Sask. human trafficking trial hears conflicting testimony from key witnesses
A human trafficking trial connected to three small-town Saskatchewan restaurants heard contradictory testimony from two key witnesses on Wednesday.
The trial of Mahammad Masum and Sohel Haider continued through its third week Wednesday with cross-examination of Hugh Nerlien, a former Saskatchewan Party MLA who court heard was enlisted by his colleague Doug Steele to pass a clandestine note with a safe contact number to a woman, whose name is protected under a publication ban, that police say was forced to work long hours for little pay and was sexually assaulted by Masum.
The court heard Steele, Sask. Party MLA for Cypress Hills, met the woman at Empire Diner in Gull Lake and grew concerned she may be in an exploitative employment situation.
Nerlien, who served as MLA for Kelvington-Wadena from 2016 to 2024, testified he and Steele were concerned for her welfare and regularly spoke about what whether to intervene and how.
When the woman was suddenly moved from Gull Lake to Tisdale to work at Little Town Restaurant, Nerlien said he went for lunch and passed her a note with the number of a nearby settlement agent he believed could help.
When the trial began in September, the woman testified Masum made unwelcome sexual advances shortly after she arrived in Tisdale. She told court he grabbed her from behind in the walk-in freezer and kissed her neck. Later, she says he drove her to a secluded area, removed her pants and raped her.
After the woman had left her job at Bob's Diner in Elrose to what witnesses described as a 'safe place,' Nerlien said she contacted him for help updating her resume – and that they communicated regularly over text and email for that purpose.
Court heard Nerlien told police the woman changed her number or phone provider, and as a result, he lost their messages and was unable to provide them with RCMP investigators.
In cross-examination, Nerlien said he couldn't remember why he lost the message he exchanged with the complainant – whether it was because she got a new phone, or he did, or both.
But in an unexpected revelation Wednesday as the woman returned for cross-examination, she denied Nerlien provided any help crafting her resume.
As her testimony all went through a court-appointed Bengali translator, the judge asked her to clarify whether she contacted Nerlien for resume help at any point – before or after her employment at the three restaurants connected to the case.
Again, she said no, moments before the trial adjourned for the day.
The defence is expected to continue with its cross-examination of the complainant on Thursday.
The move to Canada, struggle to find work
When the Bangladeshi woman at the centre of this human trafficking trial returned to the stand for cross-examination Wednesday afternoon, she told court she always dreamed of living in Canada.
'As a child I used to collect maple leafs,' she said, testifying she was enchanted by the idea of seeing snow for the first time.
Court heard the woman earned two masters degrees in Bangladesh and formerly worked at a government-run geological research laboratory.
The woman described her lifestyle in Bangladesh as 'first class' – she, her husband and her close relatives had good jobs and lived well, she said.
'I wouldn't say we were wealthy, but we didn't have any needs.'
She testified she travelled to Toronto on a visitor's visa and stayed to find work at the encouragement of her relatives.
Court heard she applied for a number of restaurant jobs in Toronto, including Burger King, with no success, so she started looking farther afield, responding to ads from businesses in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The Empire Diner in Gull Lake was the first to call back.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Montreal police recover unidentifiable body from Prairies River
Montreal police pulled a body out of the Prairies River, north of the Island of Montreal near the Ahuntsic-Cartierville borough, Saturday afternoon. Police received a 911 call just before 3:20 p.m. after a person spotted the body in the water near the intersection of Gouin Boulevard and Martin Avenue. The body is unidentifiable, according to police spokesperson Julien Lévesque. Investigators with the Service de police de la Ville de Montréal analyzed the scene and the investigation is being transferred to the Quebec coroner's office.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Liberals taking ‘fresh' look at online harms bill, justice minister says
Minister of Justice Sean Fraser arrives for a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the federal government plans to take a 'fresh' look at its online harms legislation over the summer but it's not clear yet exactly what the bill will look like when it is reintroduced. It would be the Liberals third attempt to pass legislation to address harmful behaviour online. Fraser told The Canadian Press in an interview that the government hasn't decided whether to rewrite or simply reintroduce the Online Harms Act, which was introduced in 2024 but did not pass. He said Canadians can expect measures addressing deepfakes and child exploitation 'to be included in legislative reforms coming up in the near future.' In their election platform, the Liberals promised to make the distribution of non-consensual sexual deepfakes a criminal offence. They also pledged to introduce a bill to protect children from online sexploitation and extortion, and to give law enforcement and prosecutors additional tools to pursue those crimes. Fraser said the growth of artificial intelligence is influencing the discussions. The spread of generative AI has changed both the online space and everyday life since the federal government first introduced the legislation. 'We will have that in mind as we revisit the specifics of online harms legislation,' he added. 'The world changes and governments would be remiss if they didn't recognize that policy needs to shift.' Online harms legislation was first proposed by then-heritage minister Steven Guilbeault in 2021, but after widespread criticism, the government pivoted and shifted the file to the justice minister. Guilbeault is now back in his old ministry, which has been renamed Canadian identity and culture. Prime Minister Mark Carney has also created an artificial intelligence ministry, headed up by rookie MP Evan Solomon. Fraser said he expects 'significant engagement' with Guilbeault and Solomon but it will be determined later which minister will take the lead on it. The first version of the bill alarmed critics who warned that the provision requiring platforms to take down offending content within 24 hours would undermine free expression. When Fraser's predecessor, Arif Virani, introduced the Online Harms Act in 2024, the bill restricted that 24-hour takedown provision to content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor, or intimate content shared without consent, including deepfakes. It also required social media companies to explain how they plan to reduce the risks their platforms pose to users, and imposed on them a duty to protect children. But the government also included Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act amendments targeting hate in the same legislation — which some said risked chilling free speech. In late 2024, Virani said he would split those controversial provisions off into a separate bill, but that didn't happen before this spring's federal election was called and the bill died on the order paper. Fraser said no decision has been made yet on whether to bring back online harms legislation in one bill or two. 'That is precisely the kind of thing that I want to have an opportunity to discuss with stakeholders, to ensure we're moving forward in a way that will create a broad base of public support,' he said. Fraser said the government could 'modify existing versions that we may have on the shelf from the previous Parliament as may be needed, or to accept the form in which we had the legislation.' He added he wants to have a 'fresh consideration of the path forward, where I personally can benefit from the advice of those closest to the file who know best how to keep kids safe online.' While the government hasn't set a date to introduce legislation, it could include some online harms measures in a crime bill Fraser plans to table in the fall. Fraser said online harms provisions that 'touch more specifically on criminal activity' could be 'included in one piece of legislation, with a broader set of reforms on online harms at a different time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 29, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Pharmacist convicted, suspended for stealing drugs due to addiction
A Winnipeg pharmacist has been convicted of fraud and reprimanded by his profession's regulatory body after years of taking drugs from his pharmacy to feed his own addiction. Manitoba's College of Pharmacists gave Scott Putz an 18-month suspension and ordered him to pay a $15,000 fine, plus $10,000 for costs of the investigation, for stealing stimulants for his own consumption. Details of the case were revealed in a spring edition of the regulator's newsletter. The regulator's decision came in 2025 because it was forced to pause its investigation while a police investigation took place. Winnipeg police charged Putz in 2021 with fraud over $5,000. In late 2023, he was given a suspended sentence after pleading guilty to the charge. Court documents say that in 2021, Putz met with College of Pharmacists of Manitoba staff and admitted he had taken controlled substances from the pharmacy for his own consumption. Putz told the college he had been doing that for about three or four years and "advised that he was suffering from substance abuse issues," the court documents say. The investigation found evidence that the medication Putz took included stimulants sometimes used to treat ADHD, such as amphetamine and dextroamphetamine. When that came to light, the college suspended Putz's pharmacist licence on an interim basis. After the criminal charge was dealt with, the college resumed its investigation in February 2024. The college's investigator found video footage from March 2021 showing Putz taking medication from the safe at the pharmacy where he worked, placing it into a paper bag and taking it to the front of the pharmacy, where he then counted out medication and placed it in his pocket, the college's disciplinary decision says. Putz was handed an 18-month suspension from practice but was credited for 17 months spent in an interim suspension from 2021-23. His pharmacist's licence was reinstated in April 2024 with additional conditions. They included submitting to regular drug and alcohol screening, working limited hours, being monitored by a pharmacy staff member and attending biweekly counselling sessions. When contacted by CBC News, he declined to comment on the case. The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba said it can't comment on cases beyond what's stated in published decisions. Neely Hammerberg, communications co-ordinator for the college, did say the case highlights addiction issues in the pharmacy profession. "We encourage any registrants who may be struggling with addiction to prioritize patient safety and to reach out to [the college] for support and guidance," Hammerberg wrote in an email to CBC. Fentanyl prescription mix-up Two other disciplinary cases were also posted in the college's spring 2025 newsletter. In one of the cases, a Manitoba pharmacist was disciplined over a prescription mix-up. Instead of a patient getting a fentanyl lollipop, as prescribed by a CancerCare doctor because it provides intermittent doses, the patient was given fentanyl patches, the decision says. The patches result in continuous delivery of fentanyl every hour, which can be dangerous in a patient who hasn't developed a tolerance for it. "Such a dose per hour can be dangerous or even fatal," the December 2024 decision says. The label for the prescription was prepared by a different pharmacist, but the decision says the disciplined pharmacist, who was on duty when the prescription was picked up, should have reviewed the prescription and provided counselling to the patient. If he'd done so, the errors could have been caught. The pharmacist was required to pay a fine of $1,500, plus $3,000 for investigative costs. Through his lawyer, he declined to comment on the case. Patient goes without medication In the third case in the college's most recent newsletter, a pharmacist was disciplined for an error that resulted in a patient going without necessary medication for more than two months. Because of that, the patient had to undergo a series of procedures to save their transplanted kidney from rejection, including an emergency kidney biopsy. In 2021, the pharmacist signed off on a kidney transplant patient's prescriptions for anti-rejection medications as having been from a prescriber at St. Boniface Hospital, when in fact the prescriber was at Health Sciences Centre. As a result of the error in location, when the patient needed a prescription refill a year later and the disciplined pharmacist no longer worked at the pharmacy, the pharmacy sent the request to the clinic at St. Boniface, the college disciplinary panel found. The person had never been a patient at St. Boniface. Jennifer Sokal, the pharmacist's lawyer, told CBC her client had entered the correct information for the prescriber, but the prescriber's profile showed an address for a hospital where the prescriber no longer worked. Sokal said it's not clear why the clinic didn't advise the pharmacy that the prescriber no longer worked there, which is what would normally happen. When the HSC clinic contacted the patient for a routine followup appointment, the patient had not taken the medication for more than two months, the decision says. At a January 2025 hearing, the pharmacist admitted to the allegations in the case, and admitted to other disciplinary charges, such as failing to take all reasonable steps to prevent loss or theft of narcotics and controlled drugs. He was fined $3,500, plus ordered to pay $4,000 for costs. The decision says he "showed great remorse for his involvement" in the kidney transplant patient's negative health outcome. The discipline panel recognized that the pharmacist was in a "very stressful situation," because the owner of the pharmacy was away on medical leave, putting the pharmacist into the role of pharmacy manager without enough training or guidance, the decision says. The COVID-19 pandemic also was raging in 2021 and 2022 when events in the case unfolded, resulting in the pharmacist losing a family member and being "unable to grieve properly," it says. The pharmacist responded to CBC's request for comment in an email from his lawyer to say he was a junior pharmacist at the time and new to pharmacy management. "There were immense pressures on pharmacists during this time at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and, after working as the pharmacy manager for three months, I made the decision to step back from the role," he said. "I was distressed when I learned of my errors. I am very sorry for the errors I made when I was a novice pharmacy manager and for the impact any of the errors may have had on any patients." Since the events in the case, the pharmacist has undergone significant training and has been a pharmacy manager since 2023 without incident, he said.
