Elon Musk 'ordered Starlink shutdown' during Ukraine counterattack
The communication blackout, where staff at the American tech firm deactivated at least 100 Starlink terminals after being instructed to, reportedly caused the attack to fail, according to Reuters, which spoke with three people who were familiar with the demand.
According to reports, the blackout caused Ukrainian soldiers to panic as drones surveilling Russian forces went dark, and long-range artillery units, reliant on Starlink to aim at their targets, struggled to hit them.
READ MORE: 'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech
Although Ukrainian forces were able to reclaim Kherson, the incident was reported to have damaged the country's trust in the technology, along with shocking Starlink employees.
One of the three people who were familiar with the instruction claimed it enabled Musk to take 'the outcome of a war into his own hands'.
The Tesla-owner reportedly grew concerned that Ukrainian forces' advancements could provoke nuclear retaliation from Vladimir Putin.
A spokesperson for SpaceX, the aerospace company that owns Starlink, told Reuters the reporting of the incident is 'inaccurate'.
In March, Musk posted on his social media platform, X/Twitter: 'To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals.'
Starlink, which went live in 2019, is a satellite company that beams data across its network and is the world's largest satellite operator.
It provides customers with internet access in remote and unreliable locations and has a network of around 8000 satellites in orbit.
It has been a key tool in Ukraine's defence, as Musk has provided the country with more than 50,000 Starlink terminals during the war.
The network has allowed Ukrainians to speak to relatives across the world, and President Zelensky uses the network to transmit broadcasts to the nation.
It is also used by Ukrainian forces on the battlefield to communicate and is used to guide drones and long-range artillery units.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
a few seconds ago
- New Statesman
Trump's gangsterism towards the EU is working
Photo by Thierry Charlier/AFP In 2018, when Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs on European cars, then-president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, responded: 'We can also do stupid.' When Trump then imposed steel and aluminium tariffs, the EU responded by targeting Harley-Davidson motorbikes and bourbon. It wasn't long before the two economic blocs agreed to put further tariffs on hold. It was a different time. Juncker, of course, was cut from a different cloth from today's Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and many of the current European leaders. He had not danced the night away in Berlin in November 1989, as the Wall fell, and was not too inclined to believe in teenage ideas such as the end of history or America as a force for good in the world. He knew, as former French president François Mitterrand once put it, that between America and Europe there is a bloody economic war going on at all times, and there has been one for more than a century. But let us be fair to von der Leyen. There is another difference between today and 2018: the war in Ukraine. For all the pablum about how the war has awakened Europe from its geopolitical slumber, the truth is very different. The war has made Europe entirely dependent on the US — even as it continues to pay for most of the war expenses — because of the belief that without American weaponry Ukraine would sooner or later be defeated. It is a wonderful position for Donald Trump to be in. He can effectively threaten Ukraine with a tragic defeat and the EU with the consequences of such an outcome by simply allowing the withdrawal of all support for Kyiv to hover above the economic negotiations. 'What a nice country Ukraine is,' he says ominously to Europeans, 'it would be terrible if something happened to it.' There are no economic discussions taking place at the moment; rather, it's the logic of military force supplanting every economic discussion. The gangsterism has been effective. Terribly effective in fact as evidenced by the bizarre deal announced by von der Leyen over the weekend: for the privilege of paying tariffs of 15 per cent to export to the American market, the EU will reduce its own tariffs and prepare significant transfers of funds to the US energy and defense industries, themselves an informal part of the American state. I have to confess I have never seen a trade deal quite like this one where European concessions were seemingly exchanged for… more European concessions. It's a catastrophic outcome for a series of reasons. First, more than any other crisis in my lifetime, the deal undermines the very raison d'etre for the European Union. If the EU is after all too weak, too divided, too timid to defend European interests on the global stage, what exactly is it for? The individual states can surely be weak on their own. Second, while European leaders have often expressed their distaste for the kind of politics Donald Trump represents, they are also the best possible argument for Trump: after all, if he can extract significant tribute from wealthy European societies, in a way his predecessors could not, why should Americans vote for anyone else? And in fact, after the deal was announced, social media was flooded by Maga accounts celebrating a victory, even turning it into a battle of the sexes, with von der Leyen coming out defeated and humiliated. Good job, everyone in the Berlaymont, you made us proud. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Third, the deal is a disaster for the European economy. We saw the impact the day after the announcement: investment banks are revising their growth forecasts for Europe and the euro fell steeply against the dollar. This is particularly hard to take because it reverses very positive dynamics after Trump returned to the White House and global investors started to look at Europe as a more predictable place to park their money. Why should they do that now that exports to the US market may fall by about 30 per cent as a result of the tariffs and investment in European technology looks doomed with the necessary funds going to buy American weapons and natural gas instead of European weapons and wind turbines. Note how the deal determines that Europe continues to subsidise the military industrial complex in North Virginia instead of investing in its own military technology. Such investment would help Ukraine survive, but it would also reduce Europe's vulnerability and create a level playing field for transatlantic relations. That's the last thing Trump wants. This deal is disastrous on its own terms and doubly disastrous for creating the conditions for many similar deals in the future. The irony is that Europeans spend an enormous amount of time discussing among themselves why their economies are falling behind the boisterous US economy. One American company, Nvidia, may soon be worth more than the 50 largest European companies. What explains this? Might it be an excess of regulation, as Mario Draghi likes to say? A taste for la dolce vita? Too much wine? Too much espresso? Perhaps Europeans lack the entrepreneurial drive of Americans, the typical justification of every colonised mind and yet not uncommon in parts of Europe. What a mystery. Unless, of course, it has something to do with Europe's extreme vulnerability and America's willingness to use its unmatched military power to shape economic outcomes. Yes, it might be that. [Further reading: The plot against Zohran Mamdani] Related
Times
a few seconds ago
- Times
Beware statistical quirks — they may not tell the whole story
I t may not be able to do so for long, but the government has been claiming that the UK economy is outstripping all its main rivals. 'The UK now has the fastest growth in the G7 — our Plan for Change in action,' Sir Keir Starmer said recently. Achieving the fastest growth in the G7 — America, Japan, Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Canada — was once a key Labour target, though it now appears to have been watered down, and this appears to suggest almost an instant achievement. Hang on a second, though. Did not the Tory government also claim to have achieved the fastest growth rate in the G7? It did indeed, before attacking the Labour government for snuffing it out. In both cases, GDP (gross domestic product) figures for the first quarter of the year provided room to boast. GDP rose by a hefty 0.9 per cent in the first quarter of last year, and one official statistician said the economy was going 'gangbusters'. It rose by 0.7 per cent in the first quarter of this year, a figure that may be revised higher when second-quarter figures are released on August 14.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Google could steal the entire internet
Google has shown us what the end of the internet looks like. It calls it AI Mode. From Tuesday, instead of seeing ten blue links to third party websites when searching Google, users will see digests of information created by AI. Google says this 'lets you ask nuanced questions that would have previously required multiple searches.' Sometimes there is value in these digests – as demonstrated by AI startup Perplexity. However, the change has catastrophic economic consequences because of Google's dominant position over what we see on the web; AI mode removes the need to visit the site that created the original material. Google, it should be remembered, was found guilty of maintaining a monopoly by an American federal court last summer. An analytics study last week suggested that the top ranking site in blue link Google loses 79 per cent of its traffic after AI summaries are introduced. Other surveys suggest even more: as much as 96 per cent. This is not how the web was supposed to end. Sir Tim Berners Lee's original vision was of a rapid publishing technology, a two way conversation much like the telephone. When Google was young, it promised to get out of our way. 'We wanted people to spend a minimum amount of time on Google. The faster they got their results, the more they'd use it,' said founder Larry Page in 2004. But now Google has become like The Eagles' Hotel California – you can check in, but never leave. That's in keeping with an extractive industry which takes much from publishing but gives little back. AI makes this an order of magnitude worse. Generative AI breaks an informal social contract that has existed since the dawn of business: that a buyer should take a keen interest in the health of its suppliers. AI, though, is replacing suppliers entirely: an analogy is eating the seed corn. For having ingested everything from entire research libraries to newspapers, from YouTube to the works of every gallery, AI can create fine tuned pastiches and continue to produce them forever. Google can also punish sites that refuse to be scraped with a kind of corporate death sentence: making them disappear from Google. A former Facebook engineer, Georg Zoeller, who also advises Asian governments on AI, says generative AI is little more than piracy disguised by hype. 'Large language models are just storage, and all they are doing is compressing knowledge,' he says. 'The industry would have been murdered in its crypt if it had told the truth, and people realised that on the other side of the bot is a Napster'. The magic trick is how AI disguises the theft. Google says the old search results will still be available if you want – or can find them. Britain's Competition and Markets Authority has investigated the company's use of generative AI, but its remedies are so far very tentative, and it is soliciting views. The CMA also finds British business paying a very high toll to maintain Google's advertising dominance: UK publicly listed companies spend £10 billion with Google advertising, which the CMA suggests is far higher than it would be in a competitive digital ad market. The CMA can and should do much more to tame this predatory giant, so British internet businesses can survive.
