
Jagdeep Dhankhar Resigns: Outspoken Vice President Who Took On Judiciary
Jagdeep Dhankhar, who bowed out of office of India's 14th Vice President today two years ahead of schedule citing his health, had made his mark both in Rajya Sabha as well as in Bengal as the Governor of the state. An outspoken leader, his tenure in the second highest office of India was marked by regular run-ins with the Opposition and strong comments on the judiciary over the issue of separation of powers.
The 74-year-old had said earlier this month that he would retire at the "right time", subject to "divine interventions". The Opposition Congress remarked that there was more to his resignation than meets the eye.
In his letter to President Droupadi Murmu, Mr Dhankhar had said his resignation would be effective immediately and thanked her and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
"I am deeply thankful for the invaluable experiences and insights I have gained as Vice President in our great democracy. It has been a privilege and satisfaction to witness and partake in India's remarkable economic progress and unprecedented exponential development during this significant period. Serving in this transformative era of our nation's history has been a true honor," he wrote in his letter to the President.
Born in a farmer's family in Kithana, a small village in Rajasthan, Mr Dhankhar's journey to the second highest office in the country has been cited frequently as a study in ability, grit and determination.
An alumni of Chittorgarh's Sainik School and later, the Rajasthan University, he became a lawyer in the Rajasthan High Court and subsequently the Supreme Court, before turning to politics.
Part of the Congress when PV Narasimha Rao was Prime Minister, Mr Dhankhar had shifted to the BJP with the rise of Ashok Gehlot in Rajasthan and even had a brief stint as a minister in the government led by Chandrasekhar.
Over the years, Mr Dhankhar was known for championing issues related to the Other Backward Classes, including the grant of OBC status to the Jat community in Rajasthan.
His surprise appointment as the Governor of West Bengal in 2019 brought him back into political limelight, and he remained a vigilant sentry, often calling the Mamata Banerjee government to task over multiple issues including law and order, federalism and university appointments.
The advocate-turned politician was equally stern with the Opposition in the Upper House over multiple issues, leading to an attempt to remove him from office. While the attempt came to nothing, he remained the first Vice-President against whom such a move was made. Mr Dhankhar had brushed off the notice, likening it to using a "rusted" vegetable knife for bypass surgery.
In the Vice-Presidential election held on in August 2022, Mr Dhankhar had defeated opposition candidate Margaret Alva with 528 of 710 valid votes, securing 74.37 per cent - the highest margin of victory since 1992.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
21 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Literature, icons, history: How Indian nationhood was built through local languages
Earlier analyses by political scientists tended to emphasise the compulsions of electoral mobilisation and factional power conflicts within the ruling Congress Party or the masking of communal or ethnic demands by those of language. A spate of recent research on the emergence of reading publics in the different regions of India – which came about as a result of the proliferation of printed literature in the modern Indian languages in the 19th and 20th centuries – has given us an entirely new perspective for understanding the cultural foundations of mass nationalism. We can now see that the imagination of the nation as a community of millions of people unrelated by kin or face-to-face proximity was enabled by the circulation of printed texts in newspapers, magazines, novels, government circulars, and textbooks. Poets, novelists, and playwrights performed a crucial role in creating the emotional attachment of masses of people to something they learnt to call their nation. The printed text was supplemented by the performance of songs and plays as well as the circulation of printed images. This was possible only through the medium of the standardised print vernaculars. Consequently, the consciousness of large democratic solidarities was grounded in the regional languages. This was the reason why the Congress, at the moment of its transformation into a mass movement of nationalism, realised the importance of organising itself into monolingual provincial organisations. The same force was active after Independence in the demand for linguistic states. But if the proximate community of national solidarity was built around the regional languages, how could there be a sense of Indian nationhood? This is where the Indian experience has produced a unique historical example. This book will set out the argument that the description of the Indian nation varies according to the language formation in which one is positioned. The nation is imagined and contested in different ways in Tamil, Marathi, Urdu, Hindi, Punjabi, Assamese, or Bengali, and different genres of prose and verse literature, music, art, and theatre participate in this project of imagination. But even when the entity may be called the Indian nation, it actually looks different from each regional perspective. This is reflected in the fact that the terms 'nation' and 'state' often have different equivalents in the regional languages. Thus, Assamese and Odia use desh, and Telugu and Tamil desam and tecam, to mean nation, while in Bengali the word is jati. The word for state in Bengali is rashtra and in Telugu rashtram, which are completely different from the way the word is used in Hindi. Tamil uses arasu or maanilam. These differences are not merely nominal, because each of these words have different conceptual and affective histories in each language. My argument, therefore, is that we can only, and necessarily, get a relativist view of the Indian nation – relative to the linguistic region from which one is looking – since there is no available linguistic perspective from which we can obtain an invariant view of the object. Academic histories produced in English by professional historians only give us the history of the Indian nation-state built around an imperial state apparatus. The history of the Indian nation as a solidarity of the people can only be imagined in a vernacular print language: of these, there are several and each produces a different description of the Indian nation. Consequently, only a relativist view can reconcile the history of the state with that of the people. Thus, in Maharashtra, the memory of the Maratha Empire frames the imagination of a sovereign people, united by Maharashtra Dharma, fighting a prolonged war against the Mughals under the leadership of the warrior-king Shivaji. This nation, portrayed mainly by Brahmin writers, is male, militant, and imperial, in which Maharashtra leads the rest of India. But this vision was challenged by anti-Brahmin intellectuals who rejected the inheritance of the Peshwa-dominated Maratha Empire and instead held up the devotional congregation of the Varkari sect of Pandharpur as the living soul of Maharashtra Dharma. By contrast, the imagination of the nation in Bengal is that of a mother, insulted and injured by foreign rulers, seeking protection and sacrifice from her children. The image of the mother goddess came to dominate this representation of the nation, iconically symbolised in the song Vande Mataram. Soon, this representation of Mother Bengal was transformed into the image of Bharat Mata and circulated all over India. This showed that signifiers of the nation could be used interchangeably for the regional as well as the pan-Indian community, depending on the context. But this vision of the nation in Bengal, constructed mainly by Hindu upper-caste writers, with its strong association with the iconography of the warrior mother-goddess, was contested by Muslim intellectuals. Interestingly, when Bangladesh was created in 1971, it adopted as its national anthem a song by Rabindranath Tagore that represented Bengal as a homely mother who loves, shelters, feeds, and plays with her children – yet another transformation of the same signifier familiar in Bengal's literary imagination. In the Tamil region, the language itself was deified as the iconic maternal image of Tamilttāy. Tamil acquired the status of a classical but living language that rivalled Sanskrit. When the first generation of Brahmin nationalists identified the Indian nation with Aryan Hinduism, they were challenged by the non-Brahmin movement in the mid-20th century. The public register of the Tamil language in the theatre, cinema, and political oratory was classicised by replacing Sanskrit with pure Tamil words. This was the reverse of what happened with most North Indian languages, which produced a modern vocabulary for public use by adopting or coining neologisms out of Sanskrit words. Further, the historical imagination of the state was stoked in Tamil Nadu by memories of the glory of the Pallava, Chola, and Pandyan kingdoms, rivals to the empires of the North. The Dravidian movement was launched by the Justice Party which was anti-Congress and pro-British. Later, EV Ramasamy sustained the critique of mainstream Indian nationalism by pointing to a series of real and imagined overlaps between the Hindu religion, the Brahmin caste, the Sanskrit language, the Aryan race, the valorisation of unproductive occupations, and the patriarchal subordination of women. This reached a critical point in the anti-Hindi agitations of 1937–40 and the early 1950s when the Dravidian movement demanded freedom from Hindi imperialism by separating from India. The legacy of Dravidianism and the anti-Brahmin movement in Tamil Nadu continues to this day, even though there is no separatist political demand any more. The imagination of the Indian nation in Tamil is thus quite distinct. The role that secondary education plays in grounding the imagination of the nation in a language is dramatically shown in the large swathe of North India where Urdu was the language of bureaucracy and education in the colonial period. In Punjab, the modern high literary culture of the province was built through the medium of Urdu. But the regional and cultural identity signified by Urdu was much larger than Punjab. When the Arya Samaj tried to build a reformed Hindu identity in Punjab, it preferred to use Hindi as its chosen language which occupied an equally large cultural space. Ironically, therefore, Punjabi, which was the ordinary spoken language of most Punjabis, did not become a modern print vernacular before the partition of the province in 1947. The imagination of the nation in Punjab, split between three languages – Urdu, Hindi, and Punjabi – finally acquired three distinct demographic categories tied to three religious groups – Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs. These divisions were resolved politically not merely by the bloody partition of Punjab between India and Pakistan, but also by the later separation of Haryana from Punjab. Nevertheless, the relation between regional solidarity and the pan-Indian remains problematic because of the continued resonance of a distinct Sikh nationalism.


Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Rajya Sabha to hold debate on 'Op Sindoor' today; PM Modi likely to participate
New Delhi: A comprehensive discussion on 'Operation Sindoor' is scheduled to begin in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday as part of the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament. There is also anticipation that Prime Minister Narendra Modi may participate during the course of the discussion, underlining the significance the government places on national security. Key ministers, including Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, are expected to participate in the debate, which aims to highlight the strategic and diplomatic dimensions of India's recent counter-terror operation. The debate follows an intense discussion in the Lok Sabha on Monday, where Defence Minister Rajnath Singh delivered the opening remarks and issued a stern warning to Pakistan. He stated that India would not hesitate to resume strikes if provoked again. 'Let this be a clear message to those who support terror. India will respond decisively to any act of aggression,' Singh said, drawing loud applause from the treasury benches. Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, was India's military response to the deadly April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, J&K, which resulted in the loss of 26 lives, including many tourists. The operation was a joint effort by the Indian Army, Air Force, and intelligence agencies, aimed at dismantling cross-border terror infrastructure. According to Singh's statement in the Lok Sabha, the Indian armed forces eliminated over 100 terrorists during the operation. Nine terror infrastructure targets across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir were destroyed through precision strikes. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also addressed the House, highlighting the diplomatic efforts that ensured international support and understanding for India's actions. Prime Minister Narendra Modi lauded the speeches of both Singh and Jaishankar, calling them 'insightful' and commending the courage and professionalism of the Indian armed forces. 'Their remarks reflect the strength and determination of New India,' PM Modi said. As the Rajya Sabha prepares to take up the issue, the discussion is expected to shed further light on the execution and impact of Operation Sindoor.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
MP Vamsi Krishna protests against SIR
Mancherial: Congress MP Vamsi Krishna raised his voice in Parliament against the allegedly conspiratorial implementation of SIR (Special Identification Revision) of voter list in Bihar. He joined Priyanka Gandhi in a protest on Parliament premises in New Delhi, along with other Congress MPs, strongly condemning the SIR process on Monday. They described the attempt to filter voters based on religion and caste as a 'conspiracy to destroy democracy.' Vamsi warned that this move aims to categorise voters and vowed to fight openly to protect democracy. Priyanka Gandhi reminded the Central government that its responsibility is not to remove voters—but to listen to their voices.