logo
Moment teenagers lob a firework into a house that started a massive blaze and killed an OAP: Pair are jailed for manslaughter

Moment teenagers lob a firework into a house that started a massive blaze and killed an OAP: Pair are jailed for manslaughter

Daily Mail​02-06-2025
This is the moment a hooded teenager threw a lit firework into a home that started a massive blaze and killed a widower pensioner.
Robert Price, 76, had been the victim of a years-long campaign of harassment and criminal damage before he died in the horror fire.
The OAP, who had early signs of dementia, had been tormented by local youths to the point where all of his ground floor windows had been boarded up.
Doorbell video and CCTV captured the yobs walking up to Mr Price's property in Oval Road North, Dagenham, on 27 July 2024.
One lout then climbs onto a brick wall to lob a firework through a boarded-up window, and then sprint away from the house before the camera visibly shakes.
Paramedics and firefighters rushed to Mr Price's home and forced entry where they discovered his body.
He was pronounced dead at the scene with a post-mortem examination later giving the cause of death as inhalation of fire fumes and burns.
Nathan Otitodilchukwu, 18, and a 16-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, were today both jailed after previously admitting manslaughter.
Otitodilchukwu was handed a six year jail term, while the teenager was sentenced to two years and eight months.
Mr Price's family today thanked the CPS, police and social services 'for the work and support they have given us during this difficult time'.
'We would ask that our privacy be respected to allow us to grieve in peace,' they said in a statement released by Scotland Yard.
The teenage killers were involved in trying to hurl a firework into Mr Price's home earlier that day but they fled when the pensioner opened his front door.
Doorbell footage showed Mr Price open the door slightly and say something, before the 16-year-old ran away shouting 'he saw me fam' as the youths aborted their attack.
A short time later, they walked back towards the house, with doorbell footage capturing him saying, 'come with me, come with me' and then 'gonna f****** torch this n****', the Old Bailey previously heard.
The duo ran into the front garden of the house before the 16-year-old stepped on the gas meter box, reached above the boarded-up section of the window and punched a hole, the court was told.
Otitodilchukwu is heard on Ring doorbell footage saying: 'Gonna f***ing torch this n*****', 'Yo, you f***ing paedo', 'yo you f***ing d***head' ' 'We are gonna f**k you up,' before running away.
Sentencing the duo today, Judge Rebecca Trowler KC told the younger boy: 'Mr Price lost his life in circumstances of a planned attack where I am sure you intended some harm, and in any event it was highly reckless as to the risk of harm.'
She noted the older defendant had 'poor impulse control' and a 'lack of appreciation of the impact on others'.
However, his was a 'determined effort to carry out this offence and cause harm just short of serious harm', she said.
The judge accepted that the younger defendant may have been 'encouraged' by the other boy who had previously been involved in criminal behaviour.
She also noted that he had expressed 'remorse' and awareness of the 'gravity' of the offence.
Previously, prosecutor Catherine Farrelly KC had told how Mr Price's terraced home caught fire in July 2024, with black smoke filling the house before he could be saved.
'Robert Price was killed in a fire which was started at his home address by the two defendants who smashed a window at his property and threw a firework inside,' she told the court.
John Shoesmith, who had been friends with Mr Price for 10 years, said he would never leave his house because 'kids would disturb him,' Ms Farrelly said.
Mr Shoesmith described him as socially awkward and said his lack of social skills and poor hearing meant some people found him 'hard to get along with'.
The harassment included acts of criminal damage to his house, the court heard.
According to Mr Shoesmith, Mr Price's windows were regularly smashed by a number of the local children, to the point that he had his downstairs windows boarded up.
'In Mr Shoesmith's words, this would happen all the time and they would make his life hell,' Ms Farrelly said.
The most recent incident of criminal damage had occurred three days before Mr Price's death, when a brick had been put through his window, the court heard.
CCTV footage from the day of the fire showed that in the hours before the attack, Otitodilchukwu, who was living in care, met up with the 16-year-old boy.
They filmed themselves launching a firework into a lake, the court was told.
At around 5.30pm, they walked towards Mr Price's house with the 16-year-old holding what was believed to be a firework, Ms Farrelly said.
Doorbell footage showed Mr Price open the door slightly and say something, before the 16-year-old ran away shouting 'he saw me fam' shortly before the youths returned and carried out the attack.
'A loud bang can be heard, followed by high-pitched laughing as the group run away,' the prosecutor said.
A few minutes later, smoke could be seen coming out of the window, before flames and black smoke engulfed the room, the court heard.
A neighbour who had seen the flames knocked on the door and briefly spoke to Mr Price, but his 'responses became less clear', the court was told.
The neighbour tried to get into the house to rescue Mr Price, but the door was locked, Ms Farrelly said.
Firefighters were later able to get inside and put out the fire, but Mr Price could not be saved.
When Otitodilchukwu, of Romford, returned to his care home that evening, he spoke to a support worker and said, 'I'm going to do 20 years in jail' and 'Don't check for news about what happened in Dagenham', the court heard.
A little later he also told his support worker: 'I was drinking with my friends on Saturday and we were shooting fireworks.'
A few days later, he asked a woman if she had heard about the fire, before telling her, 'If anyone asks, don't say I was in Dagenham,' the court was told.
When asked why, he said: 'Maybe I started the fire with a firework.'
He went on to say that he was drunk with two of his friends, that he had put a firework through a letter box and that it was funny.
Otitodilchukwu was arrested the same day and the 16-year-old was arrested the following month.
In a victim impact statement read to the court, Mr Price's family said he was a 'kind' and 'generous' man, and described the 'suffering' that he must have endured.
Detective Chief Inspector Phil Clarke, from Specialist Crime North, said: 'This is a deeply tragic case, which saw a man lose his life in his own home after a completely mindless and reckless act had devastating consequences.
'The young defendants will now have to face the consequences of their actions by spending time in prison.
'I hope Robert's family can take some solace in this outcome and am pleased the defendants spared them the ordeal of a trial.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour council criticised after banning military equipment from Armed Forces Day celebrations
Labour council criticised after banning military equipment from Armed Forces Day celebrations

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Labour council criticised after banning military equipment from Armed Forces Day celebrations

A council has been criticised for banning military equipment from its annual Armed Forces Day celebrations, citing residents' concerns about planned protests. Labour-controlled City of York council made the decision to ban the equipment over fears that the Peace Pledge Union (PPU), a pacifist organisation, and ForcesWatch, which is committed to 'demilitarising the future', said they would hold protests in the city this weekend. York marked Armed Forces Day on Saturday following the official national commemorations last week, but city authorities banned equipment ranging from weapons to vehicles from the parade by local military groups and institutions. The city instead introduced a 'brand new Armed Forces Day Trail', a self-guided tour of its key military sites with a map and guidebook. 'With our military partners, we carefully considered residents' concerns and decided that the day will go ahead as planned, with the only change being no military equipment on show,' explained council leader Claire Douglas. 'This decision in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day and our deep respect and commitment to those who serve and have served. We look forward to a fantastic day.' While Ms Douglas did not confirm what the residents' concerns in question were, one soldier who lives in the region told the UK Defence Journal it was over 'fears it would spark protest'. 'It's frustrating, especially when Armed Forces Day is meant to be a chance for the public to see what we do and engage with us directly,' the soldier said, adding that it was a 'ban by any other name'. But the PPU argues that Armed Forces Day events give children a 'simplistic image of armed force as glamorous and fun' and helps to fuel the rise of 'militarism in everyday life in the UK'. Over the years, protest groups have regularly staged protests across Britain on the day of military celebration. But the number of events being held on the day across the country has dwindled over time. ForcesWatch and PPU recorded a record number of demonstrations on the national Armed Forces Day last weekend, claiming that protests had tripled compared to last year, taking place in more than 50 locations. Chris Steward, leader of the conservative group of councillors in York, said military equipment was a 'crucial part' of the day. He told the Telegraph: 'What use is any military without equipment? We totally condemn this decision of the Labour councillors. There has been no cross-party involvement,' he said, Mr Steward accused the Labour party of falling from a 'proud, patriotic party' to one which is 'more concerned how their actions may offend their increasingly extreme supporters'.

Tories demand foreigners are banned from getting disability benefits as Kemi Badenoch seeks to tighten access to handouts after Labour's U-turn
Tories demand foreigners are banned from getting disability benefits as Kemi Badenoch seeks to tighten access to handouts after Labour's U-turn

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Tories demand foreigners are banned from getting disability benefits as Kemi Badenoch seeks to tighten access to handouts after Labour's U-turn

The Tories are demanding foreigners are banned from claiming key disability benefits in the wake of Labour 's humiliating U-turn on welfare reforms. Kemi Badenoch 's party will attempt to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten access to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit. The Conservatives will table an amendment proposing a requirement for eligibility for PIP to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually. They also want to prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of Universal Credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD. And a third amendment would block a planned increase in Universal Credit and restrict PIP for some people who are not British citizens. It comes after Sir Keir Starmer was forced to shelve Labour's own plans to restrict eligibility to PIP, the main disability payment in England, in the face of a huge Labour rebellion. As he endured his worst week in office so far, the Prime Minister also witnessed Chancellor Rachel Reeves openly weeping in the House of Commons. She said her upset was due to a 'personal' issue, but it came as the welfare U-turn piled further pressure on Ms Reeves to fill a black hole in the public finances. Mrs Badenoch branded the Government's watering down of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - now set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – as 'farcical'. The Tories will now look to lay amendments to the legislation with Mrs Badenoch due to deliver a major speech on welfare on Thursday. She is expected to say the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'. 'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will add. Under the Tory plans, PIP and both categories of Universal Credit health top-up would be limited 'to British citizens, excluding all foreign nationals', according to The Telegraph. There would be an exception for citizens from EU countries who have settled status, who are entitled to equal treatment under the Brexit deal. Under current rules, foreign nationals must prove that they have lived in Britain for two of the last three years to claim PIP. Helen Whately, the Tory shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'The Government's welfare plans are in chaos. Instead of saving money, the welfare Bill we're voting on next week costs money. 'We've told them how to fix it: stop signing people off sick for mental health problems like anxiety, bring back face-to-face assessments, and only give sickness benefits to British citizens. 'If ministers had the guts to take up even one of these proposals, they could save billions – and spare the country from more tax rises this autumn.' Labour's original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5billion a year. Economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to Labour rebels, as well as Sir Keir's previous U-turn on axing winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. Ms Reeves has said it is impossible for her to rule out tax rises in the autumn, as she warned 'there are costs' to the watering down of the welfare bill. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, has demanded the Office for Budget Responsibilty (OBR) watchdog carry out an emergency forecast to update the fiscal outlook in the wake of Sir Keir's climbdowns. In a letter to OBR chair Richard Hughes, he wrote: 'The public, Parliament and markets deserve clarity and transparency about the impact of recent events on the nation's finances and the Government's fiscal strategy.'

Keir Starmer should be bold and consider a wealth tax, Neil Kinnock says
Keir Starmer should be bold and consider a wealth tax, Neil Kinnock says

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Keir Starmer should be bold and consider a wealth tax, Neil Kinnock says

Keir Starmer's government is suffering from a 'lack of narrative' about what it is trying to achieve and should be more fiscally bold and consider a tax on wealth, Neil Kinnock has said. The former Labour leader said too many of the government's achievements were being overshadowed. A year after a landslide election win, the party is struggling in the polls and has U-turned on policies including cuts to winter fuel payments and welfare. 'It's not a mess, but what has gone wrong is really the lack of a narrative, a story of the objectives of the government and where they're working towards it and how they're working towards it,' Kinnock said. The government had implemented 'a series of really commendable and absolutely essential policies', added Kinnock, who led Labour into two elections. But these policies, he said, had been obscured by controversies over things such winter fuel and welfare, 'all those negative things that really are heartily disliked across the Labour movement and more widely'. 'And that means that, apart from the distaste for undertaking those policies, the cloud hangs over the accomplishments of the government, which are substantial and will become greater.' Kinnock was scathing about the move by Jeremy Corbyn and other former Labour MPs to set up their own leftwing party. 'I understand the difficulty of thinking up a name, and in a comradely way, I'd suggest one: It would be the Farage Assistance Group.' Amid increasing speculation that Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will have to raise taxes at the autumn budget, Kinnock said that while Labour's election focus on fiscal discipline was vital for restoring credibility, 'it did mean that they depressed expectations and limited themselves by saying they were going to rigidly stick to fiscal rules'. Kinnock said there was a risk of the government being 'bogged down by their own imposed limitations' and he believed a number of cabinet ministers would want more fiscal boldness. One option, he said, would be a form of wealth tax, which would be useful not just to raise revenue but as 'a gesture, or a substantial gesture in the direction of equity fairness would make a big difference' in a time when 'earned incomes have stagnated in real terms, while asset values have zoomed'. He said such a policy should target wealth above £6m or £7m, where a 2% tax would raise £10bn or £11bn a year. 'That's not going to pay all the bills, but it does two things. One is to secure resources, which is very important. But the second thing it does is to say to the country: we are the government of equity, and this is a country which is very substantially fed up with the fact that whatever happens in the world, whatever happens in the UK, the same interests come out on top, unscathed all the time, while everybody else is paying more for gutted services.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store