New plans to provide Winter Fuel Payments to more pensioners could be due next week
An update on Uk Government plans to issue the heating payment to 'more pensioners' could be given on June 11.
Keir Starmer reveals partial U-turn on Winter Fuel Payment cut
Details on when Winter Fuel Payments could be restored to more pensioners could be announced next week. The Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, recently indicated the Spending Review by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday, June 11 could be when an update is given.
Limiting the annual payment of up to £300 to only those in receipt of a qualifying means-tested benefit such as Pension Credit or Universal Credit (for mixed age couples), was one of the earliest moves made by the Labour Government when it set out plans to deal with what it called a £22 billion 'black hole' in the public purse left behind by the outgoing Conservative government.
Sir Keir Starmer recently said at Prime Minister's Questions that he wants to restore Winter Fuel Payments to 'more pensioners,' claiming the UK's improving economic prospects could allow for the move at the next 'fiscal event'.
Many in Westminster took the PM's comments to mean the Budget in the Autumn, but Ms Rayner suggested it could come sooner during a recent appearance on Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips on Sky News.
She said: "I think that we've got the upcoming Spending Review, and I'm sure that the Chancellor will set it out when we've got the opportunity, at the first opportunity, she will set out what we'll be able to do.'
Asked if this means details on the Winter Fuel Payment will definitely be announced at the Spending Review, Ms Rayner added: 'I don't know, but I hope so.
'I mean, the Prime Minister has announced it, so logically to me that indicates that the Prime Minister wants to do something in this area. And if the Prime Minister wants to do that, I'm sure the Chancellor is going to look at how we can achieve that.'
Ministers are reportedly considering restoring the payment to all but the wealthiest pensioners, according to the Sunday Times, but could face delays rolling it out this winter due to ageing computer systems.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called for the immediate restoration of the Winter Fuel Payment when she appeared on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg, on May 25.
She said: "We need to restore it right now. We would never have taken the winter fuel (payment) away. We kept it for 14 years - we brought in the Triple Lock - we look after pensioners.'
By contrast, the Scottish Government announced earlier this year that all 1.1 million pensioners living north of the border would receive at least £100 this winter.
First Minister John Swinney confirmed to the Daily Record last month that payments of either £100, £203 or £305 would be issued by St Andrew's Day on November 30.
Options to reintroduce Winter Fuel Payments
Full reversal
One option would be a full reversal of the decision to strip the benefit from millions of pensioners.
The decision to make it available only to those who claim pension credit last year meant those claiming Winter Fuel Payment fell by almost 90 per cent and saved around £1.5 billion a year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) estimates.
Undoing last year's policy change would make some 11 million more households eligible and of course wipe out the £1.5 billion in savings.
Create a specific threshold for Winter Fuel Payments
Creating a new threshold and means test would allow households not on Pension Credit to apply directly for Winter Fuel Payments.
Raising it 20 per cent above the Pension Credit threshold would cost around £100 million and see payments go to around 400,000 more families, according to the Resolution Foundation.
One option would be to model this on Child Benefit by allowing all pensioner households to claim but then require those above a certain income level to pay some back via a self assessment tax return, the IFS notes.
But there is a risk to adopting 'a clunky bureaucratic mechanism for what is, ultimately, a relatively small payment', IFS associate director Tom Waters warned.
Expand entitlement to those who get disability or housing benefits
Some 1.8 million more households could get Winter Fuel Payment at a cost of around £500 million per year if entitlement is extended to those on disability benefits, the IFS estimates.
However, this would be more complicated to put in place in Scotland, where disability benefits are devolved.
Extending eligibility to include those on housing and disability benefits would give support to 1.3 million more pensioner families at a cost of £300 million a year, the Resolution Foundation estimates.
This would be an 'affordable' and 'sensible way forward', chief executive Ruth Curtice said.
Pay Winter Fuel Payments to individuals, not households
One difficulty in allocating the Winter Fuel Payment is that it currently goes to households rather than individuals.
Changing this would mean the UK Government could do a means test on an individual basis and use information that it already records for income tax purposes.
It would see pensioners with a low income but with a high-income spouse get the winter fuel payment.
However, it could also see couples get twice as much winter fuel payment as single people, where at the moment a single person would get the same amount as a couple sharing a household.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
18 minutes ago
- ITV News
Starmer has ‘every confidence' in the First Minister and Welsh Labour ahead of Senedd election
The Prime Minister says he has 'every confidence in the First Minister and Welsh Labour' ahead of next year's Senedd election. Sir Keir Starmer was speaking to ITV Cymru Wales on a visit to RAF Valley on Anglesey. He'll also speak to Welsh Labour members at the party's conference in Llandudno today. In her speech to the conference, Eluned Morgan is expected to underline how difficult next year will be, saying that 'The next Senedd election won't be a routine affair. It will be a moment of reckoning. "Reform are rising. Plaid are mobilising. And across the country, people are asking big, serious questions about the kind of future they want for Wales.' The most recent Barn Cymru poll for ITV Wales and Cardiff University suggests that Labour could come third behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK. Starmer to warn of 'backroom stitch-up' in Welsh elections I asked Keir Starmer if he was worried that Labour might lose Wales after more than a quarter of a century in power and a century dominating Welsh politics. He said that 'I have every confidence in the First Minister and Welsh Labour. They have delivered over many years for Wales and we have the added advantage now that, with a Labour government in Westminster, working hand in hand with the Welsh Government we are able to deliver... ...just to give some examples, the biggest settlement in the budget since devolution, hugely important under the spending review; much more money into transport in Wales; money for coal tips; money into the energy sector; supporting through the defence spend the 6,000 or so jobs in Wales. 'That's the benefit of having a Prime Minister and a First Minister who, yes, engage and of course the First Minister argues and makes her point and challenges and puts her propositions forward, as she should , as I'd expect. "And then we engage together and we deliver for Wales and what we both have in our mind is 'are we delivering for the people of Wales?' And the answer to that is yes, look at what we've done in the spending review, in the budget.' The Prime Minister's visit comes after a week in which he was forced to make major concessions on plans to reform disability welfare payments, following a threatened rebellion by Labour backbenchers. I asked him why it had taken that threat to force him to act and not earlier calls for a rethink from the First Minister. He said, 'I think that's the opposite of what you've just put to me because, true it is that the First Minister raised issues with me; we've been engaging with her and others. And look, for me, some of these things are common sense. "I want to get this right. I want the package right and therefore we've had a discussion with the First Minister and others as a result of which we've changed the package and that means that we can deliver the overall reform that we need now. 'In politics sometimes people pretend it's much more complicated than it is. It's common sense to hold a proposition up to the light and make sure it's the right package. We've done that now, we've adjusted the package, I'm pleased that we've gone through that exercise and now we can get on with delivery.' In her conference speech, Eluned Morgan, is expected to say that the 'moment of reckoning' created by the pressures from Plaid Cymru and Reform UK will mean that Labour needs to work together. She's expected to say, 'This is not a moment to look away. This is the moment to look forward - a moment of maximum opportunity and, yes, also of serious threat. It's time to stand up. It's time to get involved. 'Now, for the first time in a generation, we have two Labour governments - in Cardiff and Westminster - working together, pulling in the same direction. 'Reform don't want to protect the NHS - they want to dismantle it. Rip it up and replace it with an insurance system. Privatised. Profit-driven. Out of reach for the people who need it most. Because in their world, your health depends on your wealth. 'They point to problems. We are the party of answers - not the party of excuses. Not the party of fear. But make no mistake - they are a threat. To your NHS. To your rights. To our Welsh way of life.' Meanwhile, the Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens will announce a new £11 million fund for businesses in Port Talbot and the surrounding area s. She's expected to tell the conference that the 'Economic Growth and Investment Fund' wil support companies that take on workers in that region. Away from politics, perhaps the most difficult question of all, knowing that the Prime Minister is a big football fan and a supporter of England, is who would he support in the Euros, Wales or England? 'The third game is England versus Wales. I went to see the Lionesses and we discussed that very fixture. I'm afraid I'm going to have to say this: good luck to Wales in every game other than when they play England because I'm an England fan and I will be supporting England on that occasion. "But for all other games the best of luck [to Wales] - it'll be a great game and the Lionesses know that that is going to be a really important game in the group and I've talked it through with them and their preparation for it.'
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer still faces Labour anger over risk of ‘two-tier' disability benefits
Keir Starmer is battling to stem the revolt over his cuts to disability benefits, with about 50 Labour MPs concerned the new concessions will create a 'two-tier' system where existing and new claimants are treated differently. Senior government sources insisted things were 'moving in the right direction' for No 10, with the whips phoning backbenchers to persuade them to support the bill on Tuesday. Government insiders said they believed they had peeled off enough of the original 120-plus Labour opponents of the legislation to win the vote, after the work and pensions secretary, Liz Kendall, promised to exempt current disability claimants from the changes, and to increase the health element of universal credit in line with inflation. However, rebel MPs will attempt to lay a new amendment on Monday giving colleagues a chance to delay the bill, which will still involve £2.5bn of cuts to future disability benefits. The continuing row over the changes is likely to blight the week that will mark the first anniversary of Labour's return to power. In an interview on Thursday, Starmer admitted to a range of mistakes – including using the phrase 'an island of strangers' in an immigration speech, and hiring his former chief of staff Sue Gray. His government has made a series of U-turns in the last 12 months, but his handling of the welfare bill might be the most damaging episode of them all. Starmer will next week be hoping to draw a line under the difficult period, in which the government has also reversed cuts to winter fuel payments and changed course over holding an inquiry into grooming gangs. Dozens of Labour MPs are continuing to criticise the welfare cuts on a Labour WhatsApp group. Many MPs are still undecided about how they will vote and are pressing for more assurances that it is ethical and legal to set up a division between current and future claimants. Disability charities have said the bill remains 'fatally flawed' and will lead to an 'unequal future' for different groups of disabled people, making life harder for hundreds of thousands of future claimants. The government confirmed on Friday night that people who have to make new claims for Pip after November 2026 will be assessed under the new criteria. This means those reapplying after losing their Pip or who have fluctuating health conditions will not have the level of their previous awards protected. Starmer defended the bill on Friday, saying it struck the right balance. The changes will protect 370,000 existing recipients who were expected to lose out after reassessment. The prime minister said: 'We talked to colleagues, who've made powerful representations, as a result of which we've got a package which I think will work, we can get it right.' Asked how the government would pay for the £3bn of concessions, which experts believe will have to be funded by tax rises or extra borrowing, Starmer replied: 'The funding will be set out in the budget in the usual way, as you'd expect, later in the year.' There would need to be at least 80 rebels to defeat the bill, and government sources were quietly confident they had given enough ground after Meg Hillier, the chair of the Treasury committee, said she would back the legislation following changes. Others were unconvinced. One leading rebel said 'everyone but a handful of people is unhappy', even if they do end up reluctantly backing the changed legislation. Another expressed frustration that No 10 and the whips were 'trying to bounce people into agreeing before we've seen enough details'. Rachael Maskell, the Labour MP for York Central, a leading opponent of the bill, said: 'They are going to have to go back to the negotiating table … deaf and disabled people's organisations are rejecting these changes as it fails to address future need and gives no security for people with fluctuating conditions, for instance where people are in remission.' Other critics who plan to vote against the bill include the MP for Crawley, Peter Lamb, who said: 'Despite many improvements to the system set out in the bill, at its core the bill remains a cost-cutting exercise. No matter the level of involvement of disability groups in co-producing a scheme for new applicants, to save money the new scheme has to result in people with high levels of need losing the support necessary to wash themselves, dress themselves and feed themselves.' Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Simon Opher, the MP for Stroud, said he still opposed the bill. 'The changes do not tackle the eligibility issues that are at the heart of many of the problems with Pip [personal independence payments]. The bill should be scrapped and we should start again and put the needs of disabled people at the centre of the process.' Diane Abbott, a leading figure from the left of Labour, said the rebellion was 'far from over', while another Labour MP said: 'The bill starts from the premise of cuts, not reform. It's also arse about face in terms of impact assessments and co-production. It's simply a negotiated dog's dinner. In that sense, nothing has really changed except the fact they've negotiated more [people to] misguidedly to sign up to it.' One thing Labour MPs are pushing for is more clarity on the review of the Pip system, due to be done before autumn by Stephen Timms, a work and pensions minister. Many expect that process to change the points system from the current proposals. Some in the party also want Starmer to reinstate Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a whip to vote against the bill before the U-turn was made. Stella Creasy, a leading Labour MP who had initially signed the amendment to delay the bill, said she wanted to see more details. 'We need to understand why we would treat one group of claimants differently from another,' she said. A Labour MP from the 2024 intake said: 'I'm waiting to look at the details before making any decisions. Many are in the same place as me and need to get something more than a midnight email on an issue of this much importance to hundreds of thousands of people.' The Labour MPs opposed to the changes are citing a fundamental rejection of the idea that a Labour government will be making disabled people worse off. At the same time, many of them have also been alienated by what they say is a No 10 operation that is out of touch with the parliamentary party, and has tried to strongarm MPs into backing the legislation with threats and promises of preferment. 'Good will has been lost and there is still huge suspicion about whether they will try and pull a stunt at the last minute,' said one Labour MP. The majority of disability charities and campaign groups still opposed the cuts. Ellen Clifford, from Disabled People Against Cuts, said: 'Many people who rely on Pip to survive have fluctuating conditions which means our support needs can go up and down. By penalising existing claimants if we go out of and then go back to the benefits system depending on our health, more people will be denied the support they need. 'This is exactly why no disabled people's organisation across the whole of the UK has welcomed these concessions because we know the complexities of the social security system and bitter experience from years of cuts that there are many ways in which grand sweeping statements about protections translate to very little in practice when you go into the detail of it.' The disability equality charity Scope said that despite the concessions, an estimated 430,000 future disabled claimants would be affected by 2029-30. Its strategy director, James Taylor, said: 'It is encouraging that the government is starting to listen to disabled people and MPs who have been campaigning for change for months. But these plans will still rip billions from the welfare system. 'The proposed concessions will create a two-tier benefits system and an unequal future for disabled people. Life costs more if you are disabled. And these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work.' Additional reporting by Frances Ryan
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Mobile phone use in East Renfrewshire schools could be restricted
Parents, carers and staff have raised concerns about the use of smartphones in schools, which can 'facilitate bullying', councillors have said. There are plans to hand out questionnaires from August, which will help to refresh guidance on how phones can be used while at school. Cllr Katie Pragnell, Labour, said she has been 'contacted by a number of parents, carers and staff who work within East Renfrewshire schools' and there are 'some concerns about the use of mobile phones in our schools'. She added: 'I think it's really important that we consider this issue fully as there is evidence emerging, particularly on the impact mobile phones have on young people's mental health, especially as they are going through a quite vulnerable stage of puberty and adolescence.' Cllr Kate Campbell, Conservative, added: 'I am very aware from what I've heard from parents and pupils, it's not just receiving and sending texts, smartphones facilitate bullying. READ MORE: 'Very sad': School announces death of 'loved & respected' teacher 'They are being used for bullying, so we must really look into how they are used.' At an education committee meeting earlier this month, councillors were updated on work around the use of mobile phones in schools. Consultation has already been carried out through pupil council and head pupil meetings, parent council chair meetings and staff forums. Education officials have also audited current practice in secondary schools. They reported: 'Our next step will be to design and implement a fuller consultation, which will involve designing a questionnaire which will be issued to parents/carers, pupils and staff in schools. 'The results of this consultation will inform how we update guidance for schools in East Renfrewshire.' READ MORE: Glasgow restaurant visited by Celtic & Rangers star to temporarily close An official told councillors that they would engage with stakeholders on the content of the questionnaires and aim to 'have it ready for launching early August when schools come back'. Cllr Gordon Wallace, Conservative, said one of four rules on smartphones suggested in the book 'The Anxious Generation' by Jonathan Haidt is phone-free schools. It proposes storing phones, smart-watches and other personal devices that can send or receive texts in phone-lock pouches during the school day, he said. Cllr Wallace added: 'I appreciate to suddenly fire that out to our youngsters who really spend an awful lot of their time on smartphones, that would be a big ask. 'I do appreciate the value of going out to consultation on this, but I don't think there's any question in anybody's mind, the impact that smartphones are having on our youngsters. 'That's not to say that we must do without them but we need to find a way through this for the benefit of our young people.'
