Cosatu: The importance of BBBEE in addressing inequality in SA
Image: Unsplash
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) remains an important tool to address our deeply ingrained levels of inequality.
It would be strange for any democratic government of a nation emerging from three hundred and fifty years of the most brutal and institutionalised forms of discrimination that left over 90% of society consigned to the most poorly paid form of manual labour, not to embrace state supported economic empowerment programme.
It would have been tantamount to endorsing South Africa's status as the world's most unequal society, something clearly the fringe right wing extremists wish for.
BBBEE is merely one tool, among many, to address the legacies of the past and the inequalities of today. This is a key prescript of the Constitution and an obligation of the state to society.
BBBEE in short seeks to give a fair opportunity to millions historically denied such due to their race, gender or disability. People, in particular the race baiting fringe right wing, ignore its inclusivity. BBBEE includes Africans, Coloureds, Indians, plus women, workers and persons with disabilities of all races. In short it covers about 97% of society!
BBBEE is not just the 30% shareholding option but also equity equivalents where investors can offer similar investments supporting local companies, creating jobs and investing in communities. All equally important.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
It includes Employee Shareholder or Worker Ownership Programmes (ESOPs).
This has been an initiative COSATU and many unions have championed. In the recent past few years, it has seen over 550 000 workers become shareholders in their companies.
This has given them a stake in the companies' well-being and growth, but also crucially put money in their pockets.
Some critics lament that BBBEE has failed and must be scrapped. Yet they are silent on its role in creating a growing Black middle class.
They deride efforts to create Black industrialists yet miss the point of their role in opening factories and companies, and the jobs these create in local communities.
Is BBBEE perfect? Of course not. Does it need to be adjusted, lessons learned, mistakes corrected? Without a doubt.
Cosatu does have many concerns with the implementation of BBBEE, notwithstanding appreciating its successes in many instances.
BBBEE does need to be adjusted to learn from challenges experienced, to avoid repeating them and to ensure its progressive objectives reach those most in need of empowerment, the millions of working class residents living in townships, informal areas, rural towns and villages across the nation.
A discussion needs to be had about the once empowered, always empowered notion. Do we want BBBEE to continue to benefit those already empowered?
Or can it be adjusted to prioritise those still in need of empowerment? How can this be practically done? An elegant solution is needed lest BBBEE be dismissed as benefiting only the wealthy.
How can SMMEs, especially emerging ones, and particularly those in townships and rural areas, be elevated?
We should not continue to normalise township and rural economies to be composed of taxis, petrol stations, hawkers and taverns alone. An inclusive targeted approach to these communities where the overwhelming majority of South Africans live, is needed.
Can more be done to eliminate fronting where White South Africans merely add the name of a Black employee or partner to their ownership papers or where a Black owned company simply imports goods from Asia?
BBBEE is not about names on a letter head.
It is meant to reach those in need of empowerment. It cannot be about enriching importers when we need to elevate local procurement and give support to local businesses, Black and White, and not sacrifice them in pursuit of cheap imports.
Public procurement with an annual budget of over R1 trillion, from departments to municipalities, entities and State-Owned Enterprises, has a key role to play in supporting BBBEE and more critically making sure it reaches those who need it, not the nouveau riche.
The recently assented to Public Procurement Act elevating this important objective across the state will be an important boost in this regard. Public representatives across the three spheres of government need to hold the executives accountable in this regard.
The private sector too, in particular large mining, manufacturing, financial and other well-resourced sectors with large procurement budgets, need to provide more solidarity and support to local companies, in particular BBBEE compliant ones. This is key not only to transformation and empowerment, but also to boosting localisation and stimulating badly needed economic growth and tackling unemployment.
Whilst Cosatu supports the thrust of BBBEE, the heart of our support and in fact our passion, lays in ramping up ESOPS or Worker Ownership Programmes.
We want workers to live a better life, to boost their earnings, to have more money to pay their debts, to feed their families and to buy the goods local companies produce and thus spur economic growth and sustain and create more jobs.
We want workers to become co-owners of their companies as this gives them a stake in their success and a direct motive to boost productivity and again spur economic growth and sustain and create jobs.
We want to end the still painfully prevalent apartheid scars that are the feature of almost every township, village and community.
We want workers, African, Coloured, Indian, White, women and with disabilities, to be co-owners in this economy, including on the JSE.
We want this better life now, not in some indeterminate future promised on a Jpeg by irrelevant populists. Workers are the backbone of the economy.
They have made South Africa the industrial hub of the economy. Many have grown wealthy off of their sweat and blood, it is time that this wealth is shared with the working class. ESOPs are a critical path to doing that.
BBBEE is not perfect, but its objectives remain as valid today as they were in 1994. Adjustments are needed, in particular to make sure the SMMEs in our townships, local manufacturers, and most importantly workers are elevated and prioritised at all times.
Solly Phetoe is the General Secretary of Cosatu.
Solly Phetoe is general secretary of Cosatu.
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Millions spent, jobs lost as Tourism Equity Fund scandal exposed
The meeting, led by Minister Patricia de Lille, exposed a web of implementation challenges, transparency failures, and accountability concerns that have plagued the fund since its inception. Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Media IN a tense and revealing session recently, the Select Committee on Economic Development and Trade convened to hear testimony from the Department of Tourism regarding the beleaguered Tourism Equity Fund (TEF). The meeting, led by Minister Patricia de Lille, exposed a web of implementation challenges, transparency failures, and accountability concerns that have plagued the fund since its inception. The TEF, launched in 2021 with the aim of driving transformation and inclusive growth in South Africa's tourism sector, has been mired in legal battles, administrative delays, and allegations of mismanagement. A court challenge brought by AfriForum and Solidarity initially halted the fund, which was only revived after an out-of-court settlement in mid-2023. Despite this, the fund's rollout has continued to face serious hurdles — most notably, the refusal of the Small Enterprise Finance Agency (Sefa), now known as Sedfa, to release critical beneficiary information to the Department of Tourism. De Lille opened the meeting by acknowledging the complexity of the situation: 'We appreciate the opportunity to present on the TEF, and we request the Committee's support in helping us move the process forward.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She explained how her predecessor had initially set the fund's black economic empowerment threshold at 51%, exceeding the legislated 30% requirement under the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) codes. This decision was challenged in court by AfriForum and Solidarity, and the government lost the case on jurisdictional grounds. Following her appointment in 2023, de Lille engaged directly with the litigants and brokered a settlement to unblock the R2.1 billion fund. She described the decision-making process in candid terms: 'I made a deliberate decision to set aside political pride to serve the interests of the sector and the country… I proposed a settlement in the spirit of recovery and collaboration, given the urgency of economic reconstruction following the pandemic.' The revised framework, approved by Cabinet in August 2023, allocates 80% of funding to existing SMMEs and 20% to new entrants, a policy shift that drew sharp criticism from several committee members. The Department outlined how Sefa, appointed as the implementing agent for the TEF, had failed to meet expectations: 'Due to ongoing challenges with Sefa's performance, the Department informed them in early 2025 of our decision to terminate the agreement,' De Lille said. Despite terminating the service-level agreement, the Department is still awaiting a full close-out report from Sefa. More troublingly, Sefa has refused to disclose details of beneficiaries, citing the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia). 'They refuse to disclose the names of applicants who benefited from the TEF,' the Minister said. 'We disagree with their position and have sought legal opinion confirming that the Department is entitled to receive this information.' Legal advice obtained by the Department supports this view, reinforcing that Parliament, as an oversight body, also has a right to access such data. The legal opinion, circulated during the meeting, recommended including confidentiality clauses in future agreements to ensure Popia compliance while maintaining transparency. 'Parliament must be able to exercise its oversight function,' said Mmaditonki Setwaba, the deputy director-general of Tourism Sector Support Services. Committee members raised urgent questions about the cost per job created through the TEF. The DA's Nicolaas Pienaar expressed alarm: 'Based on the figures presented, nearly R1 million has been spent per job created. In my view, R1m should result in at least four jobs.' His sentiment was echoed by the FF+'s Hendrik van den Berg, who pointed to staggering disparities: 'In the Northern Cape, two jobs were created at a cost of R4.4m each. In the North West, ten jobs came at a cost of over R8m per job.' Setwaba responded that while some projects were capital-intensive, particularly in the accommodation and travel sectors, the Department was aware of the need for better value-for-money outcomes. 'We are learning from the rollout and working on enhanced pre-investment support and streamlined compliance processes,' she said. The lack of detailed breakdowns on the nature of these jobs — whether part-time, seasonal, or permanent — further deepened scepticism among members. The PA's Bino Farmer questioned the regional distribution of funds and the effectiveness of outreach campaigns in rural areas: 'How many applications came from the Western Cape? How many were rejected and why? If the fund is meant to drive transformation, why allocate 80% to existing businesses when new entrants are the ones most in need?' He highlighted the case of Lamberts Bay, where tourism remains racially exclusive and ownership opportunities for black entrepreneurs are limited. 'Communities like mine want to know how people are informed about such funding opportunities. Tourism is spoken about in terms of job creation, but not ownership.' The ANC's Patrick Mabilo lamented the minimal investment in his province despite its rich natural and cultural assets: 'Only one project received funding in the Northern Cape, valued at R8.8 million. Given the scenic richness of the province, including Unesco sites, why hasn't there been more meaningful participation?' He called for clarity on outreach efforts and asked whether the Department could quantify results in rural townships. The chairperson, Sonja Boshoff, from the DA, acknowledged the severity of the situation: 'This is not just about administration, it affects the lives of ordinary South Africans. We cannot allow SEFA to hold the Department or Parliament to ransom.' The Committee resolved to summon Sefa before Parliament, even if it required convening outside normal hours. It also agreed to send a letter to the Minister of Small Business Development, Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams, requesting her urgent engagement with Sefa ahead of their scheduled meeting the following week. 'We expect feedback from her then so that we can determine how best to support the Department going forward,' said the chairperson. The ANC's Mpho Modise supported the idea of a joint session involving both Ministers and Sefa: 'All relevant stakeholders need to be in the same room so we can ask direct questions and get comprehensive answers.' The Minister welcomed the suggestion: 'I welcome the Committee's oversight and support any parliamentary investigation into the administration and outcomes of the Fund.' De Lille did not shy away from the legal and reputational risks involved: 'As the accounting authority, I am fully aware of the possibility of personal liability. But I remain committed to preserving my integrity and resolving this matter as quickly as possible.' Director-general Victor Vele confirmed that no fruitless or wasteful expenditure had yet been recorded, though he admitted that the full financial picture would only emerge once SEFA released its complete records. 'From the perspective of an accounting officer, there is currently no record of fruitless or wasteful expenditure associated with the Fund,' he said. Meanwhile, the Department has identified the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) as the new implementing agent, aligning with the TEF's objective of promoting transformation in the tourism sector. 'We are working on a formal handover process to a new implementing agency, which will be announced following legal and operational finalisation,' said Setwaba. The TEF was conceived as a vehicle for economic transformation and inclusion. Yet five years after its launch, it stands as a cautionary tale of poor governance, legal entanglements, and institutional dysfunction. With Sefa refusing to share basic information, the Department hamstrung by outdated contracts, and Parliament demanding accountability, the TEF has become emblematic of the broader crisis in public administration. Unless swift and decisive action is taken — including full disclosure of beneficiaries, independent auditing, and reform of implementation frameworks — the TEF may well go down as another failed attempt at redress in post-apartheid South Africa. For now, all eyes are on the upcoming joint meeting between the Departments of Tourism and Small Business Development, and on whether SEFA will finally answer the call for transparency. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.

IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Healing the wounds of the July 2021 unrest: a path to unity and reconciliation
In a bid to promote peace, cartoonist Nanda Soobben painted this peace mural in Chatsworth after the July unrest to promote social cohesion. On the 4th anniversary of the July 2021 unrest, RAVI PILLAY explores the ongoing challenges of nation building in South Africa, the need for unity, and the importance of the National Dialogue in healing our communities 'TOWARDS Nation Building' is the title of a comprehensive submission that some of us made to the Human Rights Commission at its national investigative hearing into the July 2021 unrest. As we approach the 4th anniversary of this most traumatic period in our democratic era, we have to confront the reality that we have not moved forward towards nation building. At best we have treaded water. Many will argue that we have regressed. I remain convinced that there is an overwhelming body of goodwill among the majority of our people who are ready to support any credible effort towards unity and nation building. Yet there remains this wound that has not healed and which without care, may fester. Some 350 people died. Their families need closure. The issues are complex and difficult. I am inspired by the potential of the National Dialogue. It is the first opportunity since the Freedom Charter in 1955 (it is the 70th anniversary this year) and the adoption of our Constitution in 1996, for a grass-roots, people driven conversation and a new, substantially national, consensus and direction. The July 2021 unrest could be one important part of the conversation, especially in our province of KwaZulu-Natal. Our submission to the HRC was comprehensive. It is useful to recall a few salient aspects: We remain deeply committed to the building of a united, non-racial society and entrenching the values espoused in our Constitution - 'heal the divisions of our past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights'. We cannot avoid the characterisation of the unrest as an "attempted insurrection" which included: incitement primarily through an intensive social media campaign; mobilisation by highlighting grievances relating to poverty and unemployment; incentivising by using money to instigate as documented; and organising through the use of "advance teams" who would break into identified targets creating access for others to loot, and then setting fire to property in a manner designed to cause maximum damage. One security expert suggested that the organized objective was to provoke an over-reaction from security forces leading to mass deaths which in turn lead to a mass uprising leading to a collapse of the state. The economic damage was devastating and calculated at R50 billion. Not many knew that we were 48 hours away from a full-blown food crisis. Fuel trucks were unable to refuel petrol stations. Delivery trucks were unable to reach retailers – the shelves were empty. It took an extraordinary effort to restore fuel supplies, secure the roads and replenish supplies in time. The submission also reflects on corruption and the culture of impunity that had developed leading to the type of complete lawlessness that was witnessed. The role of the police, the intelligence services and lack of coordination until the SANDF was deployed, and delayed at that. At least 350 people died. Initially all of these deaths were attributed to the Phoenix area until it was clarified that the Phoenix mortuary served a very large area beyond Phoenix. It was finally assessed that 36 deaths occurred in the Phoenix area. But the damage had been done. Phoenix became the focus area and it was alleged that the deaths were racially motivated. The narrative held. Rational analysis became impossible. Others asked: did the killings cause the unrest? Or, did the unrest cause the killings? We must refuse to be stereotyped whichever community we may hail from. The Human Rights Commission subsequently produced a report that made various credible findings and recommendations and does not use the highly provocative term 'massacre'. The Commission for Religious and Linguistic Rights produced a 'report' that consisted of some 21 slides. Despite repeated requests it was only some two weeks ago on June 25, 2025, that we were provided with a full report. Notwithstanding very grave reservations, patriotic South Africans must be committed to working with our chapter 9 institutions and all stakeholders to implement the many progressive recommendations that have emerged. However, progress has been slow. Prosecutions have been few and far between. The main instigators still escape accountability. This has to be challenged. It is very important to record that the submission to the HRC includes inter alia the following: '. . . we too are outraged and appalled by the brutality of the violence that marked several of the incidents. We condemn the perpetrators who carried out these vicious acts, without qualification …' Our humanity demands that we recognise those innocent people who were victims of the violence and that there is pain and suffering which endures until today. There are individuals and families who need closure. The Human Rights Commission and Commission for Religious and Linguistic Rights are jointly embarking on a process that seeks to bring this closure. It is a process that raises many difficult issues but the intention is in good faith and seeks to bring communities together and promote reconciliation. However not enough groundwork has been done. The commissions understand this and therefore resolved that on this anniversary they cannot go beyond launching the process. We await announcements in this regard. While experts in these social processes will be essential, it is clear that this initiative cannot succeed without the active participation of community organizations and leaders. Religious leaders in particular have a special role to play. Finally, as we reflect on this 4th anniversary, and in anticipation of the National Dialogue, we must draw a distinction between the very important soft issues of humanity or Ubuntu, religion, culture, language and sport on the one hand, and economic inequality on the other. We must resist those who seek to infuse a toxic overlap between race and inequality. An economic growth and development vision that is fair and just for all becomes fundamental to a sustainable future for all South Africans.


Eyewitness News
19 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa: Outcomes of National Dialogue can't supersede the Constitution
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa said the outcomes of the National Dialogue cannot supersede the country's Constitution. Ramaphosa is currently meeting with the eminent persons group at the Union Buildings in Pretoria. ALSO READ: Committee working on National Dialogue looks to bring projected R700m cost down The group is made up of high-profile South Africans tasked with championing the dialogue across the country. Ramaphosa said the dialogue, which is due to take place in August, will be an important event that will shape the future of the country. 'The National Dialogue does not and is not aimed at displacing the democratic processes mandated by our Constitution. Its outcomes cannot supersede the electoral mandates that the parties that contested for elections and were finally elected into our Parliament.'