Oxford United: When a potential new stadium was national news
Back in 1981, Oxford was still awaiting its first "superstore". Several firms were hoping to build it in Marston but the rub was that if there was no superstore built, there would be no new Oxford United stadium either. "Oxford's more than a university town. It's a major manufacturing base, with British Leyland at Cowley and a regional centre, surrounded by small towns and villages," presenter David Freeman said. "Marston used to be such a village and it's at the centre of [the] argument."
Marston resident Lynne Isaac, who told the audience she was a mother of five children and grandmother of nine, said the development would be "at the bottom of her garden"."We've watched this development for nine years. We have seen everybody over there working. We have watched it, we've put up with it for nine years," she said.
Ian Greaves, who by May 1981 had managed Oxford United's first team for four months, sat next to the club's chairman Bill Reeves and coach Ray Graydon on the show. Greaves and Graydon had helped lead the U's to a 14th-placed finish in the then Third Division four days before the programme aired."The overall idea of the stadium has got to be excellent," said Greaves, who left Oxford in 1982. "Wherever the stadium is, whether it's Marston or wherever, it's got to be excellent. We are just about 100 years behind others in this respect [of community]."Remember a soccer club is only used once a fortnight. That's why the club's losing money - because there's only people going into the soccer club once a fortnight."The thing should be used every day. With the idea that is being mooted at the moment, this stadium will be used every day. Not just by the soccer club but by the local community."
Andrew Smith was then the chairman of Oxford City Council's recreation committee. Mr Smith said the stadium would be a "plus when local authorities, because of the attacks on our ability to spend money by the current Conservative government, haven't got the money to put into these sorts of facilities ourselves".While he said residents had "legitimate concerns", the potential benefits for the football club and community outweighed the disadvantages. He was elected Oxford East's MP in 1987 and retired in 2017.
James Simmonds, who lived in Marston, said that "faceless people in Jersey" stood to benefit from the scheme, which he said would lead to the "despoiling of our local village"."God created grass, trees, birds, tranquillity in Marston. We still require that tranquillity and it should not be despoiled just to make profits for faceless people. And that's what it's all about," he said.
One guest, Carol, who lived in the Blackbird Leys area of the city, was aggrieved at the lack of facilities available there. "The Marston people don't want this stadium," she said. "They have got their beautiful views and their lovely birds singing in the trees. They want to live in Blackbird Leys with 4,500 kids and see what views those have kids got."Little could she have known that eventually the football club - and a leisure park, which itself could be built upon soon - would be based a stone's throw away at the site formerly known as Minchery Farm, between Blackbird Leys and Littlemore. Marston did get eventually a football stadium and sports complex at Court Place Farm in 1993, which is used by Oxford City, but the scale of it is much smaller than the one planned in the early 1980s.
About 3,700 people, groups or businesses have commented on the current planning application for the potential Oxford United stadium at the Triangle near Kidlington. A decision on that is expected in the summer.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Stop your nonsense! Dithering BBC told to agree deal to televise Glasgow 2026 or else it will have damaging ramifications for the Commonwealth Games and beyond
The BBC have been warned to 'stop their nonsense' - and secure a deal to televise the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. Every Games since 1954 has been screened for UK viewers by the national broadcaster, but the corporation's role in next year's event is in doubt following news that a deal has not yet been struck. Mail Sport understands that, although talks are ongoing with different parties, the BBC are reluctant to proceed despite their long history with the Games. Former Scottish track star Brian Whittle, now a Conservative MSP, says if the BBC don't show the Games it will be 'another nail in the coffin' for sport in Scotland - and he is urging the UK Government to step in should the broadcaster not agree terms. 'They absolutely should be showing the Games,' he said. 'If I was to hazard a guess, I'd say this was the curse of the 'dancing around the handbags to do a deal'. 'The driving force behind this is probably the logistics and the money side of things and the amount of money it costs to host one of these things.' Whittle fears the future of the Games will be in jeopardy if the BBC are not involved. 'As we currently stand, the reason the Games are in Scotland is because the Games are struggling, and were struggling to become financially viable in Australia. So it's really important, even if it is a reduced (event), that this is successful and is seen by as many people and validated by as many organisatons as possible. 'If the host nation's broadcaster decided it wasn't big enough, how on earth can (other) countries be persuaded to host the Games? 'It's crucial that the BBC stop this nonsense.' Whittle competed in three Games during his athletics' career, winning silver in the 4x400m in 1990. He said it was 'massively important' as an athlete for the Games to be shown on television, and to obtain exposure to a much bigger audience. 'The 1986 Commonwealth Games (in Edinburgh) was my first major outdoor Games,' he said. 'It brought me to the homes of people across the country, and then two weeks later I won the European championship. 'As a home nation, you get to wear the Scotland vest, and it's a stepping stone to a much bigger arena. 'I was a fledgling UK athlete at the time, but it was about being able to compete alongside contemporaries and be seen. The Commonwealth Games is unbelievably important to our home athletes.' Asked if he felt there should be cross-party support for the BBC to remain the host broadcaster, Whittle said: 'Yes, definitely'. 'I think there would be cross-party support for this and, if there's political pressure to be put on the BBC, it should be done. 'I will be doing exactly that and speaking to the BBC and asking what they're playing at. 'I know outside broadcasters have already been subcontracted, so I just don't believe it. I do think it's a dancing around the handbags thing. 'It's vital that they keep the association with the Games. More and more key sports are not hosted on the BBC any more. It's really important, especially in a home Games, that the BBC are the host broadcaster. 'The ramifications - if it didn't happen - would be a massive blow to sport in this country, because these major Games are a shop window for physical activity and sport. If a big swathe of the population doesn't have access to that, the inevitability is that less people will see world class sport at that level, less kids will be enthused by that. 'My worry is that there is this continual decline in participation, in physical education, fitness, health, in sport, and that would just be another nail in the coffin.' The Department for Media, Sport and Culture told Mail Sport that the BBC's failure to commit so far is a matter for 'Commonwealth Sport and Glasgow 2026'. But a spokesperson added: 'The Commonwealth Games is an amazing sporting event, and the Government is keen that Glasgow 2026 provides another great opportunity to inspire millions by bringing elite sport into our living rooms.' Glasgow stepped in to save the day with a 'revamped' Games after Australia pulled out of the event in 2023, due to a significant rise in costs. The Games' future was immediately put in doubt, but a decision was agreed for Glasgow to host the competition on a scaled-down basis, with financial help from Commonwealth Games Australian, and the Commonwealth Games Federation. Organisers have made clear that no public money will be used to host the Games in Scotland, although the UK government will provide financial support should there be an increased security threat. The revised edition will feature ten sports and six para-sports, across four different venues - after securing £100m from the Australians to host. Though massively reduced in size, it's a model that organisers hope can be used in further iterations, so that a long-term future is secured.
The Sun
18 hours ago
- The Sun
‘Catastrophic' – New 16,000-seater Championship stadium delayed by ‘ancient woodland' amid warnings over club's future
OXFORD UNITED will be forced to wait a further two weeks for a decision regarding their proposed new stadium after a nearby woodland was designated as "ancient". The Championship side are hoping to build a 16,000-seater stadium at The Triangle, which is located by nearby Kidlington. 3 3 Plans were first unveiled in 2023, but have been marred by a series of delays. Cherwell District Council had been scheduled to come to a decision at a planning committee on July 31. Remarkably, this meeting has been delayed by two weeks to August 14 following a ruling by Natural England. Oxford 's proposed Triangle site borders the Stratfield Brake woodland. The woodland area was recently handed "ancient" status - sparking fresh concerns over whether this could affect the council's decision on Oxford's proposed new stadium. Upon the delay, U's development director Jonathon Clarke said: "It's frustrating that this delay has been caused by a last-minute submission from a statutory consultee, particularly given they had previously raised no objections to the application. 'However, we have provided comprehensive evidence addressing the points raised. This is an incredibly detailed, robust application. 'We will continue our work towards a positive recommendation as we await a new committee date.' BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK Natural England claim that Oxford's plans "have the potential to adversely affect" the woodland. But the organisation does not oppose the stadium build. Championship club could be left without a stadium as EFL deadline looms Oxford play at the Kassam Stadium, having moved there since 2001. In May the second-tier side extended their lease at the Kassam to 2027, with an option for a further year. The site is still owned by Oxford's former owner Firoz Kassam, and Oxford City Council plans could see the Kassam Stadium torn down and replaced by as many as 150 homes in future. Oxford's proposed new Triangle home would boast plenty of community facilities in addition to the stadium, including a 180-bed hotel, restaurant, conference centre and community plaza. 'CATASTROPHIC' Labour MP for Oxford East Anneliese Dodds has stressed the importance of the U's receiving planning permission. She wrote on X: "I'm disappointed by the delay in deciding on @OUFCOfficial's new stadium. "OUFC, its fans, and Oxfordshire need this stadium for the benefits it will bring. "A positive decision is crucial, as more delays could have a catastrophic impact on the club." Oxford are currently preparing for their second season back in the Championship following their promotion in 2023-24. Gary Rowett 's side finished 17th last term, four points clear of the drop zone. 3
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Oxford stadium decision delayed due to ancient woodland
A decision on Oxford United's new stadium plans has been delayed after a nearby woodland was designated as District Council was due to review an application for a 16,000-seat venue on land known as the Triangle, near Kidlington, on 31 the local authority said it required further time after Natural England identified an area of ancient woodland near the site, and said its planning committee would now consider the application on 14 club said it was "disappointed" with the delay. Development director at Oxford United Jonathon Clarke said it the last-minute submission was "frustrating"."However, we have provided comprehensive evidence addressing the points raised," he said, adding it was "an incredibly detailed, robust application"."We will continue our work towards a positive recommendation as we await a new committee date."The planning application has faced several delays since its council said the designation required "a further period of time to ensure the robust consideration of those matters" and incorporate them into its recommendation England previously said its woodland specialists had "found that there has been sufficient evidence submitted to support this site as ancient woodland".But it added that it would be willing to "consider further substantively different evidence" in this particular case. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
