It's hot in Tennessee. A new law will make it hotter – and you sicker.
Last legislative session, Tennessee lawmakers voted on a bill that, on its face, seemed technical and harmless.
The jargon-loaded legislation stated that 'the International Energy Conservation Code's requirements for roof solar reflectance and thermal emittance for low-sloped roofs do not apply in this state.' A roofing industry lobbyist even testified before members of the legislature that the bill was benign, 'simply a fix; not quite administrative, but almost.'
Not even close. This deceptive bill — SB 1194/HB 0801 — which passed through the legislature and is now state law, will harm the health of Tennesseans. It will also lead to much hotter temperatures in Memphis and Nashville, and throughout the southern and western part of the state. That's not a 'fix' worth supporting.
Which is why I voted against it.
Memphis and Nashville are already experiencing dangerous urban heat levels, which disproportionately impact vulnerable communities, outdoor workers, and people who struggle with high energy costs.
Propped up by a narrow industry lobbying group, this new law will undermine standards that are crucial for reducing extreme heat impacts. It will have an even more harmful effect on Tennessee's under-served Black and Brown communities, including many of the neighborhoods I represent in Nashville.
Unfortunately, this is the same case in countless frontline communities across the nation.
Years ago, Tennessee adopted the International Energy Conservation Code's requirements for cool roofing. It required new commercial buildings and multi-family buildings with low-sloped roofs to install light-colored 'cool roofs' in parts of the state.
These cool roofs reflect solar energy and reduce heat transfer, both in the buildings and for surrounding communities. Cool roofs are a proven, cost-effective solution, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. They reduce peak cooling demand by 11-27% and provide annual energy cost savings of up to 7.5%.
This ill-conceived legislation stripped out a common part of the energy code that has been saving money and improving the health of Tennesseans.
Letter: My neighbors and I served Nashville for years. Now we can't afford to live here.
We desperately need more cool roofs in our state. Every year, at least 2,000 emergency room visits in Tennessee are attributed to heat, with over 4,000 heat-related ER visits in 2023 alone, according to the Tennessee Department of Health.
Research from the University of Tennessee-Knoxville confirms that urban areas across the state experience significantly higher temperatures than surrounding regions. This is due to the urban heat-island effect, which occurs when man-made structures absorb and re-emit the sun's heat.
With this new law, commercial and multi-family buildings in Tennessee will continue to absorb and trap heat, raising cooling costs and putting residents at risk — particularly seniors, children, and other vulnerable populations.
That's why a coalition of pro-health groups wrote letters in opposition to the bill. The coalition included the American Public Health Association, the Tennessee/Kentucky chapter of the American Lung Association, and the non-profit Smart Surfaces Coalition, which includes the Metropolitan A.M.E. Church as a key partner.
The lobbyists who pushed the bill through, representing roofing companies that manufacture so-called 'dark roof' products, know they are losing market share because dark roofing materials make buildings less efficient, communities hotter, and often cost more than cool-roof options.
Letters: Readers question motivations, actions of Tennessee's elected officials
The dark-roofing industry has also created a disinformation campaign about cool roofs, questioning decades-long science. They misrepresented the bill as a minor, technical patch when the legislation has massive health implications for the state.
This new law will lead to higher energy costs and cause an increase in heat-related illnesses and deaths, and it will force taxpayers to subsidize structural environmental inequality.
I urge my fellow lawmakers to revisit this poorly understood bill and let common sense prevail.
Rep. Harold Love, Jr., D-Nashville, represents the 58th District in the Tennessee House of Representatives and is Pastor of Lee Chapel AME Church and President of The National Black Caucus of State Legislators. Rev. Dr. Jon Robinson is the Smart Surfaces Senior Program Director at Metropolitan A.M.E. Church in Washington, D.C.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Tennessee weather is hot. A new roof law makes it hotter | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
GOP senators reach deal on AI regulation ban
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said Sunday that she reached a deal with Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on new text for a provision in President Trump's sweeping tax package that seeks to bar states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI).The updated text would enact a 'temporary pause,' banning states from regulating AI for five years if they want access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funding included in the bill. The original provision, which Blackburn opposed, sought to limit state legislation for a 10-year also includes new exemptions for state laws seeking to regulate unfair or deceptive practices, children's online safety, child sexual abuse material and publicity rights.'For decades, Congress has proven incapable of passing legislation to govern the virtual space and protect Americans from being exploited by Big Tech, and it's why I continue to fight to pass federal protections for Tennesseans and Americans alike,' Blackburn said in a statement.'To ensure we do not decimate the progress states like Tennessee have made to stand in the gap, I am pleased Chairman Cruz has agreed to update the AI provision to exempt state laws that protect kids, creators, and other vulnerable individuals from the unintended consequences of AI,' she has been a key proponent of legislation seeking to protect kids online. She reintroduced the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) last month alongside Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).'I look forward to working with him in the coming months to hold Big Tech accountable — including by passing the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework that gives consumers more power over their data,' she added. 'It's time to get the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to the President's desk so we can deliver on our promise of enacting the America First agenda.'It's unclear whether Blackburn and Cruz's deal on the AI provision will resolve the concerns of other lawmakers who have previously voiced opposition to the measure, including Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).The provision survived scrutiny from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough last week, who ruled that the AI moratorium did not violate the Byrd rule and can remain in the reconciliation Senate is expected to move forward with a series of votes on the package Monday morning, as they race to get the bill across the finish line before Trump's self-imposed deadline of July 4. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
GOP senators reach deal on AI regulation ban
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said Sunday that she reached a deal with Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on new text for a provision in President Trump's sweeping tax package that seeks to bar states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI).The updated text would enact a 'temporary pause,' banning states from regulating AI for five years if they want access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funding included in the bill. The original provision, which Blackburn opposed, sought to limit state legislation for a 10-year also includes new exemptions for state laws seeking to regulate unfair or deceptive practices, children's online safety, child sexual abuse material and publicity rights.'For decades, Congress has proven incapable of passing legislation to govern the virtual space and protect Americans from being exploited by Big Tech, and it's why I continue to fight to pass federal protections for Tennesseans and Americans alike,' Blackburn said in a statement.'To ensure we do not decimate the progress states like Tennessee have made to stand in the gap, I am pleased Chairman Cruz has agreed to update the AI provision to exempt state laws that protect kids, creators, and other vulnerable individuals from the unintended consequences of AI,' she has been a key proponent of legislation seeking to protect kids online. She reintroduced the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) last month alongside Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).'I look forward to working with him in the coming months to hold Big Tech accountable — including by passing the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework that gives consumers more power over their data,' she added. 'It's time to get the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to the President's desk so we can deliver on our promise of enacting the America First agenda.'It's unclear whether Blackburn and Cruz's deal on the AI provision will resolve the concerns of other lawmakers who have previously voiced opposition to the measure, including Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).The provision survived scrutiny from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough last week, who ruled that the AI moratorium did not violate the Byrd rule and can remain in the reconciliation Senate is expected to move forward with a series of votes on the package Monday morning, as they race to get the bill across the finish line before Trump's self-imposed deadline of July 4.


San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: The federal government once stood up for what was right. What's changed?
As a Black teenager growing up in Detroit in the 1960s, I was horrified after seeing news coverage of the peaceful demonstrators, marchers and children being attacked and brutalized. The demonstrators, mostly Black Americans, were simply asking for the same rights that were afforded to the majority of Americans. Today's demonstrations against the Trump administration's immigration roundups in Los Angeles and elsewhere remind me of the Civil Rights Movement. The National Guard is deployed in Los Angeles, purportedly to protect federal property. The last time the guard was used in a disputed manner was 1957. Nine Black high school students attempted to enroll at the all-white Little Rock Central High School in 1957. The Democratic Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus called in the National Guard to prevent it. In response, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent the Army to protect the students. The irony is self-evident. The cause of the peaceful demonstrators in Los Angeles and beyond is righteous. It is a shame that the federal government under President Donald Trump no longer protects the disenfranchised and marginalized. Clarence Boyd, Oakland Maintain health care I was relieved when Sen. John McCain voted against repealing the Affordable Care Act in 2017. As a breast cancer survivor with two pre-existing conditions, the thought of losing my health care was terrifying. I recently overcame another bout of breast cancer, and I'm grateful a second mastectomy was avoided. Medicare's follow-up care has been superb. Now we're facing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, which threatens the health care coverage of 16 million Americans by 2034. The proposed bill includes substantial cuts to Medicaid and changes to the Affordable Care Act that will affect low-income individuals and families. What kind of society are we if we fail to support our sick, elderly and disabled? We need to pressure Congress to refuse a huge deficit increase while simultaneously denying health care to vulnerable populations. It's not crazy You might think that I am a Republican. I believe in fiscal responsibility. I support a balanced federal budget. I support a strong immigration policy. I support a strong national defense. I support a rational and fair tariff policy. I believe in fair and honest elections. But I am not a Republican. I am a Democrat. And just because I have empathy for the most vulnerable and defenseless among us, that also does not make me 'a radical left lunatic.' Bill Schrupp, Lafayette