New Mexico funds $20 million ‘STEM Institute' aimed at improving student scores
Story continues below
Crime: Two ABQ police officers placed on leave in critical pedestrian crash on Central
Real Estate: 'Nothing short of a personal resort' luxury property listed for $12M in Santa Fe
National: 'I'm sincerely sorry': Billy Joel cancels all concerts due to brain disorder diagnosis
The state is trying to close the gap in New Mexico, where students are underperforming in math and science, with the new institute that would be built in Albuquerque. 'We are finally once and for all directing our state dollars that we have available in the right direction,' said Senator Michael Padilla, (D-Albuquerque).
The state is already pouring $20 million into the idea, the most money any single capital outlay project got this last session. The money will go toward planning, design, and construction.
Managing the project, the New Mexico Higher Education Department said the 'institute' will help address gaps in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Over the 2023-24 school year, the state said only 23% of New Mexico students were proficient in math, and just 38% in science. The planned STEM institute would provide tutoring and more for students in fourth through eighth grade.
'I mean, if you looked a decade ago, just a decade ago, we were probably half that rate at that point. So, if you take a look at it from that standpoint and we're making these investments now, I'm looking to see this 23-25% bump all the way up to 40-50%,' said Sen. Padilla.
The Public Education Department is expected to run the institute, which has no specific location at this point. HED said whatever gets built will 'equip the next generation with the critical thinking, problem solving, and innovation skills' needed to succeed in an evolving workforce.
'Border Plex, Los Alamos, Sandia, a quantum economy, all of these things that are coming into the state now are going to make a huge difference, but they're not going to make a difference if we don't have a STEM workforce,' said Sen. Padilla.
KRQE News 13 tried to talk to the governor's office, the Department of Higher Education, and the state Public Education Department about the STEM Institute, but no one would do an interview at this point. They emphasized that the $20-million project, so far, is still in the planning phases.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
'Do it the right way.' Seeking illusive path for immigrants to legally come the U.S.
John Manley is sick of people telling immigrants to 'stand in line' and 'do it the right way.' An immigration attorney for almost three decades in Los Angeles, he said what most don't understand is that trying to legally come into the United States is nearly impossible for people from certain nations like Mexico. 'People are dying in line,' he said. In some cases, 'it's literally a 150 year wait.' Manley said one of his clients, a U.S. citizen originally from Mexico who petitioned his two brothers to become legal residents, waited more than 15 years and wound up burying them instead of giving them the good news. 'They're trying their best. They're waiting in line,' he said. 'But when you have a system that was essentially designed to fail from the beginning it's difficult to have faith in that system.' Immigration laws have not seen a wholesale reform in nearly 40 years, but as the Trump Administration cracks down on undocumented migrants, politicians are seeing a window of opportunity. Economists, immigration attorneys and scholars say that without another relief valve, it is not just the immigrants who will suffer but people in a wide swath of the economy. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) on Monday plans to introduce legislation that could potentially provide a path to citizenship to 11 million immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for at least seven years. With a Republican led House and Senate, the legislation, which died last year, is unlikely to pass, but Padilla said he wanted to re-introduce the bill because he sensed a 'mood shift' in Congress and across the country. He's not the only one. Earlier this month in the House, Reps. Maria Elvira Salazar, (R-Fla.), and Veronica Escobar, (D-Texas) dusted off their legislation, the Dignity Act, which would give qualified undocumented immigrants living here prior 2021 up to seven years of legal status with work authorization. For decades, both Republicans and Democrats have tried and failed to bring reforms to what is widely viewed as an outdated system, which in the last fiscal year approved 3% of the 34.7 million pending green card applications, according to David Bier, a researcher at the Cato Institute. 'Given the extreme overreach of the Trump administration, I believe now's the time,' Padilla said. 'You talk to colleagues on both sides of the aisle about farm workers, agricultural workers. They say that farm workers deserve better, but the political will hasn't been there for many, many years.' But the imagery of Trump's enforcement actions against non-criminals — videos of mothers wailing as they're separated from children and arrests of workers and vendors outside of Home Depots — have seeped into the national consciousness and drawn criticism across political lines. A Gallup poll released earlier this month showed record-high support for immigration. When asked if immigration is generally a good thing or bad thing for the country, 79% of U.S. adults called it a good thing. And a record-low 17% viewed it as a bad thing. Just a year earlier, Americans concerned about their own pocketbooks were increasingly anxious about the waves of immigrants at the Southern border and voted in President Trump, whose hardline policies on immigration was at the center of his campaign. In 2024, Gallup poll showed that 64% viewed it as a good thing and 32% as a baad thing. When asked about the Dignity Act earlier this month, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said the president had not read through the legislation but he 'has made it very clear, he will not support amnesty for illegal aliens in any way.' Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, America has looked the other way as immigrants have filled jobs picking in the fields, cooking and cleaning in the back of restaurants, taking care of children and building homes. But with the Trump Administration's stepped up enforcement, net migration will likely turn negative in 2025, and monthly job growth and the GDP could fall by the end of this year, according to a paper from the conservative American Enterprise Institute. One of the paper's authors, Brookings Institution economist Tara Watson, said this drop in migration hasn't happened since they have been keeping records in 1960. A typical year would bring in about 1.2 million people, about 600,000 of whom come legally on green cards from abroad and others who cross illegally or come seeking asylum or another status. The paper projects the U.S. could lose as much as 525,000 people and could reduce domestic product growth, or GDP by 0.3 to 0.4%. She called a projection in negative migration 'shocking.' 'All of the growth in our labor force comes from immigration,' she said. 'Our workforce that was born in the U.S. is actually now at the stage where it's shrinking.' If this trend continues to drag on, she said, it could make the United States less appealing to academics, scientists, tech workers and PhD students. 'We have built a whole infrastructure around global talent,' she said. 'If we lose that this could be a long run, really, really damaging effect on our economy. In the short run, I would say it's going to slow our growth.' Immigration-enforcement hardliners like Ira Melhman, with the Federation for American Immigration Reform, counters that an economy that is built on the cheap labor of immigrants degrades conditions for American workers. 'You can create self-fulfilling prophecies, that if you offer poor wages and poor working conditions, and Americans don't show up and apply for those jobs, and then you turn around and say, 'Well, you see, only immigrants will take them,'' he said. His group advocates for 'merit based migration' and says 'chain migration' or family-based migration needs to be eliminated except when it comes to immediate relatives. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, the U.S. made admitting immigrants with relatives here a priority. The system replaced racially tinged national-origins quotas, that dated back to the 1920, and favored European immigrants. Every year about 1 million people get a green card — a prelude to citizenship — through four basic ways: a family relationship, work, a lottery system or as a refugee or asylee. The most common way is through family ties, and many of those approved are already living in the U.S. The current system imposes caps on the number of green cards approved for family - excluding immediate relatives — to 226,000 a year. And it also caps employment based green cards to 140,000 annually, although there are exceptions. Family relationships, like the one Manley's clients were using, are lifetime waits and many can take decades. If you applied for a Mexican sibling 24 years ago, your case would just be coming up. But those wait times are now longer, as the docket has grown. For India, cases 19 years old are now being approved, and for nearly all other countries it has been taking about 17 years. The declining birthrates and aging demographics means that the labor force can't keep up with demand. Bier has pointed out that the United States ranks in the bottom third of wealthy countries for immigrants per capita. The result is a pent up demand that lures workers to come illegally. 'There is a mismatch between the economy and the legal system that has created, for many years, a system where … the invitation to the workers is built in, but there's no lawful status offered,' said Hiroshi Motomura, co-director of UCLA 's Center for Immigration Law and Policy. 'And then what happens is their lives, the workers lives, become very precarious.' Carl Shusterman, an immigration lawyer who has been practicing since the 1970s says he sees it everyday near his home on the Westside and in his practice. 'Go into any restaurant and look at who's cooking the food, or you see who's building the buildings in the fancy, fancy neighborhoods, or who's mowing the lawns or taking care of the kids, or just pick almost any industries, and you'll see that either there's no way for these people to get legalized status.'
Axios
14 hours ago
- Axios
Padilla to propose bill easing immigrant residency rules
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) is introducing a bill that would amend decades-old requirements for immigrants seeking permanent status — another long-shot proposal amid the Trump administration's immigration raids. The big picture: Congress has not passed a major immigration overhaul since 1986, resulting in residency requirements that are now over 50 years old. Zoom in: Under a bill that Padilla will announce Friday, the Immigration Act of 1929 would be amended so some immigrants may qualify for lawful permanent resident status if they have lived in the U.S. continuously for at least seven years. The current registry cutoff date is January 1, 1972 — more than 50 years ago. The change would provide a pathway to a green card for DACA recipients and those who had temporary protective status (TPS) State of play: The proposal comes as the Trump administration is letting TPS deals expire and going after what could be hundreds of thousands more immigrants who were given humanitarian "parole" under former President Biden. Many of those immigrants are being detained at immigration court hearings and are being placed in removal proceedings. What they're saying:"Roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants live in the United States today, yet most have no way to earn permanent legal status," Padilla's office said in a statement. "The overwhelming majority of these undocumented immigrants have established roots in the U.S. They work in essential jobs and pay taxes." His office said Padilla will formally introduce his bill on Monday. Reality check: Republicans control both chambers in Congress and such immigration proposals are hardly getting heard. Reps. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.) and Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) have introduced the DIGNITY Act of 2025, a bill that is lingering in the House, which focuses on border security, mandatory E-Verify, asylum reform and legal immigration reform. Zoom out: Padilla's latest bill comes after he and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) introduced a bill that would ban federal immigration agents from wearing most face coverings but require them to wear visible ID during public enforcement operations. That long-shot proposal comes following images of masked, heavily armed immigration agents snatching people off the streets and taking them away in unmarked cars have shocked many Americans. What we're watching: The pressure to rein in some of ICE's enforcement tactics does have support among some conservatives worried over policing.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
The Greenway Institute – Making Transformative Engineering Education Affordable
Aerial View of the Greeway Institute Campus in Montpelier, Vermont The Greenway Institute - a new university in Vermont - is making engineering education more affordable. Several other new engineering and STEM-focused institutions have recently been founded across the US, but without the same focus on revolutionizing the business model of higher education. Olin College of Engineering, founded in 1997 with gifts of $460 million from the F. W. Olin Foundation, was one of the first of these new institutions and developed a new curriculum centered on project-based learning and user-centered design. The Roux Institute at Northeastern University launched in Portland, Maine in 2020, backed by tech entrepreneur David Roux and by the Harold Alfond Foundation, who each contributed $100-million gifts. The Roux Institute focuses on graduate education infused with AI, and in 2024 opened its new campus at the former B&M Beans Factory to be a base for co-op work-study projects that can help transform the local economy. The newest addition is a STEM-focused higher education institution planned for Bentonville, Arkansas, announced at the 2025 Heartland Summit by members of the Walton family, and will offer an education that integrates STEM and business for its planned 500 students in its first undergraduate class, with tuition fully covered in the initial years. Building a University Economically Another new entrant in this space is The Greenway Institute. In contrast with Olin, Roux, and Walton, Greenway was founded without a large endowment or major gift and provides a case study of how engineering education can more efficiently and economically serve students and society. The initial seed funding for investigating the concept of Greenway came from corporate sponsors and a $1.2 million grant from the National Science Foundation in collaboration with Elizabethtown College to develop and launch the Greenway Center for Equity and Sustainability (GCES) in Engineering in Vermont. The NSF grant enabled Elizabethtown and Greenway to pilot new educational approaches within an ABET-accredited engineering program and have set the stage for the opening of a standalone engineering college in Vermont. Greenway Founders and their Vision Greenway's founders include Troy McBride, Rebecca Holcombe and Mark Somerville. Troy McBride, a Greentech entrepreneur and former engineering professor at Elizabethtown College, began thinking about Greenway College over a decade ago. Rebecca Holcombe, a former Secretary of Education of Vermont, brought extensive experience in educational policy and a commitment to better serve historically marginalized students. In 2024, Mark Somerville, former Provost of Olin College of Engineering, was appointed as the founding president and co-founder. As a former founding faculty member, dean of faculty, and provost at Olin College, he brings 23 years of experience in transforming undergraduate engineering education. Somerville also brings a deep knowledge of engineering with a bachelor's degree from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from MIT, and from studying physics at Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar. The Greenway Model Greenway's approach addresses three key problems in engineering education: affordability, engagement, and connection to real-world engineering work. Two years of Greenway education are centered on hands-on engineering projects that target learning objectives across multiple courses simultaneously, acquiring math, science, and engineering skills while discovering real-world applications. Mark Somerville, in an interview, pointed out that 'learning engineering by practicing engineering is both much more effective and a whole lot more fun.' Greenway's model also includes two years of 'work-integrated learning' in which students work in engineering jobs, while simultaneously receiving high-touch mentoring and support from Greenway faculty. Somerville observed that 'instead of just sitting on a campus, students are actually out working and doing real things that matter to real people – and if you couple that with intentional reflection, you get incredibly powerful learning.' This structure also makes the Greenway education 'radically affordable,' both because it drives down cost and simultaneously enables student earnings. At the same time, it ensures alignment between Greenway's curriculum and current work in industry. Building Maturity and Professionalism in Students Greenway's approach is intended to help students develop interpersonal and workplace skills usually only found after graduating from college. Somerville notes that 'while there's enormous growth that happens in the first two years of residential education, we do our students a disservice when we cloister them for four years.' Drawing on and expanding the idea of 'co-op' internships pioneered at the University of Waterloo, Northeastern University, and the new Iron Range Engineering program in Minnesota, Greenway's model has students living in the world and working for two years during their education, while simultaneously getting support from mentors from Greenway. This is more of an intentional transition to the 'real world', and it produces 'the kinds of outcomes that only come from an authentic work environment with coaching and mentoring,' according to Somerville. The common 'drink from a fire hose' form of engineering education is not only 'a sadistic metaphor,' says Somerville, but also 'assumes that the most important outcome of an engineering degree is to acquire a whole bunch of specific technical content knowledge. That doesn't make sense in a post-AI world.' Greenway's approach posits that 'content knowledge acquisition may not be nearly as important as learning to learn, habits of mind, and the processes and ways of approaching things that engineers employ.' A Vermont Prototype Greenway plans to admit its first class in the Fall of 2027, on the former Vermont College of Fine Arts campus in Montpelier, Vermont. According to Somerville, 'Vermont's a great place to prototype - there's the necessary infrastructure, a growing Greentech sector that's hungry for employees, and a real need to create more attractive educational options.' Somerville notes, though, this is just the start: he frames the Vermont campus as 'a first full prototype.' Greenway's intent is to scale to multiple locations across the US, once the model is proven. A More Sustainable Business Model for Higher Education The rising cost of higher education, the student debt crisis, and the increasing numbers of colleges closing were all important factors in developing the Greenway model. According to Somerville, 'The key move with Greenway is asking the question, how might you design the education to be synergistic with the business model?' Greenway's new business model 'really changes your value proposition and your cost structure.' 'Between making the education 50% out in the real world, and questioning the idea of the amenities arms race, the institution is simply a lot cheaper to run.' Somerville says that at the same time, the model helps students' bottom lines as well: since they are working for two full years while at college, 'instead of students waiting four years before any real earnings, they'll be making good money for half of their program – about a hundred thousand dollars on average,' according to Somerville. The result is 'something that both is unlike anything that is out there and that at the same time builds out of a set of ideas and components that are actually proven in the world,' says Somerville, who says Greenway asks the question, 'how can we maintain the humanity of education, but do so in a way that actually is affordable?' With the arrival of the Greenway Institute and other new engineering institutions, we will see how these questions are answered in the coming years.
