Musk's X sues to block New York social media transparency law
"Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California.
"X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said.
The New York law requires social media companies with over $100 million in annual revenue to submit semiannual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment.
Companies face fines of $15,000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office.
X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech.
'Stop Hiding Hate'
Reporters Without Borders said in a statement that asking X "account for their actions against misinformation is by no means an infringement of freedom of expression, but the bare minimum to clean up the digital space."
"Freedom of expression does not come without responsibilities," it added.
The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds.
X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy."
The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage.
Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee -- who introduced the law -- said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law."
"Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilize," they added.
"The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers as required by our statute illustrates exactly why we need the Stop Hiding Hate Act."
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
17 hours ago
- LeMonde
Elon Musk says he has created a new US political party
Elon Musk, an ex-ally of US President Donald Trump, said on Saturday, July 5, that he had launched a new political party in the United States to challenge what the tech billionaire described as the country's "one-party system." The world's richest person − and Trump's biggest political donor in the 2024 election − had a bitter falling out with the president after leading the Republican's effort to slash spending and cut federal jobs as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk has clashed with Trump over the president's massive domestic spending plan, saying it would explode the US debt, and vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it. Now he has created the so-called America Party, his own political framework, through which to try and achieve that. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," the Space X and Tesla boss posted on X, the social media platform that he owns. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Musk cited a poll − uploaded on Friday, US Independence Day − in which he asked whether respondents "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" that has dominated US politics for some two centuries. The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses. "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he posted on Saturday. Musk also shared a meme depicting a two-headed snake and the caption "End the Uniparty." 'Laser-focus' on vulnerable lawmakers It is not clear how much impact the new party would have on the 2026 mid-term elections, or on the presidential vote two years after that. The Trump-Musk feud reignited in dramatic fashion late last month as Trump pushed Republicans in Congress to ram through his massive domestic agenda in the form of the One Big Beautiful Bill. Musk expressed fierce opposition to the legislation, and ruthlessly attacked its Republican backers for supporting "debt slavery." He vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill, which experts say will pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. "They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk said earlier this week. After Musk heavily criticized the flagship spending bill − which eventually passed Congress and was signed into law − Trump threatened to deport the tech tycoon and strip federal funds from his businesses. "We'll have to take a look," the president told reporters when asked if he would consider deporting Musk, who was born in South Africa and has held US citizenship since 2002. On Friday after posting the poll, Musk laid out a possible political battle plan to pick off vulnerable House and Senate seats and become "the deciding vote" on key legislation. "One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts," Musk posted on X. All 435 US House seats are up for grabs every two years, while about one third of the Senate's 100 members, who serve six-year terms, are elected every two years. Some observers were quick to point out how third-party campaigns have historically split the vote − as businessman Ross Perot's independent presidential run in 1992 did when it helped doom George HW Bush's re-election bid resulting in Democrat Bill Clinton's victory.
Euronews
18 hours ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk announces his own political party called the America Party
Elon Musk announced he will create a new political party in the United States just weeks after a public fallout with US President Donald Trump. The tech mogul announced on his social media platform X that he had set up a party called the America Party, which is formed to 'give you back your freedom,' Musk wrote on Saturday. Musk said that the party would challenge the two-party Republican and Democratic system. It is unclear if America Party has been formally registered with election authorities, but he said it would launch 'next year'. The move comes after he asked his followers on July 4 if he should create a political party. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Must wrote on X. After initially supporting Trump in his re-election bid, both publicly on X and financially, Musk had a high-profile role in the US government's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But in May, Musk announced he was leaving the government department, as it was the end of his 'scheduled time' as a special government employee. Trump then praised him as "one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced". However, on May 22, the relationship took a turn after the US House of Representatives passed a significant piece of legislation, a tax-cut and spending bill, which was signed into law by Trump on Friday. The document, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, aims to fast-track policy around spending and has hundreds of proposed changes, such as tax cuts to changes in social benefits, such as health care. Musk has called it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination'. Musk argued the bill's spending would increase the "already gigantic budget deficit" and "burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". Earlier this week, Trump threatened to cut off the billion-dollar federal subsidies that flow to Musk's companies, and even hinted at considering to deport him.
France 24
4 days ago
- France 24
Can Musk's proposed ‘America Party' become a Republican party pooper?
The first salvo in the second round of the Elon Musk - Donald Trump breakup saga was fired before the US president's massive spending bill headed to the Senate this week. The world's richest man opposes the tax-cut and spending bill advanced by the world's most powerful man – and the two are again at each other's throats. Musk is so upset about the act, dubbed 'The One Big Beautiful Bill', that he has threatened to form a new political party to undermine the Republicans. Ahead of Tuesday's Senate vote, Musk vowed to create his rival party, titled the "America Party", if the Republicans approved the bill. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uni-party so that the people actually have a VOICE,' Musk said on X on Monday evening. 'Vox populi, vox Dei'? Musk's alternate party threat is not new. The billionaire businessman floated the idea in early June during the first round of the Musk-Trump bromance-to-breakup proceedings, which erupted on social media. Shortly after formally stepping down from his role in the Trump administration as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk launched a 'poll' on X to see if his social media followers were in favour of creating a new party. Musk's hundreds of millions of X followers were informed that the new party would be in the 'middle' of the political spectrum, between the Democrats and the Republicans. On Tuesday, Musk brought up his poll again on X, posting the 80% favouring a new party result with the phrase, 'Vox Populi, Vox Dei'. Since the Latin phrase translates as "the voice of the people [is] the voice of God", the post suggested that Musk was now obliged to follow the majority opinion. Except the 'vox populi' on X is not necessarily representative of the American people. 'I don't think it's particularly serious,' said Richard Johnson, senior lecturer in US politics and policy at Queen Mary University of London. Experts note that even Musk's considerable fortune would not be enough to create a new movement. 'It is possible to create a party, and money can help, but it's a fairly closed system,' confirmed Jérôme Viala-Gaudefroy, a US politics expert and author of the book ' Les mots de Trump ' (The Words of Trump). In practical terms, it's 'very, very difficult to create a new party in the US system. There are all kinds of barriers, state by state, which require huge numbers of signatures to get to be put on the ballot', said Johnson. 'This isn't just a case of money. You actually need thousands and thousands of people in every state to give your party ballot access. So this kind of the undertaking would be enormous, and it would require a huge investment in time.' Viala-Gaudefroy is sceptical about Musk's ability to generate enough popular enthusiasm to garner the requisite number of signatures. Musk is 'even lower in the polls than Donald Trump, he has angered the Democratic electorate and his positions are not very popular among independent voters either', he noted. A 'wealthy tech bro' sours on 'woke ideology' The political platform of a potential America Party would indeed struggle to appeal to a broad electorate. Musk's brand of politics, which Johnson describes as 'basically Silicon Valley, but a little bit more socially conservative', is distasteful for many voters across the Republican-Democrat divide. 'His kind of anti-woke positions is offensive to Democrats,' noted Johnson. But on the other hand, Musk also supports the kind of high-skilled immigrant labour that has powered the Silicon Valley startup industry. 'He basically has the positions of a wealthy tech bro who has soured a bit on what he views as woke ideology, but otherwise carries a lot of the policy positions of wealthy tech men in California,' explained Johnson. In other words, Musk's economic positions – such as his support for greener energy sources, compatible with his Tesla electric cars, or his defence of high-skilled immigration – are unlikely to appeal to Trump's electoral base. On the other side of the political spectrum, his controversial statements and gestures – such as his raised arm, which strongly resembles a Nazi salute – disqualify him in the eyes of more progressive voters. A measure of the billionaire businessman's unpopularity was evident in Wednesday's market quarterly deliveries, which saw Tesla posting a 13.5% drop in sales over the past three months, reflecting a lingering anti-Musk sentiment. A 'beautiful' bill splits conservative ranks While the Tesla-SpaceX boss may be delusional about his actual popularity in the real world, experts say the new party threat could be Musk's way of sending the message that he is prepared to go to great lengths to hurt 'Trumpism'. Viala-Gaudefroy believes the president's inner circle should be more concerned about Musk's promises to 'defeat Trumpist candidates' using his personal fortune if the tax-cut and spending bill is passed. By becoming the Republican Party's biggest donor, Musk proved very useful to Trump during the presidential campaign. The US president probably does not want to see the world's richest man turn his billions of dollars against Trumpist candidates in the 2026 midterm elections, or even in the Republican primaries. 'This could have a significant impact, as the presidential majority in Congress is very slim. It could tip the balance if Elon Musk manages to sway the scales against pro-Trump candidates in just a few key constituencies,' explained Viala-Gaudefroy. The political precariousness was on display on Tuesday, when Senate Republicans squeaked through their sweeping tax and spending bill by a 51-to-50 vote that required Vice President JD Vance to cast the tie-breaker. The close Senate vote reflected the considerable angst within the Republican Party over the bill, which even lost its grandiose 'One Big Beautiful Bill' name after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer invoked Senate budget rules to delete the title of the bill on the floor Tuesday. Trump himself appears to be cognisant of the threat Musk poses to his fiscal conservative base. Shortly before the bill was put to a Senate vote on Tuesday, the US president launched a high-octane castigation of his former billionaire friend. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said he would 'take a look' at measures to consider deporting the South African-born Musk, who has held US citizenship since 2002. Trump also signaled that he could take aim at the huge contracts and subsidies that Musk's Space X rocket and Starlink satellite internet businesses receive from the US government. "We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon," Trump said. Money is important, but not everything Democrats, for the moment, might be rubbing their hands with glee over the latest round of the Musk-Trump fallout. Some party figures have floated the possibility of Democrats making overtures to Musk, given his political largesse. But others warn that the financial support of someone as controversial as Musk could just as easily hurt a Democratic candidate. As a result, experts interviewed by FRANCE 24 believe that the most effective tactic for the billionaire businessman would be to promise to support all Republican candidates who, in a right-wing primary, run against Trump's men. While money is important in US politics, it's not everything, notes Johnson. 'When Barack Obama first ran for the Senate, he ran against one of the wealthiest men in Illinois,' explained Johnson, referring to Obama's 2004 Democratic primary win over multimillionaire Chicago trader Blair Hull, who spent 'spent millions and millions of dollars, outspending Obama massively. He got nowhere in the Democratic primary because basically, he wasn't offering anything that Democratic voters found particularly interesting'. But while Musk's money could potentially be toxic for Democratic candidates, the disruption he has caused among Republican ranks is an asset for Democrats. 'We are witnessing a kind of civil war brewing within the Republican Party,' said Viala-Gaudefroy. The Democrats could hardly dream of a better scenario than one in which Trump does everything in his power to defeat Republican candidates who have opposed his spending bill while Musk does the opposite.
