logo
Ex-DWP employee identifies key reasons State Pension cannot be means-tested by UK Government

Ex-DWP employee identifies key reasons State Pension cannot be means-tested by UK Government

Daily Record9 hours ago
Sandra Wrench worked at the DWP for 42 years and sets out why it cannot be means-tested.
Pensions Minister Torsten Bell confirmed last month that the State Pension will not be means-tested in the future after growing speculation on social media hinted that the contributory benefit would be the next to be reviewed by the Labour Government.
Under the Triple Lock, the New and Basic State Pensions increase each year in-line with whichever is the highest between average annual earnings growth from May to July, Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation in the year to September or 2.5 per cent. Deferred State Pensions and additional elements rise by the September CPI inflation rate.

Around 55 per cent of social security expenditure goes to pensioners - in 2025/26 the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will spend £174.9 billion on benefits for pensioners. This includes spending on the State Pension which is forecast to be £145.6bn over the current financial year.

As the costs continue to rise, the topic of means-testing will no doubt surface again, however, former DWP employee Sandra Wrench, who has 42 years' experience dealing with benefits including the State Pension, says it would be 'virtually impossible' to means-test the State Pension due to the different administration structures for the New and Basic State Pensions.
Mrs Wrench told the Daily Record: 'There are two main barriers that the Uk Government would face if they did go down this path and why it makes it virtually impossible to means-test the State Pension.
'I worked on the State Pension section at Bedford DWP for 18 years, and when you actually process claims for the State Pension, you have a greater understanding and knowledge of the benefit.'
Voluntary Contributions paid by way of cash
You can fill in gaps in your National Insurance (NI) record by paying cash into the State Pension scheme by way of Voluntary Contributions.
Mrs Wrench explained: 'You are not going to pay cash into a scheme unless you can get your money back. We look at the recent time extension for the payment of Voluntary Contributions from 2006, where the deadline was originally April 5, 2023, but this was extended by the UK Government to April 5, 2025, so they are still actively encouraging the payment of Voluntary Contributions.

'Would they be doing this if they were going to means-test the State Pension? The answer is no.'
She continued: 'If the State Pension was means-tested, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) would have to refund Voluntary Contributions to those members of the public, who had paid them, but were not entitled to the payment of State Pension.
'State Pension is based on the NI contributions you pay from age 16 to State Pension age - typically, a period of 50 years - so some people may have paid Voluntary Contributions 20/30 years ago for a period in the future.

'It is unlikely that HMRC would retain detailed payment details of Voluntary Contributions, both Class 3 and Class 2, paid all those years ago, even though the NI record will confirm that Voluntary contributions have been paid, which count towards qualifying years.'
The DWP insider highlighted how if the State Pension was means-tested, would HMRC be able to refund NI contributions from all those years ago?
Mrs Wrench said: 'In a nutshell, the answer is probably no, unless the customer had kept detailed records of all payments made for past years.'

She continued: 'I myself paid a substantial sum into the Additional Pension Top Up scheme for those who were State Pension age before April 2016, and this scheme ran between Oct 2015 and April 2017.
'Due to the higher rate of Basic State Pension for the New State Pension, currently £230.25 a week, this gave those pensioners who were State Pension age before April 2016 with the lower amount of Basic State Pension, currently £176.45 a week, the opportunity of purchasing up to £25 a week additional pension to help bridge this gap.'
It's important to note that the Additional Pension uprates annually under the CPI measure of the Triple Lock.

Additional Pension (1978-2016) and contracted out employment
The Old?Basic State Pension scheme consists of three parts:
Basic State Pension - paid on the number of qualifying years which you have
Additional pension - first known as SERPS (State Earnings Related Pension Scheme) from 1978, then known as the Second State Pension from 2002 to 2016, and it was the additional State Pension scheme you could contract out
The Graduated Retirement Pension which existed from 1961-1975

Mrs Wrench explained that with 'contracted out' employment, your additional pension is paid with your occupational pension as opposed to being paid by the state.
She continued: 'DWP have admitted and confirmed in writing that they do not know the exact amount your scheme will pay you as a result of contracting out as it will depend on the actual rules of your private scheme.
'So DWP would have to estimate the amount of additional pension in pay for State Pension purposes, if that person had been in contracted out employment. So how can you means-test an amount which is estimated?

'DWP have stated that the pension you get from your workplace or personal pension scheme for the periods you were contracted out, should include an amount that, in most cases, will be the equivalent of the Additional State Pension you would have got if you had not been contracted out, and this amount is known as the Contracted-Out-Pension-Equivalent (COPE).
'DWP will know how much Additional Pension you would have got if you had not been contracted out, but this figure will be distorted once it is incorporated into an occupational pension scheme, via contracted out employment.'

Contributory and Non Contributory Benefits
Mrs Wrench explained how non contributory benefits are funded by general taxation and do not depend on NI contributions, and are benefits such as Attendance allowance, Carer's Allowance, Child Benefit, Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment.
Contributory benefits are funded by NI contributions and include benefits such as Jobseekers Allowance, Employment and Support Allowance, State Pension and Statutory Sick Pay.
Mrs Wrench said: 'You could understand non contributory benefits being means tested, such as Universal Credit, but you would be hard pushed to start means testing contributory benefits, such as State Pension, as the payment of these depend on NI contributions paid by the public, and the public have paid into the scheme.

'With means testing, you are paid the benefit on a temporary basis, and if your circumstances change, the amount of money you are paid could fluctuate. The last thing you want when you reach retirement is fluctuating income, and the anxiety which accompanies this .
'At least with the State Pension, you receive what you are entitled to, know exactly how much money you have coming in a month and know exactly where you stand financially'
She added: 'To mention means-testing the State Pension may cause concern for some people, particularly when their State Pension may be their main source of income, but for the reasons mentioned above, it is highly unlikely that the government would be actually able to means-test it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schools told to make sex education ‘stage appropriate' as age limit plans axed
Schools told to make sex education ‘stage appropriate' as age limit plans axed

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Schools told to make sex education ‘stage appropriate' as age limit plans axed

Schools in England should ensure relationships and sex education lessons are 'age and stage appropriate', the Government said as it scrapped proposals to impose age limits on certain topics. The Labour Government has recommended that primary schools teach sex education in Year 5 or Year 6, in line with what pupils learn about conception and birth, but it is not compulsory. Primary school teachers may decide to discuss the sharing of naked images or online sexual content if it is affecting their pupils and they know that children have seen pornography, according to the final statutory Government guidance on relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) in schools. Proposals to impose strict age limits on topics in the RSHE curriculum, proposed by the previous Conservative government, will not go ahead. Draft guidance, published in May last year under the Conservatives, had suggested sex education should be taught no earlier than Year 5. It had proposed for issues like sexual harassment, revenge porn, upskirting and sexual exploitation and abuse to not be taught before Year 7 (age 11), and for explicit discussion of sexual violence, including rape and sexual assault, to not take place before Year 9 (age 13). The draft guidance also said schools should not teach pupils about the concept of 'gender identity'. The final guidance on RSHE, which has been published a year after a consultation over the draft Conservative guidance closed, has not assigned specific ages to certain RSHE topics. Instead, it said schools should develop the RSHE curriculum to be 'relevant, age and stage appropriate and accessible to pupils in their area'. The Government guidance, published on Tuesday, said pupils should be taught the facts and the law about biological sex and gender reassignment. But on the debate around biological sex and gender reassignment, it told schools to be 'careful not to endorse any particular view or teach it as fact'. It said schools should avoid materials that use cartoons or diagrams that 'oversimplify' the topic, or which 'encourage pupils to question their gender'. The Department for Education (DfE) has said revised guidance for schools and colleges on gender questioning children is due to be published this summer. In her foreword to the updated RSHE guidance, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The depth and breadth of views is clear, and there are understandable and legitimate areas of contention. 'Our guiding principles have been that all of the compulsory subject content must be age appropriate and developmentally appropriate. 'It must be taught sensitively and inclusively, with respect to the backgrounds and beliefs of pupils and parents while always with the aim of providing pupils with the knowledge they need of the law.' The guidance said pupils should be given the opportunity to discuss the sexual norms endorsed by so-called 'involuntary celibates' (incels) or online influencers by the end of secondary school. It added that secondary school pupils should be taught about the prevalence of 'deepfakes' and how pornography can portray 'misogynistic' attitudes. The guidance has also advised secondary schools to work closely with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention in an age-appropriate way. It added that schools should continue to share RSHE curriculum materials with parents on request. Since September 2020, relationships and sex education has been compulsory in secondary schools in England, while relationships education has been compulsory in primary schools. In March 2023, then-prime minister Rishi Sunak brought forward a review of RSHE guidance for schools after hearing concerns that children were being exposed to 'inappropriate' content. Schools in England will have to follow the statutory RSHE guidance from September 2026. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'We are pleased to see that there are no age 'limits' included in this new guidance. 'Schools already work hard to ensure that teaching is age-appropriate and this approach gives them the vital flexibility to respond to their own community and the needs of pupils in their schools.' But he added: 'NAHT has particular concerns that the inclusion of suicide prevention content has not been accompanied by a commitment from the Government to provide funded training for all teachers to give them both the knowledge and the confidence they need to discuss suicide prevention and self-harm with young people. 'The provision of training is vital before this content becomes statutory and it is unacceptable that the guidance simply says that schools should work with mental health professionals to discuss how this sensitive content should be tackled in the classroom.' Margaret Mulholland, Send and inclusion specialist at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We welcome the clarity over biological sex and gender reassignment in the guidance. 'There are strongly held and sometimes polarised views over these issues and it is important to have a clear set of national guidelines to follow. 'We hope soon to see specific guidance on supporting gender questioning children – something for which we have been calling for several years.' She added: 'We also welcome the focus on suicide prevention and pay tribute to campaigners for their work on highlighting this issue and the risks to young people. 'Schools already have a great deal of experience in supporting the wellbeing of pupils – and many have seen a rising number of young people struggling with their mental health in recent years. 'Unfortunately, there is still not enough external support available and we would like to see more work done to ensure that young people can access specialist services in a timely manner.' Laura Mackay, chief executive officer of LGBT+ young people's charity Just Like Us, said: 'Some teachers still struggle to discuss LGBT+ topics with their pupils. So it's good to see the new RSHE guidance strongly encouraging primary schools to teach about diverse families, including same-sex parents. 'However, there are aspects of the new guidance that could make teachers feel even more anxious about what they can do or say to support all LGBT+ young people. 'If schools treat gender identity as something that is taboo, trans and gender diverse young people across the UK will feel further alienated and unsafe at school.'

Thousands of Brits face surprise tax bill letter from HMRC
Thousands of Brits face surprise tax bill letter from HMRC

Daily Mirror

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Thousands of Brits face surprise tax bill letter from HMRC

The taxman has been sending out letters to people in the UK in a bid to register for self-assessment or ordering them to pay extra tax People with savings of £3500 or more are being warned that they may receive an unexpected tax bill from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in the forthcoming weeks. HMRC has the capability to automatically detect interest accrued on your bank savings, and if this exceeds a certain limit, you will be issued a notice for an additional tax payment. ‌ With the new 2025-25 tax year already underway, the tax authority has been dispatching letters to individuals, urging them to register for self-assessment or instructing them to pay extra tax. Now that the entire previous financial year has concluded, HMRC is evaluating people's financial circumstances and issuing tax bills to those found to owe tax on their savings accounts. ‌ Your bank automatically reports these details to the taxman unless your savings are held in a Cash ISA, which is tax-exempt, reports the Daily Record. ‌ Under the Personal Savings Allowance rules, you can accumulate up to £1000 per annum in savings interest in your bank accounts without it being taxed, but this only applies to individuals earning less than £50,270. If your earnings exceed £50,271, your Personal Savings Allowance is reduced to a mere £500. And if your income reaches £125,000, your Personal Savings Allowance plummets to £0. The precise amount you will owe depends on your earnings, the amount of interest you received, and when it was paid out. ‌ However, you may face a tax bill with savings as low as £3500 if you had invested it in a three-year fixed savings account, as the interest is paid out in a single lump sum. In a fixed account, the interest is considered taxable in the year it is received, rather than being spread out over the account's term. For instance, if you deposited £3500 into a three-year fixed savings account earning 5% interest, you would accrue over £500 in interest. The interest on fixed accounts is "crystallised" upon payout, meaning you receive the entire interest amount at once. In this scenario, the £500+ interest payment would exceed your £500 Personal Savings Allowance, potentially triggering a letter from HMRC, especially if you have other interest-earning accounts. High-income earners should be aware that exceeding the Personal Savings Allowance by just £100 would result in a £40 tax liability, as 40% of every £1 above the allowance is taxed.

Earlier plan to dual A1 was dropped, leaked report says
Earlier plan to dual A1 was dropped, leaked report says

BBC News

time43 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Earlier plan to dual A1 was dropped, leaked report says

A leaked government report has revealed 2021 plans to dual the A1 were quietly shelved. The scheme to upgrade the 13-mile (20km) section of road between Morpeth and Ellingham was cancelled by the Labour government last year. But earlier plans to dual the road were pulled in 2021 after funding was "withdrawn", according to a leaked Department for Transport (DfT) said it did not comment on leaked documents. The report detailed that during the 2021 Spending Review, funding for the dualling scheme was dropped, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service."The funding decision was not made public, but we instructed National Highways to cease work on the scheme," the document said. A government analysis of the scheme in 2021 also found the costs of the project would outweigh its this year, it was revealed that more than £68m had already been spent on the project, despite work not yet getting under report also suggested that between 2021 and 2024, the scheme was subject to several development consent order (DCO) extensions. DCOs are required for nationally significant infrastructure were to "allow time to consider environmental matters" as other schemes, such as the A38 Derby Junctions project, had been impacted by legal challenges on environmental grounds. The report also suggested the cost of dualling the road had "nearly doubled" between 2021 and May 2024, when it was approved by then Conservative government, before it was paused by the new Labour government that same year. That was due to inflation, it said. 'Paints vivid picture' Labour MP David Smith said the report confirmed the last Conservative government had no intention of dualling the A1."My focus since becoming MP for North Northumberland has been to secure sensible safety improvements at key junctions," he Northumberland County Council's Conservative deputy leader Richard Wearmouth said the report proved Tory ministers had been determined to get the project approved."The document paints a vivid picture of officials trying to kill the project multiple times but being overruled by Conservative ministers on every single occasion," he said National Highways was now "exploring options" for the road which could improve "safety and congestion" while "offering value for money" to the taxpayer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store