Probe into power projects: Senate panel for action against PD for providing ‘misleading' info
The inquiry pertains to the ACSR Bunting Conductor tender and the World Bank-funded 765kV Dasu-Islamabad Transmis-sion Line Project (Lot-1).
According to official documents, Additional Secretary Power Division, Imtiaz Hussain Shah, informed the Committee on June 30, 2025, that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had confirmed no Power of Attorney (PoA) related to Chinese firms M/s Henan Tong-DA Cable Co. Ltd. or M/s Jiangsu Zhongtian Technology Co. Ltd. was submitted to the Pakistani Embassy in Beijing for verification. The Embassy also clarified that since Pakistan joined the Apostille Convention in November 2024, such attestations are no longer required through diplomatic channels.
HUBCO proposes $51mn investment in Thar-based coal projects
The Committee, chaired by Senator Saif Ullah Abro, directed the EAD and Power Division to directly contact the companies involved to determine whether they had ever submitted such documents.
In its session, the Committee was also briefed on the submission of records for a special audit into the ACSR Bunting Conductor case. These were handed over to the Auditor General's office on June 4, 2025.
Regarding the high-voltage Dasu–Islamabad Transmis-sion Line (Lot-1), the Power Division shared that the internal inquiry led by GM NGC Muhammad Mustafa had recommended referring the matter to the World Bank. The Bank, in response, confirmed that the procurement process was conducted in line with its guidelines.
However, the Committee expressed concern over a potential cover-up. Officials from the Power Division failed to present the supplementary report that supposedly formed the basis for communication with the World Bank. Instead, they showed only a letter written by a former senior official, which the Committee suspects was intended to conceal irregularities. The panel demanded all correspondence relating to that letter and clarified that under World Bank procurement regulations, the borrower (in this case, Pakistan) holds full responsibility for the procurement process.
The Committee was told that no formal inquiry report was ever prepared or submitted by former caretaker Energy Minister Muhammad Ali, despite his active role as head of an internal investigation committee. Power Division officials stated they had only heard about an unsigned report, which was never officially shared.
The Committee was visibly shocked and questioned how the former Minister was able to present conclusions at a Senate Standing Committee meeting on February 20, 2024, without a documented report. It directed the Power Division to locate and submit even an unsigned copy of the inquiry findings and recommended that EAD take disciplinary action against the Power Division for providing misleading information in this matter.
The Committee further advised EAD to seek clarification on how both the former caretaker Minister and the then Secretary of the Power Division—members of the inquiry committee—could act with such negligence, allegedly concealing facts about financial and procedural irregularities in key power sector tenders.
On the issue of recovering Rs 1.282 billion from a contractor involved in the 765kV Dasu–Islamabad Grid Station (Lot-IV), the Committee clarified that the NTDC Board was not authorized to conduct an independent inquiry. It recalled earlier discussions confirming that the disputed amount was not to be considered in the bid evaluation, per the bidding documents.
The Committee instructed EAD to formally write to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to ensure recovery of the Rs 1.282 billion from the lowest bidder in line with earlier recommendations.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Indian cities need $2.4 trillion for climate infrastructure by 2050, World Bank says
NEW DELHI: India needs to invest more than $2.4 trillion by 2050 to build climate-resilient urban infrastructure, as its fast-expanding cities face growing challenges from extreme weather events linked to climate change, the World Bank said on Tuesday. The number of Indians living in cities is projected to nearly double to 951 million by 2050 from 480 million in 2020. But erratic rainfall, heatwaves, and rising sea levels are leaving urban areas in the world's most populous nation increasingly vulnerable, the bank said in a report. Without large-scale investments in housing, transport, water, and waste management systems, India will face escalating costs from weather-related damage, said the report entitled 'Towards Resilient and Prosperous Cities in India'. 'Cities need to become more resilient if people living in those cities are going to be safe,' Auguste Tano Kouame, theWorld Bank's country director for India, said at the launch of the report, which was prepared in collaboration with India's urban development ministry. Urban flooding already causes an estimated $4 billion in annual losses in India, the report found. That figure is projected to rise to $5 billion by 2030 and as much as $30 billion by 2070 without remedial action. India to issue climate risk disclosure rules for banks in the next few months, sources say The report's estimates based on conservative urban population growth put India's investment needs at $2.4 trillion by 2050 and $10.9 trillion by 2070, with those projections increasing to $2.8 trillion and $13.4 trillion respectively if the population is moderately urbanised. 'Timely actions can avert billions of annual damages and losses in flooding and extreme heat while investing in resilient and efficient municipal infrastructure and services,' the report said. India currently spends about 0.7% of its gross domestic product on urban infrastructure, well below global benchmarks, and must significantly scale up public and private financing, the World Bank report said. Federal, state and municipal governments must coordinate to improve project financing and provide climate-linked fiscal transfers. And India must increase partnerships with the private sector in areas including energy-efficient water supply, sanitation, solid waste management, and green buildings, it said. Private finance currently accounts for just 5% of urban infrastructure investment, the report said.
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's parched future: bonds to bridge the water funding chasm
As the monsoons arrive, once again, Pakistan is facing a water crisis, shifting from drought-like scenarios to the threat of a flood. The seasonal threat is no longer creeping but ferocious. As seasonal relief in monsoon showers may seem to provide, the bitter truth remains the same: our water security is falling, drop after drop, each passing year. Where once favoured with powerful rivers and glacial flows, present-day Pakistan is a water-scarce nation. Water availability on a head-per-capita basis has crashed down to 800–1,017 cubic meters from 5,260 in 1951. By 2035, we could dip below 500–660 cubic meters, a threshold of pure scarcity, while UNDP predicts extreme scarcity below 500 cubic meters in 2025. This is no future prospect; it is present in the dried-out canals in Punjab, Sindh's saline groundwater, drop in water tables in Balochistan, and failing supply lines in main cities like Karachi and Lahore. But behind the green disaster is the less spoken but no less lethal, twin disaster: the disparity between what we need to pay for water security and what we pay. The cost of inaction Pakistan's water economy is bleeding. Analyst estimates and official sources put inefficiencies, climate-related disasters, and old infrastructure at Rs3-4 trillion every year, about 3–4 percent of GDP. The losses occur due to floods, droughts, inefficient irrigation, and crumbling infrastructure. Agriculture, which accounts for more than 90 percent of usable water, loses on conveyance estimated at between 40–60 percent, endangering both productivity and rural livelihoods. Consider, for example, a rural Punjabi smallholder, Abdul Rehman. During the lean season, his wheat crop shriveled for lack of water as irrigation canals dried up, prompting him to sell livestock to make ends meet. Just as in lower Sindh, Ghulam Mustafa encountered an almost identical ordeal in May-June this year; he was waiting for water to begin kharif planting amidst water scarcity. The Indus reduced significantly by the time it flowed to his distributary because of downstream restrains added to existing upstream problems, slowing down and dwindling the stream. By the time water flowed back, as well, it was in vain, the sowing period was gone and his debts increased. Such incidents are not unique. Along the coasts in Sindh, advancing seawater engulfs arable lands as flows of freshwater fail to trickle down to the delta, making previously fertile patches near Thatta and Sujawal desolate areas. Across central and southern Punjab, numerous Rabi growers watched their wheat crop drought for insufficient final irrigations in February just months before harvesting, owing to paucity of water. Across cities such as Karachi, Lahore, Multan, and Quetta, damaged water infrastructure compelled families to rely on costly and sometimes hazardous tanker supplies. The World Bank warned that unabated disruptions would shave an estimated 6 percent of the GDP until mid-decade, long-term estimates could be 10 percent until 2050, or even 18-20 percent because of broader climate damage. The flood damage in 2022 alone was estimated at Rs3.2 trillion, sweeping away homes, crops, and livelihoods. Yet investment hasn't caught up. Why the gap persists The 2018 National Water Policy (NWP) had set a humble target: 10 percent of the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) should be for water in 2019, increasing to 20 percent in 2030. We still aren't achieving even the baseline. Present federal PSDP allocations are around 9.5 percent, national water expenditures, across federal and provincial governments, are a mere Rs380–400 billion in FY2025–26, less than 0.3 percent of GDP. Although mega-projects such as Mohmand Dam (Rs35.7 billion) and Diamer-Bhasha (Rs25 billion) are separately funded, the aggregate amount remains inadequate. Provincial budgets are no different. Punjab allocated Rs38 billion for irrigation, Sindh Rs31 billion, KP Rs25.1 billion, and Balochistan Rs32 billion (inclusive of foreign-aided schemes). The figures are humble for a sector for which provinces are the sole operator for canal operations, water distribution, and urban supply. Much of the gap lies in the larger fiscal constraint in Pakistan: debt servicing accounts for more than 20 percent of the federal budget. With IMF austerity, restricted fiscal space, and increasing rivalry from defense, subsidies, and social protection, long-gestation infrastructure initiatives end up on the casualty list. The federal PSDP for water for the next financial year is down by more than 25 percent to Rs185 billion in FY2024–25. Dams receive Rs63.3 billion, canals Rs39.3 billion—the figures 10–15 percent below previous years in real terms. This reduction threatens to trap us in a vicious cycle of postponed upkeep and exposure. Enter: Pakistan Water Bonds In this dismal fiscal context, one idea offers a way out: Water Bonds. These are structured financial instruments that raise dedicated capital for water-related infrastructure and services, independent of the donor cycle or the vagaries of annual PSDP allocations. They are not untested. In 2021, WAPDA raised USD500 million through a Green Eurobond, oversubscribed six times. More recently, the Parwaaz Green Action Bond raised Rs1 billion with a strong AA–rating, while the federal government's Green Sukuk in May 2025 brought in Rs32 billion, testifying to strong investor appetite. Pakistan's Islamic finance market, which is estimated to hold Rs7 trillion in deposits (close to 20 percent of the banking network), is waiting for innovation. The Water Bonds, in the name of green sukuks, can exploit this resource pool and provide 10–12 percent yields while conforming to ethical investment paradigms. They can be traded on home exchanges and can appeal to pension funds, insurance, and even microfinance institutions. The diaspora dividend Arguably, the most promising and emotionally resonant source of capital lies in the Pakistani diaspora. Remittances totaled USD35 billion in FY2025, and the Roshan Digital Account (RDA) mobilized over USD10 billion in just a few years. Overseas Pakistanis have shown that they are willing to invest if credible, transparent, and purpose-driven instruments exist. Green Diaspora Water Sukuk issued in dollars, pounds, or euros would potentially raise USD250–500 million if only 2–3 percent of RDA investors buy in. Such bonds could fund filtration plants, desalination facilities, rainwater harvesting, and pipeline improvements in the very towns where their loved ones live. Picture a Pakistani doctor in the United States funding a desalination plant back in his hometown in Sindh—it would not only provide him 6–8 percent returns but ensure that future generations also drink clean water. With sovereign backing, ESG reporting, and zakat-associated functionalities, such bonds could blend moral responsibility with financial sense. These diaspora flows could unlock matching contributions from development institutions such as the World Bank, the Islamic Development Bank, or the IFC, much like ADB's recentUSD500 million commitment for water resilience. Making it work: a phased roadmap But it won't happen without a phased, strategic roadmap. A Rs100 billion pilot bond in 2025 would aim for low-hanging fruit: wastewater treatment (national efficiency <1 percent) and flood irrigation and unlined channels (up to 60 percent loss of applied water). In 2026–27, scaling could be Rs 560 billion for storage, urban networks, and flood control. By 2030, an additional Rs400–580 billion could be spent on precision agriculture, desalination, and AI-based metering. These initiatives would need to be aligned with the existing water-sector project in the PSDP, worth Rs424 billion but stalled because not adequately funded. Transparency, not just tranches Naturally, finance alone is not a panacea. Diaspora and private investors need reassurance. Transparency must be ingrained through blockchain-powered audit trails, third-party audits, and exchange listing on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Volumetric water pricing against cross-subsidies, sovereign guarantees, and municipal-level credit enhancements will be imperative. The Council of Common Interests must be empowered to offer interprovincial oversight and break political impasses. Although Pakistan's credit rating is a concern, Fitch's upgrade in the near term and IMF criteria hold promise. The OECD's Asia Capital Markets Report 2025 points to unprecedented growth in sustainable bonds but cites challenges in new markets such as Pakistan, such as regulatory barriers and investor awareness, underlining the imperative for sound frameworks. A bond for our future Our water shortage is reality. But so is our capacity for innovation. We have capital. We have policy frameworks. What we lack is urgency and vision. Water Bonds provide something beyond dollars. They provide a trustworthy, long-term financing tool to pay for the singular most important determinant of our survival: water. Let's not wait for the next flood, the next drought to teach us lessons we know all too well. The moment to act is today. Let's construct our water future, bond for bond, drop for drop. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bureaucracy the main hurdle
Modernizing governance is the biggest challenge faced by the government the 'Baboo'-friendly Prime Minister (PM) has spoken against his own loyalists. His cabinet includes powerful bureaucrats from Punjab and the former Chief Secretary who now sits as the Cabinet Secretary in complete harmony. The meeting was convened to review the new expert driven framework introduced by the Power Division. To achieve efficient and accountable governance, professionalization and decentralization have been adopted. He blamed the institutional inertia in blocking the much-needed reforms in the bureaucracy. I am not sure whether he was speaking his heart out or was reading the prepared text as he has enjoyed very cordial relationship with the bureaucrats. It is indeed interesting that every ruler starts with the praise of the 'Baboos' but then finally turns against them at the end of their rule. Those who control the files have the final laugh. Worldwide, bureaucrats have been outdated for about half a century. Technocrats have taken over. Confusion prevails over understanding of the role of these so-called experts who have been called in to replace the obsolete 'Baboos'. I remember my meeting with prime minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali on June 26, 2004. As Chairman Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) I was invited for my professional input into the Sui Gas project for supply of natural gas to Ziarat. After the formal discussions, I floated the idea of bringing in the 'technocrats' for better governance. Prompt came the reply, 'They are not elected'. He was misguided by the aides in his Secretariat who surrounded him. I had to explain that technocrats replace bureaucrats not politicians. In a technology-driven complex environment of today 'generalists' cannot deliver they are replaced by individuals with technical background combined with management skills. Jamali was a well-meaning honest politician; he decided to pursue the option of inducting technocrats in all technical ministries. Fortunately, I was able to leave guidelines for this switch to take place. On a happy note, we left his office around 3pm. On the 9pm news that night it was announced that Jamali had resigned. Experts do bring technical know-how but cannot understand the bureaucratic loops and the file work unless they have been trained in management in their respective area of expertise,; only such a person qualifies to be a technocrat. Bhutto-style of governance is remembered till today. His file and paperwork were excellent. No 'Baboo' could hide behind the papers/procedures. Files were returned within 24 hours either with approval or written comments by the PM. Every ministry had a night Section Officer who was responsible for late hours co-ordination as the PM worked round-the-clock. Through lateral entry several technocrats were appointed Federal Secretaries to efficiently run their ministries. Engr Masood Hasan headed the Defence Production Division; Nasim Ahmed was appointed Secretary Information while Dr Muhammad Ajmal, a prominent educationist, took over Education. The PM is right; bureaucracy is the main hurdle. Institutional inertia is insurmountable. As three-time Chief Minister (CM) of Pakistan's largest province he has a team of loyalists who can bring about the much-sought change provided the 'Baboos' are willing to give up their grip over real power. The big question is: who will bell the cat? After taking charge as Chairman PSF, in 2002, I decided to call on the minister. After exchange of pleasantries, I requested him to bring in technocrats to run the important ministry of science and technology (MoST). He was very excited with the idea and asked me to prepare Job Descriptions (JDs) for the top three positions (Secretary, Additional Secretary, Joint Secretary). Within a few days I submitted the JDs but there was no response. As the matter was crucial for the ministry, I decided to meet the minister again. On inquiry he told me that he had forwarded the JDs to the Secretary for a necessary action. Baffled, I asked him why on earth will the secretary give up his job to be replaced by a technocrat? The minister had no answer. I could sense his reluctance to take on the 'Baboos'. My parting suggestion to him was to get approval of the President and hire technocrats for the three positions on open merit to set the ball rolling but he shied away. Till today MoST remains ineffective, several of its affiliated departments are either being shut down or without professional leadership. Accountability remains a buzz-word only to please the galleries. Bureaucracy has been able to dodge all forms of checks to its un-limited authority. Major recommendations to reform the bureaucracy were prepared by Justice A. R. Cornelius Commission in the decade of the sixties. Justice Cornelius was himself a Civil Servant, who rose through the ranks of judiciary to reach the position of Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP). He understood the importance of introducing accountability to contain executive abuse. His recommendations were hijacked by the powerful bureaucrats of their times before they could be implemented. Finally, his inputs were enacted in the 1972 interim constitution as article 216 for the formation of Administrative Accountability Courts. In the permanent 1973 version taxation was removed and a toned-done article 212 was included. The courts were never established. Finally, in 1979, the entire article was removed through a Martial Law Act. Bureaucracy prevailed as always. Lt-Gen. Ghulam Jillani Khan as Governor Punjab proposed the idea of 'Citizen's Desks' for the redressal of public complaints but there was no implementation. According to Jillani Sb, the President wanted to preserve status-quo to prolong his rule, reforms were not part of his agenda. Yes, indeed hurdles must be removed. It is not only Pakistan, all the 56 colonial states left by the British continue to suffer. De-colonization must take place. In a democratic country people are respected as customers. With well-entrenched bureaucracy it is an up-hill task which must be challenged with a firm resolve to serve not rule as has been the case. 'Kadam Baraho' is the standard slogans of the Sharifs. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
