logo
Informal sperm donation is on the rise in Australia. So are the risks

Informal sperm donation is on the rise in Australia. So are the risks

The Age22-07-2025
The decision to find a sperm donor online and to conceive a child with a donor is a practice that's not only entirely unregulated, but also becoming increasingly common.
It's also one that carries huge risks. Without urgent changes, governments are sleepwalking into a public health crisis.
The story of a 32-year-old Melbourne man donating his sperm to 15 women (resulting in 27 half-siblings) highlights the scale of problems associated with informal sperm donation. In Victoria, the limit is a maximum of 10 families, and lower in other states.
It's estimated that as many as 4000 children have been born via informal sperm donation in the past decade, but one private Facebook group that connects informal donors and women says they recorded 692 births in 2022 alone.
Loading
In large part, this practice – where sperm donors and those hoping to conceive connect through informal channels like Facebook or donor apps – is growing in popularity due to the prohibitive costs, wait times and lack of donor diversity available via IVF clinics.
While many sperm donors may be altruistic and have good intentions, anecdotal evidence and research suggests that others are acting unscrupulously – for example, donating in order to have sex with women under the false implication that natural insemination has a higher success rate than IVF or artificial insemination (where sperm is placed into a cup before being injected with a syringe). As The Age previously reported, one woman alleged she was sexually assaulted by an informal donor, while others reported feeling that their vulnerability and desperation for a child was played upon by informal donors, and used as a way to coerce them into sex.
Because of the informal nature of these arrangements, there is little oversight and even less data. But my research suggests these experiences are underreported. Whatever the exact numbers, no woman should have to go through this kind of trauma in the pursuit of parenthood.
While a rapid review has been announced in Victoria, this issue requires in-depth exploration nationwide to understand how many people are choosing informal donation, how many donations have resulted in live births, and how to track donor children.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Science fraudster shows independent research watchdog a necessity
Science fraudster shows independent research watchdog a necessity

The Age

time10 hours ago

  • The Age

Science fraudster shows independent research watchdog a necessity

Professor Mark Smyth was once considered one of this country's leading cancer researchers. Yet as The Age has reported in the past week, alarming aspects of his work have put into question both his research and the manner in which complaints about his work have been investigated. At core is this: integrity and trust. The Age revealed that while Smyth was working at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, he faced inquiries into falsifying research data. A preliminary investigation found he had a case to answer based on claims of falsified data. That prompted a second probe by the University of Melbourne, which cleared him. Smyth left Peter Mac in 2013 after being hired by leading research institute QIMR Berghofer in Brisbane in 2012. At QIMR, members of his lab team raised concerns about his practices. He was investigated twice, secretly, and no problems were detected. Whistleblowers went looking elsewhere for help. They approached the Office of the Chief Scientist and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), which oversees research integrity. The whistleblowers were referred back to QIMR. Then, finally, four years ago, amid the turmoil of the COVID-19 pandemic, an external independent investigation for the institute found research misconduct by Smyth. He left. This circuitous route of investigation is unacceptable, as is the fact that the report has never been released. The Age 's reports have shown an unhealthy nexus between taxpayer funding for institutions, self-interest and a system ill-equipped to manage complaints. Smyth was protected, it appeared to those complaining, partly because he was a cash cow, having attracted more than $42 million in taxpayer funding for his projects over his career. A staff member at QIMR said of Smyth's work practices: 'Mark was bringing money to the institute, so the institute protected Mark.' Who then protects the integrity of the science?

Making the hospo industry safer: Good Food calls for Cultural Change Champion nominees
Making the hospo industry safer: Good Food calls for Cultural Change Champion nominees

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Making the hospo industry safer: Good Food calls for Cultural Change Champion nominees

At last year's Good Food Guide Awards, we introduced the Cultural Change Champion to shine a light on those making the Australian hospitality industry a better place to work. The award came about after investigations by this masthead revealed the workplace culture of a number of Australia's hospitality businesses were putting women at risk, with allegations of sexual assault, harassment, drug use and misogyny. Further investigations this year has revealed more claims. The Cultural Change Champion award, presented by The Age and Sydney Morning Herald Good Food Guides in October 2025, allows Good Food to highlight the exceptional Victorian, NSW and ACT business operators, organisations, not-for-profits, voluntary groups and networks transforming the industry. Last year's Victoria winner was former hospitality worker Jamie Bucirde, who was behind the Instagram account Not So Hospitable. It sparked a nationwide reckoning and brought the systemic, largely sidelined issue to the surface. She consolidated her findings into an academic report with the University of Melbourne to galvanise the movement into meaningful change.

Making the hospo industry safer: Good Food calls for Cultural Change Champion nominees
Making the hospo industry safer: Good Food calls for Cultural Change Champion nominees

The Age

time2 days ago

  • The Age

Making the hospo industry safer: Good Food calls for Cultural Change Champion nominees

At last year's Good Food Guide Awards, we introduced the Cultural Change Champion to shine a light on those making the Australian hospitality industry a better place to work. The award came about after investigations by this masthead revealed the workplace culture of a number of Australia's hospitality businesses were putting women at risk, with allegations of sexual assault, harassment, drug use and misogyny. Further investigations this year has revealed more claims. The Cultural Change Champion award, presented by The Age and Sydney Morning Herald Good Food Guides in October 2025, allows Good Food to highlight the exceptional Victorian, NSW and ACT business operators, organisations, not-for-profits, voluntary groups and networks transforming the industry. Last year's Victoria winner was former hospitality worker Jamie Bucirde, who was behind the Instagram account Not So Hospitable. It sparked a nationwide reckoning and brought the systemic, largely sidelined issue to the surface. She consolidated her findings into an academic report with the University of Melbourne to galvanise the movement into meaningful change.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store