When Val Kilmer Was Batman and the '90s Were Their Most '90s
'Batman Forever' was the third movie in a franchise kicked off in 1989 by the director Tim Burton's brooding 'Batman.' Starring Michael Keaton in the title role and Jack Nicholson as the Joker, 'Batman' was, by the standards of the time, dark for a comic-book flick.
Burton's and Keaton's follow-up, 'Batman Returns' (1992), failed to repeat the original's box-office success. So a new director, Joel Schumacher, was brought in expressly to make what one journalist termed a 'Batman Lite.' Schumacher was a fan of Kilmer's portrayal of Doc Holliday in the 1993 western 'Tombstone' and tapped him as his leading man.
This was not Burton's Batman. 'There's not much to contemplate here,' the critic Janet Maslin wrote in The New York Times, 'beyond the spectacle of gimmicky props and the kitsch of good actors (all of whom have lately done better work elsewhere) dressed for a red-hot Halloween.'
Schumacher favored showy camera angles and a garish color scheme. The villains — Jim Carrey played the Riddler, Tommy Lee Jones was Two-Face — were freely permitted to chew the scenery. Batman's suit had nipples. The movie was weird.
It was also a box-office smash. It broke an opening-weekend record and eventually brought in more than $336 million worldwide, besting its predecessor by tens of millions of dollars.
In his highest-profile role ever, Kilmer played Batman and Bruce Wayne as stolid. He romances Kidman's psychologist with aw-shucks respectability ('Chicks love the car'). He combats his antagonists' ridiculousness with a straight face. His Wayne is tortured and guilt-wracked, and also middle-aged. No longer just a son seeking vengeance, he becomes a father figure to an orphaned young man (who turns out to become Robin, played by Chris O'Donnell).
The outlandishness of 'Batman Forever' was recognized almost immediately as emblematic of its era. The next year, the French director Olivier Assayas made 'Irma Vep,' a satire of modern blockbuster moviemaking. While the sleek black suit that the star of the film-within-the-film must wear is most obviously a reference to Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman of 'Batman Returns,' the gaudy aesthetic is all 'Batman Forever.'
There have since been efforts to reclaim Kilmer's film as something of an unsung masterpiece. Vera Drew, the director of last year's art house independent movie 'The People's Joker,' credited 'Batman Forever' as its primary influence.
But Kilmer was one-and-done as the Caped Crusader. He did not return for Schumacher's follow-up, 'Batman & Robin' (1997), and decades later told The Times that the role felt like too much of a cipher. 'It's not about Batman,' he said. 'There is no Batman.' He was replaced by George Clooney.
'Batman & Robin' was a relative flop best remembered today for the execrable puns uttered by Arnold Schwarzenegger's Mr. Freeze ('All right everyone — chill'). That iteration of the franchise ended there.
The kind of comic-book movie that 'Batman Forever' typified faded away, to be replaced the following decade by the grittiness of Christopher Nolan's 'Dark Knight' trilogy and the real-world irony of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Not counting his brief appearance three years ago in 'Top Gun: Maverick,' Kilmer was never again in so big a movie.
But 'Batman Forever' is an immaculate artifact of its time, in much the same manner as 'Top Gun' (1986), another of Kilmer's most memorable films. It was not the best '90s movie, but it may have been the most '90s movie. When historians wish to learn what it was like to live in the United States during the height of its unipolar moment atop the world, they could do worse than to dust off Kilmer's Batman suit, nipples and all.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wordle hints today for #1,492: Clues and answer for Sunday, July 20
Hey, there! We hope you're having a spectacular weekend. You deserve it. Surely, keeping your Wordle streak intact will help with that. Here's our daily Wordle guide with some hints and the answer for Sunday's puzzle (#1,492). It may be that you're a Wordle newcomer and you're not completely sure how to play the game. We're here to help with that too. What is Wordle? Wordle is a deceptively simple daily word game that first emerged in 2021. There is one five-letter word to deduce every day by process of elimination. The daily word is the same for everyone. Wordle blew up in popularity in late 2021 after creator Josh Wardle made it easy for players to share an emoji-based grid with their friends and followers that detailed how they fared each day. The game's success spurred dozens of clones across a swathe of categories and formats. The New York Times purchased Wordle in early 2022 for an undisclosed sum. The publication said that players collectively played Wordle 5.3 billion times in 2024. So, it's little surprise that Wordle is one of the best online games and puzzles you can play daily. How to play Wordle To start playing Wordle, you simply need to enter one five-letter word. The game will tell you how close you are to that day's secret word by highlighting letters that are in the correct position in green. Letters that appear in the word but aren't in the right spot will be highlighted in yellow. If you guess any letters that are not in the secret word, the game will gray those out on the virtual keyboard. However, you can still use those letters in subsequent guesses. You'll only have six guesses to find each day's word, though you still can use grayed-out letters to help narrow things down. It's also worth remembering that letters can appear in the secret word more than once. Wordle is free to play on the NYT's website and apps, as well as on Meta Quest headsets and Discord. The game refreshes at midnight local time. If you log into a New York Times account, you can track your stats, including the all-important win streak. How to play Wordle more than once a day If you have a NYT subscription that includes full access to the publication's games, you don't have to stop after a single round of Wordle. You'll have access to an archive of more than 1,400 previous Wordle games. So if you're a relative newcomer, you'll be able to go back and catch up on previous editions. In addition, paid NYT Games members have access to a tool called the Wordle Bot. This can tell you how well you performed at each day's game. Previous Wordle answers Before today's Wordle hints, here are the answers to recent puzzles that you may have missed: Yesterday's Wordle answer for Saturday, July 19 — SWORD Friday, July 18 — LORIS Thursday, July 17 — MODAL Wednesday, July 16 — NERVY Tuesday, July 15 — FOIST Today's Wordle hints explained Every day, we'll try to make Wordle a little easier for you. First, we'll offer a hint that describes the meaning of the word or how it might be used in a phrase or sentence. We'll also tell you if there are any double (or even triple) letters in the word. In case you still haven't quite figured it out by that point, we'll then provide the first letter of the word. Those who are still stumped after that can continue on to find out the answer for today's Wordle. This should go without saying, but make sure to scroll slowly. Spoilers are ahead. Today's Wordle help Here is a hint for today's Wordle answer: Like a crossword puzzle square that remains empty. Also, a firearm cartridge that does not shoot a projectile. Are there any double letters in today's Wordle? There are no repeated letters in today's Wordle answer. What's the first letter of today's Wordle? The first letter of today's Wordle answer is B. The Wordle answer today This is your final warning before we reveal today's Wordle answer. No take-backs. Don't blame us if you happen to scroll too far and accidentally spoil the game for yourself. What is today's Wordle? Today's Wordle answer is... BLANK Not to worry if you didn't figure out today's Wordle word. If you made it this far down the page, hopefully you at least kept your streak going. And, hey: there's always another game tomorrow.
Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Martin Izquierdo, 83, dies; costume designer who specialized in wings
At the conclusion of 'Angels in America: Millennium Approaches,' the first part of the two-part play, the angel of the title makes an impressive entrance, crashing through the ceiling of an AIDS-stricken gay man's New York apartment and proclaiming, 'The great work begins.' It was Mr. Izquierdo's ingenuity, and his flamboyant imagination -- assisted by a certain amount of technical wizardry -- that allowed Ellen McLaughlin, who played the angel on Broadway, and Emma Thompson, the angel in the HBO version, to hover convincingly some 30 feet overhead, framed by prodigious wings that were illuminated from behind. Those wings became a symbol of the production itself, an indelible part of its 'astonishing theatrical landscape,' as Frank Rich of The New York Times described the show in a 1993 review. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Their creator arrived in the United States in the 1940s, a young immigrant without legal status from Mexico who had been recruited to do agricultural work in California. Advertisement Mr. Izquierdo, who never became a citizen, eventually gravitated to a career as an artist, painting scenery for the theater before becoming a costume designer. In 1978, he left California for New York, where he opened his own studio and spent nearly four decades making costumes and props for film, theater, and the music and fashion industries. Advertisement He was best known, however, for the oversized appendages he created for 'Angels in America,' which combined genuine and fake feathers that were glued to a steel frame and then attached to a corset worn by the actress playing the angel. 'Wings symbolized the total imaginary world that Martin created for himself with his studio,' Austin Scarlett, a fashion designer and one of Mr. Izquierdo's many proteges, said in an email. 'Martin was all about making the fantasy come to life in a tangible way. What could only be dreamed of, he made real,' Scarlett added. 'He was a guardian angel to me and countless other artists he took under his 'wings.'' Mr. Izquierdo also conjured the large gossamer wings worn by Victoria's Secret models in the company's fashion shows, as well as custom regalia for celebrities. His clients included supermodel Heidi Klum, who commissioned Mr. Izquierdo to create a shockingly lifelike Halloween costume in 2011 that resembled a skinless body, and designer Marc Jacobs, who, thanks to Mr. Izquierdo, arrived at his annual holiday party in 2006 dressed as a life-size pigeon. Martin Nunez Izquierdo was born Jan. 30, 1942, in Mexico City, one of three sons of Rodrigo Izquierdo, an amateur painter who worked in a brewery, and Amaliz (Nunez) Izquierdo. When he was a young man, he moved to California under the Bracero program, which brought Mexican men to the United States during the labor shortage of World War II. In the late 1940s, the rest of his family joined him in California; they settled on Mandeville Island, near Stockton. Advertisement After graduating from Edison High School in Stockton, he briefly served in the Navy in the mid-1960s. He then enrolled at the California College of Arts and Crafts (now the California College of the Arts) in San Francisco, where he received a bachelor's degree in fine arts in the late 1960s. His first job as a designer was creating window displays for Macy's in San Francisco. In his mid-30s he moved to New York, where he found a one-bedroom apartment in Greenwich Village. He lived there for the rest of his life. Mr. Izquierdo spent several years working as an art department supervisor for the Brooks-Van Horn Costume Co. before 1981, when he opened his own studio, where he was the creative director and Anne Marie Alessi ran the business side. The studio closed in 2020, during the COVID pandemic. Throughout his long career, he worked on the costumes for some two dozen Broadway shows, including the most recent revival of 'Gypsy,' in 2024, and a number of films and music videos, including the 2002 movie 'Spider-Man' and Kanye West's 2010 'Runaway' video. He also worked on costumes and scenery for concert tours by David Bowie, Beyoncé and Lady Gaga, among others, and on window displays for retailers like Ralph Lauren and Armani. In addition to Glaser, Mr. Izquierdo is survived by two brothers, Roberto and Rodrigo. Asked once by Twelv magazine what he would choose to embody if he could be transformed into anything, Mr. Izquierdo picked a bird of paradise. But while he spent most of his life designing costumes for others, he told New York magazine in 2013 that he rarely wore one himself. Advertisement 'When you work in this world all year round, Halloween isn't that exciting,' he said, adding: 'I was once in a costume contest at Studio 54. I was a mummy -- but I didn't win.' This article originally appeared in
Los Angeles Times
17 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
How the TikTok algorithm created new words like ‘unalive'
Adam Aleksic has somehow managed to make linguistics cool. His rapid-fire videos have attracted an audience of millions across the social media universe. In them, the Etymology Nerd explores linguistics topics like the semiotics of dating websites, the social science of emoji usage and how we are naming our children after influencers. A Harvard graduate with a linguistics degree, he has now published a book called 'Algospeak: How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language,' which explores in depth some of his more fanciful and fascinating theories. We chatted with Aleksic about edutainment, brainrot and President Trump as influencer in chief. (Please note: The Times may earn a commission through links to whose fees support independent bookstores.) Did you get into linguistics because you wanted to explore online language? I don't think you can actually hope to fully be caught up with online language itself, as it's mutating by the minute. The book is more of a road map of the general patterns we're seeing. I personally got interested in etymology in ninth grade. I didn't know I would be going into internet linguistics. How do algorithms shape and change language on the web? You can't avoid talking about algorithms if you're talking about modern language change. I'm looking at my own videos thinking, 'Wow, I can't say this specific word because of the algorithm. I have to say it another way.' I use the example of the word 'unalive' as a replacement for 'kill.' That developed in English-language mental health spaces to circumvent platform community guidelines that were enforced by an algorithm used by Chinese government, which was then retooled for TikTok. Suddenly, 'unalive' was all over the internet. Algorithms are creating new words. In the book, you talk about context collapse, the notion that effective videos are designed to appear as if they are addressed directly to the user, even though they are, in fact, bringing in disparate users to a single focal point. When you're looking at a video on your For You page, you really think it's for you. But it never is. As a creator, I never think about individual people. I think about what's going to go viral, but also, what do I want to make? I make the video first for myself, then I make it for the algorithm. Never do I consider the actual people that end up seeing the video. Your phone is an extension of yourself. You perceive a message coming from your algorithmic version of yourself. The algorithm doesn't actually align who my intended audience might be with who the actual audience is. It just sends my video to whatever makes the most money. What about brainrot — the notion that the internet is damaging young people's ability to think and reason. Does this apply to online language? I think there's no such thing as 'brainrot' with words. They've done neurological studies. No word is worse for your brain than other words. Now, the other stuff, culturally, is another conversation. It probably is bad that these platforms are monopolizing our attention to sell us things. So I can say, linguistically, we're fine. Do you think the internet makes us smarter? It's an interesting question. What is 'smarter'? I know that's a hard thing to define. I think like with any tool, it can be true. Every tool has good and bad, right? You talk about rage-baiting and hyperbole, or hype, as a tool to gain virality online. Our president is quite proficient at this tactic. I think Trump's language uniquely lends itself to virality. He has these phrasal templates, like 'Make X Y Again,' or 'This has been the greatest X in the history of Y.' People use his sentence structures as these skeletons, which they can remix. He coined 'sad' as an interjection, which I regularly see my friends using. I don't know how much of it is intentional. Maybe he just stumbled into it. But the fact of the matter is, I think we have Trump in office because he is uniquely suited to the internet. Chris Vognar chats with Michael M. Grynbaum about his book 'Empire of the Elite,' a history of Condé Nast during its '90s heyday. Hamilton Cain calls 'The Aviator and the Showman,' Laurie Gwen Shapiro's joint biography of Amelia Earhart and her husband, 'a vibrant account of the courtship and union of the famous pilot and her publisher husband whose intrusive management of his wife's career may have cost her life.' According to Ilana Massad, Kashana Cauley's novel 'The Payback,' a satire about student loans, of all things, is a 'terrifically fun book that made me laugh out loud at least once every chapter.' Valorie Castellanos Clark thinks fan fiction writer turned novelist Brigette Knightley's debut novel 'The Irresistible Urge to Fall for Your Enemy' is 'proof positive that writing fan fiction is an excellent training ground for building a novel.' Today we are chatting with Carlos Chavez, a bookseller at Hennessey + Ingalls, a sprawling space in downtown L.A. that specializes in books about art, architecture, graphic design and all things visual. What's selling right now? Because we are a speciality bookstore, sales are really across the board. Everyday it can be something different. Someone came in yesterday and bought a bunch of books featuring art from the painter and sculptor Claes Odenberg, for example. We also sell a lot of books on industrial design, and fashion designers have been buying books about shoes. The other day a prop designer came in and purchased books with red covers. It's a mixed bag. Art books can be very expensive. Why do you think there is still a market for them, despite the plenitude of images online? There are still plenty of book lovers who want to hold a book, and they want to see it before they buy it. For many of our customers, books are a great source of artistic inspiration of the kind you just can't find online. This is the kind of store where customers are free to linger for hours if they want to. There has been a lot of social unrest downtown this year. How is the store coping? Business has been up and down. Some days are better than others. I think people were scared to come out, but yesterday was a good day, for example.
