logo
Britain depends on Norway to avoid blackouts. Some Norwegians want to cut us off

Britain depends on Norway to avoid blackouts. Some Norwegians want to cut us off

Yahoo23-02-2025
It was a typical, some might say miserable, British winter day: grey, still and biting cold.
As millions of people came home in the early evening on Jan 8, boiled the kettle, made dinner and settled down in front of the TV, the pressure on Britain's electricity system surged.
At the peak of demand around 5.30pm to 6pm, solar panels were sitting idle in the dark and wind farms were generating only an eighth of their maximum output because of a lack of wind.
Had it not been for electricity flowing from countries like Norway, the evening 'would have been a disaster', says Kathryn Porter, of consultancy Watt Logic, threatening a 'cascading blackout'.
'We did come really close,' she says.
Such days are a reminder of how reliant Britain is on the kindness of strangers to keep the lights on and prevent bills from spiralling out of control.
Thick copper cables buried under the seabed are now crucial to the country's energy security. Chief among them is the 450-mile-long interconnector that runs from the English coast to south-west Norway.
'If we weren't able to access it, it would certainly increase prices in Great Britain,' says Tom Edwards, from Cornwall Insight, another energy consultancy.
'It would get tight. The risk would be that prices would spike during cold, dark, still evenings at close to £6,000 a megawatt hour, which is 100 times the normal.'
Norway's sprawling network of interconnectors carries electricity generated by its rivers, waterfalls and dams to homes in countries such as Britain and Germany.
Such cables were once regarded as a hallmark of success in the Nordic nation described as Europe's battery. Yet they have become deeply contentious after the energy crisis.
While they help to lower costs in the countries to which they connect, Norwegians feel they are paying the price through far higher and more volatile bills. It is particularly galling in a country accustomed to cheap and abundant energy.
'Many people are really angry,' says Mímir Kristjánsson, a Red Party MP. 'They feel they have been deceived.'
He represents the region of Rogaland, where the British interconnector resurfaces. It has the highest electricity prices in the country.
'It's about more than money,' says Kristjánsson. 'People just see the situation as really wrong.'
Tensions over the electricity market blew up Norway's two-party coalition last month, leaving the country's Labour Party in charge of a minority government until elections in September.
'We say enough is enough,' Trygve Slagsvold Vedum, the leader of the Centre Party, declared when announcing their exit from government.
'We are doing this to change Norwegian electricity policy and create a dynamic where we can take steps that can give us lower and stable electricity prices in Norway and so we don't give away more power to the EU.'
Norway is one of the world's richest nations. Yet even here cost of living pressures are fuelling a polarised debate. It is not helped by Euroscepticism and the sense that Norwegians are being asked to pay for other countries' energy policy failures.
In December, electricity spot prices briefly hit a 15-year-high, sparking widespread anger.
'A lot of the political parties in Norway are thinking of cutting the cables,' says Eimund Nygaard, the chief executive of power and telecom firm Lyse in Stavanger, a city on the country's southern coast. 'The nationalism we see on this is quite scary.'
In Britain, Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, would be wise to pay attention.
While other European countries race to expand renewable energy, Norway started powering its country from clean hydropower more than a hundred years ago. The country's thousands of fjords, rivers and lakes make it the perfect place to generate electricity from water-powered turbines.
'We have mountains that are flat and not very high compared to the Alps. Therefore we gather a lot of rain and snow high up in the mountains. There are lakes, rivers and waterfalls. We have almost always had cheap electric power,' says Egil Hollund, from the Chamber of Commerce in Stavanger.
While the country exports vast amounts of oil and gas, its own homes and industry are powered by cheap, clean energy. An abundance of power has become ingrained in the national psyche.
'There is this saying: if you go past student halls in the UK, you can easily see where the Norwegian international students are living because they always have the lights on,' Hollund adds.
Hydropower has the added benefit of being more reliable than wind. This abundance of stable, cheap electricity makes the Nordic country a convenient trade partner.
Hollund's office in Stavanger is only about 50 miles as the crow flies from where Britain's interconnector with Norway emerges from the North Sea at Kvilldal, a hydropower plant in Rogaland.
When it became operational in 2021, the interconnector cable was the world's longest. The North Sea Link can power 1.4m homes, carrying 1.4 gigawatts (GW) of electricity between the countries.
It was built by mutual agreement and with investment from both countries. Britain's contract with Norway still has decades left to run and billions have been invested.
The UK has similar links to countries like Denmark, France and Belgium. Within the next decade there may even be one to solar farms in the Moroccan desert.
'We have built out interconnection massively over the last few years. We now have about 10 gigawatts of interconnection. Back in 2010 we only had two and a half gigawatts, so we've quadrupled the amount,' says Shivam Malhotra, an analyst from consultancy LCP.
This radical expansion of the ability to import power has coincided with a shift in national energy policy away from fossil fuels and towards renewable power. As older gas power stations have shut down, Britain has needed a backstop to guard against blackouts as we ramp up wind, solar and nuclear power.
'The interconnection in Great Britain is a necessity at this point,' says Malhotra. 'We've seen that recently over the very tight days in winter. In those periods where there is very little wind, it is very useful for us.'
While the power can flow to either country, Britain is usually the recipient. The imports can prove vital to preventing blackouts or stress on the grid.
Edwards, of Cornwall Insights, says: 'The Norwegian and Danish interconnectors are the single largest sources of import power. 1.4GW on our peak demand is about 3pc. So on a tight day when our margin might only be 5pc or 10pc that can be quite a lot.'
While the imports are gratefully received in Britain, they are viewed very differently by many Norwegians. They call the growing impact of interconnectors on their bills 'pris-smitte' – price infection.
It is not only the British cable that Norwegians must contend with. As net zero gathers pace, countries are getting increasingly interlinked by a growing spider web of copper cables.
As Britain's link to Norway opened, the country also became more closely tied to the German market through a separate cable.
It was just as gas prices were starting to rise. Vladimir Putin was also preparing to invade Ukraine and before long Europe was in the throes of the worst energy crisis in a generation.
The interconnectors, which helped keep the lights on in the UK and Germany, became extremely controversial.
'The two electricity cables that were put into operation in 2021 increased export capacity by 47pc and tied the Norwegian electricity market closely to markets with high and volatile energy prices,' says Gro-Anita Mykjåland, a Centre Party MP and the party's spokesman on energy policy.
'Today, European energy prices clearly have a strong impact on Norwegian prices, particularly in the southern parts of the country. We see that prices in Norway surge significantly when there is, for example, little to no wind in Germany.'
Such frustrations helped pave the way for the coalition imploding last month.
Two interconnectors to Denmark are up for renewal next year. The country's minority Labour Party government has already said it is not inclined to expand the lifespan amid public outrage over prices. New connections are also out of the question.
'We have announced that we won't consider any new interconnectors in the next term of parliament. It's a wise decision with the quite polarised energy debate that we have seen in Europe as a whole and also in Norway,' says Elisabeth Sæther, state secretary in the energy department, the second most senior official in the organisation.
Many Norwegians will point to one day in particular as emblematic of all of these issues.
Electricity spot prices hit a 15-year high of 13.16 kr (£0.94) per kilowatt hour on Dec 12 last year, 27 times the average seen in 2019.
Businesses and households in Norway are typically on variable energy contracts, leaving them exposed to such sharp price fluctuations.
Monica Oliversen, the chief executive of Håland Kjøtt, a family-owned butcher business in the small town of Kleppe, near Stavanger, is still shaken by that day.
'You go to work and you just know you're losing money,' she says. 'I can't stop the production. You just have to keep on going.'
Grey, still weather in Germany was a key factor in the spike. A lack of wind power there led to a surge in electricity imports. Britain also imported electricity via the interconnector during peak hours that day.
This sparked anger and frustration in south Norway as prices surged. Terje Aasland, the Norwegian energy minister, had a blunt assessment at the time: 'It's an absolutely s--- situation.'
Businesses in the south of Norway that are reliant on energy for their production, like Håland, are especially exposed to such crises. This is despite being in the vicinity of many of the country's wind farms and largest hydropower stations.
'For us, it's been a struggle,' Oliversen says. 'We had to reduce 5,000 working hours. That is people who have been working here for like 20-30 years. You have to look them in the eye and say, 'Hey, we have to reduce your work time.''
While the government shields households from some of the price rises, businesses are not offered the same support.
Oliversen says her company's annual electricity bill surged from 300,000 kr (£21,342) one year to 1.3m kr the next. It has now finally fallen to 500,000kr.
'It's still unacceptable, because I don't know if I get a [monthly] bill of 20,000kr or 70,000kr,' Oliversen says. 'You cannot budget. And that's crazy because Norway has the electricity.
'It is very unfair. I feel betrayed ... or like somebody is taking me for a fool.'
The country is split into five areas, with energy prices far lower in the north where there are no large interconnectors and fewer people.
The south, by contrast, produces plenty of electricity but also sends large amounts to other countries.
Big energy-intensive businesses based in the south that sell across the whole country face a distinct disadvantage because their bills are so much higher.
The smallest businesses, meanwhile, find it difficult to survive. Olga Tønnessen ran a bakery from home for eight years but was ultimately forced out of business by high energy bills.
'I used to pay maybe 1500kr a month and suddenly it was like 4,000 or 5,000 when I was baking a lot,' she says.
'Unfortunately, I had to increase my prices and because people didn't want to pay I had to stop. It was really tough. It was my baby. I really, really loved it. And I think I was good at it.'
But she adds: 'I work 20 hours on a cake and make nothing. It's not worth it.'
Tales of wildly swinging energy bills will be familiar to business owners across Europe. But many Norwegians feel particularly affronted given the country produces far more electricity than it needs.
'It's difficult to understand why the prices have to be that high in Norway when there is no energy crisis in Norway,' says Hollund, from the Chamber of Commerce in Stavanger.
'The average Norwegian struggles to understand why, when we have enough water, do we have to pay three times more because they have a shortage in the UK or Germany?'
Access to cheap hydropower is considered a part of Norwegian identity, says Mímir Kristjánsson, the Red Party MP. The right to generate power from waterfalls, rivers and dams is enshrined as a right for local councils and the Government, with no intervention by foreigners.
Power from waterfalls, rivers and dams is enshrined as a resource that belongs to and must be managed in the best interests of the public thus preventing foreign ownership.
'This is something Norway is really proud of,' he says. 'You get taught that this is how Norway became a rich country. When the oil was discovered, we took the same approach with the state owning it rather than foreign companies. Hydropower is described as the family silver.'
Such strong feelings have made the debate over electricity prices even more explosive. Electricity prices have also risen just as interest rates soared, hitting mortgages in Norway instantly, and the value of the national currency plunged.
Kristjánsson says many people feel there has been a lack of honesty around the impact of the interconnectors.
'The electricity debate is the start of a million conspiracy theories. But there is this genuine feeling at the same time. People were told we would get interconnectors and it would have no impact on the price. Then suddenly they have a very high impact. I think this has damaged trust in politicians in Norway for many years to come.'
When the Norwegian government approved the interconnectors to Germany and the UK in 2014, Statnett, the Norwegian state power company, predicted it would only raise prices marginally by 3-4 øre per kilowatt hour – less than a penny.
Not everyone was convinced. Businessman Øystein Stray Spetalen at the time offered to bet 1bn kr against an energy boss who made a similar claim. It appears he has been vindicated.
'The fact that people have constantly been told these half-truths has created this really angry feeling among people,' Kristjánsson says.
Experts like Nygaard, the chief executive of Lyse, point out that the average prices are now back to 2019 levels when accounting for inflation.
'The big problem now is that even though you can explain this, people just don't accept it. They don't even believe it. People don't accept that in winter time you have these peak prices because they feel insecure. They feel no one is in control,' he says.
'It's more the discussion of what's acceptable for the public than the market. The market really did a good job all over Europe in these difficult years from 2022 to 2024. It handled the situation. People forget this is a physical market.'
For households and businesses struggling to come to terms with fluctuating energy bills, there is little respite ahead.
'I'm trying to be totally open about this. I don't think it will change this. This will be volatile, even more volatile than today,' Nygaard says.
'On very cold days with dunkelflaute [still, dark periods of weather], the prices are going to be extremely high because there is not enough capacity,' he says.
'To prevent blackouts we need to have high pricing to take out consumption. There is no alternative the way it is now.'
Many politicians argue otherwise. They say there is an alternative, with suggestions ranging from large subsidies, renegotiating interconnectors and ceasing all cooperation over energy with the EU. This could effectively take Norway out of the European Economic Area.
Gro-Anita Mykjåland, from the Centre Party, which ended the coalition, warns that without action 'rising energy prices may jeopardise Norwegian industry, especially the competitiveness of the strategically important energy-intensive heavy industry.'
It's only 'prudent' to seek to limit the impact of interconnectors on Norway's market, she says.
'The key is to ensure political control so the cables are mutually beneficial. We can achieve this by renegotiating the agreements that govern power exchange through this cable,' Mykjåland says.
The governing Labour Party has meanwhile surged in the polls after promising a fixed 'Norges pris' for households from October, meaning that regardless of spot prices they'll have the option to always pay the same.
The proposal will cost a cool £818m a year for a country of 5.5m people, analysts estimate, and will undermine incentives to use less power.
Sæther, from the energy ministry, says her party has no intention to turn off the connections to the UK and other countries. 'It's not on the table for us to challenge those agreements,' she says.
'We had interconnectors in Norway from the 1960s. We have a high interconnectivity and that also benefits Norway.
'But of course the political debate is challenging. It's a complex system and easy solutions dominate. My concern is that we will make bad decisions if we don't calm down the debate.'
Looming elections in September are raising the pressure. The Progress Party, which is polling neck-and-neck with Labour, declared as far back as 2021 that 'Norway should not be Europe's battery'.
Tina Bru, a Conservative MP for the region where Britain's interconnector makes land, says the cables have been 'fiscally very good for Norway'.
But she warns: 'If we're not good enough at explaining why we are well served with the system, my fear is it will drive us to eventually make decisions that we are not well served with in the future.'
In Kleppe, Monica Oliversen just wants lower and more stable prices for her family butchers.
'We have to be helpful to other countries,' she says. 'But there has to be compensation for us when the prices are high.'
Kathryn Porter, at Watt-Logic, says the debate playing out in Norway is a sign of what's to come across Europe. The country is 'the [canary in the] coal mine on all of this,' she says.
'While Norway is explicitly saying what it's doing, other people are secretly thinking about it. You can expect that other countries will behave in a similar way, just maybe less openly.'
For now, Britain can rely on its Norwegian neighbours to help keep the lights on in the depths of winter. But as tensions rise across the North Sea, ministers would do well to consider what they would do if the cable was cut.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who Is Pete DeJoy? Astronomer's Interim CEO After Andy Byron Resigned
Who Is Pete DeJoy? Astronomer's Interim CEO After Andy Byron Resigned

Newsweek

time9 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Who Is Pete DeJoy? Astronomer's Interim CEO After Andy Byron Resigned

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Saturday Astronomer CEO Andy Byron announced his resignation from the company after he was filmed embracing a female colleague, then attempting to hide, on a kiss cam at a Coldplay concert in Boston, Massachusetts, on Wednesday. Prior to Byron's resignation he had been placed on leave with Pete DeJoy, Astronomer's co-founder and chief product officer, appointed as interim CEO. Newsweek contacted DeJoy for comment via LinkedIn direct message. The Context On Wednesday Bryron, who is married, was pictured in an embrace with Kristin Cabot, Astronomer's head of human resources, at the concert. Footage of the pair attempting to hide after noticing they were on the kiss cam went viral on social media with Coldplay frontman Chris Martin commenting: "Either they're having an affair, or they're just very shy." Following the incident Bryon's wife, Megan Kerrigan Byron, changed her last name on Facebook before deactivating her account. What To Know On Saturday Astronomer announced that "Cofounder and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy is currently serving as interim CEO" adding "we will share more details as appropriate in the coming days." According to his LinkedIn profile DeJoy has a bachelor's degree in chemistry and physics from Bowdoin College in Maine. Pete DeJoy has been announced as the new interim CEO of Astronomer following his former boss's kiss cam scandal. Pete DeJoy has been announced as the new interim CEO of Astronomer following his former boss's kiss cam scandal. Pete DeJoy/LinkedIn He co-founded data company Astronomer in 2017 becoming its vice-president for product in January 2023, then its chief product officer in February 2025. British newspaper The Sun reported DeJoy was "instrumental in expanding Astronomer's data orchestration platform" during his eight years with the company. On LinkedIn DeJoy said he "did whatever it took to bring the first incarnations of our commercial offerings to market and build our business." What People Are Saying In a statement provided to Newsweek on Saturday a Astronomer spokesperson said: "Astronomer is committed to the values and culture that have guided us since our founding. Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met." Earlier the company said: "Astronomer is committed to the values and culture that have guided us since our founding. Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability. "The Board of Directors has initiated a formal investigation into this matter, and we will have additional details to share very shortly... Andy Byron has not put out any statement; reports saying otherwise are all incorrect." Ry Walker, CEO of AI company Tembo, said on X: "Great choice by @astronomerio in naming @petedejoy as interim CEO. He is an amazing co-founder and friend." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether DeJoy will replace Byron as Astronomer's permanent CEO or if the company will select someone else.

President Trump sues Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties
President Trump sues Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties

Chicago Tribune

time12 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

President Trump sues Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch Friday, a day after the newspaper published a story reporting on his ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein. The move came shortly after the Justice Department asked a federal court on Friday to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's sex trafficking case, as the administration seeks to contain the firestorm that erupted after it announced that it would not be releasing additional files from the case, despite previously pledging to do so. The controversy has created a major fissure between Trump and his loyal base, with some of his most vocal supporters slamming the White House for the way it has handled the case, and questioning why Trump would not want the documents made public. Trump had promised to sue the Wall Street Journal almost immediately after the paper put a new spotlight on his well-documented relationship with Epstein by publishing an article that described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album compiled for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump denied writing the letter, calling the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' The suit, filed in filed in federal court in Miami, accuses the paper and its reporters of having 'knowingly and recklessly' published 'numerous false, defamatory, and disparaging statements,' which, it alleges, caused 'overwhelming financial and reputational harm' to the president. In a post on his Truth Social site, Trump cast the lawsuit as part of his efforts to punish news outlets, including ABC and CBS, which both reached multimillion-dollar settlement deals with the president after he took them to court. 'This lawsuit is filed not only on behalf of your favorite President, ME, but also in order to continue standing up for ALL Americans who will no longer tolerate the abusive wrongdoings of the Fake News Media,' he wrote. A spokesperson for Dow Jones, the Journal's publisher, responded Friday night, 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.' The letter revealed by The Wall Street Journal was reportedly collected by disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before the wealthy financier was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Trump. The letter bearing Trump's name includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the newspaper. Trump denied writing the letter and promised to sue. He said he spoke to both to the paper's owner, Rupert Murdoch, and its top editor, Emma Tucker, before the story was published and told them the letter was 'fake.' 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures,' the president insisted. The outlet described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it entirely or provide details on how it came to learn about it. In the lawsuit, Trump takes issue with that fact. The defendants, it attests, 'failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained.' 'The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists,' it goes on to charge, alleging that the 'Defendants concocted this story to malign President Trump's character and integrity and deceptively portray him in a false light.' Earlier Friday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche filed motions in a separate federal court urging them to unseal the Epstein transcripts as well as those in the case against Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Epstein killed himself in 2019 shortly after his arrest while awaiting trial. The Justice Department's announcement that it would not be making public any more Epstein files enraged parts of Trump's base in part because members of his own administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier. The Justice Department said in the court filings that it will work with with prosecutors in New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personally identifying information before transcripts are released. 'Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims,' Blanche wrote. But despite the new push to release the grand jury transcripts, the administration has not announced plans to reverse course and release other evidence in its possession. Attorney General Pam Bondi had hyped the release of more materials after the first Epstein files disclosure in February sparked outrage because it contained no new revelations. A judge would have to approve the release of the grand jury transcripts, and it's likely to be a lengthy process to decide what can become public and to make redactions to protect sensitive witness and victim information. The records would show testimony of witnesses and other evidence that was presented by prosecutions during the secret grand jury proceedings, when a panel decides whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge.

Lynch: Normalizing the abnormal is happening on both sides of the gate at the Open
Lynch: Normalizing the abnormal is happening on both sides of the gate at the Open

USA Today

time12 hours ago

  • USA Today

Lynch: Normalizing the abnormal is happening on both sides of the gate at the Open

PORTRUSH, Northern Ireland — The concept of 'normalization' wasn't invented in Northern Ireland but it was perfected here. From the 1970s, the British government worked tirelessly to present the image of an otherwise ordinary society being wrecked by mindless terrorists, conveniently positioning itself as a defender of norms instead of an active belligerent in a conflict that killed 3,500 people. Almost three decades after the Good Friday accord largely ended the violence, normalizing the abnormal continues, inside and outside the gate of Royal Portrush, where the 153rd Open is taking place. The R&A altered third-round tee times and logistics because the town of Portrush is hosting a band parade by pro-British Protestant loyalists that will begin as spectators are leaving the course Saturday evening. The Open was announced four years ago, so the parade's scheduling isn't accidental. Nor was there a debate about which one would give way when a major sports event with a global audience clashed with a parochial, coat-trailing parade. After all, this is a place where the government census asked those who identified as atheist to declare their family's historic religious affiliation, literally demanding to know if one is a Protestant or Catholic atheist. Loyalist parades are a staple of Northern Irish summers. The intent is to claim ownership of the street. Most are organized by the Orange Order, a fraternal group founded to maintain Protestant supremacy. They're frequently controversial and have often sparked violence when the Order insisted on marching through predominantly Catholic neighborhoods. Enormous bonfires are another feature of the festivities, and last week two drew widespread condemnation. One was built close to an electricity substation that powers Belfast's two main hospitals, another was topped with an effigy of migrants in a raft — a brazen example of the far-right racism that underpins much of loyalist sentiment. Organizers rejected calls to remove either and the government sat idle. Naked bigotry normalized as an expression of culture. The R&A's chief executive, Mark Darbon, was diplomatic when asked about the need to accommodate a loyalist parade during the Open: 'We are a guest in the community in which we operate,' he said, revealing that the R&A contributed to the cost of trying to ensure both events happen seamlessly. 'Security and the safety of your guests and the experience of your guests is always a prime consideration. This is no different,' he added. Lynch: With Open returning to Royal Portrush, tales of redemption sweep aside reality The parade organizers, the Portrush Sons of Ulster, informed followers on social media that 'we don't have as much control of the town as we usually would … We hope everyone understands what we're up against.' Uninitiated visitors in town for the Open — and some unaligned locals — will view the parade as a source of entertainment or amusement, jaunty flute music performed by ruddy-faced men gussied up in sashes and costumes, the entire spectacle suggesting a prank pageant for guys who'd struggle to get a dog to bark at them on dating apps. The Open largely exists outside of this binary guff that defines so much of life in Northern Ireland. It's unifying, a cause for celebration among people who for too long had more cause to commiserate. But even the Open is becoming a platform for normalizing the deplorable. The R&A deals with the Sons of Ulster by necessity. It deals with the Saudis by choice. LIV Golf has a hospitality location directly across the street from the Royal Portrush clubhouse, but then the R&A's writ doesn't extend beyond the perimeter of the course. It does, however, have control over what happens inside. Qiddiah, the entertainment mega project under construction in Saudi Arabia, has a hospitality presence on site and one of its representatives will be playing Royal Portrush on Monday as a guest of the R&A. Qiddiah is bankrolled by the Public Investment Fund and overseen by Yasir Al-Rumayyan, LIV's founding benefactor. Graeme McDowell, a popular native of Portrush, is working here as a commentator on the world feed for Sky Sports while wearing his LIV team apparel and regularly name-checking his employer. He was hired by IMG, which has deep business ties to the R&A. Coincidences? Possibly. Or perhaps the R&A is eager to position itself as more ally than antagonist to the Saudis. The process of normalizing the Kingdom's ambitions in golf began two years ago during the Open at Royal Liverpool, when Darbon's predecessor, Martin Slumbers, lamented the cash arms race in one breath while in the next attempting to cut to the head of the line for handouts. 'We have a number of large corporate partners that help us make this thing happen,' he said when asked if the R&A would accept a Saudi partnership in some form. 'The world of sport has changed dramatically in the last 12 months, and it is not feasible for the R&A or golf to just ignore what is a societal change on a global basis. We will be considering within all the parameters that we look at all the options that we have.' As of now, there exists no formal commercial relationship between the R&A and the Saudis, but if we're debating which parties on the board of the Official World Golf Ranking are compromised when it comes to deciding on LIV's application for recognition, there's circumstantial reason for concern about the R&A as much as the PGA Tour. The R&A is trying to be subtle, but that seldom works with the Saudis, and never in Northern Ireland.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store