The trick to fast adaptations for war is a 'Silicon Valley' model that puts companies on the front lines, DoD official says
It's a "Silicon Valley" type of model, the DoD official said.
US military officials, acquisition team members, and leaders in Washington have long been discussing the need for rapid iteration for future fights, pointing to examples from the war in Ukraine, where an underdog nation on defense built an arsenal on a shoestring warfighting budget and held its own in the tech arms race against the larger invading Russian force.
Lessons from this conflict have shown just how quickly some weapons, like different types of drones, are entering the battle and then being thwarted by electronic warfare like signal jamming and other countermeasures.
When they run into a problem, the soldiers can relay their concerns and experiences to industry partners, which must react quickly to introduce new solutions. Sometimes, the cycle takes only a matter of weeks.
At a Hudson Institute event on building weapons that can be adapted at scale, Defense Innovation Unit Program Manager Trent Emeneker said uncrewed systems had changed warfare like nothing since the introduction of the machine gun during World War I and that the war in Ukraine is showing constant iterative adaptation in both technology and tactics.
What's the trick? Emeneker suggested a rather untraditional government contracting approach with more trust in the defense industry and constant, close work on adapting systems.
"What we see is the model that works is companies and their engineering teams are embedded directly with the warfighter, on the front lines, at operations, in combat," he explained. "They take that learned feedback, and they send it back, overnight, to the larger engineering team."
Then, the solution is brought back to the warfighter. It's not going to be perfect, Emeneker said, but it's going to be better. And if not, they try again until they get it right.
"It's the Silicon Valley model of software development: go fast, release, update, and improve," he said.
That is a shift in traditional thinking and how defense contractors have worked with the US military on weapons programs in the past. It would be a move away from years of testing complex, exquisite weapons systems before getting them into the hands of troops. There are efforts like that in the US military, but it's not militarywide.
A lot of smaller, newer defense companies are embracing these concepts, especially in the uncrewed systems and artificial intelligence spaces. US military and defense industry leaders recognize that for potential future wars against peer adversaries like China, cheap, easily made weapons will be needed. Some companies have told Business Insider the work with soldiers has provided a constant stream of feedback for adapting systems.
This type of acquisition and development process is one that is becoming increasingly popular within special operations forces.
At the Hudson Institute event, some panelists discussed how this approach could give the US an advantage in a future war with China, which has undergone a massive transformation of its military resources, technologies, and capabilities in recent years.
Adapting systems and capabilities to the needs of the US military quickly in a conflict situation depends on the private sector. "Silicon Valley is our secret weapon," Emeneker said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
15 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
News Analysis: Trump's ‘force of personality' hasn't delivered on key foreign policy goals
WASHINGTON — When President Trump returned to the White House in January, he promised to deliver big foreign policy wins in record time. He said he would halt Russia's war against Ukraine in 24 hours or less, end Israel's war in Gaza nearly as quickly and force Iran to end to its nuclear program. He said he'd persuade Canada to become the 51st state, take Greenland from Denmark and negotiate 90 trade deals in 90 days. 'The president believes that his force of personality … can bend people to do things,' his special envoy-for-everything, Steve Witkoff, explained in May in a Breitbart interview. Six months later, none of those ambitious goals have been reached. Ukraine and Gaza are still at war. Israel and the United States bombed Iran's nuclear facilities, but it's not clear whether they ended the country's atomic program once and for all. Canada and Denmark haven't surrendered any territory. And instead of trade deals, Trump is mostly slapping tariffs on other countries, to the distress of U.S. stock markets. It turned out that force of personality couldn't solve every problem. 'He overestimated his power and underestimated the ability of others to push back,' said Kori Schake, director of foreign policy at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. 'He often acts as if we're the only people with leverage, strength or the ability to take action. We're not.' The president has notched important achievements. He won a commitment from other members of NATO to increase their defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product. The attack on Iran appears to have set Tehran's nuclear project back for years, even if it didn't end it. And Trump — or more precisely, his aides — helped broker ceasefires between India and Pakistan and between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. But none of those measured up to the goals Trump initially set for himself — much less qualified for the Nobel Peace Prize he has publicly yearned for. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this,' he grumbled when the Rwanda-Congo agreement was signed. The most striking example of unfulfilled expectations has come in Ukraine, the grinding conflict Trump claimed he could end even before his inauguration. For months, Trump sounded certain that his warm relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin would produce a deal that would stop the fighting, award Russia most of the territory its troops have seized and end U.S. economic sanctions on Moscow. 'I believe he wants peace,' Trump said of Putin in February. 'I trust him on this subject.' But to Trump's surprise, Putin wasn't satisfied with his proposal. The Russian leader continued bombing Ukrainian cities even after Trump publicly implored him to halt via social media ('Vladimir, STOP!'). Critics charged that Putin was playing Trump for a fool. The president bristled: 'Nobody's playing me.' But as early as April, he admitted to doubts about Putin's good faith. 'It makes me think that maybe he doesn't want to stop the war, he's just tapping me along,' he said. 'I speak to him a lot about getting this thing done, and I always hang up and say, 'Well, that was a nice phone call,' and then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city,' Trump complained last week. 'After that happens three or four times, you say the talk doesn't mean anything.' The president also came under pressure from Republican hawks in Congress who warned privately that if Ukraine collapsed, Trump would be blamed the way his predecessor, President Biden, was blamed for the fall of Afghanistan in 2022. So last week, Trump changed course and announced that he will resume supplying U.S.-made missiles to Ukraine — but by selling them to European countries instead of giving them to Kyiv as Biden had. Trump also gave Putin 50 days to accept a ceasefire and threatened to impose 'secondary tariffs' on countries that buy oil from Russia if he does not comply. He said he still hopes Putin will come around. 'I'm not done with him, but I'm disappointed in him,' he said in a BBC interview. It still isn't clear how many missiles Ukraine will get and whether they will include long-range weapons that can strike targets deep inside Russia. A White House official said those details are still being worked out. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov sounded unimpressed by the U.S. actions. 'I have no doubt that we will cope,' he said. Foreign policy experts warned that the secondary tariffs Trump proposed could prove impractical. Russia's two biggest oil customers are China and India; Trump is trying to negotiate major trade agreements with both. Meanwhile, Trump has dispatched Witkoff back to the Middle East to try to arrange a ceasefire in Gaza and reopen nuclear talks with Iran — the goals he began with six months ago. Despite his mercurial style, Trump's approach to all these foreign crises reflects basic premises that have remained constant for a decade, foreign policy experts said. 'There is a Trump Doctrine, and it has three basic principles,' Schake said. 'Alliances are a burden. Trade exports American jobs. Immigrants steal American jobs.' Robert Kagan, a former Republican aide now at the Brookings Institution, added one more guiding principle: 'He favors autocrats over democrats.' Trump has a soft spot for foreign strongmen like Putin and China's Xi Jinping, and has abandoned the long-standing U.S. policy of fostering democracy abroad, Kagan noted. The problem, Schake said, is that those principles 'impede Trump's ability to get things done around the world, and he doesn't seem to realize it. 'The international order we built after World War II made American power stronger and more effective,' she said. 'Trump and his administration seem bent on presiding over the destruction of that international order.' Moreover, Kagan argued, Trump's frenetic imposition of punitive tariffs on other countries comes with serious costs. 'Tariffs are a form of economic warfare,' he said. 'Trump is creating enemies for the United States all over the world. ... I don't think you can have a successful foreign policy if everyone in the world mistrusts you.' Not surprisingly, Trump and his aides don't agree. 'It cannot be overstated how successful the first six months of this administration have been,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said last week. 'With President Trump as commander in chief, the world is a much safer place.' That claim will take years to test.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Redwire Aims Higher: Analyst Backs Space Firm's Defense Expansion
Redwire Corporation (NYSE:RDW) is one of the best space stocks to buy according to hedge funds. On July 16, Canaccord analyst Austin Moeller reiterated a Buy rating on Redwire, while nudging the 12‑month price target from $20 to $21, implying roughly a 24% upside from current levels, which were around $17.70 at the time. Moeller emphasized Redwire's expanding capabilities beyond space, especially its Edge Autonomy drone tech. The VXE30 Stalker UAS, soldier-friendly with 8+ hours of flight endurance and classified on the DoD's Blue UAS list, underpins the firm's belief in growing defense adoption. The analyst also highlighted how Redwire is locking in federal and NATO contracts using its drone-satellite end‑to‑end encrypted communication systems, including Link‑16 antennas and Mako satellite buses, giving it a competitive edge in secure ISR and tactical applications. A satellite dish installation atop a modern building, symbolizing the power of signal transmission solutions. This fresh reiteration shows confidence that the Edge acquisition shifts Redwire's profile from pure components provider to an integrated space-and-defense platform specialist, capitalizing on rising aerospace budgets and strategic infrastructure investments. The modest price‑target bump reflects measured optimism, balancing execution risks with strong growth potential. Redwire Corporation (NYSE: RDW) is a multi-domain space and defense technology integrator supplying advanced spacecraft components, deployable solar arrays, and robotics to NASA, DoD, and allied space agencies; following its 2025 acquisition of Edge Autonomy, it now also delivers unmanned aerial systems and ISR capabilities to U.S. and NATO defense forces. While we acknowledge the potential of RDW as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lunar Ambitions Grow: Intuitive Machines Secures Expansion to Build the Next Generation of Space Infrastructure
Intuitive Machines, Inc. (NASDAQ:LUNR) is one of the best space stocks to buy according to hedge funds. On July 16, 2025, the Houston City Council approved a strategic lease amendment for Intuitive Machines, adding 3 acres and extending its lease at the Houston Spaceport by 5 years to enable a $12 million expansion. The project includes new production and testing facilities, plus support infrastructure, to scale lunar lander assembly, Earth‑reentry systems, Lunar Terrain Vehicle development, and NASA's Near Space Network Services. A huge in-process machining center producing parts for aircraft and aerospace systems. Intuitive Machines, headquartered in Houston, is a commercial space infrastructure firm behind the Nova‑C lunar lander series (Odysseus, Athena), spacecraft cargo systems, in-space communication services, and emerging work in lunar mobility and re-entry platforms under NASA and DoD contracts. While we acknowledge the potential of LUNR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio