Addressing IAF's fighter aircraft conundrum
The Indian Air Force (IAF) plays a critical role in securing India amidst a world in flux. For this massive task, India must possess indigenously produced fighter aircraft engines to power its fighter aircraft variants over the next 50 years without falling into undue dependency on foreign suppliers. As the timely delivery of fighter aircraft to the IAF is linked to the security of supply chains, this brief underlines the need for both the development of indigenous capabilities and technological collaboration to proceed simultaneously. Equally important is the creation of indigenous testing and certification facilities, as well as the transfer of technology. FILE PHOTO: Indian Air Force's Rafale fighter jets fly past during the "Aero India 2021" air show at Yelahanka air base in Bengaluru, India, February 3, 2021. REUTERS/Samuel Rajkumar/File Photo(REUTERS)
India's neighbourhood is fraught with military challenges and the strategic collaboration between China and Pakistan is deepening. Additionally, China is producing large numbers of the fifth-generation J-20 stealth fighter aircraft, as reports are emerging of Pakistan acquiring fifth-generation fighter aircraft from China. These developments have lent increased urgency to meeting the needs of the IAF, especially since several of its existing frontline fighter aircraft will be due for replacement soon.
At the Aero India 2025 show in Bengaluru in February this year, Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh lamented the delays in the delivery of the Tejas Mk-1 Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) to the IAF by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). The issues that have had an adverse impact on the IAF's operational needs should be viewed against the backdrop of evolving threats and challenges.
This paper can be accessed here.
This paper is authored by Sujan R. Chinoy – ORF, New Delhi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
Rupee slips, volatility expectations unruffled by looming tariff deadline
MUMBAI, July 2 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee declined on Wednesday as the dollar nudged higher ahead of closely watched U.S. economic data, with investors focused on prospects for trade deals ahead of a July 9 deadline. The rupee closed at 85.7025 against the U.S. dollar, down 0.2% on the day. Asian currencies declined as well, led by the Malaysian ringgit, which fell 0.7%. The dollar index was up nearly 0.3% and hovering just shy of the 97 handle. Stronger-than-expected U.S. economic data released on Tuesday offered mild support to the greenback with investors now awaiting a key non-farm payrolls report on Thursday and developments on bilateral trade negotiations. Despite the looming trade deadline, the rupee's very near-tenor implied volatility, a gauge of future expectations, was hovering a tad below its three-month average, indicating that traders are not yet pricing in the possibility of sharp swings in the near-term. U.S. President Donald Trump has said he was not considering extending the deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals but expects an agreement will be reached with India. While Trump has ruled out an extension of the deadline, "markets are wary of taking this at face value given recent reversals," ING said in a note. "The prevailing view may be that global tariff threats peak before another last-minute reprieve," ING said. Analysts polled by Reuters expect the rupee to be largely rangebound over the next year, trailing Asian peers amidst sustained weakness in the dollar. In three months, the rupee is forecast to decline 0.1% from current levels to 85.75 per dollar. It is then expected to trade at 85.50 in six months and weaken marginally to 86.13 in a year, according to the median forecast of 41 FX strategists. (Reporting by Jaspreet Kalra; Editing by Ronojoy Mazumdar)
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US revises travel warning for Israel as Iran issues ‘fatwa' against Trump, Netanyahu; Full details here
The US Department has revised its travel advisory for Israel 'to reflect the current security situation' in the country amid 'terrorism and civil unrest.' The update comes as Iran, which was in conflict with Israel, on Sunday issued a 'fatwa' against US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday. US has updated travel advisory for Israel ahead of Trump and Netanyahu meeting in the White House.(Reuters) The US has added Israel and the West Bank under a Level 3 Reconsider Travel category on Tuesday. Earlier, Israel was listed as a Level 4 Do Not Travel destination because of 'armed conflict, terrorism and civil unrest,' according to June 16 update. 'Terrorist groups, lone-actor terrorists and other violent extremists continue plotting possible attacks in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza,' the new warning states. 'Terrorists and violent extremists may attack with little or no warning, targeting tourist locations, transportation hubs, markets/shopping malls, and local government facilities.' It further states that violence can happen in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza at any time due to the unstable and complex security environment. Flights into and out of Israel may be canceled or minimized by airlines due to heightened regional tensions. What we know about fatwa issued against Trump and Netanyahu According to the New York Sun, Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi's fatwa, a religious decree similar to the one declared against award-winning author Salman Rushdie, encourages Muslims to overthrow Israeli and American officials for endangering the leadership of the Islamic Republic. The decree states anyone or any organization that jeopardizes the unity and authority of the Ummah, the worldwide Islamic community, should be labeled a "warlord" or "mohareb"—one who fights a war against God. Iranian law allows people who are considered mohareb to be executed, crucified, have limbs amputated, or exiled. Also Read: Netherlands Queen Maxima breaks silence on claims of mocking Trump in viral video; 'I said...' Trump says Israel accepts US-proposed 60-day ceasefire proposal Meanwhile, Trump appealed to Hamas to accept what he described as a "final proposal" for a 60-day ceasefire with Israel in Gaza, which will be presented by negotiating officials from Egypt and Qatar. Trump claimed on social media that a "long and productive" meeting between his delegates and Israeli officials over Gaza had taken place. According to Trump, Israel has consented to the terms of a 60-day truce and 'during which time we will work with all parties to end the War.' 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' the US President stated. Earlier in the day, Trump expressed optimism to reporters that Israel and Hamas terrorists in Gaza will be able to reach a ceasefire-for-hostages arrangement next week. On Monday, he will meet with Netanyahu at the White House.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
US dollar just had its worst start since 1973. What triggered this collapse?
The US dollar has suffered its sharpest six-month decline since 1973, falling 10.8 per cent amid Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, surging national debt and waning investor confidence. As central banks reduce their dollar exposure and gold prices soar, concerns grow about America's fiscal path, Federal Reserve pressure, and the dollar's role as a global safe-haven currency read more US Dollar banknotes are seen in this illustration taken July 17, 2022. Representational Image/Reuters From January to June, the United States dollar index — which tracks the currency against a group of six major global counterparts including the euro, yen, and pound — plummeted by 10.8 per cent. This marks its worst first-half performance since 1973, when the Bretton Woods system, which had pegged the dollar to gold, came to an end. This year's decline has taken the dollar to its weakest level against key international currencies in over three years, and analysts across financial institutions and governments are recalibrating their exposure to US assets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The currency's depreciation has created ripple effects for investors, governments, and consumers globally, complicating everything from capital flows to trade balances. While the dollar retains its role as the world's principal reserve currency, concerns have mounted about the scale and speed of its weakening. These have been driven by a number of factors — most notably US President Donald Trump's aggressive economic strategy, a sharp increase in US debt, changing Federal Reserve expectations, and shifting investor sentiment. Behind the collapse of the US dollar The dollar's sharp fall came after a volatile series of trade policy announcements early in the year. On April 2, the Trump administration declared sweeping tariffs on goods from most countries, a move the president labelled 'Liberation Day.' The announcement far exceeded previous projections by economists and market analysts, triggering a sell-off in both equities and government bonds. $5 trillion was erased from the value of the benchmark S&P 500 index of shares in the three days after Trump's 'Liberation Day'. The immediate aftermath saw a broad market retreat. Investors, shocked by the scope of the trade measures, responded with a sharp pullback from riskier US assets. Treasury prices dropped as bondholders exited en masse, which in turn pushed up yields and raised the government's borrowing costs. Despite a 90-day suspension of most tariffs (excluding China) declared on April 9, investor confidence remained shaken. Initially, the dollar had risen following Trump's re-election, buoyed by investor hopes for pro-business policies. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' A central cause of concern for financial markets has been the administration's fiscal trajectory. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' a major legislative package being advanced by Republican leaders, is designed to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, reduce healthcare and social welfare spending, and significantly increase government borrowing. Despite some delays, party leaders have set a target of passing the bill before July 4, though a final vote may not happen until August. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the legislation would add $3.3 trillion to federal debt by 2034. This would increase the national debt burden from 124 per cent to an even higher percentage of GDP, placing additional strain on the Treasury market. Meanwhile, annual budget deficits are expected to widen, reaching 6.9 per cent of GDP — up from 6.4 per cent in 2024. The legislation is expected to add $3.2 trillion to the US debt pile in the next decade. As foreign and institutional investors become more hesitant about holding dollar-denominated assets, questions are being raised about the long-term viability of US fiscal management. Even as Trump has claimed success in reducing costs through the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), the anticipated savings have not materialized at a scale sufficient to offset increased expenditures. Tariff revenue, though rising, has ultimately translated into higher consumer prices rather than budgetary relief. Moody's downgraded the United States' credit rating in May, citing governance risks and worsening debt dynamics, further undercutting market perceptions of US fiscal stability. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Fed rate cut expectations Compounding the economic uncertainty are shifting expectations around US monetary policy. Amid rising signs of economic deceleration, Trump has publicly urged the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. Futures markets now anticipate two to five rate cuts by the end of 2025. While equity markets have rallied on the prospect of looser monetary policy — with the S&P 500 reaching a new record high — the weaker dollar has diluted returns for global investors. For example, when measured in euros, the 24 per cent rise in the S&P 500 this year is effectively reduced to around 15 per cent. In contrast, the Stoxx 600 — an index tracking European stocks — has risen roughly 15 per cent in its native currency, but the return climbs to 23 per cent once converted into dollars. Safe-haven status of US dollar in jeopardy International investors and central banks have responded by re-evaluating their US dollar exposure. From sovereign wealth funds to pension boards, asset managers are actively shifting capital toward European markets and alternative stores of value. This movement reflects both concern over the dollar's trajectory and a broader reassessment of the United States' central role in the global financial system. Notably, gold has become an increasingly attractive asset class, hitting new highs this year due to heightened central bank purchases and fear of dollar devaluation. In contrast to past periods of geopolitical stress — when the dollar and Treasuries were seen as ultimate safe havens — investors this year have increasingly diversified away from US-centric assets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development also revised its outlook for the US economy in June, cutting its growth forecast from 2.2 per cent to 1.6 per cent. What this means for Americans For American consumers, international travel becomes more expensive, while inflation pressures persist due to higher import costs. For exporters, however, the weaker currency makes US goods more competitive abroad — although trade effects remain uncertain amid volatile tariff rules. Moreover, as the dollar weakens, fewer US dollars are exchanged in global trade, reducing the reinvestment of those dollars into US assets, including Treasuries. Though the dollar's decline is significant, some analysts note that it had started the year from historically high levels, which partially cushions its fall. Still, the convergence of policy instability, high debt levels, and softening macroeconomic indicators signals that the dollar may not regain its earlier strength without substantial structural adjustments. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
