'The Man Who Would Be King': Saudi crown prince pushes for liberalization of his society
Between the moment Karen Elliott House finished the text of her book The Man Who Would Be King and its forthcoming publication on July 8, events of historic proportions have taken place.
In the month before the book's appearance, the long-established order of the Middle East was stood on its head. It was US President Donald Trump's declared intention, during his second presidential campaign and shortly after assuming office, to withdraw the United States from foreign entanglements. However, on June 22, he dispatched a fleet of stealth bombers into Iran and destroyed its three major nuclear facilities.
What happened has changed the geopolitical aspect of the Middle East. It does not, however, detract at all from House's in-depth, insightful, and fascinating account of the life, achievements, and future plans of Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince and virtual leader, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS).
In 2019, House reminds her readers, Iran bombed Saudi oil fields; and Trump, in his first term as president, though closely aligned with the kingdom, did nothing in retaliation.
Saudi leaders took that, she writes, 'as evidence that Washington is no longer a reliable protector of the kingdom…The US ignoring a direct attack by Iran on the kingdom was… shocking.' Which explains why House writes, elsewhere in the volume: 'The kingdom's traditional protector, the United States, is steadily losing interest and influence in the region.'
That view surely needs modifying in light of recent events.
In compiling this work, House has drawn on decades of personal involvement with Saudi Arabia and its leading personalities – and MBS in particular.
That she likes him and admires his achievement in turning his country from a strict, repressive, Islamic theocracy into a modern, secular-oriented (though still Islam-rooted) nation is evident. That, however, has not deterred her from presenting her readers with other, less attractive, aspects of his personality.
She details, for example, how he ruthlessly eliminated the internal opposition to his rise to power, including what has become known as the Ritz-Carlton lockup when he rounded up members of the royal family and kept them under armed guard – albeit in a luxury hotel – until they agreed to relinquish their challenge to his authority. What he threatened them with has never been revealed.
'MBS achieved at least two goals with the Ritz lockup,' writes House.
'He disgraced and disposed of the late King Abdullah's sons as potential challengers to his power. One paid the government a reported $1 billion of alleged ill-gotten money and was forced to resign his powerful post as head of the national guard, giving MBS control of all the kingdom's armed forces. Another of King Abdullah's sons remains in prison to this day. But the Ritz-Carlton lockup was much more than a family affair. It was a terrifying signal to elite Saudis that the way of doing business in the kingdom was changing.'
House provides a vivid contrast of life in the kingdom today compared with how it was when MBS was growing up.
Yet against his extensive liberalization of Saudi society in general, and in particular that of women within that society, the horrific murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi still casts a shadow.
House was acquainted with Khashoggi, whom she had interviewed many times. He had started by supporting the young MBS on his rise to power but later became increasingly critical about the prince's elimination of all opposition, when – as House puts it: 'No longer were powerful uncles alive to curb MBS, as they had with previous kings' empowered sons.'
Khashoggi left Saudi Arabia for the US, where his articles in The Washington Post grew ever more critical of MBS and, House writes, 'led to his shocking death in October 2018 in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. Khashoggi's body was sawn into pieces and hauled out in suitcases. That brutal murder was sensational news worldwide. Overnight, MBS, the Saudi savior, was now widely viewed as a savage. Suddenly, MBS stood for 'Mr. Bone Saw' to his critics.'
HOUSE IS convinced, and presents a very convincing case, that MBS never ordered Khashoggi's assassination, that his murder was in fact an abduction attempt that went wrong. All the (circumstantial) evidence points to an operation aimed at seizing Khashoggi and flying him back to Saudi Arabia. What MBS actually planned to do with him, once he had been returned, is anyone's guess.
Born in 1947, Karen Elliott House is an American journalist and former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal. Her journalism awards include a Pulitzer Prize for international reporting in regard to coverage of the Middle East.
Her book On Saudi Arabia: Its People, Past, Religion, Fault Lines – and Future was published in 2012.
The meticulous research that went into The Man Who Would Be King is obvious from the 21 pages of detailed notes that she appends to it. Every major statement the author makes is provided with its source and can be checked by the assiduous reader. In addition, 13 pages of references help her readers access each facet of her investigation into MBS's life, career, and plans.
For many in Israel who are interested in Saudi Arabia and its dynamic young leader, the most intriguing aspect of recent years has been the speculation about whether the kingdom could be the next Arab state to normalize relations with the Jewish state and join the Abraham Accords. House, of course, deals in detail with the history of Saudi-Israel relations, and she asserts that MBS's vision is 'for his kingdom's economic and security future tied to cooperation with Israel.'
In view of that, it is rather odd that the term 'Abraham Accords' never appears in the book and is therefore absent from the index.
House describes how MBS's vision of Saudi-Israeli cooperation was blown off course by Hamas's massacre in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and even more so by the death and destruction within Gaza following Israel's efforts to defeat Hamas.
She writes: 'Saudi officials say the Crown Prince would be putting his life at risk were he to recognize Israel when his own young population and that of other Arab states is deeply incensed by images on social media of Israeli devastation and death in Gaza.'
The ceasefire in the 12-day Israel-Iran war is another recent event that could put a different gloss on previous attitudes and opinions.
The kingdom of Saudi Arabia is less than 100 years old. It was only in 1932 that Abdul Aziz ibn Saud emerged from many years of political and military struggle against the Ottoman Empire and other local chieftains and was able to name the area he had conquered 'Saudi Arabia' and proclaim himself its monarch.
It was doubtless with an eye to the eventual centenary celebrations of the monarchy and the kingdom that in April 2016, MBS launched Saudi Vision 2030, an ambitious plan to revitalize the nation state.
If it succeeds, by 2032 Saudi Arabia will have been transformed from virtual total dependence on oil revenues into a modern, liberalized, thriving society, its prosperity underpinned by flourishing industrial, financial, economic, and commercial sectors.
House, telling us of MBS's long fascination with futuristic video games, sees his Vision 2030 as 'full of his grandiose, videogame futurisms. At the top of a long list,' she writes, 'is Neom, a $500 billion development nearly the size of Belgium... It will feature an AI-driven linear city, 'the Line,' a high-rise mirrored structure running 110 miles long and standing 1,600 feet high – taller than the Empire State Building. The city will have no cars and no carbon emissions, [ and be] powered entirely by renewable energy. Residents will travel by high-speed trains and flying taxis.'
However, there have been setbacks along the way, and some of the more ambitious schemes in Vision 2030, including Neom, have had to be cut back.
House reserves judgment: 'Whether the kingdom successfully transitions from Vision 2030's big push to a sustained long push by truly diversifying sources of public revenue across oil, mining, sales tax, tourism, and financial income on both domestic and foreign assets remains to be seen.'
The Man Who Would Be King is a highly readable assessment by an expert – who is also a top-flight journalist – of one of the most colorful and characterful personalities on today's political scene. She presents him 'warts and all,' as Oliver Cromwell is reputed to have remarked – and her account is all the more entertaining because of it.
MBS is still a young man – he celebrates his 40th birthday on August 31. His story is far from over. Everyone with an interest in the Middle East will welcome this study by Karen Elliott House of a man who is bound to play a vital role in the region's future.
The writer is the Middle East correspondent for Eurasia Review. His latest book is Trump and the Holy Land: 2016-2020. Follow him at www.a-mid-east-journal.blogspot.com.
THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING: MOHAMMED BIN SALMAN AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF SAUDI ARABIA
By Karen Elliott House
304 pages; $29
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Musk forms 'America Party' opposing Trump's tax bill
The dispute between US President Donald Trump and campaign financier Elon Musk has taken another fractious turn after the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Trump's "big, beautiful" tax bill will bankrupt America. A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new US political party should be created, Musk declared in a post on Saturday that "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he wrote. By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025 The announcement from Musk comes after Republican President Trump signed his self-styled "big, beautiful" tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which Musk fiercely opposed. Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term aimed at slashing government spending. The first sign of investor dissatisfaction with Musk's announcement followed later in the day. Investment firm Azoria Partners will postpone the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund, Azoria CEO James Fishback said in a post on X. Fishback, who has asked Tesla's board to clarify Musk's political ambitions, said the new party undermined the confidence shareholders had that he would focus more on the company after leaving government service in May. Elon has gone too investment firm (@InvestAzoria) has decided to postpone next week's public listing of our Azoria Tesla Convexity decision comes in direct response to @ElonMusk's announcement that he is launching a new national political party. This creates… — James Fishback (@j_fishback) July 6, 2025 Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Trump to attacking him, Musk said: "Increasing the deficit from an already insane $US2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country." There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Trump's November re-election and hit a high of more than $US488 ($A745) in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing at $315.35 on Friday. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years and Trump's approval ratings in polls during his second term have generally held firm above 40 per cent, despite often divisive policies.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
With One War Over, Netanyahu Heads to Washington Amid Calls to End Another
For Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, the meeting with President Trump scheduled for Monday will serve as a kind of victory lap after the joint Israeli-U.S. assault last month on Iran's nuclear facilities. The White House visit — the prime minister's third since Mr. Trump returned to office — is likely to add luster to Mr. Netanyahu's laurels, especially with his voters back home, analysts said, as he soon heads into an election year. But such trips have yielded surprises in the past. The last time Mr. Netanyahu was in the Oval Office, in April, he sat somewhat awkwardly at Mr. Trump's side as the president announced that Washington would be engaging in 'direct' talks with Iran in a last-ditch effort to rein in the country's nuclear program. That month, Mr. Netanyahu tried to convince Mr. Trump that the time was right for a military assault on Iran, but he was swatted down. This time, Mr. Trump is eager to advance a cease-fire deal for Gaza that would see Hamas release hostages and would ultimately end the long war in the Palestinian enclave that was set off by the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel. On Sunday, Israel was sending negotiators to Qatar, a mediating country, to try to bridge differences with Hamas. The United States said it was also brokering talks between Israel and Syria aimed at restoring calm along their frontier. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump's ‘reciprocal' tariff pause is about to expire. Cue the confusion
The 90-day deadline President Donald Trump set for countries to make trade deals with the United States or risk substantially higher tariffs is just days away. What will happen after that's reached at 12:01 a.m. ET on July 9 is anyone's best guess. The stakes could not be higher, with the entire global economy on notice. On April 2, a date Trump dubbed 'Liberation Day,' he unveiled new, 'reciprocal' tariff rates for key US trading partners, with some levies as high as 50%. Collectively, the rates were the highest the US has charged on foreign goods in over a century. Economists quickly sounded alarms about a recession hitting not just certain countries, but rather the whole world. As the tariffs went into effect on April 9, they sparked a sell-off on Wall Street and the bond market rebelled, forcing Trump to announce a three-month pause to give countries more time to solidify deals with the US, saying investors 'were getting a little bit yippy, a little afraid.' Since then, almost all goods the US imports have been subject to a minimum 10% tariff. Stocks, meanwhile, have not only recovered all those losses but have set multiple new record highs. And inflation has barely budged. But if tariffs start to rise again and inflation roars back, those gains could quickly get erased all over again. After months of meeting with foreign government officials and countless claims that several trading partners were on the cusp of completing deals, only three have been announced. One of those, with Vietnam, has yet to be finalized and few details are known about it. Still, the Trump administration is advertising that a flurry of deals are forthcoming. At the same time, the president has threatened to send letters to countries that don't ink deals, telling them the rate at which their exports to the US will be taxed. Leading up to July 9, Trump administration officials threatened to simply return to April tariff rates, or possibly even higher levies. They also floated the possibility of extending the pause for countries 'negotiating in good faith,' without defining what that means or which it includes. It's not clear where Trump, who will get the ultimate say, stands. 'We can do whatever we want. We could extend it; we could make it shorter,' Trump recently said. 'I'd like to make it shorter. I'd like to just sent letters out to everybody, 'Congratulations, you're paying 25%.'' 'We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out,' Trump also recently said. On Friday, he said he'd begin sending letters over the coming days. 'They'll range in value from maybe 60% or 70% tariffs to 10% and 20% tariffs,' Trump said. For many countries, such rates would deal an even bigger economic blow compared to the levels Trump announced in April. But countries may have the opportunity to still negotiate, given Trump said most new rates won't take effect until August 1. The deal Trump announced on Wednesday with Vietnam, which calls for minimum tariffs of 20% on Vietnamese goods, double the rate throughout the three-month pause, has raised the possibility that countries may not be able to score lower rates even if they reach a trade agreement. But considering tariffs on Vietnam were set to rise to a minimum of 46% if the rates Trump announced in April held — which was among the highest Trump announced — 20% suddenly feels like a relief. That may be an intentional strategy on Trump's part, allowing him to stick to his major campaign promise of levying higher tariffs on other nations in an effort to raise revenues and bring manufacturing jobs back to the US. 'On balance, we take the US-Vietnam accord as a positive step toward more durable bilateral deals for the US and toward greater clarity for investors,' Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, global head of equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note last week. 'Headline risks around trade may persist as negotiations continue, but we think the market impact should moderate as President Trump's negotiating tactics become increasingly familiar,' he said. 'Ultimately, we expect the US administration to prioritize economic stability over more maximalist tariffs, especially ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.'