
Nagpur Footprint In Karachi, Baloch Oasis In Nagpur's Quetta Colony
2
3
Nagpur: A left turn from somewhere in the middle of busy Alamgir Road from Old to New Karachi leads to CP & Berar Society — an address that may sound oddly placed in Pakistan, but echoes Nagpur's Capital glory and its colonial past.
More than 1,300km away, navigating a left turn on congested Central Avenue in Nagpur, one stops at Quetta Colony — an alien name in the heart of India, which is the capital of the faraway restive region of Balochistan in Pakistan. These are enduring landmarks named after distant lands left behind by their ancestors.
In Karachi, the biggest city of Pakistan, an Urdu signage and a lonely hoarding offer a fleeting reminder of the erstwhile Central Provinces and Berar, which encompassed vast areas under Maharashtra's Vidarbha region, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, which had Nagpur as capital.
After Partition, Muslims of the region who migrated to Pakistan named the land allotted to them on Karachi's outskirts CP & Berar.
Seven decades later, with Karachi's landscape swiftly changing, CP & Berar Society struggles to remain just more than a name. A handful remain from that generation and one of them who still carry memories of Nagpur and Central Province is the family of AQ Khan, father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb programme.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
The scientist had eloquently written about his childhood days in Nagpur in a newspaper column, a decade ago.
And the Saraiki-speaking Hindus who came from the desert region of Balochistan, 1,700km away, called their new home in Nagpur Quetta Colony. Even today many who come from Balochistan seeking a better life and citizenship under CAA land up at Quetta Colony here.
An enthusiast of Karachi's heritage, Iqbal A Rehman Mandavia, shared the manuscript of his upcoming book on the city with The Times of India.
"Turning leftwards from Bahadurabad circle on Alamgir Road leads to CP & Berar Society. Refugees from Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are settled here," it reads. It's a concrete jungle now. The migrant families that came after Partition were each allotted 120 square yards of land, and CP & Berar Society was established.
"There were around 400 homes in Karachi's CP & Berar Society," says Mandaviya.
Over the years, people moved out, and plots were bought over by Memons — a Gujarati-speaking business community.
"Now, CP & Berar Society is largely a Memon area, dotted with multi-storied apartments with flats costing as much as Rs4 crore," says Mandaviya. His script also talks of a grand CP mosque and Karachi's first fast-food restaurant — Toso — that came up in 1976. It was just an anglicised version of the Urdu/Hindi word 'Thooso', which means gorging.
"Thooso is a typical Nagpurian word for overeating," said Tejinder Singh Rawal, who helped TOI translate the document.
"My mother came from Balaghat, and my father was from Bhandara. Both were from Central Provinces," says Qadir Khan (name changed). The two cities are in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra now. His family, like others from the erstwhile province, did not live in Karachi's CP & Berar Society, but the connection remained. "My mother used to talk about monkeys climbing the roof of their homes and breaking the 'kavelus'. We used to wonder what a kavelu was.
That is what they called roof tiles in CP, but it's not part of Karachi jargon. So is not 'santra' — the Nagpur oranges she longed for. Here we call the fruit 'malta' or 'kinoo'," he says.
Back in Nagpur, Quetta Colony is more known to the rest of the city for its Navratri garba celebrations. Like the Memons in Karachi's CP & Berar Society, Gujarati-speaking Hindus too have carved a niche for themselves in Quetta Colony. Priced apartments and bungalows have replaced refugee quarters.
However, Quetta Samaj, a community guild, keeps migrants who came from places like Noshki, Sibi and Usta Mohammed, together. The Batras, Chugs, Thutejas, Ahujas and Kalaras regularly gather at a temple-cum-gurdwara in the colony.
Sporadic migration to India continues in the hope of getting citizenship. The newcomers from Balochistan also land at Quetta Colony or pockets within a couple of kilometres. These are Saraiki-speaking people.
The language that belongs to Pakistan's Multan and Bahawalpur pockets is also spoken in parts of Balochistan. "During Partition, Hindus from different parts of Pakistan came to Nagpur. The Sindhis settled mainly in Jaripatka, Khamla and Chapru Nagar.
The Saraikis were allotted land here, and we named it Quetta Colony. The fresh migrants also prefer staying here," says Rajesh Muniyar, president of Quetta Samaj. Secertray Rajesh Kingre says the Quetta Samaj is their identity now.
Maya Thutheja, who came to Nagpur after her marriage in the late 1970s, remembers her village on the outskirts of Quetta. "The weather was cold even in summers. Life was comfortable for Hindus even after Partition. Later, we began to feel unsafe, and my family too moved to India after my marriage," she says. Shreechand Kalra came in 2006 from Haji Shaher, 120km off Quetta, to join his three brothers. "Things may have changed now, but in those days, minorities did not face trouble in Baloch areas.
I shifted to India because my brothers stayed here," he says.
Amarlala Chugh, 64, came in the 1990s, leaving his home on Jinnah Road, Quetta, and settled in Nagpur's Quetta Colony, where his relatives were already living.
For third-generation settlers like Muniyar, little is known about Balochistan, except that their ancestors came from a city called Quetta and that sticks on their identity. However, Muniyar is concerned about dwindling numbers of his community in the area.
There were more than 200 homes, now reduced to 40. "Sometimes I wonder if those who have large plots here can build a flat scheme exclusively for the Quetta Samaj.
Each group has its own identity," says Muniyar.
Close to the Quetta Colony stands Karachi Samaj Bhavan, a community hall built by Sindhi community living away at Chapru Nagar to mark their distinct identity. Similarly, the road to Karachi's CP & Berar Society passes though Dhoraji, a locality named after the temple town of Gujarat. It's a tale of two cities, geographically and culturally far apart, but carrying a shared legacy of Partition and communion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Stop unlawful deportation of Bengali Muslims, Human Rights Watch tells govt.
Criticising India's deportation of 'ethnic Bengali migrants' to Bangladesh, the Human Rights Watch on Thursday (July 24, 2025) said the exercise was being done 'without following due process'. Such acts done to 'garner political support' reflect the 'broader discriminatory policies against Muslims', it said in a statement. Citing various news reports of Bengali migrants being picked up from 'BJP-run States' such as Assam, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Odisha and Uttar Pradesh, Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch said: 'India's ruling party BJP is fuelling discrimination by arbitrarily expelling Bengali Muslims from the country, including Indian citizens.' The statement said the government should stop unlawfully deporting people without due process, and instead ensure everyone's access to procedural safeguards against arbitrary detention and expulsion. The body further said that it had interviewed 18 people in June, including affected individuals who returned to India after being expelled to Bangladesh, their family members, and relatives of those who were detained and are still missing. Subsequently, the body alleged that it had written to the Ministry of Home Affairs with its findings but did not receive any response. '1,500 Muslims sent out' 'The Indian government has provided no official data on the number of people expelled, but Border Guard Bangladesh has reported that India expelled more than 1,500 Muslim men, women and children to Bangladesh between May 7 and June 15, including about 100 Rohingya refugees from Myanmar,' the statement read. It further noted that the authorities of 'BJP-run States' of Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Odisha, and Rajasthan have 'rounded up Muslims, mostly impoverished migrant workers', and turned them over to Indian border guards. In some cases, the border guards allegedly 'threatened and beat the detainees to force them to cross into Bangladesh' without adequately verifying their citizenship claims, the statement said. The body further said in its statement that India's detention and expulsion of anyone without due process violates fundamental human rights. 'India is obligated under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination to ensure the protection of everyone's rights and to prevent deprivation of citizenship on the basis of race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin,' it read. Citing examples of Bengali Muslims from various States being 'harassed' and Rohingyas being 'deported', the body said the Indian government is undercutting the country's long history of providing refuge to the persecuted as it 'tries to generate political support'. 'The Indian government is putting thousands of vulnerable people at risk in apparent pursuit of unauthorised immigrants, but their actions reflect broader discriminatory policies against Muslims,' Ms. Pearson further said.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amicus counters government stand, says it violates right to autonomy
NEW DELHI: Opposing the government's firm stand not to lower the age of consent below 18 years, amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising told Supreme Court that it criminalised "consensual sexual activity between children in the age group of 16-18 years, and violated their right to autonomy". Presenting a counter to Centre's stand in the case, Jaising said the age of consent was static at 16 years for 80 years and "neither any rational reason was given justifying the increase to 18 years nor was there any data to suggest that the age of consent required any increase". "Until enactment of Pocso Act , there was no law dealing with sexual offences against children. The newly enacted Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, in Section 63, has kept a legislative scheme similar to the one in Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013, that amended IPC to increase the age of consent to 18 years," she said. Jaising said increase in age of consent violated right of autonomy of children in 16-18 age group, who could give mature consent to sexual activity given the fact that they had attained puberty and, consequentially, sexual awareness. However, she put in an important caveat. "This brief does not suggest that anyone above the age of 18 who has sex with another below the age of 18 be decriminalised," she said. "Scientific research indicates that adolescents are attaining puberty sooner than they did several years ago and puberty as we know, is the age of awakening of sexual awareness. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It is the age during which there is a natural attraction between the sexes and development of sexual relationships of choice," Jaising said, adding, "Hence, to criminalise such an activity rather than addressing the issue of sex education, is arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the best interests of children as defined in law. " Jaising requested SC to "declare that any consensual sexual activity between children of the ages of 16-18 constitutes an exception to penal provisions of the statute as being 'close in age', non-abusive and non-exploitative". Increasing the age of consent has led to branding hundreds of children in the 16-18 age group as criminals, she said, adding, "Data also indicates that most complaints to police are filed by parents of the girl, often against her own wishes and for extraneous reasons such as inter-religious relationships or inter-caste relationships. "Consensual sexual relations between adolescents in the 16-18 age bracket need not necessarily result in marriage, but on the contrary, criminalising such sexual behaviour will result in children eloping and getting married to avoid being prosecuted by Pocso." She suggested to the court that the law as it stands requires to be read down to include a 'close in age' exception when the sexual activity is consensual.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Age of consent for sex cannot be less than 18 years, Centre tells SC
NEW DELHI: Union government has told Supreme Court that the age of consent for sex cannot be lowered from 18 years, as it is meant to protect minors from sexual abuse, often by relatives, but conceded that judicial discretion can be exercised on a case-by-case basis in instances of adolescent romantic and physical relationships. "The statutory age of consent fixed at 18 years must be strictly and uniformly enforced. Any departure from this standard, even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy, would amount to rolling back decades of progress in child protection law, and undermine the deterrent character of laws like Pocso Act , 2012, and BNS," it said. Centre said the constitutional framework unequivocally supported the legal presumption that a person below 18 years of age was incapable of giving valid and informed consent to sexual activity. "Loosening age-based protections could open avenues for abuse (rape) under the guise of consensual (sexual) activity," it said. In a comprehensive written submission settled by additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, the Centre detailed how the age of consent increased from 10 years in Indian Penal Code, 1860; to 12 years under the Age of Consent Act, 1891; 14 years in an amendment to IPC in 1925 and Sharda Act (Child Marriage Restraint law) of 1929; to 16 years in a 1940 amendment to IPC and 18 years in 1978 through amendment to Child Marriage Restraint Act which has remained in force till date. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo "The age of consent under Indian law, fixed at 18 years, represents a carefully considered legislative choice aimed at creating a non-negotiable protective framework for children. This flows from the inherent protection provided to children envisaged under the Constitution of India," govt said. It added that the judiciary, on a case-by-case basis, could exercise discretion, including the close-in-age exception for those nearing 18 years and engaged in adolescence romance. "The legislative framework governing child sexual offences, particularly under Pocso Act, 2012, is premised not only on the vulnerability of the child due to age, but also on the recognition that a majority of such offences are committed by persons within the child's immediate environment of trust, including family members, neighbours, caregivers and teachers. Such perpetrators have a strong influence on the authority and agency of the minors," Centre said. It said data collated by National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and NGOs like Save the Children and HAQ Centre for Child Rights, indicated that over 50% of sexual offences against children were perpetrated by persons known to the child or those who were trusted by the minors. Lowering the age of consent from 18 years, under the guise of adolescent romance, would be legally unsound and provide a defence to the abusers, who exploit the minor's emotional dependence or silence, govt said. "A child's inability to report or resist is exacerbated when the perpetrator is a parent or close family member. In such cases, presenting 'consent' as a defence only victimises the child, shifts the blame onto them, and undermines the very object of Pocso Act to protect children from exploitation regardless of whether they were 'willing," it said. Govt said the existing age of consent (18 years) must not be tinkered with by the court as it was specified in several legislations to "protect the bodily integrity of children and uphold the constitutional and statutory safeguards accorded to them".