More council candidates quit Ray Chung's Independent Together campaign group
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Two more Wellington council candidates running under the Independent Together ticket have left the group following mayoral candidate
Ray Chung's email about Tory Whanau.
In a press release, the group confirmed that Andrea Compton and Dan Milward had left their organisation to campaign independently of it.
It follows fellow candidate Lily Brown's announcement on Wednesday that she would not run with the group either.
She said she did not feel aligned with tactics employed by Better Wellington who has helped run Independent Together.
The changes meant that the number of candidates that stood under Independent Together had reduced from nine to six.
Independent Together billboards showing Andrea Compton, Dan Milward, and Lily Brown are up around Wellington.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
In a statement Milward said that he was surprised by "recent allegations and the subsequent media coverage storm".
He said that at an Independent Together roadshow event on Tuesday his wife was threatened by "agitators".
"I knew it was time to take a different approach.
"I'm proud of what we have achieved together but this is the right call for me, my family, and my community - it's time to run the 'Dan Milward Campaign'".
Independent Together said the media scrutiny on its team had been intense.
"The extent of it has been unnerving on our business and community minded candidates.
"While the team feels the loss of both Andrea Compton and Dan Milward, we acknowledge the impact this is having on both of their families."
They said that threats and bullying tactics from "the political establishment won't work on Independent Together candidates anymore".
Compton said standing independently offered her the best opportunity to connect directly with her community.
"This election is about listening, offering practical solutions, and having the courage to stand by what you believe in."
Ray Chung sent an email, seen by RNZ, to three fellow councillors in early 2023 recounting a story he'd been told by his neighbour about the neighbour's son allegedly having a sexual encounter with the mayor.
The email surfaced last week. Whanau rejected the contents of the email and said it was false and contained a "malicious and sexist" rumour.
She has since received an apology from Chung.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Can the national ticketing project get back on track?
The nationwide ticketing project would allow NZers to tag on to buses, trains and ferries using contactless payments. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The long awaited $1.4 billion national ticketing project needs to get back on track, says the transport minister, with Waka Kotahi advice earlier this year seen as "overly optimistic" about the project's viability. Meanwhile, the US firm responsible for its development has seen its credit rating drop this month. The nationwide ticketing project would - for the first time - allow New Zealanders to easily tag on to buses, trains and ferries using contactless payments across the country. In 2022 an almost $500 million was signed with US defence contractor Cubic to deliver the plan, with rollout having started in December with a pilot on Route 29 in Christchurch. It has since fallen behind targets to be piloted in other parts of the country, due to technical complications with the project. In April , Auckland councillor Andy Baker said it may be time for the city to walk away from the plan and Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown told RNZ he was very concerned about it. It was meant to be on public transport across the country by the end of next year, but a review of the project has been launched, and a revised rollout plan was due to be announced in August. In a briefing document to Transport Minister Chris Bishop from NZTA Waka Kotahi in February, the transport agency was positive about the project's rollout. "The NTS project is on target to be completed on time and within budget". The paper did note that there were some time and budget pressures with the payment overhaul, but further information on this was redacted in the document. When RNZ approached Bishop's office with the briefing he said although the Christchurch pilot showed "some promising signs", he was concerned about the project. "I believe NZTA may have been overly optimistic in their evaluation of the project's viability moving forward in their briefing from February." Bishop said he had met with the NTS governance group to stress the significant investment in the payment plan and "encourage them to exercise leadership to get the project back on track". "The group has commissioned an independent review into the project to identify opportunities for improvement in the programme, and I expect to receive a copy of its findings in July, along with a plan to deliver the project." He was advised that its budget was not an issue. In a response to RNZ, NZTA Waka Kotahi said the NTS Governance Group was working to address challenges with complex parts of the technology. "In May 2025 the NTS Governance Board commissioned an independent review of the programme to provide an independent assessment on the current plan, the challenges for delivery and approach to managing programme delays, and to support the successful delivery of the NTS programme. "The independent review is expected to be completed with a final report presented to the NTS Governance Board at the end of July 2025." US defence and transport contractor Cubic has developed the ticketing overhaul with Waka Kotahi. On 9 July the financial agency Fitch Ratings downgraded the company's credit rating from B negative to triple C negative - rating which indicated that there was a substantial credit risk for the technology business. The change was due to the company completing a restructure of its debt. In a statement to RNZ, Cubic said that it had reached an agreement with its financial sponsors and lenders that would enhance its liquidity, strengthen its capital structure and position it to accelerate its strategic investments. Both the transport minister and NZTA Waka Kotahi would not comment on whether they were concerned about the company. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Flood victims will not be on their own, says chair of contentious report
There will always be a role for the government in alleviating hardship, says the head of a panel that looked at how the government should adapt to climate change. Photo: RNZ The chair of the panel behind a contentious report on how the government should adapt to climate change says its authors never meant that flood victims should get no help from the taxpayer. The report was criticised for leaving people to manage their own flood risk after a transition phase of possibly about 20 years. But Matt Whineray says there will always be a role for the government in alleviating hardship, beyond the initial disaster response. "I think the government will always have a role in alleviating hardship - that's my view and that's the discussion we had at the reference group - but most critically it's not linked to the property value." Whineray said councils and central government could not keep buying properties at market rates when they were not suitable for rebuilding and were not covered by private insurance. He cited overseas examples of homes being rebuilt in the same place six times, with the government as the default insurer. Whineray said that did not mean people should be left on their own, even after a cut off date, and even after homeowners have been supplied with the best available risk information. He said currently there was an unofficial but powerful assumption that people will be compensated to their full pre-flood value - an expensive proposition for tax- and/or rate-payers, as climate change and poor development decisions increase the number of ruined homes. But Whineray said there were other ways to supply compensation, like capping the amount people can get for relocation assistance. "It's just how you determine how you do that and step away from a world where you say someone gets to get $5 million because because that's what they thought it was worth the day before the event happened. "There will be an impact (on property prices)," he said. "If you moved directly to a world where there is no automatic buyout, you have that abruptness. The idea of the transition period is to smooth the impact. "At some the point in the future where the government is no longer underwriting those property values, that will have been reflected by the market." Canterbury University Professor and climate scientist Dave Frame has been studying how much worse extreme events are getting on a hotter planet, and how much worse they might be expected to get in different parts of the country. He said he understood why some experts wanted a fund for property buyouts, and he also understood why others were wary of promising guaranteed compensation. "Often the people who are most adept at tapping into those funds are the kind of people who've been climate sceptics their whole life, brought a low lying property and now want to exit without paying a bill. It's the classic moral hazard," he said. "It's actually a really subtle one for the government to find a way of exercising prudent judgement, like it seems to me to be pretty clear that the people up Esk Valley weren't being unduly risky in in their behaviour." Professor Jonathan Boston of Victoria UNiversity led a previous report on how to stage a planned exit from the most risky areas. That report said financial help was needed to avoid worsening inequality and keep communities functioning, but the primary goal should not be restoring people's full wealth. Boston agreed that offering uncapped compensation or government insurance encouraged people to stay (and build) in places they should not, and said councils often struggled to stop them. But he said many people would not have the money to leave on their own, without some government assistance. "Some people will have mortgages and they run the risk of being left without any equity, in fact in debt, other people might not have a mortgage but the property might be unsaleable so they have no means of purchasing another property... they are in what a colleague has called property purgatory." Boston said he found it mind boggling that society would allow people with kids or serious disabilities to stay in harm's way, as councils withdrew sewage, water and road maintenance. He did not believe the decision to exit can be left to individual choice, even once people have access better access to risk information. "With sea level rise, more powerful storms and so on, if you look out decades and indeed centuries fro now, tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of properties in New Zealand are going to be vulnerable to one kind of flooding or another, or other hazards, and if there's no assistance to help people move, well it's pretty clear that we're going to have a hell of a mess." The environment ministry is working on options to present to the government, on how to move from today's ad hoc regime to something more financially sustainable. What that looks like and who pays still is not clear. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
'Difficult conversations' for employers if staff chat about pay, lawyers say
Camilla Belich's bill would prevent employers prosecuting employees for discussing their salaries. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith Employers may need to be ready to face up to some uncomfortable discussions about employee pay, employment experts say. On Wednesday night, Labour MP Camilla Belich's Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill passed its second reading, with National voting alongside the three opposition parties. The bill would ensure that pay secrecy clauses, which prevent employees from discussing their salaries with colleagues, would no longer be enforceable, meaning employers could not take legal action, if an employee talked about pay. Simon Schofield, a professional teaching fellow in University of Auckland law school, said it would be a positive move. "The underlying reason for the bill is to ensure that people who are discriminated against have the ability to see where they sit relative to other employees doing the same work and allows them to discuss that." He said some employers may have to deal with challenging situations, justifying why certain people were paid a certain rate compared to others. "Those questions may be uncomfortable for an employer to answer, but I don't think that means an employee should be dismissed for having those discussions. "If someone isn't feeling that they're getting paid well compared to their peers, they'll often just leave the employment relationship, but by ensuring that people can have these discussions, it puts the onus on employers to justify some of their decisions around pay, which sometimes… can have elements of unconscious bias involved and that feeds into the gender pay gap." Hesketh Henry partner Alison Maelzer said remuneration was slightly taboo, so people might be reluctant to talk about it anyway. "It's awkward both ways," she said. "If you find out you're being paid less than the person you're talking to or if you're being paid more than the person you're talking to, either way, it opens up all kinds of a can of worms." She said, if the bill passed, salaries could become a water cooler conversation for a while. "It might be prompting people to ask their colleagues a question they might not have done otherwise." Duncan Cotterill partner Alastair Espie said he saw people getting into trouble over pay disclosure "very infrequently". "It's an issue that is often difficult for employers to prove, so concerns about employees talking about their salary will often go unaddressed or be dealt with through more informal channels." Maelzer said she had been an employment lawyer for more than 20 years and had not been on either side of such a matter. "Perhaps employers are reluctant to take disciplinary action, because it could open up a can of worms related to the reasons why the employee is sharing salary details." She said agreements often contained a clause that made the terms of employment confidential. "The way it would be in there is not a specific clause, but when you're defining confidential information, client information, marketing strategy or whatever, you'd also include the terms of your employment in that list." She said the bill would not prevent employers doing that, but would prevent them taking action against an employee for remuneration disclosure. Schofield said action had been taken against employees who disclosed their pay. "Employers are entitled to treat pay as confidential information, therefore - because there's been a breach of that confidential information - employers may think they're entitled to dismiss an employee for that disclosure." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
