MultCo parents to Gov. Kotek: ‘Hands off' Preschool for All
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Multnomah County parents rallied in Southeast Portland on Wednesday to save their children's' preschools.
They are worried they could close if state lawmakers make good on a threat to stop the county funding for free Preschool for All.
City Council approves $65M in Children's Levy grants
Money comes from a tax on high-income earners in Multnomah County.
Parents are concerned about an that would ban the county from collecting the income tax from high earners, which would end the program by 2027.
'My daughter is now in a preschool she loves. She lives in a community she loves, and we are not grappling with the choice of paying a tremendous amount of money, or pursuing our careers, or paying rent. So I would like to say, hands off to Governor Tina Kotek. Please preserve preschool for all our communities and our youth,' said parent Courtney Dawson at the rally.
The governor has concerns about the tax paying for free preschool, saying it is driving high-income earners out of Portland.
At a legislative meeting on Tuesday, Multnomah County Board Chair Jessica Vega Pederson urged legislators not to cut off the county's funding source.
On Wednesday, KOIN 6 reached out to the head of the Senate Finance and Revenue Committee about the attempt to stop the funding.
Portland-made film shines light on senior homelessness
Senator Mark Meek's chief of staff told us in a statement, 'I can confirm the bill is not moving forward this session. The senator looks forward to continuing these conversations during the interim.'
Governor Kotek's office said it has received hundreds of emails on this issue.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani's rise should teach NYC's non-radicals to invest in the long game
Now that tossing $25 million into last-minute spending to promote Andrew Cuomo failed utterly to stop pro-Intifada, anti-cop socialist Zohran Mamdani from winning the Democratic mayoral primary, perhaps New York business leaders will finally realize that political 'investment' requires an eye on the long game, and fostering an entire infrastructure that can produce credible centrists candidates. 'Crying over Mamdani is, as they say, a bit rich when it comes from the rich,' snarked The Post's Charles Gasparino, since the 'city's business class sat idly by' as the local left grew ever more powerful. New York magazine's Errol Louis was even more on-point: 'The same people dumping millions into last-minute attack ads should have been investing time and money to recruit, educate, and encourage young leaders.' Advertisement Dumping a ton of cash in at the last minute can work when it comes to passing or defeating a single bill, or influencing any particular government decision — but altering the political climate requires steady attention and investment. 'The city's business community,' writes Gasparino, 'is the most politically neutered class of people I have ever met.' Partly that's just fear of sticking your neck out; partly that so many think of themselves as 'liberal' or 'progressive' without ever noticing how drastically the meaning of those labels has shifted; partly the knowledge deep down that they just don't understand how politics works. Advertisement And a 'go along to get along' mindset in a Democratic Party-dominated city and state has resulted in very little pushback as the hard left came to dominate that party. The political-talent pipeline in this town is no longer about community-based clubhouses; it's about social-service nonprofits and public-sector unions that feed off the taxpayers on a scale that dwarfs Tammany Hall's wildest dreams. Each in his own way, Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg were political unicorns — Rudy rising to prominence as a federal prosecutor; Mike popping in with a huge fortune that still wouldn't have won him office except for the crisis atmosphere in the immediate wake of 9/11. And all through the 20 years of their mayoralties, the left has been creeping up from the bottom of city government, gaining City Council seats once held by moderates, with every successive borough president, comptroller and so on steadily more progressive than the last. Advertisement Meanwhile, supposedly 'nonpartisan' reforms — taxpayer funding of campaigns; the 'ranked choice' voting rules — further added to insiders' advantages, making it that much harder for fresh faces and voices to break in unless, like Mamdani, they had the support of a political machine like the Working Families 'Party' or the Democratic Socialist apparat. Building such infrastructure takes years; interests that feed off the public put in the time, talent, care and effort to do it. Hiring an expensive consultant for a single campaign can't match those results. Advertisement Even if the city and the business community somehow dodge the Mamdani bullet this fall, the left will keep coming back, ever stronger, unless and until the folks that get fed off of start doing 'political investing' for the long term. That means finding and fostering young political moderates, supporting institutions (even, yes, the city's near-extinct Republican Party) that will oppose the left on a million minor battles that never make a single headline — and not thinking you can fix things by paying attention at the last minute.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Committee recommends adding party designations to Newport News City Council elections
The Newport News Charter Review Committee unanimously voted to recommend eliminating the city's prohibition on partisan primary elections for City Council candidates. The change would not add anything to the current voting process. If multiple candidates filed under the same political party run for City Council, then those candidates would be added to the existing partisan primary ballot for other races, where party designations would be visible to voters. 'By doing this, that's not going to dictate whether or not there's a primary,' committee co-chair Lee Vreeland said during Thursday's meeting. 'It's just as long as there is a primary, then it will be reflected.' Norfolk community members challenge school closure plan Ahead of a possible move out of state, Armed Forces Brewing Co.'s fundraising falls short Criticized natural gas compressor station project in Chesapeake will be reconsidered Norfolk to offer 2 hours of free deck parking, increase meter rates July 1 Virginia Beach Trail receives $24 million grant for next phase of the project The recommendation is one of a series of city charter changes the committee is presenting to the City Council for review. To change the city's charter, the City Council must ask the General Assembly to make amendments. State law bars party designations in local elections from appearing on general election ballots. Most cities in Hampton Roads are barred by their city charters from having partisan council elections, but some Virginia cities do hold primaries for those positions. The change would create a system where general election ballots do not contain party designations, but the final candidates are implied to be from different political parties. Independent candidates would still be allowed to run, and a primary would not be held for them. Vreeland said during the meeting her vote was a reflection of the community feedback voicing overwhelming support for the change. 'There has not been a single person who has said that they don't support it,' Vreeland said. 'For me, it's important that it is known that I listened.' The committee received eight emails from residents voicing support for partisan voting, along with one speaker. One came from Mary Vause, a Newport News resident who said partisan primaries minimize the risk of spoiler candidates winning a City Council seat. 'Without partisan local elections, most voters do not know the party affiliation of candidates who are running for local office, making it difficult for voters to make an informed decision' Vause wrote in an email. The vote came during the committee's last meeting before submitting its report to the City Clerk's office June 30. It will then be up to the City Council to review. City Council appointed members to the committee in April 2024 to examine the City Charter and look for areas of improvement, and its first meeting was last July. The city considered requesting several charter change amendments in 2023, but ultimately held off due to a lack of consensus. Other recommendations already approved for City Council review include having council appoint School Board members rather than hold elections, and making the mayor a full-time position, limited to two terms. However, the committee rejected recommending shifting the power to remove department heads from the city manager to the mayor, and is definitively against creating a strong mayor system in Newport News. 'If it was to imply of leave open for interpretation whether or not a full-time mayor would leave any room for a strong mayor, I would have to not vote for full-time mayor,' Vreeland said. 'I think we do need to make a statement.' Additionally, the committee opted not to make a recommendation on ranked choice voting in Newport News, because council already has the authority to adopt it without a charter adjustment. Devlin Epding, 757-510-4037,
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Mace requests Trump to unfreeze Biden-era climate funding: Report
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) reportedly requested the Trump administration to unfreeze Biden-era climate funding in support of a car manufacturing plant in her southeastern district, which covers much of the Palmetto State's lowcountry region. In a Tuesday letter obtained by The Washington Post, Mace asked the Department of Energy (DOE) to release the funds for a Mercedes-Benz plant's refashioning to produce electric vehicles, stating the move would bring roughly 800 jobs to her district. The staunch Trump ally argued in the letter addressed to Energy Secretary Chris Wright, per The Post, that the grant would help 'ensure America-made options remain available in the commercial vehicle sector.' The project sought nearly $300,000 from the federal government. The report comes after Mace backed the House-passed spending and tax bill, which includes significant cuts to green energy tax credits. Many Republicans in the Senate, which is currently working through their own version of the legislation, voiced concern that renewable energy cuts may be too vast. President Trump, in his broad efforts to curb government spending and root out fraud and abuse, nixed the South Carolina grant program when he halted the disbursement of former President Biden's climate programs earlier this year. 'We strongly support President Trump's initiative to restore fiscal responsibility within the executive branch, particularly in reducing waste, fraud, and redundancies,' the letter reads, according to The Post. 'While we understand and support the necessity of such measures, we believe that federal investments should continue to prioritize projects with sustained economic growth.' Mace's office as well as the DOE did not respond to an immediate request for comment on the matter. As The Post noted, it is difficult to assess how much climate funding Trump has withheld after he signed an executive order on Inauguration Day rescinding funds disbursed through Biden's landmark Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The move wasn't unexpected, however. On the campaign trail, he vowed to end the 'madness' of national emphasis on developing EVs and accompanying infrastructure and has continued to rail against green funding touted by his predecessor. Still, it drew widespread pushback from Democrats and imperiled billions of dollars, including projects in red states and districts, which sparked some concern from Republicans on Capitol Hill. It has even provoked a number of lawsuits against the Trump administration. In March, farmers and environmental groups sued over the grant pause, including the halting of a $300 million program seeking to aid farmers install renewable energy or efficiency upgrades. Earlier this week, a judge blocked the administration from withholding funds for EV charging infrastructure. Still, Trump has maintained his distaste for climate-related funding. This month, the president blasted green tax credits that were still included in the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL. They are largely a giant SCAM,' he posted last weekend. The Senate has taken a less aggressive approach to climate funding compared to their House counterparts. The upper chamber is expected to take up its own version on Saturday, after the text was unveiled overnight. The new bill text would still need House approval.
