logo
Ontario court clears path for First Nations' land claim over Anicinabe Park

Ontario court clears path for First Nations' land claim over Anicinabe Park

National Observer10 hours ago
A group of northwestern Ontario First Nations can proceed with their legal attempt to reclaim Anicinabe Park after a ruling by Ontario's Superior Court cleared a key legal hurdle.
The court rejected two separate motions by the City of Kenora and the Government of Canada to dismiss the case, allowing the land claim to proceed to trial.
The lawsuit was filed last November by Niisaachewan Anishinaabe Nation, Wauzhushk Onigum Nation and Washagamis Bay First Nation. The Nations argue that the 14-acre park was set aside for their use in 1929 but was sold by Canada to the City of Kenora in 1959 without their consent.
They are asking for the land to be returned or held in trust, plus damages for loss of use and for the court to recognize that Canada broke its legal and constitutional duties.
Both the federal and municipal governments argued that the lawsuit was filed too late, citing the Real Property Limitations Act, which requires land claims to be made within 10 years.
But the Superior Court judge rejected that argument, saying it wasn't clear the claim was too late given the circumstances of this case, so the case can go to trial.
'I cannot find that it is plain and obvious that the RLPA [Real Property Limitations Act] bars the Nations' claim. As such, I must dismiss the Defendants' motions,' wrote Justice Robin Lepere in her decision.
The court rejected two separate motions by the City of Kenora and the Government of Canada to dismiss the case, allowing the land claim to proceed to trial.
Luke Hildebrand, a lawyer representing the First Nations, said the case hinges on constitutional rights that don't fall under regular legal time limits. 'There are no limitation periods for constitutional rights,' said Hildebrand. 'You need to deal with things… on the merits, not on the basis of technical defenses like limitation periods. And the court agreed with us.'
Hildebrand told Canada's National Observer there's hope the dispute could be resolved before trial. 'I would love to see the city come to the table, put reconciliation into action and try to resolve this outside of a courtroom,' he said. 'I think the Nations are very open to that. Everyone knows that litigation isn't the best solution, so I would be cautiously optimistic that could happen — but the ball is in the city's court.'
Hildebrand says Anicinabe Park has long been an important place for local First Nations. Families stayed there while visiting children in residential schools, and the land was used for fishing, harvesting and traditional ceremonies.
The First Nations have been fighting to get the land back for generations. More than 50 years ago, the Ojibway Warrior Society occupied Anicinabe Park for 38 days, calling for better living conditions, education, land access and the return of the park to nearby First Nations.
'Anicinabe Park has been, and always will be, a gathering place,' said Chief Skead of Wauzhushk Onigum. 'This case is not about excluding anyone from the park. It's about correcting a historic injustice, a blight on Kenora's history and doing what's right.'
Canada's National Observer reached out to both the federal government and the City of Kenora for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.
'The City of Kenora is at a crossroad,' said Chief Cobiness of Niisaachewan Anishinaabe Nation in a statement. 'It can continue using taxpayer dollars to fight us in court or it can work with us as partners to advance reconciliation.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights
First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights

First Nations in Quebec are suspending consultations with the government on its planned forestry reform because they say the province is not respecting their rights. The Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador says in an open letter that Quebec's minister of natural resources has failed to recognize the status of its members as Indigenous governments. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The Quebec government tabled a bill last spring that would divide public forests into three zones, including one that would prioritize forestry. But the assembly says the zoning approach paves the way for a form of land privatization, and it accuses the government of refusing to engage on the issue. The group, which represents 43 First Nations communities, had agreed to consultations with the government after the bill was tabled in April. Story continues below advertisement The minister has said the legislation is intended to protect communities that rely on the forest industry in an uncertain economic time.

First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights
First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

First Nations call off talks on forestry bill, say Quebec disrespecting rights

MONTREAL – First Nations in Quebec are suspending consultations with the government on its planned forestry reform because they say the province is not respecting their rights. The Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador says in an open letter that Quebec's minister of natural resources has failed to recognize the status of its members as Indigenous governments. The Quebec government tabled a bill last spring that would divide public forests into three zones, including one that would prioritize forestry. But the assembly says the zoning approach paves the way for a form of land privatization, and it accuses the government of refusing to engage on the issue. The group, which represents 43 First Nations communities, had agreed to consultations with the government after the bill was tabled in April. The minister has said the legislation is intended to protect communities that rely on the forest industry in an uncertain economic time. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 22, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store