Trump says Epstein ‘stole' Giuffre and other young women from Mar-a-Lago spa
One of the women, he acknowledged, was Virginia Giuffre, who was among Epstein's most well-known sex trafficking accusers.
Trump's comments expanded on remarks he had made a day earlier, when he said he had banned Epstein from his private club in Florida two decades ago because his one-time friend 'stole people that worked for me'. At the time, he did not make clear who those workers were.
The Republican president has faced an outcry over his administration's refusal to release more records about Epstein after promises of transparency, a rare example of strain within Trump's tightly controlled political coalition. Trump has attempted to tamp down questions about the case, expressing annoyance that people are still talking about it six years after Epstein committed suicide while awaiting trial, even though some of his own allies have promoted conspiracy theories about it.
Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's imprisoned former girlfriend, was recently interviewed inside a Florida courthouse by the Justice Department's No. 2 official, though officials have not publicly disclosed what she said. Her lawyers said Tuesday that she's willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony.
Aboard Air Force One while returning from Scotland, Trump said he was upset that Epstein was 'taking people who worked for me'. The women, he said, were 'taken out of the spa, hired by him — in other words, gone.'
'I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people,' Trump said. When it happened again, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.
Asked if Giuffre was one of the employees poached by Epstein, he demurred but then said 'he stole her'.
The White House originally said Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because he was acting like a 'creep'.
Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year. She claimed that Maxwell spotted her working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, when she was a teenager, and hired her as Epstein's masseuse, which led to sexual abuse.
Although Giuffre's allegations did not become part of criminal prosecutions against Epstein, she is central to conspiracy theories about the case. She accused Epstein of pressuring her into having sex with powerful men.
Maxwell, who has denied Giuffre's allegations, is serving a 20-year-prison sentence in a Florida federal prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse underage girls.
A spokeswoman for the House Oversight Committee, which requested the interview with Maxwell, said the panel would not consider granting the immunity she requested.
The potential interview is part of a frenzied, renewed interest in the Epstein saga following the Justice Department's July statement that it would not be releasing any additional records from the investigation, an abrupt announcement that stunned online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's political base who had been hoping to find proof of a government coverup.
Since then, the Trump administration has sought to present itself as promoting transparency, with the department urging courts to unseal grand jury transcripts from the sex-trafficking investigation and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewing Maxwell over the course of two days at a Florida courthouse last week.
In a letter Tuesday, Maxwell's attorneys said that though their initial instinct was for Maxwell to invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, they are open to having her cooperate provided that lawmakers satisfy their request for immunity and other conditions.
But the Oversight Committee seemed to reject that offer outright.
'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' a spokesperson said.
Separately, Maxwell's attorneys have urged the Supreme Court to review her conviction, saying she did not receive a fair trial. They also say that one way she would testify 'openly and honestly, in public', is in the event of a pardon by Trump, who has told reporters that such a move is within his rights but that he has not been not asked to make it.
'She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning,' they said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Big day for America': US President Donald Trump declares August 1 tariff deadline will not be extended after securing deals with Japan, EU
President Donald Trump has declared his August 1 deadline for the introduction of tariffs will not be extended after the United States secured fresh trade deals with Japan and the European Union. The President's threat of widespread tariffs first emerged in April when the US leader announced a long list of nations would be hit with levies to address perceived trade imbalances. Those measures were subsequently delayed, however, with President Trump ultimately pushing back their introduction until August 1 in order to strike "90 deals in 90 days". Despite the delay, the US is set to fall well short of that target, prompting speculation the President could again push back the deadline. On Wednesday, though, President Trump took to his Truth Social platform to dispel any doubts about when tariffs would come into force. "The August first deadline is the August first deadline - it stands strong, and will not be extended," he wrote. "A big day for America!!!" The declaration is likely to cause concern for a number of Australian businesses, with the Albanese government yet to negotiate a new deal with the Trump administration. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have both cited an existing free trade agreement, as well as Australia's longstanding trade deficit with the US, as reasons the nation should escape tariffs, although neither argument has appeared to resonate. President Trump had singled out Australian biosecurity restrictions on US beef, which the government loosened last week, as an example of unfair trade practices, while pharmaceutical companies are understood to have lobbied his administration over Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. If Australian officials are unsuccessful at allaying those concerns, and others, the nation appears set to face tariffs of at least 10 per cent - although President Trump flagged that number may rise as high as 20 per cent in future. The President's declaration comes on the heels of major new agreements struck with Indonesia, Japan and the EU. All three nations will still face tariffs as part of the deals, although at a lower level than originally threatened when President Trump first announced the measures. President Trump's moves to upend global trade have sparked chaos in world markets and prompted the International Monetary Fund to warn they could impact economic growth in the years ahead. In its July World Economic Outlook Update, the organisation's chief economist, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, warned: "The world economy is still hurting, and it's going to continue hurting with tariffs at that level, even though it's not as bad as it could have been". Mr Gourinchas added tariffs were beginning to impact the US economy, saying the IMF was seeing evidence consumer prices were beginning to edge higher.
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem
The existence of a so-called Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' matters, of course. As do the political implications of the long-running saga of the paedophile financier, whose death by suicide in 2019 turbocharged the conspiracies already swirling about a secretive cabal of the wealthy and powerful, and the lengths they would go to protect their secrets. Given that the men rumoured to have been 'gifted' vulnerable girls trafficked by Epstein were friends or associates, rather than paying clients, one might assume that Epstein knew better than to keep such a list anywhere other than in his own head. The obsessive focus on this list, along with a trove of court and other documents relating to the criminal investigation against Epstein, diverts attention away from what should trouble us most: Why Epstein got such a kick out of abusing underage girls, and why he got away with it for decades. In this post-Me Too era it's worth examining whether Epstein is a particularly egregious case of a much broader phenomenon. The profile of Epstein's victims, of which there are said to be more than 1000, is familiar to us already, should we care to look. A vulnerable young woman, sometimes from a troubled background, sometimes in need of cash, aspires to make something of her life. In awe of the obscene wealth, status, clout or celebrity of a powerful, older male who, implausibly at first, suggests friendship. He might explicitly offer to use his influence, or such assistance might be implied. Favours are sought, then they are compelled. There is a kind of implicit blackmail, only sometimes articulated, about what might happen should she try to break free or, heaven forbid, alert others to what she has been led to believe she has been complicit in, and guilty of. Does this remind you of Harvey Weinstein, that other notorious case recently back in the courts? What about 'Diddy' Combs, convicted this month of 'transportation to engage in prostitution' during more than a decade of abuse of several women including young singer Cassie Ventura, whom he started dating when she was 19 years old (he was 37)? Then there's fellow Grammy-winning rapper R. Kelly, serving concurrent 20- and 30-year prison sentences for child sex abuse, sex trafficking and racketeering. Among Kelly's many victims was deceased pop star Aaliyah, whom Kelly illegally married when she was 15 years old. Mohamed al-Fayed. Russell Brand (allegedly). Neil Gaiman (allegedly). Bill Cosby. Jimmy Savile. Rolf Harris. Larry Nassar. Loading Groupies and gold-diggers have been around forever, and all of these men could have potentially leveraged their wealth, power or status to have their pick of such women in an entirely consensual fashion, as unpalatable as that may be to some. So why is it that the more influence a man accrues, the seemingly higher the likelihood he will become an abuser? And why do many of these men seem to get off on targeting vulnerable women in particular? There is no single typology of a paedophile or sex abuser, but the research on the nexus between sex and power does provide clues. Studies have demonstrated that feelings of power enhance pre-existing sociopathic tendencies, and that 'men who associate sex with power are more likely to use power to get sex '. Men who hold misogynistic or dehumanising views of women have also been shown to be more likely to perpetrate sexual violence. A combination of both 'high levels of power motivation' and 'strong power-sex associations' is considered a predictive factor for aggressive sexual behaviour. This brings us to that other high-profile guy recently convicted of sexual assault, who also has a lengthy history of misogynistic, dehumanising and allegedly abusive behaviour toward women: Donald J. Trump. The president's infamous 'grab 'em by the pussy' and the remark preceding it, 'when you're a star, they let you do it', suggests that, like the other wealthy and influential men I've mentioned, he strongly associates sex with power.
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem
The existence of a so-called Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' matters, of course. As do the political implications of the long-running saga of the paedophile financier, whose death by suicide in 2019 turbocharged the conspiracies already swirling about a secretive cabal of the wealthy and powerful, and the lengths they would go to protect their secrets. Given that the men rumoured to have been 'gifted' vulnerable girls trafficked by Epstein were friends or associates, rather than paying clients, one might assume that Epstein knew better than to keep such a list anywhere other than in his own head. The obsessive focus on this list, along with a trove of court and other documents relating to the criminal investigation against Epstein, diverts attention away from what should trouble us most: Why Epstein got such a kick out of abusing underage girls, and why he got away with it for decades. In this post-Me Too era it's worth examining whether Epstein is a particularly egregious case of a much broader phenomenon. The profile of Epstein's victims, of which there are said to be more than 1000, is familiar to us already, should we care to look. A vulnerable young woman, sometimes from a troubled background, sometimes in need of cash, aspires to make something of her life. In awe of the obscene wealth, status, clout or celebrity of a powerful, older male who, implausibly at first, suggests friendship. He might explicitly offer to use his influence, or such assistance might be implied. Favours are sought, then they are compelled. There is a kind of implicit blackmail, only sometimes articulated, about what might happen should she try to break free or, heaven forbid, alert others to what she has been led to believe she has been complicit in, and guilty of. Does this remind you of Harvey Weinstein, that other notorious case recently back in the courts? What about 'Diddy' Combs, convicted this month of 'transportation to engage in prostitution' during more than a decade of abuse of several women including young singer Cassie Ventura, whom he started dating when she was 19 years old (he was 37)? Then there's fellow Grammy-winning rapper R. Kelly, serving concurrent 20- and 30-year prison sentences for child sex abuse, sex trafficking and racketeering. Among Kelly's many victims was deceased pop star Aaliyah, whom Kelly illegally married when she was 15 years old. Mohamed al-Fayed. Russell Brand (allegedly). Neil Gaiman (allegedly). Bill Cosby. Jimmy Savile. Rolf Harris. Larry Nassar. Loading Groupies and gold-diggers have been around forever, and all of these men could have potentially leveraged their wealth, power or status to have their pick of such women in an entirely consensual fashion, as unpalatable as that may be to some. So why is it that the more influence a man accrues, the seemingly higher the likelihood he will become an abuser? And why do many of these men seem to get off on targeting vulnerable women in particular? There is no single typology of a paedophile or sex abuser, but the research on the nexus between sex and power does provide clues. Studies have demonstrated that feelings of power enhance pre-existing sociopathic tendencies, and that 'men who associate sex with power are more likely to use power to get sex '. Men who hold misogynistic or dehumanising views of women have also been shown to be more likely to perpetrate sexual violence. A combination of both 'high levels of power motivation' and 'strong power-sex associations' is considered a predictive factor for aggressive sexual behaviour. This brings us to that other high-profile guy recently convicted of sexual assault, who also has a lengthy history of misogynistic, dehumanising and allegedly abusive behaviour toward women: Donald J. Trump. The president's infamous 'grab 'em by the pussy' and the remark preceding it, 'when you're a star, they let you do it', suggests that, like the other wealthy and influential men I've mentioned, he strongly associates sex with power.
