Teacher loses RM23,000 to phone scam
Arau district police chief Supt Ahmad Mohsin Md Rodi said the 26-year-old teacher received a phone call from an individual introducing himself as a Touch 'n Go officer at 12.21pm while she was at school, informing her that her Touch 'n Go had been used to steal money from someone else's account.
"Then, the call was supposedly connected to the authorities (namely) from the Penang police contingent headquarters (IPK), who claimed that the teacher was involved in money laundering and drug smuggling crimes.
"The teacher was asked to transfer money to a bank account given by the suspect totalling RM23,000 in a single transaction to avoid having her bank account frozen. The teacher made the money transfer transaction on the same day," he said in a statement on Tuesday (June 3).
Supt Ahmad Mohsin said the teacher only realised she had been scammed after checking the information again and lodged a police report the next day on May 30.
"This case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code and further investigations are being conducted by the Commercial Crime Investigation Division of Perlis IPK.
"We would like to remind the public not to easily panic if they receive a call claiming they are involved in a crime," he said. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Cosmetics marketing assistant charged with sexual abuse of stepdaughters
ALOR GAJAH: A cosmetics marketing assistant was charged in the Sessions Court here today with committing physical and non-physical sexual abuse against his two stepdaughters, aged five and six, since May. The accused, a 27-year-old divorcee, pleaded not guilty to all charges and claimed trial before judge Aiza Khairuddin. For the first and second charges, he was accused of physically abusing the two girls in a bedroom and bathroom of a house here at night between May 11 and July 5. He was charged under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act (SOACA) 2017, which provides for a maximum 20-year jail term and whipping upon conviction. The accused also faces another charge under Section 15(a)(i) of the same Act for non-physical abuse by exposing his genitals to the two victims in the kitchen of the same house on the same dates. If found guilty, this section carries a maximum jail term of 10 years or a fine of up to RM20,000, or both. Deputy public prosecutor Muhamad Ali Hussain appeared for the prosecution, while the accused was represented by Mohd Anif Rafih. The prosecution proposed bail at RM20,000 for all charges with one surety, along with conditions that the accused must report to the nearest police station once a month during the first week and refrain from contacting prosecution witnesses, including the victims. However, Mohd Anif requested that bail be set at RM12,000, citing his client's low income of RM2,000 a month as an online marketing assistant for cosmetic products. "The accused is also financially supporting both victims and his biological child, aged two, who is currently under the care of his mother in Pendang, Kedah. "My client has no objection to the additional bail conditions and promises not to disturb the victims," he said. The court then set bail at RM15,000 with one surety and imposed the additional conditions sought by the prosecution. Mention has been fixed for Aug 25.
New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Op Curi Air: Illegal water connection uncovered at Mantin farm
NILAI: The National Water Services Commission (SPAN) enforcement division raided a vegetable farm in Mantin late Tuesday night for allegedly stealing treated water. In a statement today, SPAN said the farm had made an illegal pipe connection to draw water for use on the premises and in its workers' quarters. "SPAN, together with Syarikat Air Negeri Sembilan Sdn Bhd (Sains), carried out Op Curi Air at a farm suspected of illegally tapping into the water supply network. "Checks revealed an unauthorised connection made without the operator's permission. "The illegal tapping was done directly from a pipe connected to a Sains meter," the statement read. Chlorine tests confirmed that the water was treated and supplied by the operator for use in farm operations and the workers' quarters. The case is being investigated under Section 89(9) of the Water Services Industry Act 2006 (Act 655), which carries a maximum fine of RM50,000, imprisonment of up to six months, or both, upon conviction. SPAN warned that unauthorised tapping of treated water is a serious offence and would result in legal action. "Further action, including cutting off the connection and a full investigation, will follow. "The public is urged to notify their local water operator if they detect any suspicious activity involving illegal water connections or the theft of treated water. "Reports or information on water pollution can be submitted via (SPAN's sisMAS system)," it added.
Rakyat Post
27 minutes ago
- Rakyat Post
RM580K Property, RM1,500 Left To Live: The Malaysian Homeownership Reality Check
Subscribe to our FREE A viral social media post about a Malaysian worker earning RM5,500 monthly purchasing a RM580,000 property has ignited fierce discussions about financial literacy and homeownership affordability across local online communities. The controversy began when a concerned individual shared his friend's story via the Facebook page 'Boom Go Employee,' detailing his friend's recent property purchase—a 900-square-foot, 3-bedroom apartment in Malaysia. What caught everyone's attention wasn't just the purchase itself, but the stark financial reality behind it. According to the post, here's how the friend's monthly finances break down: Net income: RM5,500 Car loan: RM700 PTPTN (education loan): RM180 New property monthly payment: RM2,600 The real estate agent calculated the Debt Service Ratio (DSR) at 63.27% and declared it 'qualified' for bank approval. The friend enthusiastically agreed to proceed with the purchase. Why RM2,600 Monthly Payment Becomes RM3,000+ But the original poster wasn't convinced. He broke down the hidden costs that many first-time buyers overlook: Maintenance fees: RM297/month Sinking fund: RM29.70/month Utilities: RM150-200/month Internet: RM100/month Annual property tax: Several hundred ringgit After accounting for all expenses, the friend would have approximately RM1,500 left monthly for food, daily expenses, social activities, and savings. The poster wondered how his friend would manage financially, especially considering the costs of renovation and unexpected expenses. He said the agent mentioned he could withdraw from his EPF Account 2 for renovation. So basically, he has no savings for renovation except for the RM20,000 he's saved up. The poster, who owns an 847-square-foot property himself, shared his own maintenance fee bill, showing charges exceeding RM3,000 for accumulated fees and late payment interest, highlighting the often-overlooked ongoing costs of property ownership. Public Reaction: Divided Opinions The post has generated polarising responses from netizens: Team 'Too Risky': 'Salary RM5.5K buying RM580K property – I'm speechless' '35 years is a long time; many things can happen to your career' 'Don't bite off more than you can chew' Team 'It's Doable': 'No problem with utilities and rent – you'd have to pay those anyway unless you never buy property' 'Better to buy at RM2,500 monthly and rent out 2 rooms for RM1,300 each – at least the property is yours' 'His parents might help cover costs if needed' Beyond Individual Choice: The Market Forces at Play The case highlights several critical issues in Malaysia's property market: Aggressive Sales Tactics : Real estate agents focusing solely on DSR approval without considering total living costs Financial Literacy Gap : Young buyers not fully understanding the true cost of homeownership Social Pressure : The cultural push toward property ownership regardless of financial readiness Hidden Costs : Maintenance fees, sinking funds, and other expenses that can add hundreds of ringgit monthly The poster's analysis reveals that the friend's actual monthly property-related expenses could reach RM3,176 – significantly higher than the RM2,600 mortgage payment alone. This doesn't include renovation costs, which could easily exceed the friend's RM20,000 savings for basic kitchen cabinets and wardrobes. 'The agent isn't wrong – they're just doing their job,' the poster concluded. The DSR calculation passes, and the bank approved it. But if you face financial problems later, don't blame others – blame yourself for not calculating properly. The Waiting Game: A Cautionary Tale for Malaysian Homebuyers While homeownership remains a significant milestone for many Malaysians, this case serves as a stark reminder that qualifying for a loan and being able to afford a property comfortably are two very different things. As property prices continue rising faster than salaries, the debate over what constitutes responsible borrowing versus financial overreach shows no signs of cooling down. The friend's property is expected to be ready next year. Whether his optimism about salary increases and financial management proves justified remains to be seen – but his story has already become a cautionary tale echoing across Malaysian social media. READ MOR E: READ MORE : READ MORE : Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
