Starbucks takes aim at remote work, says some employees may need to relocate to headquarters
In a letter to employees posted on Monday, Starbucks Chairman and CEO Brian Niccol said corporate employees would need to be in the office four days a week starting in early October instead of three days a week.
The Seattle-based company said that all corporate 'people leaders' must be based in either Seattle or Toronto within 12 months. That is a change from February, when it required vice presidents to relocate to Seattle or Toronto.
Starbucks said individual employees working under those leaders would not be asked to relocate. But the company said all hiring for future roles and lateral moves will require employees to be based in Seattle or Toronto.
'We are reestablishing our in-office culture because we do our best work when we're together. We share ideas more effectively, creatively solve hard problems, and move much faster,' Niccol wrote in the letter.
Niccol said affected workers who choose not to relocate will be eligible for a one-time voluntary exit program with a cash payment.
While many workers grew to enjoy working from home during the pandemic, the call for workers to return to offices full-time has been growing over the past year. Major employers such as Amazon, AT&T and the federal government have required employees to work in company sites five days per week. Competition for fully-remote jobs is fierce.
Starbucks spokeswoman Lori Torgerson said she didn't have a count of employees who are currently working as 'people leaders' or are working remotely. Starbucks has 16,000 corporate support employees worldwide, but that includes coffee roasters and warehouse staff.
Niccol was not required to relocate to Seattle when he was hired to lead Starbucks last August. Instead, the company said it would help him set up an office near his home in Newport Beach, California, and would give him the use of a corporate jet to commute to Seattle.
Since then, Niccol has bought a home in Seattle and is frequently seen at the company's headquarters, Torgerson said.
___
AP Business Writer Cathy Bussewitz contributed from New York.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
How Starbucks Is Engineering a Turnaround With Warm Vibes and Cold Foams
By Brian Niccol is standing in the corner of a newly renovated Starbucks in Seattle on an afternoon in mid-April. Baristas are making iced cherry chai lattes and mocha Frappuccinos with whipped cream, and warming egg bites and croissants. Customers sit in plush mustard-colored chairs and on cushioned benches in an olive tone, surrounded by wood-paneled walls. 'I like it,' says Niccol, who took over as chief executive officer in September. 'I like the furniture. I like the lighting. I like the music.' Mostly he likes the vibe. People camping out, doing homework, chatting with friends. There's a guy preparing a tax return. 'Every seat is full,' Niccol says. 'That's what we want. What we should be able to do is have spaces for people that, if you want to socialize, you can socialize. If you want a moment for yourself, you have a moment for yourself.' He asks me what I think is the best seat in the house, and I tell him I'd tried a few as I alternated between grabbing a bite and working on my laptop. 'I want a great seat for whatever occasion you're having. If you want to eat, that's probably the best seat,' he says, pointing to the cushioned bench.
Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Rishi Sunak: A 21st-Century Democratic Alliance
The next decade will be one of the most dangerous yet most transformational periods the world has ever seen. Democratic market states must seize this moment and shape it. If they don't, it will be the axis of authoritarian states—China, Russia, Iran and North Korea—that takes advantage of this opportunity. The international order that has existed since the end of the Cold War is gone and won't return. Electorates have rejected it, and its limits have become all too apparent. Technology is transforming the world. Old-fashioned great-power competition is returning. In China the U.S. faces a credible economic, technological and military rival for the first time in 40 years. Economic, security and technology cooperation must go hand in hand in this environment. Neither standard free-trade agreements nor 19th-century-style military alliances are sufficient to the moment. We need to create a partnership that spans all of these areas, and I am delighted to be working with my colleagues at the Hoover Institution on this issue. The U.S. must realize that no country on its own can face down the axis of authoritarian states. But together, democratic market economies can outcompete any rival coalition and deliver peace and prosperity for their people. We can't expect to benefit from our friends' protection if we don't contribute ourselves. Europeans must be willing to make greater sacrifices for our own security. So the keystone of this new partnership must be for everyone to increase defense spending.
Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Sovereign-Wealth Fund to Keep America's Technological Edge
If the U.S. wants to win the global race for technological supremacy, the country's best tool is a sovereign-wealth fund. Washington's haphazard approach to fueling national competitiveness and strategic industries isn't cutting it in today's environment. But intelligently deploying President Trump's proposed sovereign-wealth fund could secure American leadership in such critical technologies as quantum computing, artificial intelligence and advanced microchips. China is already shaping its technological future through strategic investment. The U.S. can't afford to cede leadership in technologies that will define the coming century. Other countries have used sovereign-wealth funds to great national advantage. Norway's Government Pension Fund Global is the premier example. It sets the standard for performance and transparency, delivering consistent returns while adhering to strict ethical guidelines. The Government of Singapore Investment Corp. generates outsize influence for the small nation. Oil-rich states leverage their wealth strategically with funds such as Abu Dhabi's Mubadala investment fund, which aims to position the United Arab Emirates as a global AI hub. Critics rightly point out that an American sovereign-wealth fund must be free of political interference and focused on commercial national research and defense priorities. But other nations' examples prove this is possible. There are also concerns about forming a fund when the U.S. is running budget deficits. The benefits far outweigh the risk. America needs this fund now more than ever. Both geopolitics and innovation shape the economy. It isn't enough to hope we maintain tech leadership through our financial dominance, banking leadership, private venture capital and intermittent government interventions. American firms have to grapple with difficult market distortions thanks to Chinese state investment, which places U.S. tech companies at a disadvantage. Beijing has formed various state-backed venture funds to invest in AI, quantum research and semiconductor manufacturing. These investments foster domestic innovation and advance strategic sectors. China's National Venture Capital Guidance Fund channels tens of billions of dollars of central, provincial and private capital into key technologies, aligning investments explicitly with industrial strategy.
