
Porter County residents protest Union Township data center proposal of nearly 800 acres
Planned unit development (PUD) applications were submitted to the county on Feb. 28 and were not part of Tuesday's board agenda; the Post-Tribune acquired the applications through an Access to Public Records Act request.
Those voicing opposition did so predominantly on environmental grounds, particularly concerns over noise and water pollution, the safety of school children separated from the southerly proposed site by a railroad track, and the desire to make a decision sooner rather than later.
Nearly two dozen people spoke against the application, starting with John Hunter, superintendent of Union Township School Corporation. He cited not only environmental concerns, such as pollution and noise, but said tax increment financing districts, or TIFs, would have negative impacts on the school district if approved.
He said property values would also be affected. 'Residentially, we're going to lose about 10 square miles,' Hunter said. 'Why would we put an industrial area immediately adjacent to a school?'
Residents in Chesterton, Burns Harbor, and most recently, Valparaiso, have opposed data center proposals on similar grounds.
The areas in question are currently zoned rural residential, and the board of commissioners would need to pass ordinances to amend the county's unified development ordinance approving a PUD. The applications were submitted by AXPK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the property owners who would transfer ownership upon adoption of the ordinances. The proposed projects are being called Jeremiah A and Jeremiah B.
Jeremiah A is proposed for a 351.85-acre parcel at the northeast corner of County Road W 450 North and County Road N 750 West owned by John Loxas of Hammond. It is the more northerly of the two non-contiguous parcels and south of the landfill, and proposes an 80% impervious surface area.
Jeremiah B is proposed for 434.46 acres owned by Johnson Sunnybrook Farm, LLC, and Ceres Cedar Creek Farm, LLC, of Hobart, at the southeast corner of W 450 North and N 650 West, due north of Union Township Middle and High schools.
Architectural elevation plans show the buildings would be constructed of pre-cast concrete and pre-finished metal and aluminum composite panels, among other materials, and stand up to 120 feet tall, not including an additional maximum parapet height of 20 feet. Porter County Director of Development and Stormwater Management Mike Jabo said, 'The UDO's criteria is limiting to something less than that,' and said a building that tall would have to receive a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals.
He couldn't speak to whether a 120-foot-tall building could cast a shadow onto adjacent property with an 80-foot setback. Proposed setbacks for the developments abutting residential areas would be 80 feet to the side and rear, and 100 feet in the front. Proposed setbacks from the nearby cemetery would be 100 feet on all sides. Setbacks from the property line to primary buildings proposed for all other settings are 50 feet on the side and rear and 80 feet in the front.
Jabo said the height limitation is an example of the considerable scrutiny and back-and-forth the applicant will receive for its proposals. 'What they have proposed is nowhere near what we're going to see when they get to the plan commission,' he said.
The Summary of Intent submitted by AXPK for Jeremiah B reads, 'The property is appropriate in large part based on its location which will have minimal impact on the community as a whole, and also due to its location in close proximity to existing utility services.'
Every person who spoke against it disagreed that the impacts would be minimal. 'The proximity to three schools without land use studies is unacceptable,' said Angel Forystek, a Wheeler resident and mother of school-age children.
Sandy Hill, who lives on County Road 650, said she has a friend in South Dakota who lives near a data center. 'He says it's 24/7 noise,' she said of the noise it puts off. 'He said you can turn the TV up as loud as you want and you can still hear it.'
Under the category of noise standards, the application for Jeremiah A reads, 'Normal operation shall be mitigated through screening or muffling devices, such that the decibel level perceived at adjacent noise-sensitive land use is at or below 75 dB.' That's considered loud and equivalent to the noise level of a busy restaurant or loud radio.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says eight hours of exposure to 85 dB can damage hearing. The proposed ordinance for Jeremiah B exempts the noise maximum for 'construction, general maintenance/future construction and/or equipment or machinery used in emergency scenarios.'
The tone eventually got heated between some in the audience and Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs, R-North. 'We did not ask for a data center to come knocking at our door,' he said. He told the crowd that while the board was there to serve them, it would not do to circumvent the application and due diligence process.
Multiple speakers thanked Commissioner Barb Regnitz, R-Center, for making it known that she planned to vote against any proposed data centers, which she confirmed after the meeting.
Jabo is in the process of setting up an informational meeting at the Porter County Expo Center to be run by the plan commission. AXPK would get to introduce its proposals and the public would get to ask questions. He expects the meeting to be in late April or early May.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Coal Isn't Dead Yet: Global Trends Defy Climate Pledges
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 08: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks alongside coal and energy ... More workers during an executive order signing ceremony in the East Room of the White House on April 08, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has elected to roll back Biden-era environmental policies with the intention to help revive coal-fired power plants. (Photo by) Despite years of climate summits and net-zero targets, global coal consumption and production both hit record highs in 2024. According to the newly released 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy, global coal demand reached an all-time high of 165.1 exajoules (EJ), a powerful reminder of how deeply the world still relies on this carbon-intensive fuel. The Asia-Pacific Powerhouse At the heart of coal's resilience is Asia. China alone accounted for a staggering 56% of global coal consumption last year, burning through 92.2 EJ. That's an increase of nearly 17% since 2017, despite repeated predictions that China had already passed 'peak coal.' The reality is that coal remains the backbone of China's electricity system, industrial activity, and energy security strategy. India, too, has doubled down on coal. Consumption there climbed to 21.8 EJ, up nearly 45% from a decade earlier. A combination of rising electricity demand, a lack of natural gas infrastructure, and favorable government policies continues to drive growth. The broader Asia-Pacific region tells a similar story. Nations like Indonesia, Vietnam, and Bangladesh are rapidly expanding coal use as they build out electricity grids and industrial capacity. For these countries, coal remains cheap, reliable, and—in many cases—domestically abundant. While wealthier nations are pushing renewables, many developing economies simply can't afford the transition at the same pace. Decline Elsewhere—But Not Enough Coal use continues to fall across much of the OECD. Europe, for example, saw consumption drop to 10 EJ in 2024, continuing a steady downward trend even amid energy security concerns following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. There were some short-lived spikes in places like Germany and Poland, but the overall direction remains lower. Coal Consumption 1965-2024. In the U.S., coal use came in at 9.9 EJ—well below historical highs but showing a small post-COVID rebound. America's power sector has largely shifted to natural gas and renewables, and the long-term trajectory remains downward. Yet these declines aren't enough to offset growth in the developing world. Non-OECD countries now account for about 71% of global coal consumption, up from 63% just a decade ago. The energy divide is widening, and it has significant implications for both climate policy and resource security. Production Keeps Pace—For Now Coal production also surged in 2024, hitting a new global record of 182 EJ. China again leads the way, producing more than half the world's coal—94 EJ in total. India continued its rapid expansion, more than doubling its output since 2006. Indonesia, too, has nearly quadrupled production over that period, largely to meet export demand from Asia. In contrast, the U.S. and Russia hold massive coal reserves but have adopted more cautious production strategies. The U.S. produced 23 EJ in 2024, about 12% of the global total. Russia has plateaued around 9.2 EJ, in part due to sanctions and shifting market dynamics. Non-OECD countries now supply over 60% of global coal output, up from 45% in 2006. This underscores a broader trend: the coal economy is increasingly centered in the Global South, where energy demand is still growing rapidly and alternative infrastructure is limited. A Word on Reserves An important context is that the world still has plenty of coal. The U.S. has the largest proven reserves, with a reserves-to-production (R/P) ratio exceeding 500 years. Russia, Australia, and India also boast deep reserves, although China's are being depleted far more quickly—its R/P ratio is just 37 years. Still, not all reserves are created equally. Countries like Germany and Poland have large deposits of lignite, which is less energy-dense and more polluting than higher-grade coals. Meanwhile, nations like Indonesia and Australia hold coal that is more export-friendly, giving them an edge in global markets. The Infrastructure Trap Part of what keeps coal in play is infrastructure inertia. Across Asia, decades of investment in coal plants, rail networks, and ports have created a system that's hard to unwind. Coal provides steady baseload power in a way that intermittent renewables currently can't—especially in places where battery storage and LNG terminals are lacking. Governments are responding to surging demand with a mix of pragmatism and contradiction. China and India are investing heavily in renewables, but they're also approving new coal projects to avoid blackouts. Subsidies and favorable mining policies persist, even as leaders make high-profile climate pledges. Final Thoughts Global coal use isn't going away any time soon. To the contrary, global coal consumption still growing. The world's wealthiest nations are moving away from it, but the momentum in Asia and the Global South is more than enough to offset those declines. For better or worse, coal remains a pillar of global energy—driven by affordability, energy security, and infrastructure lock-in. The challenge for policymakers is to reconcile this reality with climate goals. Until the world finds scalable, affordable alternatives for baseload power in emerging economies, coal will continue to thrive. And that makes bridging the gap between ambition and reality more important—and more difficult—than ever.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Son Heung-min set for Tottenham showdown talks after receiving £15m LAFC offer as South Korean heads into final year of Spurs contract
LAFC make £15m bid for Son Tottenham delay decision until post-Asia tour Captain's presence vital for Spurs' commercial obligations Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱 WHAT HAPPENED? Tottenham received a £15m offer from LAFC for Son earlier this week, and the Lilywhites are seriously weighing up a potential sale this summer, as per transfer guru Fabrizio Romano. However, earlier reports have suggested that they are not expected to sanction any move until after their Asia tour, where Son is seen as a central figure. The South Korean still has a year left on his deal, and Spurs are open to further discussions. THE BIGGER PICTURE Despite a rather horrific Premier League season in which they finished 17th, Son captained Tottenham to a historic Europa League title in 2024-25. The 33-year-old has been a consistent performer over the years, even winning the Golden Boot in 2022. The South Korea international still has a year left on his deal, and Spurs are open to further discussions. An exit would mark the end of a decade-long era in north London. DID YOU KNOW? Son remains one of Tottenham's most popular and marketable players, particularly in Asia, making him crucial to their pre-season plans. Reports suggest Spurs could lose up to 75 per cent of their tour revenue if he doesn't feature, which is the reason the Lilywhites will only decide on his future after the tour. With Thomas Frank open to either outcome, the club must now balance football and commercial interests before making a decision. WHAT NEXT FOR SON? Son is expected to travel and feature in the upcoming pre-season matches in South Korea and Hong Kong. Formal talks about his future will likely resume after the tour concludes. The Black and Gold are keen, but any deal hinges on Son agreeing to a move to the United States and to LAFC, in particular.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iconic Aussie retailer's legal stoush
An Australian youth fashion icon has been hit with legal action over unpaid debts allegedly owed to its retail distributor. General Pants Co. has been served with a winding-up application due to allegedly owing suppliers nearly $70,000. In filings to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, UCC Australia launched a winding-up order against the retailer earlier this month. UCC is an importer, distributor and wholesaler of FMCG, supplying electricals and food to some of Australia's major retailers, including Myer, Big W, Kmart, Woolworths and Amazon. According to the filings, General Pants owes just less than $70,000 for the supply of cameras and film between October and December last year. A winding-up notice is issued by a creditor to a company to get them to pay a debt, forcing them to pay back the money they owe or face being placed into liquidation by the court. The hearing is listed for August 20 in Victoria's Supreme Court. General Pants is the latest business under Alquemie Group to face legal action. SurfStitch faced similar action from Nike Australia in June over an alleged $237.760 debt. General Pants has been a staple in Australian fashion for more than 50 years and has more than 50 stores across Australia and New Zealand. It is just the latest in a long line of retail chains that have struggled in the post-Covid period. Retail giant Mosaic Brands, the owner of brands Millers, Rivers, Crossroads, Katies, Noni B and Autograph, entered voluntary administration in October last year, owing creditors about $318m.