John Swinney rules out SNP coalition with Reform UK
Appearing at a live recording of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh on Wednesday, the First Minister did not appear to outright reject working with Scottish Labour, while he was much more unequivocal about Nigel Farage's party.
When asked by a member of the audience if he would consider joining forces with Scottish Labour after the next election to get his party over the line, Swinney initially said discussions around a potential pact were based on 'scenarios thrown up after the election'.
'I want to do spectacularly well in 2026, that's what my sights are on," he said.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar backs UK disability benefit cuts amid Scottish Labour revolt
'Whatever else the election throws up, then we'll deal with that.'
But on Reform UK, he said: 'I'm not going to engage roundabout Farage and Reform, I won't engage with them."
When pressed further on potentially working with Anas Sarwar's party, Swinney pointed to the SNP's minority government, which was in office between 2007 and 2011, a period where he was finance secretary and had 'all sorts of folk voting for my lovely budgets'.
Recent polling ahead of the election in May still has the SNP as the largest party after a reversal in Labour's fortunes, but the surge of Reform UK has seen them jump into second place in terms of support in some surveys.
Swinney admitted the polls were not where he would like them to be.
'I'm not sitting here saying to you where we are in the polls now is just fine for me – it's not,' he said.
'It's not acceptable for me, I need to get us into a stronger position.'
READ MORE: Pro-independence Holyrood majority 'matters for future of politics' – John Curtice
Pointing to the recent Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election – which the SNP lost to Labour – the First Minister said the party was not planning for it to be sparked, which came after the death of SNP MSP Christina McKelvie, but he would be ready for next year.
Later in the same podcast, the possibility of a coalition was put to Mr Sarwar, who said he believed the situation simply wouldn't arise for such a move – describing it as 'mad' – and reiterating his stance that Labour would seek to lead a minority administration if it could.
The next parliament, he said, would be a 'parliament of minorities'.
'Of course, with any minority government, you will have to find areas of consensus to make improvements in Scotland,' he said.
'But I genuinely believe, if we get a change of government next year and we are in a parliament of minorities … depending on leaderships and how people choose to act after there's been a change of government in Scotland, I genuinely believe that there will be a scope and an appetite to get things done in our country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
24 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Labour must take urgent action to restore investor confidence and turbocharge economic growth
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Almost exactly a year on from the Labour party sweeping to power, we are beginning to see how Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves plan to deliver on their ambitions to restore confidence in the UK's economic prospects and turbocharge growth. The spending review and now the industrial strategy have both provided more detail on the government's vision, building on some of the positive moves the government has already made. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad No one would dispute that the Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer are operating in an evolving – and often difficult – international context, and that they have acted swiftly and effectively to mitigate emerging challenges. Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have been engaging in good faith with business, but the October Budget hit business confidence (Picture: Jacob King) | PA Good work undermined Similarly, the government has begun a process of regulatory reform that could help stimulate business activity and it continues to show a willingness to engage in good faith with industry, including financial services. Plans to reduce energy costs for some industries, albeit on an elongated timescale, will also be welcome. Yet it is fair to say that much of this good work had been undermined by less positive changes elsewhere. Few would dispute that the October Budget knocked business confidence at a time when momentum finally appeared to be returning to the UK economy. Further negative changes later this year may dent confidence still further. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Equally, while the government continues to favour reform, many businesses are growing increasingly frustrated at the pace of change. Above all, there is a sense that the optimism that surrounded the new government's economic prospectus is – a year on – rapidly diminishing. Strong interest in Scotland Following a recent trip to the United States to promote investment in our financial services industry, it is clear there is still strong international interest in what Scotland and the wider UK have to offer. We may have challenges around infrastructure and the general business environment, but Scotland's financial and professional services sector continues to punch well above its weight. The strength of our universities, the depth of our talent base, our record in innovation, our relative political stability and the clarity of our regulatory frameworks are all powerful selling points. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While economic fundamentals matter, so too does sentiment, so it is important that we address some of our weaknesses, otherwise there is a risk of the UK's attractiveness deteriorating in comparison to other locations. The government is making efforts to address some of these challenges and recent announcements offer an opportunity to restore investor confidence. That is one reason why Scottish Financial Enterprise is organising a Global Investment Summit, which will take place in Edinburgh this October. Convened in partnership with the City of London and the Lord Mayor, the summit will bring together major international investors, UK business leaders, politicians and policymakers to help unlock the next wave of growth. Clear government support will send a strong message that financial and professional services remain a key part of the UK's economic future, and that Scotland is central to that. After a year in office, the government's probationary period is now over. The country and economy urgently need momentum – and, with its plan now in place, the government must kickstart it.
Wales Online
31 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Eluned Morgan responds to UK Labour comments that Wales should be 'grateful' for what it gets from Westminster
Eluned Morgan responds to UK Labour comments that Wales should be 'grateful' for what it gets from Westminster It was during a row over rail funding Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan has said comments by a senior UK Government minister saying Wales should be "grateful" for what it is has had in terms of rail funding were "unfortunate". Mrs Morgan was speaking in an interview with BBC Radio Wales' Sunday Supplement programme. The row started after the spring statement, when the UK Government announced a £445m funding package for rail in Wales. A number of questions were outstanding after that announcement including exactly what it would be spent on, and how much of it will go to the five new, promised stations in Cardiff, Newport and Monmouthshire. While the announcement was much lauded by Welsh Labour figures, it is far short of the total amount Wales needs, and does not address historic underfunding of rail in Wales, something now formally acknowledged by both UK and Welsh Governments. There were big questions remaining after the announcement, many of which we have been unable to get any clarity over since. You can read those here. Ten days ago, Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, was asked in the Commons by Wales' sole Liberal Democrat MP David Chadwick about the funding. "I hope the minister appreciates just how insulting it is for Welsh ears to been told that we're getting a fair deal when it comes to railway funding, when we've been cheated out of billions of pounds due to the classification of several projects as England [and] Wales projects. Article continues below He said five new stations in south Wales was "hardly national renewal". Mr Jones responded: "There's a huge difference. Under the last government you didn't get a penny." He said the UK Government was providing the "largest real terms increase in spending in Wales since devolution began". He added: "You might want to be a little more grateful in future." Mr Chadwick said in a statement: "This was a gobsmackingly arrogant response from the minister that just shows how out of touch Labour are with Wales." While at the time, Plaid Cymru's Liz Saville Roberts said it was "arrogant and insulting". Mrs Morgan was asked by radio host Vaughan Roderick if that was how Westminster sees Wales. "That ws an unfortunate turn of phase," she said. Article continues below Asked if it made her wince, she replied: "I've said it was an unfortunate turn of phrase". She continued: "If you compare what we were given before with relation to rail compared to what we were getting before that's a substantial increase. Is it enough? No. "Has there been a commitment to give further? Yes. This is just the beginning".
The National
40 minutes ago
- The National
Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming Pip
Wes Streeting was interviewed on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme by Victoria Derbyshire, who was filling in for Kuenssberg, about the UK Government's proposed cuts to welfare, which have been described as a 'two-tier disability system' by campaigners. The UK government confirmed on Friday evening that it will make major changes to its planned welfare cuts, aiming to avoid a rebellion by more than 120 Labour backbenchers. Under the new plan, people already receiving Personal Independence Payments (Pip) or the health element of Universal Credit will keep getting them. However, the cuts will apply to future claimants. READ MORE: Police 'examining' Kneecap and Bob Vylan Glastonbury Festival performances When pressed by Derbyshire, Streeting was forced to admit that the Labour Government is planning on having fewer people able to claim disability benefits by reforming the welfare system. During the interview, Derbyshire said: 'Members of the cabinet, you on this program this morning, and the Prime Minister have said it previously, the current system is not sustainable. 'But even after your review, the bottom line is you want fewer people in receipt of Pip, fewer disabled people in receipt of Pip, don't you?' Streeting replied: 'Well, we want to make sure we're getting the line in the right place in terms of.' To which Derbyshire cut him off and asked: 'So, the answer is yes. You want fewer disabled people claiming Pip.' (Image: BBC) Streeting continued: 'I think 1000 more people, coming on every day, like it's not sustainable in its current form, it's just not. 'And unless we address that issue, we've got to do it in a fair way. 'We've got to do it in the right way.' Derbyshire interrupted Streeting again saying: 'But you won't say that out loud. Why not?' Streeting replied: 'Well I just did.' Derbyshire then asked for clarification that there will be fewer disabled people able to claim Pip. To which Streeting replied: 'I literally just said, we've got to make sure that in terms of where we are, where we draw the line, where we get it right, that it is sustainable for the longer term.' MPs are expected to vote on the welfare reform bill on Tuesday at Westminster which the UK Government will be hoping to pass after it offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Keir Starmer's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. The UK Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Speaking on Times Radio earlier this week, campaigner at Disability Rights UK Mikey Erhardt said: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support, depending on the when of the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out.' Meanwhile, Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, said Labour's 'very small' concessions on welfare reforms will still leave the system 'woefully inadequate'.
