How Zohran Mamdani's win upended the economics of NYC voting patterns
New Yorkers woke up to a new reality on Wednesday: A proud socialist won the New York City mayoral primary, beating out his nearest rival, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, by nearly 10 points.
Zohran Mamdani ran an avowedly far-left campaign, one focused on kitchen table issues rather than the woke cultural battles we've become accustomed to from the left.
Instead of promising to Defund the Police (though he supported that movement in the past) or hyping the historic nature of becoming the first Muslim mayor of New York City, Mamdani promised free busing, a rent freeze, government-owned supermarkets and free childcare — which he said he'd pay for by raising taxes on businesses and the rich.
6 Zohran Mamdani snagged the Democratic nomination for New York's Mayoral race by appealing to the working class, but securing the votes of the elite.
Derek French/UPI/Shutterstock
Despite the promise of redistributing from each according to his ability, to each according to his need, in an ironic twist, the socialist beat Cuomo handily with wealthy New Yorkers. Meanwhile, Cuomo crushed Mamdani by a staggering 19 points with New Yorkers who make under $50,000 a year.
Mamdani also lost in a big way in New York's majority Black neighborhoods, which overwhelmingly chose Cuomo, as did neighborhoods with the highest Hispanic concentration.
Cuomo succeeded with voters without a college degree, while Mamdani absolutely slaughtered him among voters with advanced degrees. Mamdani's support was strongest with 'youthful, renter-heavy neighborhoods known for their left-leaning politics,' as The New York Times pointed out.
Gentrifiers of the World, unite!
Welcome to the new Democratic Party, same as the old, with a slight twist: Instead of imposing cultural doctrine on working-class people of color with zero interest in their woke ideology, the Dems are now imposing a socialist economic agenda on those same recalcitrant normies who just won't get with the program.
Mamdani's success with the educated continues a decades-long political realignment in which the working class has been steadily leaving the Democratic Party for the GOP, a process that turbocharged under Donald Trump, while the Democrats' base is now college-educated elites.
Nine of the 10 wealthiest congressional districts are currently represented by Democrats, as are 65% of Americans making over $500,000 a year.
6 Mayor Eric Adams is running as an Independent in November against Mamdani.
Brian Zak/NY Post
6 Despite being trounced by Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo has not yet agreed to bow out of the Mayor's race.
Matthew McDermott
The process culminated in the 2024 election with Kamala Harris winning the majority of Americans making over $100,000 a year, while Trump won with those making under.
Rather than a repudiation of the trendline in the Democratic Party, Mamdani's success reveals that even when they talk about kitchen table issues, even when they talk about redistributing resources from the wealthy to the poor, progressives are doing so in a way that speaks to the wealthy and alienates working-class voters.
Mamdani knew how to perfect the lingo of trust fund socialism from personal experience: He himself is from the exact over-educated, over-credentialed, elite background that the Democrats now represent — whether they are pushing socialism or wokeness.
The son of a filmmaker and an academic and educated at a liberal arts college in Maine, Mamdani's campaign staff was equally elite, overrepresented in Ivy League graduates, as reported in the Free Press.
Follow The Post's coverage of the NYC mayoral race
This is not to say that Mamdani's campaign was totally devoid of cultural battles unpopular with working-class voters. Mamdani joined a protest against border czar Tom Homan at the state Capitol, shouting, 'Do you believe in the First Amendment?!' as Homan disappeared down a corridor munching an apple.
Mamdani also opposes the existence of a Jewish state and defended the genocidal cry 'Globalize the Intifada' as being nothing more than a call for Palestinian rights; at Bowdoin College, Mamdani founded his school's chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine.
Like Free Palestine or Defund the Police, Zohran became a synonym for cool among young leftists, a brand for disaffected white college grads. And his victory signals where the Democratic Party might be going.
6 A crowd of people is taking photos and videos of Zohran Mamdani on a screen.
Derek French/Shutterstock
6 Mamadani's supporters skewed younger, wealthier, and Whiter — the exact opposite of the New Yorkers he claims to champion most.
Derek French/UPI/Shutterstock
Wokeness is dead, but it's been replaced by something equally at odds with the working-class voters the Dems lost to President Trump: a redistributionist economic socialism that appeals to the elites in the same way that the 'anti-racism' of Robin DiAngelo and the Abolish ICE of AOC did.
It turns out, working-class New Yorkers, like working-class Americans more generally, don't want government-run supermarkets any more than they want trans athletes in their daughters' sports. They don't want to abolish the police or ICE. They don't want a rent freeze for already rent-stabilized apartments.
They want a fair shot at the American Dream. They want jobs that pay well, less immigration, good healthcare, and — most relevant to the mayor of New York City — safe streets.
6 Zohran Mamdani with his mother, film-maker Mira Nair, and wife, Rama Duwaji, on election night.
REUTERS
Will the Democratic Party ever learn? I wouldn't bet on it. The party's bigwigs have lined up behind Mamdani, with everyone from Chuck Schumer and Hakim Jeffries to Jerry Nadler and Bill Clinton posting in support of his victory. The media has tried to portray this as the right using Mamdani as the poster child for the Democratic Party, but they're doing that all on their own.
The real lesson of Zohran Mamdani's win is this. Though the topic has shifted from culture wars to economics, the Democratic Party still has not learned that the way to get working-class voters is simple: Listen.
Batya Ungar-Sargon is the author of 'Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America's Working Men and Women.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Senate Republicans ready vote on tax bill, still awaiting its final cost
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republican Senator John Kennedy spoke with reporters after departing a Senate Republicans luncheon on Friday. There is still no final fiscal breakdown, known as a score, from either the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation on the latest version of Trump's spending package. Kent Nishimura/NYT Advertisement Many of the changes reflect deals cut with individual Republicans who were at risk of voting against the bill and other, more mechanical rewrites to their cuts on Medicaid, energy tax credits and food stamps. Those updates will allow Republicans to try to advance the bill using a fast-track budget process in the Senate without any Democratic support. The revisions, taken together, could add or subtract to the overall costs of the package, but Republicans may not know precisely by how much when they hold their first vote this weekend. There is still no final fiscal breakdown, known as a score, from either the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation, which advises lawmakers on the budget implication of their legislative agenda. Advertisement Only the joint committee has rendered a partial verdict, having studied just the tax components in the Senate's earlier, unrevised proposal. Computed in the traditional way, analysts found it would cost $4.2 trillion over the next decade. Otherwise, the two congressional budget watchdogs have not been able to offer more comprehensive projections about the sprawling bill, or the effects of their proposal on the broader economy. Studying the House version of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed in late May, they determined it would add more than $3 trillion to the debt within the next decade, even after accounting for potential economic growth. Economists across the political spectrum have come to similar conclusions about the package and its price, drawing sharp rebukes from Trump and his aides. The White House continues to insist that the bill will supercharge economic growth, and when combined with the president's other policies, generate as much as $11 trillion in deficit reduction. Senator Josh Hawley talked to reporters at the Capitol on Saturday. After releasing a 940-page version of their sprawling domestic policy bill overnight, Senate Republicans were trying to find enough votes to pass it. TIERNEY L. CROSS/NYT Nor have congressional analysts determined the ways in which the Senate's new vision would affect families' finances across different income brackets. Earlier reports about the House tax legislation projected that the bill would fall hardest on the poor, who would see cuts to federal aid, while reserving the greatest financial benefits for the rich. For now, the best estimates for the Senate legislation are either outdated or preliminary, though they suggest the version winding through the chamber may carry a similar fiscal burden or turn out to be even more expensive. In one analysis, released earlier this week, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projected that the Senate proposal could add as much as $4.2 trillion to the debt by 2034, after accounting for expected changes to the bill. Marc Goldwein, the senior vice president of the deficit-reduction group, acknowledged the true cost was unclear because 'we don't have a score.' Advertisement The cost could rise because of the specific changes Republicans made overnight, some experts said. The revised measure now provisions $25 billion for rural hospitals affected by Republicans' proposed cuts to Medicaid, for example, as well as an increase in the cap on the state and local tax deduction demanded by lawmakers in the House. Senate majority leader John Thune with reporters as he returned to his office from the floor of the Senate on Friday. Kent Nishimura/NYT Martha Gimbel, a founder of the Budget Lab at Yale, pointed to those additions as she predicted that 'everything is moving in a more expensive direction.' But that, she added, is the problem. 'None of us have had time to sit down and figure this out,' she said. On Saturday, with some fiscal hawks in the Senate refusing to vote to open debate on the domestic policy bill until they receive an official tally of its costs, and Democrats signaling they plan to force a line-by-line reading of all 940 pages to protest it, it looked unlikely the Senate would begin voting on the substance of the legislation until Sunday at the earliest. This article originally appeared in .
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Senate nailbiter
Senate Republicans stepped up their attacks on U.S. solar and wind energy projects by quietly adding a provision to their megabill that would penalize future developments with a new tax. That new tax measure was tucked into the more than 900-page document released late Friday that also would sharply cut the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act for solar and wind projects. Those cuts to the IRA credits were added after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives by requiring generation projects be placed in service by the end of 2027 to qualify. The new excise tax is another blow to the fastest-growing sources of power production in the United States, and would be a massive setback to the wind and solar energy industries since it would apply even to projects not receiving any credits. 'It's a kill shot. This new excise tax on wind and solar is designed to fully kill the industry,' said Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, who helped craft the climate law as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer. Analysts at the Rhodium Group said in an email the new tax would push up the costs of wind and solar projects by 10 to 20 percent — on top of the cost increases from losing the credits. 'Combined with the likely onerous administrative reporting burden this provision puts in place, these cost increases will lead to even lower wind and solar installations. The impacts of this tax would also flow through to consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,' Rhodium said. The provision as written appears to add an additional tax for any wind and solar project placed into service after 2027 — when its eligibility for the investment and production tax credits ends — if a certain percentage of the value of the project's components are sourced from prohibited foreign entities, like China. It would apply to all projects that began construction after June 16 of this year. The language would require wind and solar projects, even those not receiving credits, to navigate complex and potentially unworkable requirements that prohibit sourcing from foreign entities of concern — a move designed to promote domestic production and crack down on Chinese materials. In keeping with GOP support for the fossil fuel industry, the updated bill creates a new production tax credit for metallurgical coal, which is used in steelmaking.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Vance arrives
Senate Republicans stepped up their attacks on U.S. solar and wind energy projects by quietly adding a provision to their megabill that would penalize future developments with a new tax. That new tax measure was tucked into the more than 900-page document released late Friday that also would sharply cut the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act for solar and wind projects. Those cuts to the IRA credits were added after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives by requiring generation projects be placed in service by the end of 2027 to qualify. The new excise tax is another blow to the fastest-growing sources of power production in the United States, and would be a massive setback to the wind and solar energy industries since it would apply even to projects not receiving any credits. 'It's a kill shot. This new excise tax on wind and solar is designed to fully kill the industry,' said Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, who helped craft the climate law as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer. Analysts at the Rhodium Group said in an email the new tax would push up the costs of wind and solar projects by 10 to 20 percent — on top of the cost increases from losing the credits. 'Combined with the likely onerous administrative reporting burden this provision puts in place, these cost increases will lead to even lower wind and solar installations. The impacts of this tax would also flow through to consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,' Rhodium said. The provision as written appears to add an additional tax for any wind and solar project placed into service after 2027 — when its eligibility for the investment and production tax credits ends — if a certain percentage of the value of the project's components are sourced from prohibited foreign entities, like China. It would apply to all projects that began construction after June 16 of this year. The language would require wind and solar projects, even those not receiving credits, to navigate complex and potentially unworkable requirements that prohibit sourcing from foreign entities of concern — a move designed to promote domestic production and crack down on Chinese materials. In keeping with GOP support for the fossil fuel industry, the updated bill creates a new production tax credit for metallurgical coal, which is used in steelmaking.
