logo
World Bank to spend $112mln to fix flaws in wound-up Tanzania project

World Bank to spend $112mln to fix flaws in wound-up Tanzania project

Zawya11-04-2025
The World Bank has lined up a multimillion-dollar damage control programme after fundamental mistakes were discovered in the way it monitored human rights protections related to a tourism management project in Tanzania.
According to the bank officials, the amount of fresh financing may eventually total more than two-thirds of the multilateral lender's initial $150 million outlay for the Resilient Natural Resource Management for Tourism and Growth (Regrow) project in southern Tanzania. The project was officially wound up in February.
The funding will be disbursed through two separate interventions, starting with $2.8 million to support communities living in and around the Ruaha National Park who were adversely affected by the flaws identified in a recently concluded investigation into the project's implementation.
A second, bigger disbursement of up to $110 million, to be spent on another project covering other parts of the country, is also in the pipeline but awaiting approval by the bank's board.
Regrow was sponsored by the International Development Association (IDA), a World Bank affiliate, with the aim of developing Tanzania's southern tourism circuit.
Launched in 2017, the project became the subject of an extended investigation after allegations of human rights violations against surrounding communities cropped up during its last two years of operation.
The probe was conducted by an independent inspection panel mandated by the World Bank board to assess the extent of the bank's compliance with its own operational policies and procedures in projects that it finances.
According to the panel's findings, non-compliance with the bank's policies on involuntary resettlement in particular was a major weakness in the project and "contributed to the harm experienced by the affected communities.""In conducting its due diligence, the Bank's management did not recognise that, based on Tanzania's game park management legislation, people residing in and/or accessing parks and other protected areas without authorisation could face involuntary physical and economic resettlement," the panel reported.
It also noted that pre-project risk assessments did not sufficiently recognise how the involvement of the Tanzania National Park Authority (Tanapa), a state-owned agency with a law enforcement mandate, 'would invariably have implications for the livelihoods and the well-being of communities residing within park boundaries and accessing park resources for the purpose of sustaining livelihoods.'Tanapa was named as a major culprit in the original claims of violence and intimidation tactics being deployed by government park rangers to forcefully evict native communities from the project area, primarily the famed Ruaha National Park, using methods such as seizing and confiscating their cattle.
A formal complaint was filed by two local villagers to the World Bank in 2023, triggering the investigation. The identities of the two individuals have remained hidden throughout for 'fear of retribution,' according to official World Bank documentation on the case, although they are understood to have been backed by the Oakland Institute, a US-based lobby.
The Inspection Panel report was more critical of the Bank's handling of the project than of any wrongs that Tanzanian authorities may have committed.
Nevertheless, the new action plan agreed with Tanzania in response to the Panel's findings also outlines a number of new interventions designed to address this aspect of the matter.
Edith Jibunoh, the Bank's Washington DC-based spokesperson for Eastern and Southern Africa told The EastAfrican in a virtual interview on Tuesday that a workshop will be convened next month to brief Tanzanian officials on "relevant good international practice in protected area management.""The briefing will cover topics such as effective and responsible enforcement of park restrictions, conflict avoidance, community engagement, and benefit sharing," she explained.
Further interventions will include establishing and maintaining an effective grievance redress system and a fully operational hotline to raise concerns directly to the World Bank in Tanzania.
World Bank staff in Tanzania have also been provided with an interim guidance note on how to "responsibly" handle human rights issues, security, conflicts and other risks related to projects involving protected areas going forward."Based on this interim guidance note, the Bank will prepare a more comprehensive Good Practice Note on the same topic, not just for projects it sponsors in Tanzania but all countries, by December 2025," Ms Jibunoh said.
She also explained that the initial $2.8 million project to fix the harms caused by flaws in Regrow's implementation will be sponsored by a "trust fund" and the monies handled by "a third party in the form of a reputable NGO to be identified.""The NGO is to be confirmed by the end of this month, as we are aiming for the project to begin by June. The Rufiji Basin Water Board will also be involved in the project, representing the government," she said.
On the new Scaling-up Locally Led Climate Action Program (Scale) operation that is expected to cost at least $110 million, Ms Jibunoh said it would be more "national in scope" and focus on improving the livelihoods of vulnerable communities in areas such as Usangu Catchment, source of the Great Ruaha River, and Mbarali district in Mbeya region."The project plan is still being worked out and will be submitted to the Board by June. The details will be made public once it gets Board approval. We are being more careful this time because we don't want to repeat the same mistakes as in the Regrow project," she said.
© Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UAE among three countries where every adult resident owns a phone
UAE among three countries where every adult resident owns a phone

Khaleej Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Khaleej Times

UAE among three countries where every adult resident owns a phone

The UAE, along with Norway and Libya, is among the only three countries in the world where every adult resident owns a mobile phone, according to a new study. In the Gulf region, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Oman follow closely with 98 per cent mobile phone ownership among adults, while Kuwait stands at 95 per cent, according to the World Bank's Global Findex 2025 report. Several developed countries also report high mobile phone penetration. In Sweden, Iceland, Finland, Lithuania, Italy, Denmark, and Estonia, 99 per cent of adults own a mobile phone. The figure stands at 98 per cent in the United States, Cyprus, Algeria, Hong Kong (China), Latvia, Mongolia, and Vietnam. In most other developed nations, mobile ownership typically ranges in the mid-90 per cent range. Among major developing countries, the numbers are notably lower: 66 per cent in India, 63 per cent in Pakistan, 78 per cent in the Philippines, 85 per cent in Egypt, and 92 per cent in the United Kingdom. 'Mobile phones and the internet have become widespread and essential to daily life in economies around the globe. As of 2024, 86% of adults worldwide own a mobile phone,' the World Bank noted. 'For many people, barely an hour passes without using a mobile device — whether to make a call, send a text, read the news, conduct business, post on social media, make payments, play games, or search for information. As digital connectivity expands, online interaction is becoming a top priority for individuals, businesses, and governments alike.' Internet usage is also high across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), ranging between 86 per cent and 99 per cent over the past three months. This trend is reflected in the 2025 Global Digital Shopping Index, which found that the UAE leads the world in mobile-driven online shopping, with 37 per cent of purchases made via mobile devices. This surpasses Singapore (34.8 per cent), the UK (27.6 per cent), and Brazil (24.4 per cent). Commissioned by Visa Acceptance Solutions and conducted by Pymnts Intelligence, the study also found that 67 per cent of UAE consumers used a mobile device in their most recent retail purchase — a 23 per cent increase since 2022. Additionally, 38 per cent of UAE shoppers completed their latest retail transaction online using a mobile phone or computer for home delivery. 'The UAE's approach shows what is possible when all stakeholders work together to build the future of commerce,' said Salima Gutieva, vice-president and country manager for Visa UAE. A separate study by Syrve Mena highlighted the continued dominance of food delivery apps in the region. Around 75 per cent of mobile orders from surveyed restaurants were processed through platforms like HungerStation, Talabat, and Deliveroo. The remaining 25% were handled through call centers, proprietary apps, or restaurant websites — further underscoring the central role of mobile technology in the daily lives of UAE residents.

Why GBV in South Africa is an economic issue?
Why GBV in South Africa is an economic issue?

Zawya

time6 days ago

  • Zawya

Why GBV in South Africa is an economic issue?

South Africa will soon be celebrating the invaluable contribution women have made in driving the country forward. However, the intersection of financial strain and domestic abuse is a crisis that demands urgent attention. Research consistently shows that economic hardship exacerbates violence against women, particularly within marriages and partnerships. But why are women disproportionately affected, and what does this mean for South Africa, where unemployment has surged past 32%, with another 250,000 jobs lost in the first quarter of 2024 alone? The link between economic stress and domestic violence Economic stress is a well-documented trigger for domestic violence. Studies from around the world, including South Africa, indicate that financial instability increases tensions in households, leading to higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV). The reasons are multifaceted: - Loss of income and unemployment heighten frustration and aggression, particularly in patriarchal societies where men tie their self-worth to being providers. - Women's financial dependence on abusive partners makes it harder to leave violent relationships. - Increased alcohol abuse, often linked to joblessness, further escalates domestic violence. A World Bank study (2022) found that for every 1% increase in male unemployment in South Africa, reports of domestic violence rose by 2.3%. This correlation is alarming in a country where one in five women has experienced physical violence from a partner (Stats SA, 2023). A destructive relationship stressor While all marriages face stressors — infidelity, health crises, parenting challenges — financial strain is uniquely destructive. Research from the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) suggests that money-related conflicts are the leading cause of marital breakdown in South Africa, surpassing even infidelity in some cases. Yael Geffen, CEO of Lew Geffen Sotheby's International Realty and a single mother who rose to leadership while raising a young son, speaks candidly about the pressures women face: 'When I became CEO, my son was only four years old. The societal expectation was that I should choose either to be a mother or a leader. But why should women have to make that choice? Her experience underscores a harsh reality – women who lack economic autonomy are far more vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. Systemic disadvantage The economic crisis does not affect men and women equally. South African women face systemic disadvantages that make them more vulnerable: - Gender pay gap: Women earn 23-35% less than men for the same work (Stats SA, 2023). - Only 10% of top executive roles in JSE-listed companies are held by women (Businesswomen's Association SA, 2023). - Unpaid care work: Women spend four times more hours on unpaid care (childcare, cooking, cleaning) than men (ILO, 2022). This limits their ability to seek full-time employment or escape abusive situations. - Higher unemployment rates: Women's unemployment sits at 36%, compared to 32% for men (Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Q1 2024). - Black women are the worst affected, with rural unemployment nearing 50%. - Limited access to assets: Only 13% of women own property in their name (SA Women's Property Network, 2023). Without assets, leaving an abusive partner becomes nearly impossible. Geffen adds: 'When women don't own property or have savings, they're trapped. I was fortunate to have a career that allowed me financial freedom, but most women aren't that lucky. We need systemic change – better maternity policies, equal pay, and real support for single mothers.' Women's Month With over 250,000 jobs lost in early 2024 and no significant economic recovery in sight, women are being pushed deeper into poverty and danger. The government's response has been insufficient: - GBV shelters remain underfunded. - Economic relief programs do not specifically target women-led households. - Legal protections (like the Domestic Violence Act) are poorly enforced, especially in low-income areas. Activists argue that economic justice is gender justice. Solutions must include: - Expanding social grants for women in abusive situations. - Enforcing equal pay laws and supporting women-led businesses. - Investing in job creation for women in high-growth sectors. Geffen says as we enter Women's Month, South Africa must confront the brutal reality that financial strain is fuelling a hidden epidemic of gender-based violence. 'Women are not just victims of abuse – they are victims of an economy, effectively a government, that undervalues their labour, underpays their work, and overlooks their suffering. 'If the government is serious about ending GBV, it must address the economic roots of the crisis. Because for thousands of women, poverty isn't just about empty wallets – it's a life-and-death trap.'

Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Must Lead the Charge to Reverse Global Fossil Fuel Financing Bans
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Must Lead the Charge to Reverse Global Fossil Fuel Financing Bans

Zawya

time7 days ago

  • Zawya

Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Must Lead the Charge to Reverse Global Fossil Fuel Financing Bans

The African Energy Chamber (AEC) ( – the voice of the African energy sector – is urging OPEC member states and their allies to take decisive action to reverse global bans on fossil fuel financing and champion Africa's right to develop its oil and gas resources. As the 9th OPEC International Seminar convened on Tuesday in Vienna, the Chamber reiterated that it is time to urgently put upstream financing back on the table and push back against policies that deny African nations the capital needed to industrialize, grow and lift millions out of poverty. For too long, Africa has borne the brunt of contradictory global energy policies. While developed nations continue to fast-track public and private investments into natural gas to bolster their own energy security, multilateral institutions enforce blanket bans on upstream oil and gas financing that disproportionately restrict African countries. In 2019, the European Investment Bank announced it would end fossil fuel financing by 2021, a position echoed by several European development agencies and financial institutions. The World Bank followed suit, gradually phasing out support for oil and gas and culminating in a near-total exclusion of upstream fossil fuel investments. While these policies may align with net-zero targets in wealthy economies, in Africa, they are actively obstructing access to energy, job creation and industrial growth. Yet even as development finance dries up abroad, Europe has made clear exceptions for itself. Under its 2022 Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities, the EU classified certain natural gas and nuclear investments as 'transitional' – opening the door for continued funding within its borders. The result is a glaring double standard: natural gas is deemed essential for energy security in Berlin and Brussels, but off-limits in Lagos or Dakar. This hypocrisy must be addressed if the global energy transition is to be just and equitable. Africa holds more than 125 billion barrels of proven oil reserves and over 620 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, yet over 600 million Africans lack access to electricity, and more than 900 million lack access to clean cooking fuels. In this context, African nations need robust investment in oil and gas infrastructure – not ideological restrictions that ignore the realities on the ground. 'What Africa needs right now is to drill, baby, drill. Most of our multilateral institutions don't finance oil and gas – they say it's wrong. It's extremely hypocritical. Denying fossil fuel investment is denying economic justice, food security and a pathway out of poverty for millions,' said NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the AEC. 'We can't keep apologizing for oil. No country in the world has developed through renewables alone. OPEC members must pressure institutions like the World Bank to lift their financing bans and support Africa's right to industrialize.' At the OPEC Seminar, the AEC urged producing countries to rally around three urgent financial priorities. First, OPEC members must press the World Bank and other multilateral institutions to lift harmful financing restrictions on fossil fuels. It is untenable that the World Bank – originally established to support post-war reconstruction and global development – continues to deny funding for upstream oil and gas projects across Africa. With recent signals from Bank leadership hinting at a possible policy shift, now is the time for oil-producing nations to push for a reversal that puts energy access and economic transformation in the Global South at the center of development finance. Second, OPEC countries – with their sovereign wealth funds and surplus revenues – are uniquely positioned to create a dedicated investment vehicle for fossil fuel development in underfunded markets. An OPEC-led facility focused on financing strategic upstream projects could prove instrumental in unlocking capital for bankable ventures across Africa. Such a fund would not only accelerate production but also help stabilize global supply and pricing. Finally, the Chamber emphasizes the need for a pragmatic, dual-track approach to the energy transition that recognizes the differing realities of the Global North and South. While developed nations move toward decarbonization, Africa must prioritize industrialization and energy security. Natural gas – abundant, reliable and cleaner-burning than coal – offers a critical bridge fuel to power fertilizer production, manufacturing, petrochemicals and regional electricity networks. True climate justice must include energy justice, which means recognizing Africa's right to harness its resources, grow its economies and meet the needs of its people on its own terms. Africa does not need charity; it needs capital. As the voice of Africa's energy sector, the Chamber stands firm in its call for OPEC producers and the World Bank to help deliver it. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store