Cape Town school given green light to change name
Originally named after former Prime Minister Daniel François Malan – a key architect of apartheid – the school has faced mounting pressure to adopt a more inclusive identity.
The name change, first proposed in 2021, received overwhelming support from the school community, with 85% of over 3 400 voters backing the new name.
Despite the consensus, a group of individuals, including descendants of Malan, challenged the process in court, arguing the School Governing Body (SGB) had exceeded its legal mandate and failed to consult properly.
The SCA rejected those claims, affirming that the SGB acted within its powers under the South African Schools Act and that the consultation process was fair and rational.
The ruling also upheld a previous Western Cape High Court decision in favour of the school.
Ferdi Booysen, chair of the SGB, welcomed the judgment, saying it validated a process that involved parents, teachers, and students.
'This name change reflects a new chapter – one of unity and forward-thinking,' he said.
In its ruling, the SCA noted that the new name aligns with democratic values and the broader transformation of public institutions in post-apartheid South Africa.
The school is expected to officially transition to the name DF Akademie in the coming months.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 minutes ago
- IOL News
Public Works makes strides in reducing rental payments owed to landlords
Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson says his department has put in controls that were monitored daily and were aimed to improve the functioning of their payment systems. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson said his department has managed to reduce to R20 million outstanding rentals owed to landlords that dated back three months ago. Macpherson said the department has put controls that are monitored daily and is looking at systems to improve the functioning of its payment systems. 'As at 6 June 2025, the outstanding rental amount is R2,540,382.42 (0.5%) and R19,897,707.26 (4.1%) for April and May, respectively,' he said. Macpherson was responding to parliamentary questions from Build One South African leader Mmusi Maimane, who enquired about the Information and Communication Technology outages that affected the ability of the Property Management Trading Entity to process rental payments to landlords in April. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Maimane enquired about the current status of rental payments, the total number of landlords that remained, the total monetary value of outstanding rental payments, and steps his department has taken to ensure that such delays do not recur. Macpherson said there were 1,991 leases for 1,274 landlords valued at R484,425,687.62 in the lease administration system and the payment system for April rental payments as of June 6. 'Forty-four leases (2.2%) affecting 26 landlords (2%) amounting to R2,540,382.42 (0.5%) failed Central Supplier Database (CSD) verification and therefore were not paid.' He also said there had been 1,995 leases for 1,269 landlords valued at R483,952,863.48 for May. At least 89 leases (4.5%) affecting 75 landlords (5.9%), amounting to R19,897,707.26 (4.1%) were not verified and were not paid. Macpherson said the payment system was still processing the June rental payments. 'The outstanding rental payments for April 2025 are 44 leases (2.2%) affecting 26 landlords (2%). The outstanding lease payments for May are 89 leases (4.5%) affecting 75 landlords (5.9%),' he said. 'It must be noted that the non-payment of transactions submitted on the payment system is primarily due to landlords not being compliant with CSD. In addition, 33 CSD non-compliant landlords from April are included in the May figure.' Meanwhile, the Independent Development Trust (IDT) has collected R882 million in payments in just three months from 15 departments that owed for infrastructure projects it implemented on their behalf. 'The IDT has been able to collect R882,374,561 between 01 April 2025 and 30 June 2025,' Macpherson said. The entity has paid a total of 1,366 service providers to the tune of R648,167,277. 'As at 30 June 2025, 790 service providers remained unpaid an amount of R1,394,036,545. The variance in the amount is due to additional invoices that would have been received between 01 April 2025 and 30 June 2025,' he said. Macpherson was responding to ActionSA MP Malebo Patricia Kobe, who enquired about the department's obligation to pay contractors after receiving money due from client departments. The IDT had informed the portfolio committee in June that it was owed R1.2 billion by client departments. It informed Parliament four months ago that it had been unable to pay service providers due to delays in payment by client departments. The entity has incurred R47m in total expenditure on legal costs and owed creditors for more than 12,000 invoices that could not be paid within the 30-day deadline as of the end of March last year.
Daily Maverick
5 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Policing crisis is symptom of SA's transition into a violent democracy
South Africa has undergone a second transition, away from the ideals of a constitutional democracy, first into a gatekeeper state, and then increasingly into what academics call a 'violent democracy'. President Cyril Ramaphosa recently established a judicial commission of inquiry, chaired by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, to investigate Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's allegations that 'sophisticated criminal syndicates have infiltrated law enforcement and intelligence structures in South Africa'. Naturally, much of the attention has been on the toxic relationship between ANC politicians, corrupt businesspeople and the country's top police structures. However, while it is tempting to believe that this is just another example of the rot infecting the South African state, this would be a mistake, because these activities are not an aberration of South Africa's weak state but rather an outcome of the dysfunctional democratisation process that has unfolded in the country over the last few decades. Gatekeeper state In common with many other post-independent African states, South Africa transitioned from the horrors of colonialism and racism into being a gatekeeper state. In these fragile states, the control of access to wealth and power, rather than governance, is the ultimate political prize. Over time, state wealth and power are increasingly centralised and contested among the elites, while service delivery and governance for most of the population languish at the periphery. Political authority is therefore less about guiding national development and more about managing the intersection between internal resources and external recognition. At its core, a gatekeeper state revolves around who controls the 'gate'. In South Africa, this gate was historically guarded by the ANC so long as there was uncontested electoral recognition. Governance, in this framework, becomes a zero-sum game where controlling the gate is paramount because losing power means losing access to wealth. This has irredeemably reshaped the internal dynamics of the ANC, fuelling factionalism as different groups within the party compete for control of shrinking state resources. Consequently, the government is increasingly unable to meet its service delivery obligations because public office is not about public service but is instead a means of ensuring financial rewards, and because service delivery is not about optimal provision within the budgetary limits but is instead a means to garner political loyalty. Over time, as the ANC's factional battles worsened, the ANC's response has been to centralise control, consolidating authority in the Presidency, marginalising Parliament, and actively eroding independent institutions. However, as the ANC's electoral support has declined, gatekeeping, instead of weakening, has decentralised and now infects both formal and informal political-economic structures. The consequence of this system is neo-patrimonialism — ruling by patronage rather than by policy — that replaces governance as hollowed-out formal institutions are replaced with informal networks based on political allegiance and reciprocal favours. Loyalty is rewarded not through public service delivery or national development, but instead by access to tenders, jobs, and contracts. As the electorate loses faith in political leadership, political support is 'purchased' via patronage networks rather than earned through effective governance. Violent democracy The implications for South Africa's democratisation have been grim. In the years of the Zuma-Ramaphosa presidencies, South Africa has undergone a second transition, away from the ideals of a constitutional democracy, first into a gatekeeper state, and increasingly into what academics call a ' violent democracy '. This is not merely a democracy with violence. In this aberrant form of democracy, violence is an implicit part of the political system. Assassinations, intimidation and State Capture are features of how power is contested, contained, and controlled. In a violent democracy the state does not have the sole legitimate right to use violence — instead elite coalitions, criminal networks, and even taxi associations can use violence to capture and replace democratic governance. Naturally, as violent democracy deepens, constitutional democracy weakens. South Africa's democratic institutions, once the pride of our post-apartheid dispensation, are now infected with corruption, inefficiency and decay. The ANC cannot be reformed, but whether the Government of National Unity can resurrect the democratic institutions of accountability and reverse the country from its dark path remains to be seen. If not, then the dream of a free, fair, and equal South Africa will likely become just another casualty of rapacious greed. DM
IOL News
33 minutes ago
- IOL News
South Africa braces for economic turmoil as US export tariffs take effect
US President Donald Trump last month announced that his administration would levy a staggering 30% tariff on all South African products entering the US, with some exclusions or reduced tariffs on metals and minerals, in a bid to address long-standing trade imbalances and unfair market restrictions. Image: Brendan Smialowski/AFP August 1, 2025, marked the dawn of a new era for South Africa, albeit a troubling one, as a hefty 30% export tariff to the United States came into effect. This significant policy change has sent ripples through the nation's economy, stirring anxiety among businesses and consumers alike. With no agreement in sight to prevent this trade burden, South Africans are bracing themselves for the ramifications on both local markets and international trade relations. US President Donald Trump last month announced that his administration would levy a staggering 30% tariff on all South African products entering the US, with some exclusions or reduced tariffs on metals and minerals, in a bid to address long-standing trade imbalances and unfair market restrictions. South Africa exports billions of rands' worth of goods to the US each year, including fruit, vegetables, meat, and wine. These sectors employ thousands of workers, and the 30% tariff will render their products uncompetitive in the American market, placing immense pressure on producers and exporters. Major South African exports to the US include precious stones and metals, motor vehicles, parts and accessories; iron and steel, machinery; aluminium products, ores, organic chemicals, chemical products, nickel products, agricultural products such as citrus fruits, wine, processed foods. According to estimates, the tariffs will add roughly $3.5 billion (R63bn) to the cost of exports to the US, based on South Africa's 2023 export value. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Thys van Zyl, CEO of Everest Wealth Advisory, on Thursday said South Africa was facing severe economic consequences without any formal agreement in place with its second-largest bilateral trading partner. 'It is almost unthinkable that, on the eve of such far-reaching tariffs, we still do not have a formal agreement – or even a timeline for when one can be expected. This is not only deeply concerning – it is negligent,' Van Zyl said. Despite discussions between the relevant stakeholders, there are no confirmed exemptions, no concessions, and no sign of progress in negotiations with the US government. The government has denied claims of a trade imbalance between South Africa and the US, maintaining that the 30% reciprocal tariff was not an accurate representation of available trade data. Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, this week said they were working with other government departments on a response plan that also focuses on demand side interventions in the impacted industries. Tau said the government was awaiting substantive feedback from the US counterparts on the final status on its Framework Deal, which proposed importing 75-100 petajoules of Liquified Natural Gas for a 10-year period, simplifying of US poultry exports under the 2016 tariff rate quota, and private sector commitments to invest $3.3bn in US industries such as mining and metals recycling. However, Van Zyl said the lack of a formal agreement was sowing uncertainty for long-term business planning and investment beyond the immediate cost pressures. 'The only constant is uncertainty. Our export sectors are now left to fend for themselves – simply because the government acted too late and too vaguely,' said Van Zyl. 'Investors seek certainty – and what they're now getting is ambiguity and silence. This is the kind of uncertainty that drives capital away. We need a proactive trade policy – one driven by results, not rhetoric. The government must take responsibility for this disastrous diplomatic outcome, and immediately table recovery plans to protect the export sector and restore investor confidence.' Meanwhile, Foord Asset Management portfolio manager Farzana Bayat said a 30% tariff wall on South African exports to the US would be catastrophic and escalate trade risk. 'That would be a seismic shock. Even traditional US allies like the EU and Japan have negotiated reduced 15% tariffs - South Africa may not be so lucky,' Bayat said. She said the stakes were high as the expiry of the African Growth and Opportunity Act in 2025 was already clouding the medium-term trade outlook. Bayat said the immediate risk was acute as the South African Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago recently warned that up to 100 000 jobs were at risk, and the automotive and citrus industries were especially exposed. Car exports to the US have already collapsed by more than 80% due to earlier tariff pressures. 'This economic stress comes at a time when South Africa is already contending with low growth, power insecurity, and shaky investor confidence,' Bayat said.'Losing preferential access to the US - our third-largest trading partner - could be devastating.' BUSINESS REPORT
