French investigators order Tesla to stop 'deceptive business practices'
PARIS (Reuters) -French investigators on Tuesday ordered Tesla to stop what they called "deceptive business practices" or face thousands of euros in fines.
Investigators at the finance ministry's Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control office said the automaker had engaged in deceptive commercial practices over the fully autonomous driving capabilities of its cars, had issued sales contracts with no date, time or place of vehicle delivery, and had failed to provide timely refunds, among other infractions.
The office, which said the investigation began in 2023, ordered Tesla to comply with regulations within four months or face fines of 50,000 euros a day after that date until it complies.
Tesla did not respond to an email request for comment.
The carmaker has struggled in Europe in recent months, with sales of its electric vehicles plummeting in several markets in a decline blamed partly on CEO Elon Musk's political activities.
A small group of Tesla owners in France filed a lawsuit this month against the carmaker, arguing that its vehicles have become "far-right totems" after Musk's involvement with U.S. President Donald Trump and endorsement of Germany's far-right AfD party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Algeria Jails French Football Reporter for Seven Years
By and Samy Adghirni Updated on Save Algeria jailed a French sports journalist for seven years on charges of 'glorifying terrorism,' amid a simmering feud between the North African nation and its former colonial rulers. Christophe Gleizes, 36, was sentenced by a court in the eastern Kabylie region on Sunday, advocacy group Reporters Sans Frontieres said in a statement condemning the decision. He will lodge an appeal.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)
The Senate is making a final push to advance President Trump's signature legislation with a flurry of last-minute changes that stunned Elon Musk and the already besieged clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The controversy surrounding the bill's energy approach is just one front in a frenzied final push with plenty of additional attention on the price tag after a new weekend tally found that bill has grown by nearly $1 trillion since the Senate took it up. Meanwhile a grueling final Senate push to approve the package cleared a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, with consideration continuing and an amendment process expected to take up much of Monday before a final vote later Monday or perhaps Tuesday. The energy provisions of the 900-plus page bill have come in for particular scrutiny after last minute changes phased out clean energy tax credits faster than expected and also added new taxes on wind and solar projects. At the same time, new last minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral when it comes to a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in an interview released over the weekend on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." The mix left fossil fuel advocates celebrating and clean energy advocates slamming the bill at a new higher volume. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk — who worked in the White House before his dramatic falling out with the president — was perhaps the loudest voice in the latter group. He issued a series of weekend posts calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." The energy changes came as top-line costs of the deal remained a key point of contention. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tally released over the weekend showed the revised bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt. That assessment, which does not include additional interest costs, comes after a similar analysis of the House package found a $2.4 trillion tab. Trump suggested Republicans look past the deficit implications in one of his weekend posts, urging passage as soon as possible saying he also wants to cut costs but adding to lawmakers: "REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected." He also made a case that White House projections of blockbuster economic growth (dismissed by many economists as fantastical) will make the math add up in the end. The focus on energy comes after weeks of debate over Biden-era energy credits. The initial Senate blueprint had offered a slower rollback of clean energy credits for things like solar panels and electric vehicles but last minute changes to the bill put it more in line with the harder line House version which seeks to eliminate the credits sooner. Some provisions are even more immediate with the Senate version proposing to eliminate EV credits by September 30 of this year. And on top of that, a new tax was unveiled when the bill was released that would not just eliminate government help for renewable energy projects — but add a new cost for wind and solar projects completed after 2027 if a certain amount of supplies came from China. The changes stunned many clean energy advocates — not just Musk — with a statement from the American Clean Power Association saying the effect would be to "strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments." What that could means for consumers down the road — some concluded — are higher utility bills as currently under construction AI data centers are set to increase electricity demand in the years ahead. Some are even projecting double digit price increases in some utility bills by 2029. An analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found that the bill would exacerbate existing upward pressure on utility prices, with Democratic Senator Brian Schatz adding "we are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar." Fossil fuels advocates meanwhile were largely ebullient at the last minute changes which saw existing fossil fuel focused provisions — around issues like permitting, lease sales, and methane emissions fees — joined by some new credits for these producers including for coal. Senate Republicans say the bill will generate over $15 billion in new federal revenue through expanded oil, gas, and coal leasing with leaders with Senator John Barasso of Wyoming saying "America is an energy superpower and once again, we are going to act like it." The bill is also set to be even more expensive after weeks of negotiations saw expensive compromises on issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions, more generous business tax credits, and the adjustment of some cost savings around Medicaid. The fullest accounting came over the weekend when the CBO estimated the Senate bill would increase the debt by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. The analysis also found that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the health care provisions — an increase over the findings for the House-passed version that tallied that 10.9 million people would be without health coverage of that version passed. The bill is projected to be even more expensive after things like interest costs are included, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget protecting the current total tally as in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4.2 trillion over the next decade. "The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made," the group added of potential additional changes still to come. The findings also come as Senate Republicans push forward on a budget gimmick that is set to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink using a "current policy baseline" that Democrats say violated Senate rules but appears set to proceed. Either way the sky-high debt findings could imperil the bill politically, with two GOP senators already likely to vote no and others not yet saying they will back Trump's effort to get this over the line in the coming hours. The bill will also need to be approved by the House if the amended package advances and is then considered by a bloc of fiscal conservatives there who say they barely voted in May for that less expensive version. One initial comment from the House Freedom Caucus was negative, with the group writing that the new tally was above "our agreed budget framework." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Crunch Time For U.S. Clean Energy Incentives
Current Climate brings you the latest news about the business of sustainability every Monday. Sign up to get it in your inbox. Getty Images As the Senate struggles to pass its version of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful' budget bill that squeaked through the House of Representatives by a single vote, it's increasingly likely that tax credits and programs for clean energy projects won't survive. Fossil fuel industry lobbyists and fringe political figures have argued that the policies that helped create the fastest increase in renewable electricity generation in U.S. history are wasteful and unnecessary, even as oil and gas drillers continue to qualify for their own federal incentives. Setting aside benefits that large-scale wind, solar and battery storage project create in terms of reducing climate-warming carbon dioxide emissions, scrapping the credits created by the Biden Administration's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will have a devastating impact on jobs and economic development in much of the U.S., particularly Republican-leaning states that have been the top beneficiaries of those projects. The revised bill that could be voted on in the Senate today quickly phases out nearly all existing clean energy credits by as early as 2027, and even adds a new tax on large solar and wind projects. It's worse than an earlier draft that the American Clean Power Association had said would 'increase household electricity bills and threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs across the country.' If passed and signed into law, the legislation could result in the loss of 790,000 clean energy jobs by the end of the decade, according to an estimate by Energy Innovation, a nonpartisan climate policy think tank. 'Texas, California, Pennsylvania, Florida and Georgia stand out as the biggest losers from IRA repeal due to their poor combination of lost jobs and increased household energy costs,' Energy Innovation said. Biden's incentives have been demonstrably successful–generating $277 billion of investment last year and creating tens of thousands of new jobs. Aside from the economic argument, new renewable power systems–particularly solar–have also helped prevent brownouts from California to Texas to New England. Senators, including Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and Utah's John Curtis, who understand that clean energy incentives boosted manufacturing and job growth in their states, had advocated to keep the incentives and in places like Georgia, state Republicans also pushed to keep credits for domestic solar panel manufacturing. But it appears increasingly unlikely enough Republicans are willing to defy Trump to make that happen. The Big Read Elon Musk and Omead Afshar, left, in Shanghai in 2019. © 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP Elon Musk Fires A Top Tesla Lieutenant Elon Musk fired Tesla's head of operations in North America and Europe, amid declining sales in both regions and the electric vehicle brand's falling popularity, according to people familiar with the matter. Omead Afshar, who started with Tesla as an engineer in 2017, had become one of Musk's top lieutenants and was elevated to vice president to oversee business in the two key regions last October. He didn't respond to a request for comment, nor did Musk or Tesla. Afshar's removal comes a few days before the end of the second quarter and follows news that Tesla's EV sales dropped for a fifth consecutive month in Europe. U.S. sales are also down this year and China, the Austin-based company's top market, saw a 15% drop in May. Equity analysts are anticipating a decline in Tesla's EV deliveries of at least 10% worldwide in the quarter that ends on June 30, to about 392,800 units compared with 443,956 a year ago. Musk's close affiliation with and massive financial support for President Donald Trump have negatively impacted the Tesla brand, particularly during his stint running the federal job-slashing DOGE initiative. The company desperately needs to improve its lineup, following the failure of the much-derided Cybertruck to hit volume goals Musk laid out for it, and figure out how to compete with fast-rising Chinese rivals. But rather than add new electric models to boost sales, the world's wealthiest person has sought to convince investors that the company's future lies with a new robotaxi service, humanoid robots and AI. It's a tricky pivot since electric cars, batteries and charging services account for virtually all of Tesla's revenue. Read more here Hot Topic Woven Capital Nicole LeBlanc, partner at Toyota's Woven Capital venture fund, on adapting its investment strategy to Trump 2.0 How does the shift in U.S. clean energy policy impact Woven's approach in terms of climate and mobility startup investments you're making? Ultimately, we're trying to solve real problems with real solutions. From a policy and regulatory perspective, [U.S. changes] do affect things in the short term, but not really in the long term. Because if you have a problem and you have a solution, then you still are going to try to figure this out. It's the economics of how quickly you can do that. That's how we're thinking about it. This is not my statement and not my quote; it was something overheard at climate week in London. Someone said 'climate tech has gone from green to cocky,' because it's not just about green tech anymore. It's all about domestic security and domestic supply chains. I found that really interesting. We are seeing that not just in climate but in mobility tech. All of them are also now having crossovers into aerospace and defense. From an investment perspective, that mitigates the fact that there are some uncertainties around the climate element in terms of scaling of these technologies. Because now they have a second market that is accelerating and has more money in it. From a venture investment perspective, if climate's not going to work out, maybe they can apply it in this other industry. It's the same technology often. So the development is still able to have the economics needed to really scale and the timeline that venture capitalists need. The U.S. shift away from federal support for clean energy seems shortsighted, given how compelling the economics for large-scale wind, solar and battery have become as power needs grow. Are you seeing an impact? I will say there's a challenge in the venture industry as there's not as much money floating around as there used to be. What a lot of companies and investors are advising their companies to do is really focus on unit economics and profitability. It's cyclical. I've been in the venture space for 18 years now. You have the growth cycles and then you have the unit economics/profitability ones. It just keeps going back and forth. That's the cycle that we're in now. There's no green premium anymore. We've had the acceleration in the last five years for people to develop the technology, get the subsidies, get the government grants, get what they needed. The ones that were able to capitalize on that, now they're focusing on doubling down on these kinds of unit economics and profitability elements. It's a big world and there's a lot happening everywhere. Are you looking more at startup opportunities in Europe, Asia, Japan and Korea, where policies aren't changing? We're still keeping the same approach. It's just a matter of what are the economics of some of these deals? Are there valuations coming down or are they still trying to get the same valuations that they used to? Some of the areas are maybe going a little bit more niche as opposed to being so broad. We're really trying to understand the impact of AI. AI is affecting every industry. We're trying to figure out where it's having an immediate impact and where it's still a little bit of smoke and mirrors–like Wizard of Oz in the background pulling the strings versus where it's having impact right now. For example, we've made an investment in the smart charging/grid space, and are trying to double down on that to help them make that more of an ecosystem play. That's an area where it's not like one automaker and one utility. It requires the network effects of everybody coming together. … It is quasi-climate related. A cross between mobility and climate is where we're looking at these AI engineering tools. Regulation changes don't affect these types of industries. It's really trying to see where they can actually help iterate a lot faster. … Longer term, we're trying to think about things like critical minerals, geologic hydrogen, a little bit of these more moonshot elements. Again, things that aren't really subject to the negative regulation that's coming around. What Else We're Reading Trump terminates satellite data crucial for storm forecasting. Meteorologists called the end of the DOD program 'insanity' ( E&E News ) Redwood Materials is giving old EV batteries a second life as microgrids. Tesla cofounder JB Straubel's company is using old batteries in modular energy storage units ( The Verge ) Texas firm cofounded by former Gov. Rick Perry aims to build the world's largest data energy complex using nuclear, gas and solar generation ( Reuters ) Chart: Which countries get the most power from solar and wind? The 10 countries that rely on them the most ( Canary Media ) As Tesla begins Austin robotaxi tests, Waymo's ride service expands to Atlanta. It's the Alphabet Inc. unit's fifth major city ( Forbes ) When towns rebuild from natural disasters, some residents end up getting priced out ( Wall Street Journal ) More From Forbes Forbes The Cost Of Trump's Tax Plan: Sapping Clean Energy And 790,000 Jobs By Ken Silverstein Forbes Plastic Bag Bans And Fees Can Reduce Shoreline Litter, Study Finds By Jamie Hailstone Forbes Reframing Climate Action: From Managing Risk To Building Resilience By Felicia Jackson
