logo
Pressure building on Liberals to rethink electric vehicle mandate

Pressure building on Liberals to rethink electric vehicle mandate

Article content
OTTAWA — As Canada approaches a critical starting point for its electric vehicle goals, pressure is building on Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to rethink its plan.
Starting next year, the Liberal plan to get more electric vehicles on the road will enter its first phase: mandating sales targets for car companies, which could purchase credits, including by spending on charging infrastructure, or face penalties for not complying.
Article content
The government has set a target of 20 per cent of new passenger vehicles sold in 2026 must be either battery-powered or hybrid, which increases to 60 per cent by 2030 and reaches 100 per cent by 2035.
The goal is to reduce the country's emissions, taking direct aim at the transportation sector, which is among the top emitters.
But with plummeting electric car sales and Canada's auto sector under duress from a trade war with the U.S, which has abandoned its electrification goals under President Donald Trump, Carney's government must now decide whether to forge ahead or reconsider a core climate policy.
'They're going to have to make adjustments,' said Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association.
'I think they know that, the industry knows that. It's really a negotiation on where those adjustments land. Is this a time for stretch goals or is this a time for reality. What's the mix?'
Article content
He added that he had spoken to 'several ministers' this week.
Brian Kingston, the president and CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, which represents Ford, General Motors and Stellantis and has long opposed the sales mandate, says the policy heaps on added costs at a time when keeping production in Canada has been made more difficult by U.S. tariffs
'At a time where companies are already facing tariff pressure, they are now going to face challenges selling vehicles in the Canadian market. Very difficult to make the case for Canada with this policy in place.'
Ford Canada CEO Bev Goodman was among the latest to call for the mandate to be scrapped, pointing to falling customer interest.
Statistics Canada bears that out, with the agency reporting a 45-per-cent drop in new zero-emission vehicles sold in March from the same month the year before. It said these new vehicles accounted for around seven per cent of vehicles sold in March 2025 — a figure critics point to as fuel to argue a 20 per cent sales target is unrealistic.
Article content
When the sales mandate was introduced several years ago, Volpe said the market was better. Now, he says, 'we're not going to make it.'
'The math of not making it is punishing for companies that are all currently manufacturing in Canada, employing Canadians, both directly and buying lots of volume from suppliers.'
For Joanna Kyriazis, director of public affairs at Clean Energy Canada, which, along with other stakeholders, helped the Liberals develop their zero-emission vehicle policy, she says 'flexibility' has been built into the program, which recognizes the impact on industry.
The Opposition Conservatives, before the House of Commons broke for summer, also ramped up pressure on the Liberals to scrap the mandate, saying it removes 'choice' from consumers.
'The urgency and the pressure that is sort of coming across in public discussions is not quite there,' Kyriazis said. 'There's some time still to ramp up.'
Article content
She said there were steps the government could take to reverse what she also notes has been a 'drop' in consumer interest, which she connects to the ending of the federal rebate program for zero-emission vehicles announced earlier in the year, and that the Liberals have campaigned on reintroducing to the tune of $5,000.
British Columbia's Energy Ministry pointed to the same drop when it fielded recent questions regarding a slide presentation that was obtained by reporters, showing the province to be 'considering several changes' to its own program, noting how the drop in sales made it 'challenging' to meet its mandated target of having 90 per cent of new vehicles sold be zero-emission by 2030.
Another factor that the B.C. government cited was the backlash against Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was an adviser to Trump until a public falling out.
Article content
Automakers and others in the industry also warn that Tesla would stand to benefit from the sales mandate.
'The campaign that has been sort of launched against (electric vehicles) and Trump's negativity towards (electric vehicles) has had an impact on consumer sentiment,' Kyriazis said.
Interest has not disappeared, she said, citing recent polling done for the group, that around 45 per cent of Canadians say they would be open to switching to electric for their next vehicle.
The federal government also collected feedback from Canadians. Earlier this year, Transport Canada commissioned a survey and focus groups on Canadians' feelings about the transportation system, which included questions about the zero-emission vehicle mandate.
It reported that 'no clear consensus' was found when it comes to the 2035 sales mandate, with 45 per cent of respondents saying they felt it was a 'good idea,' compared to 39 per cent who said it was not. Another 16 per cent said they were not sure.
Different views also emerged, according to the focus group findings.
They're going to have to make adjustments. I think they know that, the industry knows that. It's really a negotiation on where those adjustments land
The report, delivered in March and disclosed as part of the government's reporting of its public opinion surveys, found 'most participants supported the idea' of a sales mandate, based on reasons that ranged from reducing greenhouse gas emissions to sending a signal to industry about the need to transition and lower costs as compared to gas-powered vehicles.
Those expressing concern cited the need for charging infrastructure, as well as worries about the possibility of battery fires and how they would fare in the extreme cold.
Kyriazis said more education is needed on the range capabilities of electric vehicles, as are 'more efforts from governments' to ensure charging infrastructure gets built into condominiums and apartments through changes to building codes, given that it is often young people who call these buildings home who are among the most interested in switching to electric.
Article content
Expanding public charging infrastructure is also needed, particularly outside of British Columbia and Quebec, which have their own electric vehicle mandates. That, however, is 'dependent on government investment.'
Kingston agrees that demand must increase for electric vehicles, including through spending on more public infrastructure.
Still, he suggests rebate programs cannot be permanent, given how much they cost and the overarching goal to reach parity between the cost of electric vehicles and gas-powered ones, which he says is 'taking longer than anticipated.'
Kyriazis said the government must announce when it intends to bring back the program to provide certainty to consumers waiting before deciding to make a purchase.
A spokesperson for Environment and Climate Change Minister Julie Dabrusin said the government would 'look at ways to reintroduce a purchase incentive.'
Article content
Latest National Stories
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup
U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup

Edmonton Journal

time8 minutes ago

  • Edmonton Journal

U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup

Article content OTTAWA — With less than a year to go until the 2026 World Cup, political tensions and U.S. policy threaten to pose problems as Canada, the United States and Mexico prepare to co-host the tournament. Article content Next year's FIFA World Cup will be the biggest ever, with the three countries hosting a record 48 teams. Between June 11 and July 19, they will play 104 matches, most of them in the U.S. Article content Article content Article content With millions of fans expected to cross borders to attend the games, U.S. President Donald Trump's harsh immigration policies — which include travel bans on some countries, immigration raids and mass deportations — are generating anxiety. Article content Article content 'This is all being driven by the United States. And we're entirely the guilty party here,' said Victor Matheson, a professor at College of Holy Cross in Massachusetts who specializes in sports economics. Article content 'You could have significant immigration problems with fans and players going across borders.' Article content The U.S. has travel bans in place for 12 countries and restrictions in place for seven, and is considering banning travellers from another 36 countries. Though there are exemptions for athletes, staff and families, the unpredictability of Trump's administration means no one knows for certain what kind of rules might be in place by the time the tournament starts. Article content Article content Economist Andrew Zimbalist, who wrote a book on the economics of hosting the World Cup, said Trump has the ability to make it difficult for people to travel, but it's not clear whether he will actually do so. Article content 'I think probably Trump himself might not have the answers because … he responds very impetuously to changes in his environment,' he said. Article content Concerns about visas or political opposition to Trump might lead some soccer fans to decide not to attend at all, while others opt to attend the games in Canada instead, Zimbalist suggested. But he also pointed out that the quarter, semifinals and final are all taking place in the U.S. Article content A spokesperson for Canadian Heritage said Canada could see a million international visitors during the tournament. Article content 'Given the tri-national nature of the event, it is anticipated that international and domestic travellers will move back and forth between Canada and the United States. The focus will continue to be on the flow of movement, the safety of travellers and the security of the borders,' the spokesperson said.

As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court

Toronto Sun

time38 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court

Published Jul 27, 2025 • 3 minute read U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as he plays a round of golf at Trump Turnberry golf course during his visit to the U.K. on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Photo by Christopher Furlong / Getty Images WASHINGTON — Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Read More The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. Sports Columnists Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA

U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup
U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup

National Post

time38 minutes ago

  • National Post

U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup

OTTAWA — With less than a year to go until the 2026 World Cup, political tensions and U.S. policy threaten to pose problems as Canada, the United States and Mexico prepare to co-host the tournament. Article content Next year's FIFA World Cup will be the biggest ever, with the three countries hosting a record 48 teams. Between June 11 and July 19, they will play 104 matches, most of them in the U.S. Article content Article content Article content With millions of fans expected to cross borders to attend the games, U.S. President Donald Trump's harsh immigration policies — which include travel bans on some countries, immigration raids and mass deportations — are generating anxiety. Article content 'This is all being driven by the United States. And we're entirely the guilty party here,' said Victor Matheson, a professor at College of Holy Cross in Massachusetts who specializes in sports economics. Article content 'You could have significant immigration problems with fans and players going across borders.' Article content The U.S. has travel bans in place for 12 countries and restrictions in place for seven, and is considering banning travellers from another 36 countries. Article content Though there are exemptions for athletes, staff and families, the unpredictability of Trump's administration means no one knows for certain what kind of rules might be in place by the time the tournament starts. Article content Economist Andrew Zimbalist, who wrote a book on the economics of hosting the World Cup, said Trump has the ability to make it difficult for people to travel, but it's not clear whether he will actually do so. Article content Article content 'I think probably Trump himself might not have the answers because … he responds very impetuously to changes in his environment,' he said. Article content Concerns about visas or political opposition to Trump might lead some soccer fans to decide not to attend at all, while others opt to attend the games in Canada instead, Zimbalist suggested. But he also pointed out that the quarter, semifinals and final are all taking place in the U.S. Article content A spokesperson for Canadian Heritage said Canada could see a million international visitors during the tournament. Article content 'Given the tri-national nature of the event, it is anticipated that international and domestic travellers will move back and forth between Canada and the United States. The focus will continue to be on the flow of movement, the safety of travellers and the security of the borders,' the spokesperson said. Article content A spokesperson for the Canada Border Services Agency said the agency is working closely with federal government departments, host cities and FIFA 'in the safety and security planning for this international event.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store