturing. Writing in the Thai PBS World, he described that on the regional stage, "PMX just had his finest hours.'' On the economic front, Malaysia has ended up having the same 19% tariff as Indonesia and the Philippines. However, in Jakarta and Manila, there has been reported unhappiness that they have given in too much to Trump. Malaysia stood its ground that it would not allow the red lines to be crossed, particularly on its Bumiputera policy during negotiations. To the protestors who turned up by the thousands calling on Anwar to step down, they may not understand headlines like tariffs or ceasefires, but this week's developments demonstrated the importance of leadership. * Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai is a National Journalism Laureate and chairman of the Malaysian National News Agency (Bernama).
