logo
Nifty bounces off 20-DEMA, signals springboard for next rally: Sudeep Shah

Nifty bounces off 20-DEMA, signals springboard for next rally: Sudeep Shah

Time of India24-05-2025
After giving a stellar return last week, the Indian equity market lost steam and ended the week on a negative note with
Nifty
50 and
Sensex
seeing a drop of 0.7% each. The broader markets performed relatively well with the BSE Midcap index losing 0.3% while the smallcap index gained 0.9% WoW.
The Nifty 50 and the 30-stock BSE Sensex closed with gains of nearly 1% on the day. The Nifty 50 rose by 243.45 points to settle at 24,853.15, while the Sensex advanced 769 points to finish at 81,721.
On the macroeconomic front, US deficit concerns heightened during the week as the auction of $16 bn of 20-year bonds witnessed a tepid response, developing term-premium risk (risk related to additional yield demanded by investors for holding long-term bonds) among the investors.
With this, analyst
Sudeep Shah
, Deputy Vice President and Head of Technical & Derivatives Research,
SBI Securities
,
interacted with ET Markets regarding the outlook on Nifty and Bank Nifty for the upcoming week. The following are the edited excerpts from his chat:
How does Nifty look with all the volatility that is being seen?
"In a rising market, the 20-day EMA isn't a floor—it's a springboard." The recent price action perfectly illustrates that principle. After a sharp upside rally in the previous week, the benchmark index, Nifty, witnessed a much-needed breather as the index underwent a healthy correction. This pullback found support near the 20-day EMA, followed by a smart rebound, reaffirming its role as a key springboard in the ongoing uptrend.
Notably, this behaviour wasn't isolated. A majority of frontline indices also bounced from their respective 20-day EMAs, highlighting that the broader market is still well-aligned with the primary bullish structure. As long as Nifty is trading above this dynamic support, the trend remains upward, and any dip should be viewed as a potential buying opportunity rather than a sign of weakness.
Extending this view, the current chart structure suggests that the index is well-positioned to maintain its northward trajectory in the coming sessions. Within this context, Bank Nifty stands out as a likely outperformer in the short term, as it edges closer to a breakout from its month-long consolidation. Strengthening this outlook, heavyweight banking names are also nearing breakout levels, which could collectively act as a catalyst for a strong upward move.
In terms of key levels, the zone of 24,950–25,000 will act as an immediate resistance for Nifty. A decisive close above 25,000 could unlock further upside towards 25,300 and eventually 25,500 in the short term. On the downside, the 20-day EMA zone of 24,550–24,500 remains a crucial support, and any weakness toward this zone is likely to attract buying interest.
What's the current view on Bank Nifty like?
The Banking benchmark index, Bank Nifty, has been consolidating in a narrow range for the last couple of weeks. Currently, it is on the verge of a consolidation breakout. On Thursday, the index found support near its 20-day EMA and has since resumed its upward trajectory. The daily RSI is inching towards the 60 level and continues to gain momentum, indicating strengthening bullish sentiment.
Additionally, the ratio chart of Bank Nifty versus Nifty has bounced off its 50-day EMA, highlighting emerging relative strength in the banking index. This signals that Bank Nifty could start outperforming the broader market.
Within the index, heavyweight components such as HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, and Axis Bank are also showing promising signs—they are all on the verge of breaking out of their respective consolidation patterns on the daily chart. This alignment across multiple key stocks adds to the conviction that a broader breakout in the index may be around the corner.
Talking about crucial levels, the zone of 55,700-55,800 is likely to act as a crucial hurdle for the index. Any sustainable move above the level of 55,800 will lead to a sharp upside rally of upto the level of 56,500, followed by 57,200 in the short term. While on the downside, the 20-day EMA zone of 54,800-54,700 is likely to act as a crucial support for the index.
What does FII data indicate right now?
FIIs turned net sellers, pulling out Rs 11,591 crore from the cash segment last week, including a massive Rs 10,000 crore sell-off on Tuesday — the highest in over two months. Another Rs 5,000 crore exit on Thursday added pressure. In index futures, net contracts rose to -54,197 from -23,498 on May 19, leading to the long-short ratio falling to 33% from 42%, signalling increased bearish bets. Key triggers include rising bond yields in the U.S. and Japan, unconfirmed reports of Israel planning a strike on Iran, and a mild rise in COVID cases. Despite the sell-off, India's broader market trend remains positive.
Help us with your view on the defence sector after a hige rallt and key stocks where one can focus.
The Nifty India Defence index has extended its upward trajectory and touched a fresh high last week. However, this rally comes amid an overbought setup, with the daily RSI showing a clear negative divergence—a classic warning signal where price forms higher highs while RSI prints lower highs.
This divergence suggests that the momentum behind the rally is weakening, and the upside potential may be limited in the near term. Given the current risk-reward setup, we believe it is prudent to stay cautious on the defence space for now. A period of consolidation or mild correction cannot be ruled out.
Therefore, we recommend avoiding fresh exposure to the sector at current levels until more favourable entry points emerge.
And your take on the metal sector?
The broader trend of the Nifty Metal index remains firmly bullish, as it continues to trade above both its short and long-term moving averages—each of which is trending upward. The daily RSI also reflects bullish momentum, steadily rising within the positive territory.
At present, the index is hovering near a crucial resistance zone around its prior swing high of 9,305. A decisive and sustained breakout above this level could pave the way for a sharp rally toward 9,500 and potentially 9,700 in the short term.
On the flip side, the zone of 9,130–9,100 is expected to offer strong immediate support, keeping the uptrend intact as long as this level holds.
How does the pharma sector look like now & key stocks to focus on?
Nifty Pharma index has been in the sideways zone for the last couple of weeks. The zone of 22,000-22,100 will be the crucial hurdle for the index. Any sustainable move above the level of 22,100 will lead to a sharp upside rally upto the level of 23,000 in the short term. While on the downside, the zone of 20,700-20,600 will act as immediate support for the index.
After the Q4 results, how does IndiGo seem to be placed?
The stock has been in the sideways zone for the last couple of weeks. However, it is still trading above its crucial moving averages. A sustainable move above the level of Rs 5,670 will lead to resuming its northward journey.
How about Honasa Consumer?
The stock has surged above its 200-day EMA level for the first time since October 2024. The major trend of the stock is bullish. However, the daily RSI is currently quoting at the 88 level, which is an extremely overbought condition. Hence, we believe it is likely to slide into the period of consolidation before the next round of upward rally.
Trent and BEL have made their way in the Sensex as part of the rejig. Do you recommend any positions there?
Trent: The stock is in the sideways zone, and it is trading below its 100 and 200-day EMA levels. Going ahead, any sustainable move above the level of Rs 5,600-5,650 will lead to a sharp upside rally in the stock.
BEL: The stock is in an extremely overbought zone, and it is likely to slide into a period of consolidation before the next round of upward rally.
Does there seem to be any relief for IndusInd Bank shares after the Q4 results, but not forgetting the recent headlines made by the company?
The stock has been in sideways since the last couple of trading sessions. Hence, we recommend avoiding this stock for now.
Any other sectors & stocks well poised for trading?
Nifty Bank, Nifty Private Bank, and Nifty Financial Services are all approaching a consolidation breakout, indicating potential outperformance in the short term. Apart from this, sectors like Nifty CPSE, PSE, Insurance, and Capital Markets are expected to continue their outperformance in the near term.
Technically, AXISBANK, ICICIPRULI, BHEL, JIOFIN, and HINDCOPPER are likely to witness bullish momentum in the short term.
(
Disclaimer
: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Short-seller Viceroy accuses Vedanta promoters of hidden stake via welfare trust
Short-seller Viceroy accuses Vedanta promoters of hidden stake via welfare trust

Mint

time13 minutes ago

  • Mint

Short-seller Viceroy accuses Vedanta promoters of hidden stake via welfare trust

The entity under scrutiny is PTC Cables Pvt. Ltd (PTCC), which holds a 1.91% stake in Vedanta Ltd, a company with a market capitalization of ₹ 1.75 trillion, according to BSE data. PTCC is owned by Bhadram Janhit Shalika Trust (BJST), which Viceroy alleges is controlled by the Agarwal family, founders of the Vedanta Group. According to Viceroy, PTCC received ₹ 1,500 crore in dividend income from Vedanta over the past five years, and the capital was "upcycled" to promoter-linked entities. 'PTCC exists for one purpose: to quietly recycle Vedanta's cash into promoter-controlled vehicles while maintaining the illusion of independence," the Viceroy report said. Vedanta denied the allegations. 'These assertions are baseless," a spokesperson for the company said, adding that the company was compliant with the disclosure norms as stipulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and the Companies Act, 2013. 'Neither BJST nor PTCC are part of the promoter group as defined under applicable regulations, and their shareholding has been transparently disclosed in public filings," the spokesperson added. A day after Viceroy released its report, JP Morgan had issued a note, telling investors not to get distracted by the allegations on corporate governance and financial management, and that the global brokerage had an Overweight rating on both Vedanta Resources Ltd and Vedanta Ltd. Viceroy's claims are based on publicly available records. In a 2009 income-tax case, BJST's correspondence address was listed as Anil Agarwal's personal residence in Mumbai. In another case, the trust's address was that of Todarwal & Todarwal, a firm linked to Arun Todarwal, who currently serves as a director on the board of Sterlite Power Grid Ventures, a Vedanta subsidiary. Todarwal has also previously served as a director on the boards of Hindustan Zinc Ltd, Sterlite Technologies, MALCO, and BALCO. The report acknowledged that no conclusive documentation of current control was available, noting that Indian trusts are subject to less stringent disclosure obligations compared to companies. Viceroy also cited unnamed former Vedanta employees who claimed that the Agarwal family's control over PTCC was an "open secret" within the company. In addition to alleging hidden promoter ownership, the report flagged governance concerns at PTCC. The company was incorporated in 1993 with the Agarwal family as shareholders and was transferred to BJST in 2017. Its current directors are Todarwal and Kannan Ramamirthan. Ramamirthan is an independent director of Hindustan Zinc, Vedanta's most profitable subsidiary. He has also previously served on the boards of other Vedanta group firms, including Talwandi Sabo Power Plant, BALCO, Sterlite Energy, and Sterlite Interlinks. Vedanta has not disclosed in its filings that PTCC—classified as a public shareholder—has directors with long-standing associations with the group. The company did not respond to a specific query on this issue. Calls and emails to Todarwal for a comment did not elicit a response. Mint could not reach Ramamirthan for a comment. Concerns about the independence of BJST and PTCC are not new. In a 2020 note, proxy advisory firm Stakeholder Empowerment Services (SES) had said that BJST was previously known as the SIL Employee Welfare Trust and was linked to Sterlite Industries Ltd, which was later merged into Vedanta. The trust was subsequently renamed as BJST. 'It is not clear as to who presently controls the BJST," SES had written. However, if the firm was under the control of Vedanta, then PTCC should be classified as a promoter shareholder, it said. Viceroy's first report on the Vedanta Group was published on 10 July, a day before Vedanta Ltd's annual general meeting (AGM). The initial report triggered a drop in the company's stock, though shares later recovered. At the AGM, shareholders reposed their faith in the company. Since the report's release, Vedanta shares have gained 2% to close at ₹ 449.75 on Tuesday. Also Read | Vedanta shareholders back firm after Viceroy report Viceroy has disclosed a short position in the bonds of Vedanta Resources, the unlisted holding company of the group, but said it has no exposure to Vedanta Ltd or any other listed Vedanta entities in India.

Rogue bots? AI firms must pay up
Rogue bots? AI firms must pay up

Economic Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Rogue bots? AI firms must pay up

When Elon Musk's xAI was forced to apologise this week after its Grok chatbot spewed antisemitic content and white nationalist talking points, the response felt depressingly familiar: suspend the service, issue an apology and promise to do better. Rinse and isn't the first time we've seen this playbook. Microsoft's Tay chatbot disaster in 2016 followed a similar pattern. The fact that we're here again, nearly a decade later, suggests the AI industry has learnt remarkably little from its mistakes. But the world is no longer willing to accept 'sorry' as sufficient. This is because AI has become a force multiplier for content generation and dissemination, and the time-to-impact has shrunk. Thus, liability and punitive actions are being discussed. The Grok incident revealed a troubling aspect of how AI companies approach accountability. According to xAI, the problematic behaviour emerged after they tweaked their system to allow more 'politically incorrect' responses - a decision that seems reckless. When the inevitable happened, they blamed deprecated code that should have been removed. If you're building systems capable of reaching millions of users, shouldn't you know what code is running in production?The real problem isn't technical - it's philosophical. Too many AI companies treat bias and harmful content as unfortunate side effects to be addressed after deployment, rather than fundamental risks to be prevented beforehand. This reactive approach worked when the stakes were lower, but AI systems now operate at unprecedented scale and influence. When a chatbot generates hate speech, it's not embarrassing - it's dangerous, legitimising and amplifying extremist ideologies to vast legal landscape is shifting rapidly, and AI companies ignoring these changes do so at their peril. The EU's AI Act, which came into force in February, represents a shift from reactive regulation to proactive governance. Companies can no longer apologise their way out of AI failures - they must demonstrate they've implemented robust safeguards before AB 316, introduced last January, takes an even more direct approach by prohibiting the 'the AI did it' defence in civil cases. This legislation recognises what should be obvious: companies that develop and deploy AI systems bear responsibility for their outputs, regardless of whether those outputs were 'intended'.India's approach may prove more punitive than the EU's regulatory framework and more immediate than the US litigation-based system, focusing on swift enforcement of existing criminal laws rather than waiting for new AI-specific legislation. India doesn't yet have AI-specific legislation, but if Grok's antisemitic incident had occurred with Indian users, then steps like immediate blocking of the AI service, a criminal case against xAI under IPC 153A, and a demand for content removal from the X platform would have been Grok incident may mark a turning point. Regulators worldwide are demanding proactive measures rather than reactive damage control, and courts are increasingly willing to hold companies directly liable for their systems' shift is long overdue. AI systems aren't just software - they're powerful tools that shape public discourse, influence decision-making and can cause real-world harm. The companies that build these systems must be held to higher standards than traditional software developers, with corresponding legal and ethical question facing the AI industry isn't whether to embrace this new reality - it's whether to do so voluntarily or have it imposed by regulators and courts. Companies that continue to rely on the old playbook of post-incident apologies will find themselves increasingly isolated in a world demanding AI industry's true maturity will show not in flashy demos or sky-high valuations, but in its commitment to safety over speed, rigour over shortcuts, and real accountability over empty apologies. In this game, 'sorry' won't cut it - only responsibility writer is a commentator ondigital policy issues (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Rumblings at the top of Ola Electric The hybrid vs. EV rivalry: Why Maruti and Mahindra pull in different directions. What's best? How Safexpress bootstrapped its way to build India's largest PTL Express business Zee promoters have a new challenge to navigate. And it's not about funding or Sebi probe. Newton vs. industry: Inside new norms that want your car to be more fuel-efficient Stock Radar: UltraTech Cements hit a fresh record high in July; what should investors do – book profits or buy the dip? F&O Radar | Deploy Bear Put Spread in Nifty to gain from index correction Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus

Mixed trajectory: India's June exports shrink but shipments to US zoom
Mixed trajectory: India's June exports shrink but shipments to US zoom

Business Standard

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Mixed trajectory: India's June exports shrink but shipments to US zoom

Merchandise exports to the US jumped 23.5 per cent year-on-year (Y-o-Y) to $8.3 billion in June, even as India's overall outbound shipments witnessed contraction during the month, according to the data released by the commerce department on Tuesday. The increase in outbound shipments to the US was largely driven by the rush among exporters to utilise America's pause on its plans to impose country-specific reciprocal tariffs. A 90-day window before July 9 created an opportunity for Indian sellers to accelerate shipments to the US. Outbound shipments to the US have been over $8 billion since the beginning of 2025, as compared to $6 billion-$7 billion in 2024. Indian exporters currently bear a 10 per cent baseline tariff after the US administration temporarily paused the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff on India. Commerce department Special Secretary Rajesh Agrawal said at a briefing that India is in 'wait and watch' mode amid uncertainty surrounding the US' proposed rollout of reciprocal tariffs. The lack of clarity regarding the tariffs makes it difficult to assess potential tariff differentials or determine any competitive advantage compared to other countries. 'We are not in a position to estimate the differential tariff that will play out from August 1... While letters have been sent to 25 countries, the US has also spoken about finalising some trade deals. The full spectrum of tariff rollout is still unclear,' said Agrawal, who is also the chief negotiator of the proposed India, US trade deal. Data further showed that trade deficit contracted to a four-month low of $18.78 billion as exports and imports contracted during June. Trade deficit stood at $20.84 billion in June 2024 and $21.88 in June this year. Exports contracted 0.06 per cent Y-o-Y during June to $35.14 billion, mainly due to fall in global crude oil prices as well as a strain in global supply chain because of the ongoing tariff war triggered by the policies being implemented by the Donald Trump-led administration in the US. In June, exports not only slipped to a seven-month low but were also 9.2 per cent lower as compared to a month earlier. Imports saw 3.7 per cent fall to $53.92 billion in June due to decline in shipments of petroleum products, gold, and iron and steel. Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal said exports and imports were impacted by a fall in crude oil prices and that the Department of Commerce stepped up monitoring of 'import surges'. 'We are sending surge reports to different ministries, so that they can also monitor at their level.' 'Whenever we come across any unusual surge, we are examining it and in case of any malpractice, we are also imposing restrictions on imports of certain commodities,' Barthwal told reporters at the same briefing. Non-petroleum and non-gems & jewellery exports, an indication of exports' health, saw a growth of 4.7 per cent at $30.53 billion. The drivers of the growth among non-petroleum sectors were electronic goods (46.9 per cent), engineering goods (1.35 per cent), drugs and pharmaceuticals (5.9 per cent), and readymade garments (1.23 per cent). Aditi Nayar, chief economist, Icra, said that although weakness in India's headline merchandise exports persisted in June, a relatively sharper dip in non-oil imports led to the trade deficit compressing considerably to $18.78 billion in the month from an average of $24 billion in April and May 2025, and $20.84 billion in June 2024. 'Given this, and the robust growth in net services earnings, we now expect India's current account deficit (CAD) to print at a comfortable around 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) in the first quarter of 2025-26 (Q1FY26), a tad lower than the 0.9 per cent seen in Q1FY2025,' Nayar said. Non-oil imports contracted 2 per cent to $40.1 billion in June. During Q1FY26, India's merchandise exports rose 1.9 per cent to $112.2 billion while merchandise imports increased 4.2 per cent to $179.4 billion, leading to a trade deficit of $67.2 billion. Services exports saw 14.5 per cent growth at $32.84 billion in June while services imports witnessed 16.1 per cent rise to $17.58 billion, resulting in a surplus of $15.26 billion. Services trade data for May, however, is an 'estimate', which will be revised based on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI's) subsequent release.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store